Core Viewpoint - The management of public revenue in residential communities is a significant issue that affects community governance and the protection of residents' rights, as these revenues should belong to all homeowners after deducting reasonable costs [1][2][3] Group 1: Public Revenue Management Issues - Public revenues generated from community facilities, such as elevator advertisements and parking fees, are not the income of property management companies but should be shared among all homeowners [1] - Many homeowners are unaware of the existence and management of these public revenues, leading to a lack of transparency and accountability from property management companies [1][2] - The Civil Code stipulates that income generated from shared property belongs to homeowners, emphasizing the need for property management companies to disclose financial details and return excess funds to homeowners [1] Group 2: Causes of Mismanagement - The primary reason for the confusion surrounding public revenue is the information asymmetry between property management companies and homeowners, with homeowners often lacking knowledge about service costs and revenue details [2] - Low participation from homeowners and inadequate functioning of homeowners' committees hinder effective oversight of property management practices [2] - The lack of clear regulations and strict enforcement contributes to the mismanagement of public revenues in residential communities [2] Group 3: Solutions and Recommendations - Addressing the issues of public revenue management requires a collaborative effort to clarify responsibilities and enhance cooperation among all parties involved [3] - Strengthening homeowners' autonomy and ensuring the proper functioning of homeowners' committees are essential for effective supervision [3] - Implementing robust auditing and public disclosure systems, along with strict enforcement against misappropriation of public revenues, is crucial for improving transparency and accountability [3]

Core Viewpoint - The distribution of public revenue to homeowners in the Jindi Green Green community in Tongzhou represents a new trend in community management, enhancing transparency and homeowner engagement [1][12]. Summary by Sections Public Revenue Distribution - The Jindi Green Green community distributed over 320,000 yuan in public revenue derived from sources such as elevator advertisements, parking lot income, and other communal facilities [5][6]. - Homeowners received 2 yuan per square meter, with larger homeowners receiving over 3,000 yuan and smaller units receiving around 100 yuan [5][6]. Community Engagement - The event attracted many residents, fostering a sense of community and ownership among homeowners, who were surprised and pleased to receive money instead of just paying fees [3][5]. - The community's management emphasized that homeowners are "shareholders" of the community, and the revenue belongs to them [6][12]. Transparency and Governance - The community's financial activities, including public revenue distribution, were audited by third parties to ensure transparency [6][7]. - The establishment of the homeowners' committee has improved communication between residents and property management, leading to better governance and satisfaction [10][12]. Broader Implications - The practice of distributing public revenue may become a widespread trend, enhancing homeowner participation and community cohesion [12][14]. - Experts suggest that this model can transform homeowners from passive observers to active participants in community governance, thereby increasing accountability and transparency [12][13].

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing issues surrounding the management and transparency of public revenue generated from residential properties, emphasizing the need for regulatory improvements and better oversight to protect homeowners' rights and interests [4][9][10]. Summary by Sections Public Revenue in Residential Communities - Public revenue in residential communities includes income from shared facilities such as parking spaces, advertising, and amenities like delivery lockers and charging stations, which can range from thousands to tens of thousands of yuan [3][4]. - There is a widespread concern regarding the lack of transparency and mismanagement of these funds, leading to a situation described as a "confusing account" [5][6]. Legal Framework and Issues - According to the Civil Code, public revenue generated from shared property belongs to homeowners after deducting reasonable costs [4][8]. - Reports indicate that many property management companies fail to disclose revenue details, leading to allegations of misappropriation [5][6]. Challenges in Governance - Key challenges in managing public revenue include insufficient transparency, poor accounting practices, low homeowner engagement, and ineffective oversight by homeowners' committees [10][11]. - The article notes that the property management industry suffers from a lack of competition and high barriers to changing service providers, which exacerbates the problem [10][11]. Regulatory Actions and Improvements - In response to these issues, various local governments have begun implementing regulations to clarify the management of public revenue, including specific guidelines for revenue allocation and auditing [12][13]. - For instance, Zhengzhou has introduced a management method that emphasizes fairness, transparency, and government oversight, with over 3,400 communities already reporting their public revenue [13][14]. Future Policy Optimization - Experts suggest several areas for policy improvement, including enhancing account management to prevent misappropriation, strengthening disclosure requirements, increasing audit supervision, and ensuring accountability for violations [16].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing efforts by local housing and urban construction departments to address the lack of transparency and management issues surrounding public revenue generated from residential communities, which is supposed to belong to the homeowners but often becomes a "confusing account" due to mismanagement and unauthorized appropriation [1][3][6]. Group 1: Public Revenue Issues - Public revenue from residential communities includes income from shared facilities such as parking spaces, advertising, and amenities like delivery lockers and charging stations, which can range from thousands to hundreds of thousands of yuan [1]. - There have been widespread reports from homeowners about the lack of transparency in public revenue management, with many property management companies failing to disclose income and misappropriating funds [3][6]. - Recent actions by local governments include issuing rectification notices to property management companies and conducting investigations into unauthorized use of public revenue [3][4]. Group 2: Legal Framework and Governance Challenges - According to the Civil Code, public revenue generated from shared property belongs to the homeowners after deducting reasonable costs, and its use requires the consent of the homeowners [2][6]. - Challenges in governance include insufficient transparency in revenue management, unclear accounting practices, low homeowner participation, and ineffective oversight by homeowners' committees [7][8]. - The property management industry faces long-standing issues, including a lack of clear separation between construction and management responsibilities, leading to conflicts of interest favoring developers over homeowners [7]. Group 3: Policy Developments and Future Directions - In response to public outcry, various regions have begun to implement detailed management measures for public revenue, clarifying ownership, management, and auditing processes [9]. - For example, Zhengzhou has introduced a management method that emphasizes fairness, transparency, and government oversight, prohibiting unauthorized appropriation of public revenue [9][10]. - Future improvements in public revenue management may include better account management, enhanced disclosure practices, stricter auditing, and clearer accountability measures to prevent misappropriation [10].

Core Viewpoint - Recent cases of property management companies returning funds to homeowners in cities like Chengdu, Guangzhou, and Wuhan have garnered attention, as most homeowners have not experienced such refunds before [1][2] Group 1: Property Management Practices - Property management services are divided into two systems: commission-based and fixed-price. Only commission-based systems can return surplus property fees, with less than 8% of key cities operating under this model [2][8] - The majority of properties operate under a fixed-price system, where any surplus is not returned to homeowners, while commission-based systems are primarily found in high-end residential areas [7][8] - Chengdu has seen a slight increase in commission-based management, rising to about 10% due to recent policy changes [8] Group 2: Homeowner Associations and Management - Effective management of public revenue in residential areas relies heavily on the operation of homeowner associations (HOAs), which are often underrepresented across the country [2][12] - In some successful cases, such as the Baoli Lianghe Forest community in Chengdu, the HOA has effectively managed surplus funds and returned them to homeowners [3][6] - The establishment of HOAs is crucial for the oversight and management of public revenue, yet many areas still struggle with low HOA coverage and weak homeowner autonomy [12] Group 3: Public Revenue Management - Public revenue sources include parking fees, advertising income, and other communal earnings, which are often poorly managed and lack transparency [10][12] - Recent policies in seven provinces and cities have been introduced to clarify the ownership and management of public revenue, emphasizing that these funds belong to all homeowners [10][11] - The management of public revenue is increasingly being regulated, with requirements for separate bank accounts and transparent accounting practices [11][12] Group 4: Challenges and Opportunities - The transition from fixed-price to commission-based management can yield positive results, as seen in some cases where property fees have not only been recouped but have also led to increased property values [8][12] - However, the reluctance of large property management companies to switch to commission-based systems poses a challenge, as it affects their profit margins and control over funds [9][12] - The push for transparency and effective management of public revenue is essential for enhancing homeowner rights and ensuring sustainable property services [12][13]