转自：北京日报客户端 清华大学近期发布《人工智能教育应用指导原则》，提出严禁学生将AI生成的内容直接用于学业成 果。随着AI在学术领域的广泛应用，如何引导大学生正确使用AI成为高校管理的新课题。那么，现在 大学生会不会用AI写作业？大学老师面对"AI作业"持什么态度？高校该如何为AI的使用立规矩呢？ 问题一 现在大学生写作业用不用AI？ 借助AI做作业是常态 大二学生 吴亦涵 我进入大学的时候，正值人工智能产品迎来爆发式增长之际。起初，我和身边的同学都认为借助AI完 成作业是不够认真的表现。但随着一些课程明确要求必须使用AI工具辅助学习，并需标注AI参与的部 分，AI就这样悄然走进了我的学习生活。从日常资料搜集、思路整理到报告的撰写与打磨，使用AI逐 渐成为一种常态。如今，我无法想象在没有AI的时代，大学生是如何写作业的——就像在智能手机普 及后，难以想象没有智能手机之前人们的生活一样。 触及学术不端红线直接判定不合格 作为一名汉语国际教育专业的大二学生，我使用AI的场景主要集中在材料阅读、厘清写作思路以及后 期文本润色等方面。在阅读外文文献时，我会使用AI帮我梳理各语种外文文献的大致内容。写材料 时，我通常 ...

Core Points - The editorial board of "Tsinghua Journal of Western Philosophy" has issued a statement regarding a recent plagiarism incident, marking the third occurrence of such issues [1][3] - The journal has been recognized as one of the "2024 High-Impact Academic Journals" by CNKI, highlighting its significance in the academic community [4] Group 1 - The journal has decided to handle the recent plagiarism case with a manuscript rejection and a private warning, aiming for educational purposes rather than public disclosure [3] - The editorial board has warned that any future serious academic misconduct will result in the strictest measures, including immediate rejection of the manuscript and formal notification to the author's institution [3] - The journal emphasizes the importance of adhering to academic standards and maintaining a reputable academic environment [3] Group 2 - "Tsinghua Journal of Western Philosophy" was founded in 2015 and publishes biannually, featuring sections on "Theoretical Philosophy," "Practical Philosophy," and "Philosophy, Culture, and Science" [4] - The journal aims to promote the professionalization and internationalization of Western philosophy research in China, fostering dialogue between Chinese scholars and international peers [4] - It seeks to establish itself as a leading publication in the field of Western philosophy research, representing the highest standards of Chinese scholarship [4]

2025年9月10日清晨，中国知网部分用户有所发觉，武汉大学2021级世界经济专业硕士杨某媛撰写的论 文《中印生育行为影响家庭暴力的经济学分析》，悄然从平台下架。此前该论文以31万次下载量稳居武 汉大学文献榜首，却在24小时内经历"下架-复现"的戏剧性转折，下载量数据完整保留的异常现象更添 几分诡谲。这场看似寻常的技术调整，实则撕开了中国学术评价体系的一道隐性裂缝。 论文内容之粗糙令人瞠目：摘要中英文关键词错位，"母职惩罚"对应"Outside Option"的术语混乱；研究 背景章节竟出现虚构的《离婚法》条目；人口数据误植"1049年总人口5.42亿"，实为1949年建国初期数 据。西南某高校经济学院刘婧讲师直言，这类低级错误在本科生论文中都属罕见，更遑论通过硕士答辩 关卡。更令人忧虑的是，论文存在系统性学术缺陷——中印生育行为与家暴关系的论证链条支离破碎， 文献综述未能建立有效理论支撑，数据清洗过程完全缺失，回归分析仅呈现相关性而回避因果验证，甚 至出现"Kelvin""Kelven"等引用格式混乱。 当下，杨某媛论文事件已然演变成一个引发多维度学术反思的重要契机，其影响广泛，促使学界对诸多 学术问题展开 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses a controversial academic paper claiming that Hammurabi and Shang Tang are the same person, which has sparked public outrage and skepticism [1][2] - The authors of the paper have been criticized for their selective use of evidence and for violating basic principles of historical linguistics, as they ignore the significant differences between Babylonian and ancient Chinese languages [1][2] - The paper's conclusions are seen as a threat to cultural confidence, as they blur the lines between Eastern and Western civilizations and could mislead future generations about historical continuity [2] Group 2 - To prevent such academic controversies, the article emphasizes the need for multiple layers of academic standards and oversight, including stricter peer review processes and accountability for academic misconduct [3] - It calls for universities to strengthen their supervision of research integrity and establish lifelong accountability mechanisms for academic misconduct [3] - The article advocates for scholars to regain respect for knowledge and adhere to rigorous academic standards to ensure the longevity and integrity of academic contributions [3]

Core Viewpoint - The case of Dr. Dong, a medical resident involved in a controversy at the China-Japan Friendship Hospital, raises questions about the medical education model in China and the integrity of academic research in the medical field [1][7][8] Group 1: Medical Education Model - The Peking Union Medical College (PUMC) initiated a new eight-year (4+4) medical education pilot program in 2018, aimed at attracting non-medical graduates to pursue medical careers [2] - This program allows students who may not have initially considered a medical career to transition into the field, as exemplified by Dr. Dong's shift from economics to medicine [2][6] - The curriculum includes a restructured approach to basic medical education, integrating clinical practice with core courses from the second year onward [6] Group 2: Academic Achievements - Dr. Dong has co-authored 11 interdisciplinary papers within three years, with a significant number published before her graduation [3][6] - Her research spans various fields, including orthopedics, urology, and materials science, showcasing a broad academic involvement [3][5] - Notably, Dr. Dong contributed to three parts of a clinical practice guideline on bladder cancer, indicating her active role in significant research projects [4][5] Group 3: Concerns and Criticism - The rapid production of academic papers by Dr. Dong has led to skepticism regarding the stability and integrity of research participation among medical trainees [7] - Experts have raised concerns about the appropriateness of including medical residents in research projects outside their specialty, suggesting potential academic misconduct [7][8] - The case highlights the need for maintaining academic standards and ethical practices in medical education and research, emphasizing the importance of rigorous oversight [8]