特朗普在未经国会授权的情况下对其他主权国家采取军事行动，涉嫌违反美国宪法及《战争权力法》， 此举被多名美国会议员批评为"法外处决"。有学者指出，特朗普的种种违法行径正固化美国的"全球流 氓"形象。 新华社约翰内斯堡1月7日电（记者白舸 杭泽波）南非"时报即时消息"新闻网站日前刊登评论员曼德拉 ·蒂亚拉的文章说，美国总统特朗普下令对委内瑞拉采取军事行动，公然挑战"基于规则的国际秩序"， 正固化美国的"全球流氓"形象。文章摘要如下： 在当前国际格局下，包括联合国在内的多边机制遭到特朗普无视或打压。真正能制约特朗普的只有美国 国会，但其在党派政治裹挟下已严重失职。美国民主党参议员科里·布克指出，面对特朗普"屡次逾越职 权、破坏法律"的行径，共和党人"因怯懦和屈从选择视而不见"，这将加速美国宪政的瓦解。 二战后国际秩序的核心原则是禁止使用武力侵犯主权国家领土完整、禁止使用武力干预他国政权。特朗 普无视国际法，公然对委内瑞拉发起军事行动、强行控制委总统马杜罗，甚至宣称要"接管"委内瑞拉。 这种霸权行径，无异于"酒吧里拎着最大手枪的醉汉"。 ...

央视网消息：每天8点，央视网为您梳理24小时内发生在咱们身边的大小事儿。 ·国台办：我们有充分信心和足够能力粉碎任何形式的"法理台独"图谋。 ·公安部就人民警察法修订草案稿向社会公开征求意见。 ·国务院印发《固体废物综合治理行动计划》，坚持"谁污染、谁治理"。 | 序号 | 设置事项 | 所在 | 办学 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | | स्त्र से | 性质 | | 1 | 设立天津职业大学 | 天津 | 公办 | | 2 | 设立南昌科技职业大学 | 江西 | 民办 | | 3 | 设立滨州职业技术大学 | 山东 | 公办 | | 4 | 设立日照职业技术大学 | 山东 | 公办 | | 5 | 设立河南工业职业技术大学 | 河南 | 公办 | | 6 | 设立贵州工商职业大学 | 贵州 | 民办 | | 7 | 设立昆明冶金职业大学 | 云南 | 公办 | | 8 | 设立河南信息科技学院 | 河南 | 公办 | | 9 | 设立网络空间安全学院 | 湖北 | 公办 | | 10 | 华北科技学院、防灾科技学院更名应急管理大 | 河北 | 公办 | | | 学 | ...

从所谓"司法正义"转向"石油生意",美国这套从"军事突袭"到"接管政权"再到"资本进驻"的操作,再次向世 界展示其完整的现代海盗逻辑:先罗织罪名通过武力摧毁一个主权政府,颠覆其政权,随即由本国资本长驱 直入瓜分其自然资源。美国的所作所为,完全无视国际法约束,俨然让世界重新回到了野蛮掠夺的殖民时 代。 如此恶劣手法,甚至连美国国内也无法视而不见。美国亚利桑那州民主党籍联邦参议员加列戈痛批美国 已沦为"世界上的霸凌者",犹他州共和党籍联邦参议员迈克·李质问这次行动"究竟有什么宪法依据可以证 明其合法性",美国智库新美国安全中心高级研究员德里克·格罗斯曼说:"我今后再也不想听任何美国总统 谈论所谓'基于规则的国际秩序'。" 美国的入侵行为,让所有人越来越看清一个事实:美国口中所谓的"基于规则的国际秩序",实际只是"基于 美国利益的掠夺秩序"。 美军3日凌晨对委内瑞拉发动大规模军事打击,抓走委内瑞拉总统马杜罗,并将其强行带往美国。美国总统 特朗普当天公开宣称,美国将"管理"委内瑞拉,并宣布美国大型石油企业将进入委内瑞拉,投资数以十亿计 美元,"维修"石油基础设施并创造收益。 图穷匕见,不过如此。如果说美军在众目睽睽之 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article criticizes the recent military actions by the United States against Venezuela, labeling them as blatant acts of hegemony and resource imperialism, revealing the true motives behind U.S. interventions in sovereign nations [2][3]. Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - On January 3, the U.S. military conducted a large-scale attack on Venezuela, capturing President Maduro and forcibly taking him to the U.S. [2] - President Trump announced that the U.S. would "manage" Venezuela and that American oil companies would invest billions of dollars to "repair" the oil infrastructure [2]. Group 2: International Reactions - The international community is increasingly outraged by the U.S. actions, with UN Secretary-General Guterres stating that it sets a "dangerous precedent" [3]. - Brazilian President Lula condemned the actions as prioritizing power over multilateralism, while Cuban President Díaz-Canel described it as state terrorism against nations in the Americas [3]. Group 3: Criticism from Within the U.S. - U.S. Senator Ruben Gallego criticized the country for becoming a "bully" on the world stage, and Senator Mike Lee questioned the constitutional basis for the actions [3]. - Former National Security Advisor Benjamin Rhodes described the intervention as a ridiculous attempt at regime change in Latin America [3]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The article warns that such actions threaten global peace and security, with even U.S. allies like the EU calling for respect for international law and the principles of the UN Charter [4]. - Chilean President Boric expressed the widespread concern that if "jungle law" replaces international norms, no sovereign nation is safe [4].

Group 1 - The military aid to Ukraine is revealing deep strategic anxieties within Europe, as countries face funding shortages and conflicting priorities [3][4] - The economic costs of supporting Ukraine are negatively impacting Europe, with natural gas prices rising by 20% and expected economic growth for the EU in 2025 revised down to 1.1% [4][5] - Public opinion in Europe is shifting, with a significant portion of the population supporting peace negotiations, leading to political decisions that reflect this change [5][6] Group 2 - European countries are struggling with the balance between military commitments and economic realities, as seen in Germany's military budget doubling to €8 billion by 2025 while facing domestic financial pressures [3][4] - The reliance on U.S. military support is highlighted, as European defense initiatives may falter without American backing, emphasizing the need for a more autonomous defense strategy [8] - There is a call for Europe to establish a more independent political stance, moving away from merely balancing U.S. and Russian interests to fostering its own diplomatic relations [8]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint emphasizes that China and the EU should not seek confrontation despite differences, highlighting the importance of partnership and cooperation [1][2][5] - Wang Yi stated that the development of China-EU relations should be based on mutual interests and cooperation, rather than viewing each other as adversaries [1][3] - The dialogue reflects a commitment to multilateralism and the core position of the United Nations, which is crucial for global economic recovery and long-term prosperity [2][3] Group 2 - The economic ties between China and the EU are significant, with bilateral trade estimated at $2.7 billion daily, making China the EU's second-largest trading partner [3][5] - There are ongoing discussions regarding trade issues, including tariffs on Chinese electric vehicles and the EU's control over rare earth exports, indicating existing tensions [1][5] - The upcoming China-EU leaders' meeting is seen as an opportunity to stabilize trade relations and address mutual climate goals, despite differing expectations for concrete outcomes [3][5]