Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan have escalated tensions between China and Japan, leading to strong protests from China and concerns about the impact on bilateral relations [1][2][7] Group 1: Japan's Provocative Statements - Kishida's comments suggest potential military intervention in the Taiwan Strait, marking a significant shift in Japan's stance since World War II [2] - Experts highlight that these remarks represent a severe provocation and a breach of the One China principle, undermining the political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations [2][4] - The statements are seen as a challenge to the post-World War II international order and have drawn criticism from various sectors within Japan [2][7] Group 2: Historical Context and Political Implications - Kishida's rhetoric is viewed as a continuation of right-wing policies reminiscent of former Prime Minister Shinzo Abe, with an emphasis on military expansion and revision of Japan's pacifist constitution [3][5] - The remarks coincide with significant anniversaries related to China's anti-Japanese war efforts, further intensifying the historical sensitivities involved [2][5] - Analysts warn that Japan's increasing militarization and attempts to internationalize the Taiwan issue could destabilize regional peace and security [4][5] Group 3: Domestic Reactions in Japan - Kishida's statements have sparked backlash from various political figures and intellectuals in Japan, who express concerns over the legal and security implications of such rhetoric [6][7] - The current situation is described as a critical juncture for Sino-Japanese relations, with potential negative impacts on economic and cultural exchanges [7] - Experts urge Japan to correct its course to mitigate the adverse effects of Kishida's comments on bilateral relations [7]

Core Viewpoint - Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida's provocative remarks regarding Taiwan have escalated tensions between China and Japan, with China expressing strong dissatisfaction and opposition to Japan's stance [1][3][5]. Group 1: Japan's Provocative Statements - Kishida is the first Japanese Prime Minister since World War II to publicly assert that "Taiwan's issues are Japan's issues," linking it to collective self-defense [3]. - Experts indicate that Kishida's comments represent a severe provocation and a blatant challenge to the post-World War II international order [3][5]. - The remarks are seen as a significant breach of the One China principle and a serious interference in China's internal affairs [7][10]. Group 2: Impact on Sino-Japanese Relations - The statements have caused a serious impact on Sino-Japanese relations, marking the most severe provocation since the normalization of diplomatic relations in 1972 [5][10]. - The political foundation of Sino-Japanese relations has been severely undermined, affecting cooperation in various fields, including trade and cultural exchanges [15]. - Experts warn that Japan's actions are attempting to internationalize the Taiwan issue, which could lead to increased regional tensions [10][12]. Group 3: Domestic Reactions in Japan - Kishida's remarks have sparked significant backlash within Japan, with many politicians and intellectuals expressing concern over the potential risks to regional security and the future of Sino-Japanese relations [13][15]. - There is a growing apprehension among Japanese citizens and officials regarding the implications of Kishida's statements on Japan's long-term national interests [15].

Core Viewpoint - Any attempt to distort historical facts and challenge UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 not only undermines China's sovereignty and territorial integrity but also challenges the authority of the United Nations and the post-World War II international order, which is both absurd and dangerous [1] Group 1 - The actions in question are seen as a direct challenge to China's sovereignty [1] - Such actions are viewed as a threat to the authority of the United Nations [1] - The implications of these actions are described as a regression in historical progress [1]

Core Viewpoint - The international seminar held in Beijing emphasized China's historical and legal claims over the Spratly and Paracel Islands, highlighting the importance of international legal documents in establishing post-war order [1] Group 1: Historical and Legal Basis - Scholars presented historical documents, archives, and maps to support China's sovereignty over the Spratly and Paracel Islands, asserting that there is sufficient historical and legal evidence [1] - Research on foreign archives indicated that major countries at the time recognized China's sovereignty over these islands [1] - The recovery of the South China Sea islands by China after World War II is considered a crucial part of the post-war international order established by documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation [1] Group 2: Regional Cooperation and Dispute Management - Experts discussed strategies for managing disputes and promoting regional cooperation, aiming to transform the South China Sea into a sea of peace, friendship, and collaboration [1]

Core Viewpoint - The report titled "South China Sea Truth" emphasizes China's historical and legal basis for sovereignty over the South China Sea islands, while calling for regional cooperation to address disputes without external interference [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - The report outlines China's restoration of sovereignty over the South China Sea islands post-World War II, highlighting its role as a key ally in the fight against fascism and militarism [1]. - It references international legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, asserting that China's claims are integral to the post-war international order [1]. Group 2: Current Challenges - The report identifies external powers that exacerbate tensions in the South China Sea, accusing them of spreading false narratives and engaging in military threats [2]. - It notes that certain claimant countries, like the Philippines, are provoking tensions with the support of external forces, undermining the collective desire for peace established since World War II [2]. Group 3: China's Position and Actions - China maintains a consistent and clear stance on its territorial sovereignty and maritime rights in the South China Sea, advocating for resolution through negotiation and cooperation [3]. - The country has signed the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea with ASEAN nations and is actively promoting consultations on the "Code of Conduct" [3]. - China has engaged in cooperative agreements with relevant claimant countries for joint development in overlapping maritime areas and has provided public goods like tsunami warning services to regional nations [3].

Core Viewpoint - The report by Xinhua's National High-end Think Tank emphasizes China's historical and legal basis for sovereignty over the South China Sea islands, while exposing the interference of external forces in the region [1][4]. Historical and Legal Basis - China's sovereignty over the South China Sea islands is established through a long historical process, supported by ample historical and legal evidence [2]. - The naming and discovery of the islands can be traced back to ancient texts, with records dating back to the Han Dynasty [2]. - Continuous governance of the South China Sea islands by Chinese authorities dates back to the 8th century, with official maps consistently including these islands as part of China [3]. Restoration of Sovereignty - The restoration of China's sovereignty over the South China Sea islands post-World War II is an integral part of the international order established after the war [4]. - International legal documents, such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, affirm China's rights to reclaim territories occupied by Japan during the war [5]. - The international community, including organizations like UNESCO, recognizes China's sovereignty over the South China Sea islands [5]. External Interference - External forces are identified as disruptors of peace and stability in the South China Sea, exacerbating military tensions and undermining regional relationships [6]. - The involvement of foreign military forces has intensified the militarization of the region, increasing the risk of conflict [6]. - External powers are accused of inciting regional countries to provoke China, creating pressure on these nations to choose sides [6][7]. Call for Cooperation - The report urges surrounding countries and the global community to recognize the manipulative tactics of external forces and to work towards maintaining peace and stability in the region [8].

Core Viewpoint - The report released by the Xinhua News Agency emphasizes China's historical and legal basis for sovereignty over the South China Sea islands, calling for regional cooperation and dialogue to resolve disputes and promote development, while condemning external interference [1][2]. Group 1: Historical Context - The report reviews China's restoration of sovereignty over the South China Sea islands post-World War II, highlighting its role as a major ally in the fight against fascism and militarism [1]. - China's claims are supported by international legal documents such as the Cairo Declaration and the Potsdam Proclamation, which are integral to the post-war international order [1]. Group 2: Current Challenges - Certain external powers have exacerbated tensions in the South China Sea, spreading false narratives and engaging in military threats, which contradict the global desire for peace established since World War II [2]. - Some claimant countries, like the Philippines, have provoked tensions with the support of external forces, undermining regional stability [2]. Group 3: China's Position - China maintains a consistent and clear stance on its territorial sovereignty and maritime rights in the South China Sea, advocating for peaceful resolution of disputes through negotiation and cooperation [3]. - The country has signed the Declaration on the Conduct of Parties in the South China Sea with ASEAN nations and is actively promoting consultations on the "Code of Conduct" [3]. - China has engaged in cooperative agreements with relevant claimant countries for joint development in overlapping maritime areas and has provided public goods like tsunami warning services to regional nations [3].

Core Viewpoint - The "South China Sea Truth" series of reports released by the Xinhua News Agency emphasizes China's historical and legal basis for sovereignty over the South China Sea islands and its maritime rights, while exposing the interference of external forces in the South China Sea issue [1][2]. Group 1: Report Overview - The series includes three reports: "The Historical and Legal Basis of China's Sovereignty and Maritime Rights in the South China Sea," "The Truth About External Forces Interfering in the South China Sea Issue," and "China's Practice of Making the South China Sea a Sea of Peace, Friendship, and Cooperation" [1]. - The report highlights that China's restoration of sovereignty over the South China Sea islands is part of the post-World War II international order and is protected by international law, including the United Nations Charter [1]. Group 2: Expert Opinions - Experts believe the report effectively outlines the historical process of China's sovereignty over the South China Sea islands, reinforcing the legitimacy of China's claims and showcasing its contributions to maintaining post-war international order and regional stability [2]. - The report calls for awareness of the provocations and threats posed by external forces in the South China Sea, advocating for the maintenance of regional peace and stability [2]. Group 3: Advocacy for Peace and Cooperation - The report advocates for making the South China Sea a sea of peace, friendship, and cooperation, highlighting China's ongoing efforts to support peace and prosperity in the region [3]. - It emphasizes the importance of cross-cultural communication to ensure that the "South China Sea Truth" is understood and recognized globally [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the upcoming commemoration of the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Chinese People's War of Resistance Against Japanese Aggression and the World Anti-Fascist War, highlighting a grand military parade scheduled for September 3 in Beijing, which will showcase China's military capabilities and historical significance [1][3][5]. Summary by Sections Commemoration Activities - A grand military parade will take place at Tiananmen Square on September 3, 2023, with President Xi Jinping delivering an important speech [1][3]. - The event aims to honor the sacrifices made during the war and promote patriotism and the spirit of resistance [3][5]. Military Display - The parade will feature all domestically produced active military equipment, showcasing the advancements in China's military technology, including new aircraft carriers, destroyers, stealth fighters, and drones [1][4]. - For the first time, units such as the information support forces, military space forces, and cyber forces will participate in the parade, reflecting the evolution of military capabilities [4][6]. Historical Context - The commemoration serves to reaffirm the historical narrative of the anti-fascist struggle, countering recent distortions of World War II history and emphasizing China's significant role in the victory over Japanese militarism [5][6]. - The event is also seen as a response to rising geopolitical tensions and a reaffirmation of China's commitment to maintaining the post-war international order [6][7]. Additional Activities - Other commemorative activities include awarding medals to surviving veterans, ceremonies at historical sites, and public memorials throughout the year [8][9]. - The event will also invite international leaders and representatives who contributed to the anti-fascist efforts, highlighting the global significance of the victory [1][5].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes China's commitment to maintaining the post-World War II international order and the importance of the One China policy, particularly regarding Taiwan's status [1] Group 1 - Wang Yi, China's Foreign Minister, expressed willingness to collaborate with Poland to uphold the post-war international order and the core role of the United Nations [1] - The article highlights the significance of Taiwan's return to China as a part of the post-war international order and urges Poland to adhere to international consensus against any form of "Taiwan independence" [1] - The year marks the 50th anniversary of diplomatic relations between China and Europe, with expectations for Poland, as the rotating EU presidency, to play a constructive role in advancing China-Europe relations [1]