Core Viewpoint - Japan's recent policy shifts are seen as a "triple betrayal" of its post-World War II commitments, challenging the legal framework that defines its status as a defeated nation [1][2]. Legal Foundations - The post-war international order for Japan is based on legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration, Potsdam Declaration, and its own "Peace Constitution," which Japan has increasingly deviated from [2][3]. - The "Peace Constitution" prohibits Japan from maintaining military forces or engaging in war, reflecting the international community's intent to limit Japan's military capabilities post-war [2]. Territorial Claims - Japan's actions regarding territorial sovereignty, particularly in the Diaoyu Islands and the Okinotorishima, demonstrate a systematic challenge to the legal constraints established by the Potsdam Declaration [3][4]. - The "gray zone strategy" employed by Japan aims to redefine territorial boundaries and assert claims that contradict international law [3]. Military Policy Changes - Japan's military policy has shifted from a defensive posture to one that includes collective self-defense and offensive capabilities, undermining the principles of its "Peace Constitution" [4][10]. - The 2014 reinterpretation of the constitution to allow collective self-defense and the 2022 National Security Strategy signify a departure from Japan's post-war military restrictions [4][10]. Historical Responsibility - Japan's historical narrative has become increasingly ambiguous, undermining its post-war peace responsibilities, which include acknowledging its wartime actions and fostering regional cooperation [11][12]. - The trend of downplaying historical aggression and revising educational materials reflects a broader shift away from Japan's commitment to peace and reconciliation [13][16]. Regional Cooperation - Japan's reliance on exclusive security frameworks, such as the Quad, raises concerns about regional cooperation and the potential for increased tensions [14][16]. - The shift towards militarization and away from cooperative security mechanisms threatens the stability of the post-war order in East Asia [16]. Arms Export Policy - Japan's historical restrictions on arms exports are being eroded, with recent policy changes indicating a move towards a more aggressive military export stance [15][16]. - The potential for Japan to expand its military capabilities, including nuclear options, poses significant risks to regional security dynamics [10][15].

波兰前总理兼经济部长皮耶霍钦斯基：高市早苗的言论遭到日本前首相的批评，部分日本商界人士 要求她道歉，不能再重复类似言论。目前全世界都在关注亚洲，关注中日关系，今天我们应该去寻找共 同点，而不是去制造分歧，我们完全理解并支持中国在台湾问题上的立场。 斯洛伐克汉学家黑山：国际社会普遍承认一个中国原则，中国政府是代表全中国的唯一合法政府， 台湾是中国领土不可分割的一部分，日本首相高市早苗的言论是企图复活军国主义、法西斯主义，是对 二战后国际秩序的公然挑衅。 非洲青年企业家协会南非负责人马卡马：我认为相关言论应被收回，这样的言论令人深感担忧，违 背了二战后的国际秩序，战后建立的国际秩序为世界带来稳定，这一成果来之不易，不应被破坏。对于 任何军国主义复活或挑衅倾向的言论，我们都应高度警惕。 日本最大在野党立宪民主党政务调查会长本庄知史表示，高市在国会的答辩反映出其对"存亡危机 事态"的理解不足。他说，从1972年日中邦交正常化以来，历届日本政府在相关议题上的一贯表态来 看，高市的发言存在明显偏离。 国际人士指出，高市早苗的错误言论破坏地区和平是对二战后国际秩序的公然挑衅。 央广网北京12月3日消息 据中央广播电视总台中 ...

近期，针对日本首相高市早苗近期错误言论，斯洛伐克和美国学者表示：一个中国原则是国际社会普遍共识，高市言论是军国主义、法西斯思想的复辟，是 对二战后国际秩序的公然挑衅。 斯洛伐克哲学家、翻译家、汉学家 黑山女士：一个中国原则是国际社会普遍共识，中华人民共和国政府是代表全中国的唯一合法政府，台湾是中国的一部 分。日本首相高市早苗如今竟然还敢说出那种话，完全是军国主义、法西斯思想的复辟，是对二战后国际秩序的公然挑衅。日本人应该比谁都清楚，他们是 世界上唯一被原子弹轰炸过的国家，更应该致力于维护和平，确保核武器永不再使用，因为这关乎全人类的生存。 三大洲社会研究所执行主任 普拉萨德：重要的是要记住，她（高市早苗）是一个极右翼政客，在极右翼有很长的历史，长期以来她都为日本在包括中国在 内的亚洲国家犯下的罪行辩护。日本需要反思自己的历史，现在一位为日本战争罪行以及日本军国主义辩护的首相却上台，在台湾问题上大放厥词，从未对 历史上日本对台湾作出的行径进行道歉或者反思。联合国应该采取行动，因为（高市的言论）违反了联合国宪章，她的表态是对一个国家的直接威胁。 ...

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan have escalated tensions between China and Japan, leading to strong protests from China and concerns about the impact on bilateral relations [1][2][7] Group 1: Japan's Provocative Statements - Kishida's comments suggest potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, marking a significant shift in Japan's stance since World War II [2] - Experts highlight that these remarks represent a severe provocation and a breach of the One China principle, undermining the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations [2][4] - The statements are seen as a challenge to the post-World War II international order and have drawn criticism from various sectors within Japan [2][7] Group 2: Historical Context and Political Implications - Kishida's rhetoric is viewed as a continuation of right-wing policies reminiscent of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, with an emphasis on military expansion and revision of Japan's pacifist constitution [3][5] - The remarks coincide with significant anniversaries related to China's anti-Japanese war efforts, further intensifying the historical sensitivities involved [2][5] - Analysts warn that Japan's increasing militarization and attempts to internationalize the Taiwan issue could destabilize regional peace and security [4][5] Group 3: Domestic Reactions in Japan - Kishida's statements have sparked backlash from various political figures and intellectuals in Japan, who express concerns over the legal and security implications of such rhetoric [6][7] - The current situation is described as a critical juncture for Sino-Japanese relations, with potential negative impacts on economic and cultural exchanges [7] - Experts urge Japan to correct its course to mitigate the adverse effects of Kishida's comments on bilateral relations [7]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan have escalated tensions between China and Japan, with China expressing strong dissatisfaction and opposition to Japan's stance [1][3][5]. Group 1: Japan's Provocative Statements - Kishida is the first Japanese Prime Minister since World War II to publicly assert that "Taiwan's issues are Japan's issues," linking it to collective self-defense [3]. - Experts indicate that Kishida's comments represent a severe provocation and a blatant challenge to the post-World War II international order [3][5]. - The remarks are seen as a significant breach of the One China principle and a serious interference in China's internal affairs [7][10]. Group 2: Impact on Sino-Japanese Relations - The statements have caused a serious impact on Sino-Japanese relations, marking the most severe provocation since the normalization of diplomatic relations in 1972 [5][10]. - The political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations has been severely undermined, affecting cooperation in various fields, including trade and cultural exchanges [15]. - Experts warn that Japan's actions are attempting to internationalize the Taiwan issue, which could lead to increased regional tensions [10][12]. Group 3: Domestic Reactions in Japan - Kishida's remarks have sparked significant backlash within Japan, with many politicians and intellectuals expressing concern over the potential risks to regional security and the future of Sino-Japanese relations [13][15]. - There is a growing apprehension among Japanese citizens and officials regarding the implications of Kishida's statements on Japan's long-term national interests [15].

Core Viewpoint - Any attempt to distort historical facts and challenge UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 not only undermines China's sovereignty and territorial integrity but also challenges the authority of the United Nations and the post-World War II international order, which is both absurd and dangerous [1] Group 1 - The actions in question are seen as a direct challenge to China's sovereignty [1] - Such actions are viewed as a threat to the authority of the United Nations [1] - The implications of these actions are described as a regression in historical progress [1]

Core Viewpoint - The international seminar held in Beijing emphasized China's historical and legal claims over the Spratly and Paracel Islands, highlighting the importance of international legal documents in establishing post-war order [1] Group 1: Historical and Legal Basis - Scholars presented historical documents, archives, and maps to support China's sovereignty over the Spratly and Paracel Islands, asserting that there is sufficient historical and legal evidence [1] - Research on foreign archives indicated that major countries at the time recognized China's sovereignty over these islands [1] - The recovery of the South China Sea islands by China after World War II is considered a crucial part of the post-war international order established by documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [1] Group 2: Regional Cooperation and Dispute Management - Experts discussed strategies for managing disputes and promoting regional cooperation, aiming to transform the South China Sea into a sea of peace, friendship, and collaboration [1]

Core Viewpoint - The report titled "South China Sea Truth" emphasizes China's historical and legal basis for sovereignty over the South China Sea islands, while calling for regional cooperation to address disputes without external interference [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - The report outlines China's restoration of sovereignty over the South China Sea islands post-World War II, highlighting its role as a key ally in the fight against fascism and militarism [1]. - It references international legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, asserting that China's claims are integral to the post-war international order [1]. Group 2: Current Challenges - The report identifies external powers that exacerbate tensions in the South China Sea, accusing them of spreading false narratives and engaging in military threats [2]. - It notes that certain claimant countries, like the Philippines, are provoking tensions with the support of external forces, undermining the collective desire for peace established since World War II [2]. Group 3: China's Position and Actions - China maintains a consistent and clear stance on its territorial sovereignty and maritime rights in the South China Sea, advocating for resolution through negotiation and cooperation [3]. - The country has signed the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea with ASEAN nations and is actively promoting consultations on the "Code of Conduct" [3]. - China has engaged in cooperative agreements with relevant claimant countries for joint development in overlapping maritime areas and has provided public goods like tsunami warning services to regional nations [3].

Core Viewpoint - The report by Xinhua's National High-end Think Tank emphasizes China's historical and legal basis for sovereignty over the South China Sea islands, while exposing the interference of external forces in the region [1][4]. Historical and Legal Basis - China's sovereignty over the South China Sea islands is established through a long historical process, supported by ample historical and legal evidence [2]. - The naming and discovery of the islands can be traced back to ancient texts, with records dating back to the Han Dynasty [2]. - Continuous governance of the South China Sea islands by Chinese authorities dates back to the 8th century, with official maps consistently including these islands as part of China [3]. Restoration of Sovereignty - The restoration of China's sovereignty over the South China Sea islands post-World War II is an integral part of the international order established after the war [4]. - International legal documents, such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, affirm China's rights to reclaim territories occupied by Japan during the war [5]. - The international community, including organizations like UNESCO, recognizes China's sovereignty over the South China Sea islands [5]. External Interference - External forces are identified as disruptors of peace and stability in the South China Sea, exacerbating military tensions and undermining regional relationships [6]. - The involvement of foreign military forces has intensified the militarization of the region, increasing the risk of conflict [6]. - External powers are accused of inciting regional countries to provoke China, creating pressure on these nations to choose sides [6][7]. Call for Cooperation - The report urges surrounding countries and the global community to recognize the manipulative tactics of external forces and to work towards maintaining peace and stability in the region [8].

Core Viewpoint - The report released by the Xinhua News Agency emphasizes China's historical and legal basis for sovereignty over the South China Sea islands, calling for regional cooperation and dialogue to resolve disputes and promote development, while condemning external interference [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - The report reviews China's restoration of sovereignty over the South China Sea islands post-World War II, highlighting its role as a major ally in the fight against fascism and militarism [1]. - China's claims are supported by international legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, which are integral to the post-war international order [1]. Group 2: Current Challenges - Certain external powers have exacerbated tensions in the South China Sea, spreading false narratives and engaging in military threats, which contradict the global desire for peace established since World War II [2]. - Some claimant countries, like the Philippines, have provoked tensions with the support of external forces, undermining regional stability [2]. Group 3: China's Position - China maintains a consistent and clear stance on its territorial sovereignty and maritime rights in the South China Sea, advocating for peaceful resolution of disputes through negotiation and cooperation [3]. - The country has signed the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea with ASEAN nations and is actively promoting consultations on the "Code of Conduct" [3]. - China has engaged in cooperative agreements with relevant claimant countries for joint development in overlapping maritime areas and has provided public goods like tsunami warning services to regional nations [3].