回顾这部法律的修订历程，其最值得称道之处在于对数字经济竞争规律的深刻把握。从虚假交易到恶意 退货，从平台规则滥用到底价倾销，修法者没有简单套用传统监管框架，而是针对数字竞争的新特点、 新问题量身定制解决方案。这种立法智慧既体现了对市场创新的包容审慎，又彰显了维护公平竞争秩序 的坚定决心。随着法律实施日期的临近，我们有理由期待，一个规则透明、机会平等、创新驱动的数字 经济新时代正在到来。 本版专栏文章仅代表作者个人观点 虚假交易与恶意退货的本质，是市场竞争中诚信底线的失守。当刷单软件制造的虚假销量成为行业潜规 则，当职业退货人利用平台规则漏洞实施商业诋毁，这种劣币驱逐良币的生态正在摧毁市场经济的信任 基石。新修订法律将此类行为明确列为不正当竞争，其意义不仅在于事后惩戒，更在于确立数字竞争中 的诚信标尺。这要求经营者从数据造假、规则套利的投机心态，转向依靠真实服务质量赢得消费者认同 的长期主义。平台作为规则制定者，更需承担起守门人责任，通过技术手段与制度设计双管齐下，让诚 信经营者的付出获得应有回报，让破坏规则者付出真实代价。只有如此，数字经济才能摆脱野蛮生长阶 段，步入健康可持续发展的轨道。 低价竞争作为市场经 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court of China released five typical antitrust cases during the Fair Competition Policy Promotion Week, highlighting the importance of judicial rulings in maintaining market fairness and protecting consumer interests [1][2]. Group 1: Antitrust Cases Overview - The five cases involve significant legal issues such as the abuse of administrative power to eliminate competition, price-fixing, market division, and monopolistic behaviors by industry associations, covering essential sectors like transportation, building materials, raw pharmaceuticals, and chemicals [1]. - The cases directly impact daily life, addressing concerns related to transportation costs, medication expenses, and housing costs, thereby reflecting the judiciary's commitment to safeguarding public interests and ensuring fair market competition [1]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Standards - The cases contribute to a refined regulatory framework, providing clear guidelines for identifying monopolistic behaviors, particularly in industry associations, and establishing boundaries for their operations [2]. - Specific rulings clarify the standards for recognizing horizontal monopoly agreements and the calculation of damages for victims, easing the burden of proof for plaintiffs in such disputes [2]. Group 3: Collaboration Between Judicial and Administrative Enforcement - The interaction between antitrust judicial rulings and administrative enforcement is emphasized, showcasing the judiciary's role in supervising and supporting administrative decisions to ensure legality and fairness in enforcement processes [2]. - Both judicial and administrative efforts aim to standardize market competition behaviors and promote the construction of a unified national market [2].

Core Viewpoint - The China Chemical and Physical Power Industry Association has issued a draft initiative aimed at maintaining fair competition and promoting healthy development in the energy storage industry, addressing issues of irrational low pricing [1] Group 1: Initiative Details - The initiative calls for companies to set reasonable prices based on operational costs and risks, discouraging irrational low pricing behaviors to prevent "bad money driving out good" [1] - It emphasizes the importance of integrity and transparency in bidding processes, prohibiting false commitments, below-cost competition, and breaches of contract [1] - The initiative advocates for core competitiveness based on technological solutions, service capabilities, and the overall lifecycle value of products [1] Group 2: Implementation and Support - A supervisory mechanism will be established to monitor behaviors that undermine fair competition, with potential actions including industry notifications, public warnings, or case analyses, and escalation to regulatory authorities if necessary [1] - A total of 149 companies have signed the initiative, including major players such as BYD, Eve Energy, Huawei Digital Energy, and others, covering the entire industry chain from battery manufacturers to system integrators and energy technology companies [1]

2025.05. 30 本文字数：666，阅读时长大约1分钟 5月31日，中汽协发布《关于维护公平竞争秩序、促进行业健康发展的倡议》。近年来，我国新能源汽 车产业快速发展，新能源汽车新车销售占比已经超过40%。当前，行业整体运行呈现稳中向好态势， 市场活力持续释放。我们也看到， 一段时间以来，行业盈利水平下降，以无序"价格战"为主要表现形 式的"内卷式"竞争，是行业效益下降的重要因素。 产品售后服务保障、企业创新发展需要持续加大投 入，而"价格战"严重影响企业正常经营，冲击产业链供应链安全，把产业发展带入恶性循环。 5月23日以来，某车企率先发起大幅降价活动，多家企业跟进效仿，引发新一轮"价格战"恐慌。 无 序"价格战"加剧恶性竞争，将进一步挤压企业利润空间，进而影响产品质量和售后服务保障，不仅阻碍 行业自身健康发展，也将危害消费者权益，并带来安全隐患。 3.企业在依法降价处理商品以外，不以低于成本的价格倾销商品，不进行诱导消费者的虚假宣传，扰乱 市场秩序，损害行业和消费者根本利益； 4.所有企业应对照国家相关法律法规进行自查整改。 希望全行业同心协力，共同维护公平竞争秩序，促进行业健康、可持续发展。 中国汽 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes that addressing the specific pain points of businesses is more effective than merely piling up policies, highlighting the importance of institutional innovation in optimizing the business environment in Beijing [1] Group 1: Policy Initiatives - The 2025 Work Guidelines propose 15 specific measures aimed at creating a vibrant market environment for business entities, transforming macro policy declarations into micro institutional breakthroughs [1] - The guidelines address market entry barriers, introducing measures to facilitate access in emerging sectors such as life sciences and artificial intelligence, and promoting a "non-prohibited, just enter" principle [2] - New standards for registration services for partnerships and individual businesses have been established to streamline the registration process, alleviating the burden on small and micro enterprises [2] Group 2: Fair Competition - The guidelines focus on maintaining fair competition through legislative initiatives, regulatory reforms, and case deterrence, including the promotion of a law to enhance market fairness [3] - A competitive review guideline has been introduced to prevent discriminatory policies in government procurement and bidding processes [3] - A mechanism for reporting typical cases of unfair competition has been proposed to create a deterrent effect against such practices [3] Group 3: Resource Allocation and Service Improvement - Beijing has implemented a series of policies to enhance the supply of key resources such as land, finance, and talent, including flexible land transfer mechanisms for long-cycle industries [4] - Financial services for technology companies are being prioritized, with a focus on increasing the growth rate of loans to these firms [4] - New service mechanisms have been introduced, including a regular release of application scenarios for key industries and a "zero-material" processing initiative in economic and technological development zones [5]