在Anthropic，有一位驻场哲学家Amanda Askell专门研究如何与AI模型打交道。她不仅主导设计了Claude的性格、对齐与价值观机制，还总结出一些行 之有效的提示词技巧。哲学在AI时代不仅没有落伍，反而那些通过哲学训练掌握提示词技巧的人，年薪中位数可以高达15万美元。 假设你手上有一台最新款的超级咖啡机。 你按了十几次按钮，就是做不出来你想要喝的那种咖啡。 问题不在于咖啡机的性能不够强大，而在于你不知道正确的指令是什么。 在Anthropic，就有一个专门研究和AI这台「超级智能咖啡机」沟通的人。 她既不是工程师，也不是程序员，而是一位驻场哲学家Amanda Askell。 Amanda Askell是一位受过哲学训练的学者，负责协助管理Claude的性格设定 Amanda Askell是一位受过哲学训练的学者，负责协助 Askell是正儿八经的哲学科班出身。 她曾在牛津大学和纽约大学学习哲学，2018年获得了纽约大学哲学博士学位。 毕业后，Askell曾在OpenAI担任政策方向的研究科学家。 2021年她加入Anthropic，至今一直在该公司担任对齐微调方向的研究科学家。 Askell负责 ...

将近年底，我们访问了几十位企业家和创业者，听到了他们的真实声音。 AI技术变革，全球经济重塑，我们发现：在上升突破的路上，在转型向前的路上，在持续奔跑的路 上，焦虑来自方方面面，事业、生活、家庭等等。 不管是战略问题，还是组织问题，不管是内部经营问题，还是外部环境问题，当下大环境之下，我们我 们应该如何有效思考？如何做出正确选择？ 事业的第一性原理、人生的第一性原理、家庭的第一性原理是什么？如何综合看到自身与外在？ 今天我们继续与武汉大学哲学学院教授、笔记侠PPE书院哲学模块导师&创始顾问苏德超老师对话，一 起来寻找解法。 以下是苏德超老师在访谈中的自述，略有删减。 01 东西结合的智慧：内在稳，外在智 无论是东方还是西方，顶尖的哲学传统在修炼领导者的心智层面，最终都指向了同一个核心： 领导力 的本质是影响力 。 而真正持久、深刻的影响力，绝非来自权术或威慑，恰恰源于领导者内在的稳定、清晰与智慧。 东方儒家的"向内求索"与西方斯多葛学派（ 古希腊四大哲学学派之一，强调"自身塑造" ）的"边界划 分"，为我们提供了两条路径不同、但方向一致的修炼法门。 斯多葛学派的"控制二分法" 这个心法源于古希腊哲学家埃比克泰 ...

Core Concept - The article discusses the concept of "First Principles," a foundational thinking method that helps in understanding the essence of problems and making better decisions [5][18]. Group 1: Definition and Historical Context - "First Principles" is defined as the fundamental basis or source of a concept, originating from philosophical discussions by Aristotle and others [8][13]. - The idea has been utilized by modern business leaders like Elon Musk, who emphasizes its importance in problem-solving and innovation [4][23]. Group 2: Application in Management - In management, understanding the "First Principles" of employees' motivations can lead to better alignment and productivity [18][19]. - Different individuals have varying "First Principles" that drive their actions, which can be leveraged for tailored incentives and management strategies [19]. Group 3: Innovation and Simplification - The article contrasts two types of innovation: superficial enhancements versus returning to the essence of a practice, which can lead to more effective solutions [21][20]. - Simplifying complex systems to their "First Principles" can help in identifying core issues and improving efficiency [20][34]. Group 4: Success and Failure Cases - SpaceX is highlighted as a successful application of "First Principles," where Musk reduced rocket costs by challenging conventional views on manufacturing and reusability [23][24]. - Google Glass serves as a failure case, where the product overlooked social norms and privacy concerns despite having a sound technological basis [25][29]. Group 5: Limitations and Cautions - Over-simplification can lead to neglecting emergent properties in complex systems, which may not be explained by "First Principles" alone [35][36]. - The article warns against the risks of applying "First Principles" without considering historical contingencies and the complexity of social dynamics [41][42]. Group 6: Philosophical Perspective - The article emphasizes the importance of philosophical thinking as a complement to "First Principles," advocating for a systems approach that considers the interconnections within larger contexts [42][49]. - Critical thinking and humility in recognizing the limitations of one's understanding are essential for effective decision-making [44][45].