夹在中美之间的东盟，目前正展现出超预期的战略清醒。巴拿马总统穆利诺面对鲁比奥"收回运河"要求时强硬回击："运河属 于巴拿马！"马来西亚、印尼亦多次表态"拒绝代理人战争"。而新加坡则推动数字支付系统兼容中国支付软件；越南加速加入 金砖国家磋商；泰国申请加入CPTPP。另外，东盟或借外长会推动"联合反制美国关税"，仿效欧盟对钢铝税发起WTO诉讼的 先例。 吉隆坡的这场外交交锋，本质是两种国际秩序观的碰撞。一方面是美国的"霸权惯性"，从威胁"收回巴拿马运河"，到对14国 突袭征税，特朗普政府仍迷信强权即真理。另一方面则是中国的"多极实践"，王毅曾提醒鲁比奥"大国要有大国的样子"，此 次中国以东盟舞台践行"共同安全"理念，明显更符合东盟的整体利益。 二是意图离间中俄与东盟关系，美方高调宣称鲁比奥将在会议期间与中俄外长分别会晤，意图借大国博弈舞台施压东盟选 边。然而，鲁比奥的筹码已大打折扣。就在他取消访韩当天，特朗普同步宣布对韩征收25%汽车关税，盟友待遇令东盟各国 心寒。新加坡前外长杨荣文此前直言："若今天被迫选边，东盟或选美国；但20年后，必然转向中国。" 王毅此行被赋予更清晰的使命。1月与鲁比奥通话时，王毅以"好 ...

Core Insights - The Marshall Plan, officially known as the European Recovery Program (ERP), was initiated by the United States in 1948 to provide financial aid to war-torn Western European countries, aiming to prevent them from leaning towards socialism and to integrate them into the U.S. ally framework [1] - The plan focused on providing financial assistance primarily to countries with strong industrial bases, as restoring industry was deemed essential for overall economic recovery in the region [1] - The largest recipients of the Marshall Plan funds were the United Kingdom (26%), France (18%), and West Germany (11%), which significantly boosted their economic recovery [1] Financial Impact - Over the four years of the Marshall Plan's implementation, the U.S. provided approximately $17 billion in aid, equivalent to about $231.42 billion in 2023 dollars, highlighting the substantial scale of support relative to the U.S. GDP of $2,580 in 1948 [2] - Following the conclusion of the Marshall Plan in 1951, the U.S. continued its support through a new mutual security plan, providing $7.5 billion annually to Western European countries, further solidifying U.S. influence in the region [4] Economic Growth - The Marshall Plan and subsequent mutual security plan contributed to significant economic growth in Western Europe over the following two decades, often referred to as the "economic miracle" [6] - While some scholars argue that the Marshall Plan was crucial for Western Europe's recovery, others believe that the region would have eventually recovered without it, albeit possibly at a delayed pace [6][8] Political Influence - Evidence suggests that Western Europe's economic recovery had already begun before the implementation of the Marshall Plan, indicating that the plan played a role in accelerating this process rather than being the sole factor [8] - The Marshall Plan also allocated about 5% of its funds to the CIA for covert operations aimed at countering the spread of communism, which contributed to a decline in Soviet influence in Western Europe and the establishment of NATO [8]

金十数据6月17日讯，6月17日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。郭嘉昆回应，冲突爆发以来，中 方同伊朗、以色列以及各方保持着沟通，推动停火止战、局势降温。有关国际组织也就当前的局势发表 了声明。郭嘉昆强调，武力无法带来持久和平，任何国际争端都应通过对话协商解决，秉持共同安全理 念才能彻底解决各方合理关切。中方将继续同有关各方加强沟通、劝和促谈，避免地区局势进一步动 荡。 （北京日报） 外交部：中方同伊、以及各方保持沟通，推动停火止战 ...

6月16日，外交部发言人郭嘉昆主持例行记者会。伊拉克如道电视台记者提问，中国外交部长王毅已同 伊朗和以色列外长进行了通话，王毅外长表示攻击核设施是危险的，中方是否认为伊以冲突可能扩大或 升级为更广泛的战争？中方采取了哪些措施防止战火蔓延到其他中东国家？郭嘉昆表示，关于你提到的 地区冲突下一步是否有扩大的风险，我想强调的是，中方对以色列袭击伊朗并导致军事冲突骤然升温深 感担忧。我们呼吁各方立即采取措施，推动紧张局势尽快降温，防止地区陷入更大的动荡，为重回对话 谈判解决问题的正轨创造条件。我要强调，武力无法带来持久的和平，任何国际争端都应该通过对话协 商来解决。秉持共同安全的理念，才能彻底解决各方的合理关切。中方将继续同有关各方保持沟通，劝 和促谈，避免地区局势进一步动荡。(北京日报) ...

在听取萨尔介绍以方对当前局势的看法和以色列的立场后，王毅表示，中方一贯主张任何国际争端都 应通过对话协商予以解决，反对使用武力和制裁手段。鉴此，中方明确反对以色列违反国际法以武力 袭击伊朗，尤其是在国际社会仍在寻求政治解决伊朗核问题的情况下，这一行径更是不可接受的。以 色列、伊朗都是中东重要国家，以伊关系牵动中东战和全局。当务之急是立即采取措施避免冲突升 级，防止地区陷入更大动荡，回归外交手段解决问题的轨道，这也是国际社会的普遍共识。 王毅介绍了同伊朗外长阿拉格齐通话的情况，强调中东不能永远处于冲突的阴影下，以色列也不应持 续生活在战争的不安中。伊朗核问题的外交手段并未穷尽，和平解决仍有希望。武力无法带来持久和 平，秉持共同安全理念才能彻底解决各方合理关切。中方一贯从事情本身的是非曲直出发对待和处理 地区热点问题，敦促以伊双方通过对话解决分歧，寻求和平共处之道。中方愿为此发挥建设性作用。 王毅希望以方切实维护好中国机构和人员的安全，萨尔表示以方一贯重视并将继续维护中国机构和人 员安全。 微信编辑 | 苏小 推荐阅读 工信部严查车企"说一套做一套" 2025.06. 14 本文字数：538，阅读时长大约1分钟 ...

本文字数：538，阅读时长大约1分钟 据央视新闻，2025年6月14日，中共中央政治局委员、外交部长王毅同以色列外长萨尔通电话。 2025.06. 14 微信编辑 | 苏小 工信部严查车企"说一套做一套" 在听取萨尔介绍以方对当前局势的看法和以色列的立场后，王毅表示，中方一贯主张任何国际争端都 应通过对话协商予以解决，反对使用武力和制裁手段。鉴此，中方明确反对以色列违反国际法以武力 袭击伊朗，尤其是在国际社会仍在寻求政治解决伊朗核问题的情况下，这一行径更是不可接受的。以 色列、伊朗都是中东重要国家，以伊关系牵动中东战和全局。当务之急是立即采取措施避免冲突升 级，防止地区陷入更大动荡，回归外交手段解决问题的轨道，这也是国际社会的普遍共识。 王毅介绍了同伊朗外长阿拉格齐通话的情况，强调中东不能永远处于冲突的阴影下，以色列也不应持 续生活在战争的不安中。伊朗核问题的外交手段并未穷尽，和平解决仍有希望。武力无法带来持久和 平，秉持共同安全理念才能彻底解决各方合理关切。中方一贯从事情本身的是非曲直出发对待和处理 地区热点问题，敦促以伊双方通过对话解决分歧，寻求和平共处之道。中方愿为此发挥建设性作用。 王毅希望以方切实维 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article revolves around the positive signals from the phone calls between US President Trump and Russian President Putin regarding the Russia-Ukraine conflict, contrasted with the concerns expressed by Ukrainian President Zelensky [1][3][5] - Trump announced that Russia and Ukraine will immediately initiate negotiations aimed at achieving a ceasefire and ultimately ending the war, with specific conditions to be determined by both parties [3][4] - Putin expressed a willingness to draft a peace memorandum with Ukraine, emphasizing the need for both sides to demonstrate a commitment to peace and find a satisfactory compromise [4][7] Group 2 - Zelensky made three key demands during his conversations with Trump: achieving a ceasefire, imposing sanctions on Russia, and ensuring that the US does not make decisions regarding Ukraine without its involvement [5][7] - Zelensky indicated that Ukraine is considering a joint meeting involving the US, Ukraine, Russia, and the EU, potentially to be held in Turkey, Vatican City, or Switzerland [7] - The ongoing conflict remains intense, with reports of drone attacks and military engagements, highlighting the challenges in achieving a ceasefire despite diplomatic efforts [8][11]