【#本科生1年40篇论文可笑吗#？】#9天一篇SCI远超生理极限#据中国新闻周刊，温州医科大学一名本 科生在一年内发表40多篇论文，其论文质量和发文速度引发热议。记者梳理其谷歌学术主页发现，2024 年7月至今，该生累计发表50篇文章，均发表于国外期刊。该生在超过30篇文章中为第一作者，并多次 同时任通讯作者。绝大多数文章合作者为温州医科大学师生。截至12月24日，其文章引用量已达259 次，单篇最高被引51次。"平均9天产出一篇论文，平时还要兼顾课业和生活起居，这真的是天才 吗？"公众纷纷质疑，这一数据远超同龄科研工作者的产出水平，甚至超过多数资深教授的科研效率。 这是学术奇才的横空出世，还是系统漏洞催生的"论文工厂"？目前，校方并未回应调查结果。@我是霁 月呀 认为，此事件有诸多疑点需回应。一问时间与能力的矛盾。医学论文从选题、实验到发表通常需 数月甚至数年，而洪某某平均每9天完成一篇论文的产出，远超人类生理极限。专家指出，其研究模式 高度依赖公共数据库和固定分析方法（如孟德尔随机化），缺乏创新性与实验验证，可能涉及"流水线 式量产"。二问署名规范与学术责任。洪某某大量论文同时担任第一作者和通讯作者，而通 ...

近期，科技部会同有关部门部署开展学术不端撤稿论文专项整治行动，聚焦中国学者在自然科学领域国 际期刊撤稿论文，对涉嫌抄袭剽窃、虚构伪造数据或图像、买卖论文、虚构同行评议专家及评议意见等 行为，严肃开展调查和处理，并加强结果通报、支持开展失信惩戒。不允许论文一撤了之，彰显了对学 术不端的零容忍态度。 撤稿，是学术共同体自我纠错的一种常规机制。一些作者在论文发表后，由于发现内容不严谨、不规范 而主动要求撤稿，体现了对学术的负责任态度。但也有一些撤稿，是对数据造假、抄袭剽窃、重复发表 等行为的刻意掩盖，属于学术不端。如果对此类撤稿行为"轻描淡写"，任由失信行为蔓延，将让投机取 巧者得利、踏实做事者寒心，进而让科研资源错配、科研声誉蒙尘，最终污染的是创新的源头活水，扼 杀的是真正的科学突破。这不只是个人履历上的污点，更是对公共资源的巨大浪费和对国家创新力的严 重侵蚀。 撤稿绝非终点。此次专项整治明确将严重失信行为纳入数据库，并与项目申报、院士增选、科技奖励等 直接挂钩，就是要拉起一条带电的"高压线"，彻底扭转失信成本低的局面。将专项行动作为必要的"外 科手术"，对因学术不端而撤稿的行为重拳打击，对隐瞒、迁就、包庇、纵容 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Science and Technology of China has initiated a special rectification action to address academic misconduct, focusing on retracted papers by Chinese scholars in international journals, with a strong emphasis on investigating and handling serious violations such as plagiarism, data fabrication, and fraudulent peer reviews [1][2]. Group 1: Academic Misconduct Rectification - The special action targets various forms of academic misconduct, including plagiarism, data fabrication, and the sale of papers, with a commitment to serious investigation and handling of these issues [1][2]. - The initiative aims to establish a long-term governance mechanism for retracted papers and enhance monitoring of institutions frequently involved in academic misconduct [2][3]. - There is a recognition that some academic institutions have been lax in addressing misconduct, often ignoring or downplaying issues due to a lack of external pressure [2][3]. Group 2: Consequences and Institutional Responsibility - Institutions are expected to take serious actions against authors involved in academic misconduct, ensuring accountability and maintaining academic integrity [2][3]. - Despite previous warnings from authorities, some institutions have not effectively acted against academic misconduct, allowing individuals to continue their careers without facing consequences [3]. - The rise of international academic engagement necessitates a robust monitoring mechanism to prevent misconduct and protect the integrity of Chinese academic research on the global stage [3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the repeated incidents of plagiarism in submissions to the journal "Tsinghua Journal of Western Philosophy," emphasizing the need for stricter measures against academic misconduct and the importance of maintaining academic integrity in research environments [1][2][3]. Group 1: Journal's Response to Plagiarism - The journal has issued a statement regarding a recent plagiarism incident, indicating that this is the third occurrence, and warns that future serious academic misconduct will lead to severe consequences, including public criticism [1]. - The journal, founded in 2015, aims to promote the professionalization and internationalization of Western philosophy research in China and has been recognized as a high-impact academic journal [1]. Group 2: Concerns Over Inconsistent Treatment - There are concerns about the journal's inconsistent handling of plagiarism cases, particularly if the same author repeatedly submits plagiarized work while receiving leniency, which raises questions about fairness and the integrity of the academic process [2]. - The article argues that all authors should be treated equally in cases of academic misconduct, and that leniency towards early offenders undermines the principles of academic integrity [2]. Group 3: Need for Collaborative Action - The investigation and handling of academic misconduct should involve collaboration among various academic institutions and timely information sharing, rather than secrecy or selective disclosure [2][3]. - The article highlights the responsibility of academic journals to disclose misconduct involving affiliated individuals and the potential consequences of failing to do so, which can damage the academic environment [3].

Core Points - The article highlights the emergence of a gray market for paid essay writing services, where companies offer to produce fake articles and papers for clients, facilitated by AI technology [1] - The use of AI in essay writing has lowered the barriers to entry, with some advertisements claiming that "ghostwriters" can produce up to 30 papers in a single day [1] - The article emphasizes the importance of academic integrity and warns against the dangers of relying on AI-generated content as a substitute for original work [1] Industry Summary - The practice of hiring ghostwriters for academic papers is identified as a violation of social ethics and disrupts the healthy development of the academic ecosystem [2] - The Ministry of Education has classified this behavior as "academic misconduct" and is taking strict measures against students involved in purchasing or commissioning papers, including expulsion or revocation of degrees [2] - Educational institutions and faculty members are adopting a "zero tolerance" policy towards AI-generated papers, reinforcing the need for students to focus on improving their academic skills rather than resorting to unethical practices [2]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the commercialization of academic titles, particularly focusing on the European Academy's foreign member application process, which has been linked to paid consulting services, raising concerns about the integrity of academic honors [1][2]. Group 1: Commercialization of Academic Titles - The European Academy, despite being a prestigious organization, is now associated with a consulting service that charges up to 950,000 yuan for assistance in obtaining membership, leading to questions about the commodification of academic honors [1][2]. - The emergence of such services reflects a demand gap in the academic evaluation system, where titles are often seen as core indicators of academic achievement, resulting in "title anxiety" among scholars [1][2]. Group 2: Impact on Academic Integrity - The operation of these consulting services shifts the focus of academic evaluation from capability to resource availability, creating a mature market for such services that can undermine the fairness of academic recognition [2][3]. - The article highlights the irony that while the European Academy emphasizes "sustained academic excellence" in its selection criteria, the involvement of intermediaries seeking financial gain threatens the integrity of the evaluation process [2][3]. Group 3: Regulatory and Ethical Concerns - The commercialization of academic titles exposes weaknesses in regulatory mechanisms and academic integrity, with potential legal implications for scholars using public research funds to purchase these services [3]. - The article warns of a vicious cycle where diligent researchers may be discouraged by those who seek shortcuts to academic titles, ultimately harming the environment for academic innovation [3].

Core Viewpoint - Multiple universities in Hong Kong have reported a significant increase in cases of applicants using false academic credentials, prompting enhanced verification measures and stricter penalties for fraudulent applications [1][2][5]. Group 1: University Responses - The Hong Kong University and the Chinese University of Hong Kong have intercepted hundreds of applications suspected of using false academic credentials, with the number of cases at the Chinese University rising dramatically from ten last year to hundreds this year [2]. - The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology has implemented a comprehensive approach to address fraudulent applications, including improved coordination among departments and the introduction of a reporting system for suspicious cases [1][6]. - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University has also reported similar cases and has canceled the applications of approximately ten non-local students suspected of using false credentials [6]. Group 2: Government and Legal Actions - The Hong Kong Education Bureau has adopted a "zero tolerance" policy towards false academic credentials, emphasizing the serious impact on the reputation of local universities and the potential for severe legal consequences, including up to 14 years of imprisonment for those found guilty [5]. - Recent cases have highlighted the legal ramifications of submitting false credentials, with individuals facing imprisonment for obtaining degrees under false pretenses [3]. Group 3: Enhanced Verification Measures - Universities are upgrading their admission verification systems, with the Chinese University implementing a new application and approval system to enhance the verification of PDF documents and images [7]. - The Hong Kong Polytechnic University has introduced a cross-border data verification platform utilizing blockchain and encryption technology to validate academic credentials [7].

Core Viewpoint - Multiple universities in Hong Kong have reported cases of applicants submitting false academic credentials, leading to increased scrutiny and enhanced verification processes in admissions [1][3][4]. Group 1: University Responses - Hong Kong universities, including the University of Hong Kong and Chinese University of Hong Kong, have intercepted hundreds of suspected fraudulent applications, with the number significantly increasing compared to previous years [1][2]. - The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology has implemented new procedures and a reporting system to handle fraudulent applications, emphasizing strict verification of academic documents before enrollment [1][3]. - The Education Bureau of the Hong Kong government has adopted a "zero tolerance" policy towards false credentials, enhancing admission review mechanisms and introducing third-party verification [3][4]. Group 2: Specific Cases and Incidents - A notable case involved a former Miss Universe contestant who was sentenced to imprisonment for providing false academic credentials to gain admission to the University of Hong Kong [3]. - Between January 2022 and December 2024, 25 individuals have been arrested for submitting false academic documents to local colleges, with some receiving prison sentences [2]. Group 3: Technological Enhancements - Universities are increasingly utilizing advanced technologies, such as artificial intelligence and blockchain, to improve the verification of academic credentials and combat fraud [6]. - The Chinese University of Hong Kong has upgraded its admission system to enhance the verification of PDF documents and images [6].

Core Insights - A complete chain of academic paper fraud has formed, involving online stores, social media, AI workflows, and cross-border outsourcing, with low-cost writers producing papers that are sold for thousands of yuan [1][12] Group 1: Industry Overview - The investigation revealed a thriving gray industry of academic paper ghostwriting, which operates on the edge of legality and generates significant profits [1][12] - The industry utilizes AI tools to automate the writing process, allowing non-experts to produce papers across various disciplines quickly [7][12] Group 2: Business Operations - A company named Wuhan Zhiyu Culture Co., Ltd. disguises its ghostwriting services as "plagiarism check" products on e-commerce platforms, with a customer service representative admitting to avoiding sensitive terms in conversations [6][12] - The annual sales volume of one store exceeds 40,000 orders, and a writing group has over 1,300 members, with writers earning up to 8,000 yuan per month [5][12] Group 3: Technology Utilization - Companies employ an industrialized model of fraud, where employees fill in templates and use AI to quickly generate papers, regardless of their academic background [7][12] - AI tools can produce initial drafts in as little as five minutes, significantly increasing the efficiency of paper production [7][12] Group 4: Market Dynamics - The gray market for academic writing is expanding, with social media platforms like Xiaohongshu hosting accounts that covertly sell ghostwriting services under the guise of tutoring [9][12] - Ghostwriting services are offered at high prices, with quotes for publishing in academic journals reaching up to 30,000 yuan, promising publication without the author's involvement [10][12] Group 5: Ethical Implications - This gray industry undermines academic integrity and highlights regulatory gaps, as e-commerce platforms and social media evade scrutiny by presenting their services under misleading labels [12]

Core Insights - Over 40% of university students plan to pursue further studies after graduation, demonstrating a strong academic enthusiasm with 92.2% seeking academic progress [1][9] - The topic of academic integrity and plagiarism detection has gained significant public attention, with discussions reaching billions of views on social media platforms [4] Academic Attitude - 69.3% of students prioritize their major courses, while 64.0% consider completing their thesis as one of the most important tasks during university [6] - 92.2% of students set academic KPIs for themselves, with 33.8% pursuing academic innovation [9] Academic Tools - More than half of the students experience anxiety related to plagiarism checks, often using multiple tools for a single paper [2][3] - 59.2% of students utilize AI tools, and 56.2% use plagiarism detection tools, indicating a reliance on technology for academic efficiency [19] Plagiarism Detection Experience - 68.6% of students rely on AI for assistance, while 62.9% consult AI when facing difficulties in writing [17][24] - 50.4% of students encounter inconsistencies in results from different plagiarism detection tools, leading to confusion [32] Academic Spending - 69.8% of students consider academic papers their primary expenditure in academic pursuits, with a higher willingness to pay for plagiarism checks among graduate students [38][40] - 86.6% believe that purchasing academic-related products or services enhances research efficiency [38] Expectations for Tools - 53.5% of students expect plagiarism detection tools to evolve with AIGC detection capabilities, and 50.4% desire document format conversion features [34] - Students are looking for comprehensive solutions that can assist in various aspects of academic writing [34]