Core Insights - The evolution of the U.S. financial regulatory system reflects a history of crisis reflection and reform balancing, significantly impacting global financial regulation [1] Group 1: Formation of Dual Regulatory Framework - The U.S. financial regulatory framework is characterized by the coexistence of state and federal regulation, which developed over time from the initial state-centric governance to a more significant federal role [2][3] Group 2: Impact of Major Financial Crises - The 1929 Great Depression led to fundamental changes in the regulatory framework, including the establishment of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the separation of commercial and investment banking [4][5] - The 2008 financial crisis prompted a comprehensive review and reform of the financial regulatory system, addressing issues of regulatory gaps and overlaps [6][7] Group 3: Evolution of Federal Reserve's Role - The Federal Reserve, established in 1913, has evolved to play a central role in maintaining financial stability and supervising financial institutions, with its responsibilities expanding significantly over the decades [8][9] - The Dodd-Frank Act enhanced the Federal Reserve's role in macroprudential regulation and systemic risk prevention, allowing it to oversee systemically important financial institutions [10] Group 4: Emergency Measures During COVID-19 - In response to the COVID-19 pandemic, U.S. regulatory agencies implemented emergency measures, including a $2 trillion stimulus package and various liquidity support programs to stabilize the economy [11][12][13] - The extensive economic relief measures, while stabilizing the economy, have also contributed to rising inflation, presenting ongoing challenges for the Federal Reserve [14]

Core Viewpoint - The development of China's insurance industry has undergone three distinct stages, evolving from a focus on insurance compensation to a dual emphasis on underwriting and investment, and now entering a "chain stage" that expands the insurance industry's value chain through integration with healthcare and elderly care services [4][5][6]. Summary of Insurance Regulatory Evolution - The evolution of insurance regulation in China can be divided into several phases, starting from 1949 to 1978, where the People's Bank of China initially managed the insurance sector, followed by the Ministry of Finance, and a period of suspension of domestic insurance business [5]. - From 1979 to 1998, the domestic insurance business was gradually restored under the supervision of the People's Bank of China, leading to the establishment of the China Insurance Company in 1983 and the implementation of the Insurance Law in 1995 [5][6]. - The period from 1998 to 2018 saw the establishment of the China Insurance Regulatory Commission (CIRC) and the introduction of a modern regulatory framework focusing on solvency, corporate governance, and market behavior [6]. - Since 2018, the China Banking and Insurance Regulatory Commission (CBIRC) has unified the regulation of banking and insurance, enhancing solvency regulation and establishing a national financial regulatory authority in 2023 [7]. Challenges Facing Insurance Regulation - The legal framework for insurance regulation in China is still incomplete, with a lack of specific laws governing new business models such as mutual insurance and reinsurance, and unclear regulatory responsibilities across different sectors [8][9]. - There are deficiencies in differentiated regulation for various types of insurance institutions, leading to a "one-size-fits-all" approach that does not adequately address the unique characteristics of different entities [8][9]. - Issues in behavior and functional regulation persist, including misleading sales practices and inadequate oversight of insurance intermediaries, which contribute to market inefficiencies [9][10]. International Insurance Regulatory Experience - Internationally, insurance regulation has evolved from behavior-based oversight to solvency regulation, with frameworks established by organizations such as the International Association of Insurance Supervisors (IAIS) focusing on solvency as a core principle [12][13]. - The United States employs a dual regulatory system with federal and state oversight, emphasizing risk-based capital requirements to ensure insurance companies maintain adequate solvency [13]. - The European Union has implemented the Solvency II framework, which sets capital requirements based on business scale and enhances risk management and governance standards [14]. Future Directions for China's Insurance Regulation - There is a need to improve the legal and regulatory framework for insurance, including timely revisions to the Insurance Law and the establishment of specific regulations for mutual insurance and reinsurance [17][18]. - Differentiated regulatory approaches should be adopted based on the type of insurance institution, with increased scrutiny for those with higher risks [18]. - Innovations in behavior and functional regulation are necessary to protect consumer rights and adapt to new business models, including the implementation of regulatory sandboxes for innovative insurance products [19][20].