Core Viewpoint - The State Council of China has issued a comprehensive guideline titled "Opinions on Deepening the Implementation of the 'Artificial Intelligence+' Action," which outlines a strategic framework for the future development of artificial intelligence in various sectors [1][7]. Group 1: Key Actions Proposed - The guideline proposes six key actions: 1. "Artificial Intelligence+" in science and technology to accelerate scientific discovery and innovation in research methodologies [1][7]. 2. "Artificial Intelligence+" for industrial development to foster new business models and promote smart transformation in agriculture and services [1][7]. 3. "Artificial Intelligence+" to enhance consumer quality by expanding service consumption scenarios and nurturing new product consumption models [1][7]. 4. "Artificial Intelligence+" for improving public welfare by creating smarter work and learning methods, enhancing quality of life [1][7]. 5. "Artificial Intelligence+" in governance to establish a new paradigm of human-machine coexistence in social governance [1][7]. 6. "Artificial Intelligence+" for global cooperation to promote shared benefits and establish a global governance framework for AI [1][7]. Group 2: Strategic Importance - The guideline emphasizes the importance of leveraging China's rich data resources, complete industrial system, and broad application scenarios to enhance productivity and ensure that all citizens benefit from AI advancements [7][11]. - The document reflects a holistic approach to AI development, aiming to improve efficiency, reduce costs, and boost capabilities across various sectors [11][12]. Group 3: Comparison with Global Standards - The guideline positions China as a leader in AI, with the country accounting for 60% of global AI patents and achieving significant breakthroughs in humanoid robots and intelligent hardware [12]. - The document suggests that China's strategic approach to AI development is more advanced compared to the United States, which lacks a comprehensive industrial policy [3][12].

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of teaching children to be pragmatic and resilient in a competitive society rather than overly focusing on moral education, which may leave them unprepared for real-world challenges [2][10][20]. Group 1: Education Philosophy - Traditional Chinese education often emphasizes protection and moral values, which may not equip children for the harsh realities of life [3][4][6]. - Parents may overestimate their ability to provide lifelong support, leading to a disconnect when children face societal challenges [4][7][10]. - Moral education is often more feasible for wealthy families who can afford to practice their values, while ordinary families may inadvertently harm their children by overemphasizing morality without practical skills [8][10]. Group 2: Real-World Preparedness - Children raised with a strong moral compass may struggle in a competitive environment where such values are not reciprocated [11][14][18]. - The article argues that teaching children to prioritize their own survival and financial independence is crucial, especially for middle-class families [20][24]. - Practical life skills and understanding market dynamics should be integrated into children's education to prepare them for future challenges [21][22][23]. Group 3: Parental Responsibility - Parents should focus on developing their own understanding of the world before imparting lessons to their children, ensuring that they provide coherent and practical guidance [26][27]. - The article suggests that merely enrolling children in various classes does not equate to effective education; parents must engage actively in teaching survival skills [25][24].

Group 1 - The article highlights the significant influence of China's top economists on both domestic and global economic landscapes, emphasizing their academic depth and practical experience [1][19] - Lin Yifu's new structural economics provides a framework for developing countries to choose suitable industries and technologies based on their factor endowments, which has been applied in Southeast Asia for rapid economic growth [1] - Zhang Wuchang's research on economic institutions and property rights has shaped the understanding of market economy operations, particularly influencing China's state-owned enterprise reforms [3] - Li Yining's non-equilibrium economic theory has been pivotal in explaining China's economic phenomena and has laid the theoretical groundwork for the market-oriented transformation of state-owned enterprises [5] - Wu Jinglian's advocacy for market economy principles and price reforms has been crucial in establishing China's market economy system [7] Group 2 - Du Shuai emphasizes the importance of investing in technology and healthcare as future economic growth engines, advocating for financial innovation to support real economic development [9] - Fan Gang's work in macroeconomic regulation combines Western economic theories with China's realities, offering policy suggestions for inflation and recession management [10] - Zhang Weiying's research on enterprise theory and property rights has provided essential support for the reform of state-owned enterprises in China [12] - Lang Xianping's extensive academic contributions and governance research have positioned him as a leading figure in corporate governance discussions [14] - He Fan's research on macroeconomics and international trade has provided valuable insights for government policy-making and corporate strategies in response to global economic challenges [16][17] - Li Daokui's exploration of government-market relationships offers new perspectives on economic development and local government policy formulation [16]