小区公共收益管理
Search documents
有的年年发红包 有的是笔“糊涂账”……小区公共收益如何更透明?
Bei Jing Ri Bao Ke Hu Duan· 2025-10-30 03:36
"别人家的小区!"近日,通州金地格林格林小区,因向全体业主发放公共收益出了名。据了解,金地格林格林小区发放的公共收益,来自小区内 电梯广告、底商停车场、饮水机、新能源充电桩等公共区域的收入。在不少小区的公共收益还是一笔"糊涂账"的时候,格林格林小区的做法,在 通州乃至全市都算个新鲜事儿。有专家指出,将小区公共收益返还业主,将来或许会成为一种新的趋势。 小区给业主"发钱"了 9月27日上午,通州永顺镇金地格林格林小区的小广场上人头攒动,热闹非凡。社区居委会、小区物业、业委会及众多居民齐聚一堂,对小区近五 年的公共收益分红进行了公开发放。收到通知的业主陆续来到小区广场,大家签到、领红包、合影,一派其乐融融的景象。 提起小区成立业委会的经历,业委会副主任刘迪华十分感慨。"当时小区遇到了大难题,急需大家团结起来去解决。"原来,2019年金地格林格林 小区的立体车库突发车辆坠落事故,车库暂停使用了,导致小区停车资源紧张。"小区有2000多户居民,近一半业主本来就没有车位,车库暂停使 用,让80%的业主都没地方停车了。"由于停车资源紧张,小区里里外外的空地上停满了私家车,有关停车的投诉层出不穷。 "要想解决这个事,首先要 ...
多地整治物业乱象,公共收益不能成为一本“糊涂账”
第一财经· 2025-10-21 09:37
2025.10. 21 本文字数:2826,阅读时长大约5分钟 作者 | 第一财经 孙梦凡 "小区交付十几年了,业主至今无从了解公共收益的收支情况。" "物业对业主宣称电梯广告无收益,但电梯广告每月都在换新。" 住宅小区公共收益,指利用住宅小区共有部分产生的收益,一般涉及地上停车位、场地出租、广告位 出租,以及快递柜、饮水机、充电桩等入驻费用。这笔费用,少则几千多则数十万,扣除合理成本后 属业主共有。 但在现实生活中,因管理使用不规范、违规侵占等问题,这笔收入却容易成为一本不透明的"糊涂 账"。今年以来,各地住房和城乡建设部门集体行动了起来,通过召开专项推进会、加强监督等方 式,力图集中整治这一住宅物业"乱象"。 小区公共收益"冷暖不一" 小区向全体业主发"红包"、业主首次见到"回头钱"......近段时间,部分城市出现公共收益被分发给 业主的消息,引发各界对公共收益的广泛关注。 根据《民法典》第二百八十二条,建设单位、物业服务企业或者其他管理人等利用业主的共有部分产 生的收入,在扣除合理成本之后,属于业主共有。 不过,这笔原则上属于业主共有的钱,现实中可能是一本不透明的"糊涂账"。 在人民网领导留言板上,各 ...
多地整治物业乱象,公共收益不能成为一本“糊涂账”
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-10-21 07:55
各地住建部门集体动了起来,集中整治这一"乱象"。 "小区交付十几年了,业主至今无从了解公共收益的收支情况。" "物业对业主宣称电梯广告无收益,但电梯广告每月都在换新。" 小区公共收益"冷暖不一" 小区向全体业主发"红包"、业主首次见到"回头钱"......近段时间,部分城市出现公共收益被分发给业主 的消息,引发各界对公共收益的广泛关注。 根据《民法典》第二百八十二条,建设单位、物业服务企业或者其他管理人等利用业主的共有部分产生 的收入,在扣除合理成本之后,属于业主共有。 不过,这笔原则上属于业主共有的钱,现实中可能是一本不透明的"糊涂账"。 在人民网领导留言板上,各地关于小区公共收益的问题反映较为普遍,主要集中于小区物业未公示收 益、物业擅自挪用公共收益等。 今年9月,有甘肃网友表示,阳光曦华源小区的公共收益底数不清、管理不规范,物业公司未公示公共 收益的收支情况,违规侵占小区公共收益。 住宅小区公共收益,指利用住宅小区共有部分产生的收益,一般涉及地上停车位、场地出租、广告位出 租,以及快递柜、饮水机、充电桩等入驻费用。这笔费用,少则几千多则数十万,扣除合理成本后属业 主共有。 但在现实生活中,因管理使用不规 ...
“别人家小区”召开物业费返还大会,为何多数人只能在旁羡慕
Di Yi Cai Jing· 2025-08-05 07:31
Core Viewpoint - Recent cases of property management companies returning funds to homeowners in cities like Chengdu, Guangzhou, and Wuhan have garnered attention, as most homeowners have not experienced such refunds before [1][2] Group 1: Property Management Practices - Property management services are divided into two systems: commission-based and fixed-price. Only commission-based systems can return surplus property fees, with less than 8% of key cities operating under this model [2][8] - The majority of properties operate under a fixed-price system, where any surplus is not returned to homeowners, while commission-based systems are primarily found in high-end residential areas [7][8] - Chengdu has seen a slight increase in commission-based management, rising to about 10% due to recent policy changes [8] Group 2: Homeowner Associations and Management - Effective management of public revenue in residential areas relies heavily on the operation of homeowner associations (HOAs), which are often underrepresented across the country [2][12] - In some successful cases, such as the Baoli Lianghe Forest community in Chengdu, the HOA has effectively managed surplus funds and returned them to homeowners [3][6] - The establishment of HOAs is crucial for the oversight and management of public revenue, yet many areas still struggle with low HOA coverage and weak homeowner autonomy [12] Group 3: Public Revenue Management - Public revenue sources include parking fees, advertising income, and other communal earnings, which are often poorly managed and lack transparency [10][12] - Recent policies in seven provinces and cities have been introduced to clarify the ownership and management of public revenue, emphasizing that these funds belong to all homeowners [10][11] - The management of public revenue is increasingly being regulated, with requirements for separate bank accounts and transparent accounting practices [11][12] Group 4: Challenges and Opportunities - The transition from fixed-price to commission-based management can yield positive results, as seen in some cases where property fees have not only been recouped but have also led to increased property values [8][12] - However, the reluctance of large property management companies to switch to commission-based systems poses a challenge, as it affects their profit margins and control over funds [9][12] - The push for transparency and effective management of public revenue is essential for enhancing homeowner rights and ensuring sustainable property services [12][13]