1月27日，美国正式退出《巴黎协定》。这已经是美国总统特朗普第二次宣布退出《巴黎协定》。 2025年1月20日，特朗普在就任美国总统后随即签署行政令，宣布美国将退出《巴黎协定》。随后，联 合国宣布美国退出《巴黎协定》将在2026年1月27日正式生效。 美国政府在《巴黎协定》问题上的反复无常，引发了国际社会的广泛批评，同时也在美国国内引发不 满。美国加州州长纽森曾在去年呼吁美国重新加入《巴黎协定》。与此同时，美国多州也各自采取行 动，推动清洁能源的发展，为清洁能源项目的发展提供政策环境。 事实上，特朗普在第一个总统任期中，就曾宣布退出《巴黎协定》。2017年特朗普宣布美国退出该协 定，并于2020年11月正式退出。2021年，时任美国总统的拜登宣布美国重新加入《巴黎协定》。然而， 在特朗普重回美国总统之位后，美国再一次决定退出。 2015年《巴黎协定》正式达成。在《联合国气候变化框架公约》第二十九次缔约方大会(COP29)上，各 方就《巴黎协定》第六条第四款机制(6.4条)下的碳信用标准及其动态更新机制达成共识，全球碳市场迎 来新的突破。 在2025年举行的《联合国气候变化框架公约》第三十次缔约方大会(COP3 ...

为助力能源电力装备绿色转型，近日，生态环境部、国家能源局联合印发了《温室气体自愿减排项目方 法学 电气设备六氟化硫回收和净化》，明确了六氟化硫（SF6）回收净化项目的适用条件、减排量核算 与监测规范，填补了全国温室气体自愿减排交易市场在SF6电气装备领域的空白。 作为电力设备绝缘与灭弧的关键介质，六氟化硫（SF6）是一种强效温室气体，推动其减排对落实覆盖 全经济范围温室气体的我国新一轮国家自主贡献（NDC）目标具有重要意义。 当前，我国大量SF6电气设备进入检修更替期，年处理需求达数千吨。本方法学适用的具体项目类型有 哪些？项目须满足什么条件？企业可以获得多少核证自愿减排量（CCER）收益？是否会促进相关回收 净化或原料替代技术的发展？带着这些问题，中环报记者采访了方法学编制成员之一、国家电网有限公 司基建部副主任周新风。 SF6作为强温室气体，全球变暖潜能（GWP）值约为CO2的23500倍 中国环境报：电气设备六氟化硫回收和净化在温室气体减排方面有怎样的重要意义？ 周新风：六氟化硫（SF6）回收和净化对温室气体减排意义重大，核心是减少高GWP值气体的泄漏与排 放，助力"双碳"目标达成。主要体现在如下几个方 ...

Core Viewpoint - The document outlines the importance of enhancing the national carbon market to achieve China's new round of Nationally Determined Contributions (NDC) targets, emphasizing the need for systematic integration and improved regulatory frameworks to facilitate effective carbon market operations [1]. Group 1: Legal and Regulatory Framework - Strengthening legal frameworks is essential for establishing a solid foundation for the carbon market, with recommendations to expedite the introduction of the Carbon Emission Trading Management Regulations to clarify its relationship with existing environmental laws [2]. - The current regulations are deemed insufficient to meet the comprehensive emission reduction requirements set by the new NDC targets, necessitating a higher legal standing and clearer applicability [2]. Group 2: Technical Standards and Data Integration - A unified carbon emission accounting, monitoring, reporting, and verification (MRV) system is recommended to enhance data consistency across departments, which is crucial for efficient quota allocation and trading [3]. - The integration of advanced technologies like blockchain and IoT is suggested to ensure real-time data collection and integrity, alongside mandatory disclosure of carbon emission intensities for key industries [3]. Group 3: Quota Distribution and Economic Incentives - The document advocates for a gradual increase in the proportion of paid quota distribution to better reflect industry differences and reduce emissions costs, linking quota allocation to national emission reduction goals [4]. - Establishing a mechanism for quota reserves and borrowing is proposed to mitigate market price volatility and enhance coordination with monetary policy tools [4]. Group 4: Policy Tool Integration - The integration of energy and financial policies is crucial for unlocking the carbon market's potential, with suggestions to align carbon costs with electricity pricing and promote the development of carbon-related financial products [5][6]. - The establishment of a unified carbon asset evaluation method and regulatory framework is emphasized to facilitate the financialization of carbon assets [6]. Group 5: Ecological Compensation and Market Value - The document highlights the need for synergy between carbon markets and ecological compensation mechanisms to enhance the monetization of carbon sink values [7]. - Proposals include allowing emissions units to offset quotas through verified carbon sink projects and linking local ecological compensation funds with carbon market revenues [7]. Group 6: Cross-Regional and Cross-Market Coordination - Strengthening cross-regional coordination is essential to eliminate market fragmentation, with recommendations for unified MRV standards and quota allocation methods across pilot and national markets [8][9]. - The establishment of a national market coordination mechanism is suggested to ensure policy alignment and effective resource allocation across different markets [9]. Group 7: International Linkages - The document stresses the importance of enhancing international connections in carbon markets to bolster global emission reduction efforts, with a focus on aligning with established markets like the EU [10]. - Initiatives to develop a regional carbon trading network and establish a framework for cross-border capital flow management are proposed to mitigate financial risks and enhance China's role in global carbon governance [10].

Group 1: NDC Goals and Climate Ambitions - The new NDC targets announced by China aim for a 7% to 10% reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions by 2035 compared to peak levels, with non-fossil energy consumption exceeding 30% of total energy consumption [1][2] - The NDC goals reflect a shift from "phase-based reduction" to "systemic transformation" in China's climate governance strategy, marking a significant evolution in its approach [2][3] - The updated NDC includes a broader scope covering all greenhouse gases, moving from relative intensity targets to absolute total emission reduction metrics [3] Group 2: Implementation and Sectoral Changes - To achieve the non-fossil energy consumption target, an annual increase of 0.94 percentage points is required, necessitating a high proportion of renewable energy supply and electrification [4] - The national carbon market is set to expand, with major industries like steel, cement, and aluminum included by 2025, increasing the controlled carbon emissions from 5 billion tons to 8 billion tons [4][6] - Different industries will face varying costs for emission reductions, with sectors like steel and electricity having lower costs compared to aviation and shipping, which may incur significantly higher costs [7] Group 3: International Context and Challenges - The global progress on emission reductions is lagging, with the UN Secretary-General warning of risks to the 1.5°C temperature goal, highlighting the importance of China's NDC commitments in this context [8][9] - The EU aims to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 66% to 72% by 2035 based on 1990 levels, although the final commitments are still pending [8] - The absence of the U.S. at the climate summit and its historical role as a major emitter complicates international climate cooperation, emphasizing the need for responsible leadership from countries like China [9]

Group 1: NDC Goals and Climate Commitments - The new NDC targets announced by China aim for a 7% to 10% reduction in net greenhouse gas emissions from peak levels by 2035, with non-fossil energy consumption exceeding 30% of total energy consumption [1][2] - The NDC goals represent a shift from "phase-based reduction" to "systematic transformation," indicating a comprehensive approach to climate governance [2][3] - The updated NDC includes a broader scope covering all greenhouse gases, a shift from relative intensity targets to absolute total emission targets, and an extended timeline that includes post-peak reduction phases [3] Group 2: Industry Implications and Actions - The transition to total emissions control means that more industries must actively engage in carbon reduction efforts, with a focus on systematic management across all economic sectors [5][6] - The national carbon market is set to expand, with plans to include major industrial sectors by 2027, increasing the number of monitored entities and the total carbon emissions under management [6] - Different industries will face varying costs for carbon reduction, with some sectors like steel and electricity having higher costs compared to others, necessitating a phased approach to implementation [7] Group 3: International Context and Challenges - The global progress on emission reductions is lagging, with significant gaps between national commitments and the efforts needed to meet climate goals, particularly in light of the U.S. withdrawal from the Paris Agreement [8][9] - China's NDC commitments are seen as crucial for setting a roadmap for carbon reduction in the next five years, especially given the challenges posed by the current international climate cooperation landscape [8][9]