从整体民调数据来看，美国人普遍认同政府对中印两国的施压行动。超过六成受访者支持加征关税的制裁方案。但进一步分党派分析可以发现，态度差异明 显。共和党阵营中有76%的支持者赞同强化对俄贸易伙伴的制裁，而民主党人中这一比例为58%。这表明，美国国内对俄罗斯政策的态度不仅受国际局势影 响，更深受党派分裂的制约。 与此同时，美国政府针对印度的关税措施在8月27日正式落地，部分印度商品的关税税率被提高至50%的高位。这一政策几乎在短时间内发挥了立竿见影的 效果：印度国有炼油企业不得不在48小时内暂停从俄罗斯进口石油。原本驶向印度港口的俄罗斯油轮纷纷被迫临时改变航线，甚至滞留海上，造成了明显的 能源运输混乱。 8月28日，路透社与益普索联合发布的一项最新民调显示，美国国内对能源政策与对外贸易制裁的态度正趋于强硬。调查结果显示，62%的受访美国民众支 持政府对印度和中国购买俄罗斯石油征收惩罚性关税。此次调查在8月22日至24日间完成，共有1022名成年人参与，统计误差不超过3个百分点。这份数据不 仅反映出民意对俄罗斯能源出口的态度，也显示出美国社会在外交经济手段上的分歧与趋同。 需要指出的是，印度并未彻底放弃俄罗斯石油。国 ...

Group 1 - India and Russia announced an expansion of bilateral trade cooperation, indicating that U.S. tariffs on Indian imports of Russian oil are unlikely to disrupt their partnership [1] - The bilateral trade volume between India and Russia is projected to reach a record $68.7 billion by March 2025, with India facing a trade deficit of $59 billion due to increased oil imports [1] - India aims to increase exports of pharmaceuticals, agricultural products, and textiles to Russia to address the current trade imbalance [1] Group 2 - India has become the second-largest buyer of Russian oil, importing an average of 1.6 million barrels per day in the first half of 2025, a significant increase from 50,000 barrels per day in 2020 [2] - The geopolitical dynamics suggest that U.S. tariffs may serve as leverage for trade negotiations rather than solely targeting Russian oil revenue [3] - The ongoing energy cooperation between India and Russia is seen as a strategic alliance amidst global geopolitical tensions [3]

Core Viewpoint - Despite threats from US President Trump regarding punitive measures, India remains steadfast in its decision to continue importing oil from Russia, indicating a strong response to US pressure [1][3]. Group 1: India's Energy Policy - Indian officials have denied claims that the country has ceased purchasing Russian oil, asserting that the energy policy remains unchanged and that there has been no directive to reduce imports from Russia [3][4]. - From January to June this year, India imported approximately 1.75 million barrels of oil per day from Russia, reflecting a 1% increase compared to the same period last year [3]. Group 2: US-India Relations - Trump's threats of imposing punitive tariffs on India if it does not stop importing Russian oil have created tension in US-India relations, with India unwilling to compromise on its energy and economic policies [4][7]. - The US has already imposed a 25% tariff on Indian goods, which Trump criticized as burdensome and detrimental to US-India trade [4]. Group 3: India's Energy Needs - As the world's third-largest oil importer, India's energy demand is substantial, with Russia supplying about 35% of its total oil imports [6]. - The relatively low prices and convenient transportation of Russian oil make it challenging for India to shift to alternative suppliers [6]. Group 4: Future Implications - The ongoing conflict over Russian oil imports may lead India to diversify its trade and energy partnerships to reduce dependence on the US [9]. - This situation not only tests the resilience of US-India relations but also highlights the complexities of the global energy market, suggesting that emerging economies are seeking greater influence in international affairs [9].

7月30日，国际能源署（IEA）最新月度报告发布，数据显示，2025年上半年俄罗斯对印度原油出口骤降36%，为两年内最大跌幅。与此同 时，彭博社、路透社多家权威媒体同步披露，印度国有炼油企业已集体暂停新一轮俄罗斯原油采购。仅三天后，美国白宫宣布，将自8月1 日起对所有印度输美商品加征25%关税，并对继续购买俄罗斯能源的国家祭出"二级制裁"威胁。全球金融市场应声震荡，布伦特油价一度 突破每桶97美元。 不到一周，全球能源流向、国际贸易秩序、地缘政治博弈全部被推倒重来。印度转身，特朗普出招，俄罗斯被动，欧洲观望，中东谋变。 全球贸易的神经，突然被紧紧绷住。 7月末，印度新德里气氛陡然紧张。根据印度《经济时报》独家披露，印度总理莫迪召开紧急能源安全会议，要求国有炼油企业——印度 石油公司、印度斯坦石油公司、芒格洛尔炼油石化公司等——暂停与俄罗斯的全部新订单，并加快与中东和美国的替代采购谈判。同期， 印度西海岸港口滞留的俄罗斯油轮数量达到历史新高，数百万吨原油陷入"无人可提"的僵局。 印度炼油厂负责人在接受路透社采访时坦言："折扣没了，风险剧增，成本反而更高。"俄乌冲突爆发后，俄罗斯为打破西方能源封锁，曾 以每桶低1 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the contradictions in U.S. foreign policy, particularly regarding the proposed Graham Bill, which aims to impose a 500% tariff on goods from countries purchasing oil from Russia, while simultaneously trying to maintain diplomatic relations with India and China [2][5][11]. Group 1: U.S. Policy and Tariffs - The Graham Bill has garnered support from 82 senators, indicating a strong bipartisan sentiment against Russia, but the proposed 500% tariff is unprecedented and could severely impact trade relationships [5][11]. - The logic behind the 500% tariff is seen as politically motivated, aiming to punish any purchases of Russian oil, which could lead to significant economic repercussions for the U.S. itself [5][11][19]. Group 2: Energy Market Implications - The combined oil imports from China and India exceed 4 million barrels per day, highlighting the importance of these markets for Russia's energy exports [7]. - If the U.S. successfully pressures China and India to reduce their Russian oil purchases, it could lead to a spike in global oil prices, potentially exceeding $100 per barrel, which would adversely affect American consumers [17][19]. Group 3: Strategic Considerations - The U.S. aims to reshape the global energy market by weakening Russia's influence, thereby creating opportunities for American energy exports [9][11]. - The geopolitical strategy involves not only sanctions against Russia but also a broader ambition to gain a stronger foothold in global energy pricing, traditionally dominated by OPEC and Russia [11][19]. Group 4: Domestic Economic Risks - The potential rise in oil prices could reignite inflation, impacting the cost of living for American citizens, especially as the 2026 elections approach [19][21]. - There is a risk of accelerating the de-dollarization process, as countries may seek alternatives to the dollar for energy transactions, undermining U.S. financial dominance [21][23]. Group 5: Diplomatic Consequences - The timing of the Graham Bill contradicts recent agreements with India, risking the diplomatic relationship that has been carefully cultivated [13][15]. - The proposed tariffs could jeopardize the potential for improved U.S.-China relations, especially following recent constructive meetings between the two nations [15][19].

Group 1 - China has discovered a significant thorium resource in the Baiyun Obo mine, with proven reserves of over one million tons, making it the world's largest thorium reserve, sufficient for 60,000 years of energy supply [1][3] - The thorium nuclear reactors are safer and more efficient than traditional uranium reactors, with the ability to generate electricity equivalent to 350 million tons of coal from one ton of thorium, while producing significantly less nuclear waste [3][5] - China is planning to build 12 thorium nuclear power plants in Gansu and Xinjiang, each capable of supplying electricity to three prefecture-level cities, enhancing energy security and reducing reliance on imported fossil fuels [5][7] Group 2 - The new thorium resource and technology combination positions China favorably in the global energy landscape, contrasting sharply with the U.S. reliance on Ukrainian mineral resources [1][7] - The economic benefits of thorium power generation are substantial, with each ton of thorium generating 23 times more revenue than selling the raw ore, potentially saving China 400 billion in foreign exchange by reducing coal imports [5][7] - China's strategic moves in forming a "carbon-free energy alliance" with Brazil and South Africa highlight its commitment to leveraging thorium resources and technology to reshape global energy dynamics [5][7]

Group 1 - India's plan to increase crude oil imports to 5.2 million barrels per day by 2025, an 8% increase from 2024, prioritizing Middle Eastern oil supply [1][3] - In 2024, India imported 3.8 million barrels per day from the Middle East, accounting for 73% of its total imports, which is expected to rise to 78% in 2025 [1][3] - India's crude oil consumption is projected to reach 5.1 million barrels per day in 2024, with domestic production at only 700,000 barrels per day, leading to a heavy reliance on imports [3][4] Group 2 - The Middle East is the largest crude oil export region, with a total export capacity of approximately 28 million barrels per day, and India is expected to secure a stable supply through long-term contracts [4][5] - Other major importers include China (11 million barrels per day), the US (8 million barrels per day), and Japan (3.5 million barrels per day), indicating that demand from these countries is not surging significantly [4][6] - India's procurement strategy includes long-term agreements with Middle Eastern countries and flexible purchasing through spot markets, ensuring cost-effective supply [4][5] Group 3 - The global energy landscape is shifting, with non-OPEC oil production surpassing OPEC for the first time in 2024, reducing the Middle East's pricing power [6][7] - India's ambition for energy independence by 2047 includes increasing renewable energy's share from 30% to 50%, while still relying on Middle Eastern oil in the short term [6][7] - The geopolitical dynamics involve the US imposing sanctions on Iran and Venezuela, allowing India to diversify its oil sources, including increased imports from Russia [6][7] Group 4 - The situation reflects a dynamic balance between global energy demand growth and supply adjustments, with no risk of the Middle East being "bought out" [8] - The resilience of the global energy system is crucial, as increased imports by one country can be offset by supply increases from other regions [8] - India's actions highlight the complexities of global energy transitions, emphasizing the need for collaborative responses to market changes [8]

Group 1 - The U.S. Department of State has imposed sanctions on Shandong Shengxing Chemical Co., Ltd. for purchasing over $1 billion worth of Iranian crude oil, marking a continued effort to disrupt China's independent refining enterprises [1][2] - Shandong independent refining enterprises account for over 15% of China's refining capacity and are seen as key targets in the U.S. strategy to cut off Iranian oil exports [2][3] - In the first seven months of 2023, China imported an average of 917,000 barrels of Iranian crude oil per day, with independent refiners accounting for approximately 87% of this volume [1] Group 2 - The sanctions are expected to disrupt the supply chain of China's energy sector, with nearly 30% of Shandong's refineries already shutting down or reducing production due to environmental policies and sanction pressures [3] - Experts suggest that independent refiners should strengthen cooperation with countries like Saudi Arabia and the UAE to secure non-sanctioned crude oil supplies and utilize the RMB cross-border payment system to mitigate dollar settlement risks [3] - The refining industry is advised to shift from a "processing" model to a high-value-added industry chain, focusing on producing chemicals like PX to meet domestic PTA demand [3]