智能鸿沟

Search documents
邱泽奇:所谓“智能鸿沟”,可能源于我们的自大
3 6 Ke· 2025-09-22 13:31
Group 1 - The use of AI does not necessarily lead to a decline in intelligence; this question is overly simplistic and reminiscent of outdated industrial-era concerns [1][7] - Current AI systems primarily absorb human knowledge, functioning similarly to a talking encyclopedia, but they lack the ability to interpret non-verbal cues and emotional contexts [3][4] - AI's learning is based on vast amounts of data, yet the underlying values and contexts of this data remain difficult to assess, raising concerns about the potential biases in AI outputs [4][8] Group 2 - The importance of companionship in human development suggests that private AI applications, such as AI social companions and toys, could represent a significant market opportunity [2][9] - The evolution of education emphasizes the need for cognitive education, which is crucial in the AI era, as it shapes how individuals perceive and interact with the world [9] - The disparity in AI usage can exacerbate existing knowledge gaps, highlighting the need for effective AI tools to bridge these divides [12]
邱泽奇:所谓“智能鸿沟”,可能源于我们的自大
腾讯研究院· 2025-09-22 08:48
Core Viewpoints - The question of whether AI leads to a decline in intelligence is not a binary issue and reflects a misunderstanding similar to questions from the industrial era [3][10] - Human cognition is still in its early stages of understanding, with human thought characterized by leaps and sudden changes that are not yet fully explained [3][8] - Current AI systems primarily absorb human knowledge, functioning more like a talking encyclopedia, but they lack the ability to interpret non-verbal cues and emotional contexts [6][8] Group 1: AI and Human Cognition - AI's learning is based on vast amounts of human-generated data, but the implications of the background and values of this data remain uncertain [4][12] - The interaction with AI should be seen as a collaborative process that enhances human thinking rather than a simple tool for information retrieval [11][15] - The importance of questioning and challenging AI outputs is emphasized as a means to foster deeper cognitive engagement [11][12] Group 2: The Role of AI in Education and Development - The development of foundational skills such as language, logic, and cognitive abilities is increasingly important in the AI era [13][14] - The concept of "companionship" in human development is paralleled in the potential market for private AI applications, such as AI companions and toys [4][14] - Educational approaches should shift towards cognitive enhancement rather than mere knowledge transmission, encouraging discussions with AI to deepen understanding [14][15] Group 3: The Digital Divide and Social Diversity - The emergence of AI has the potential to equalize knowledge access, but disparities in AI usage can widen the gap between different user groups [16] - The notion of an "intelligence gap" may stem from a misperception of one's position in society, highlighting the need for diverse perspectives [16] - The subjective experience of life and happiness varies greatly among individuals, underscoring the importance of embracing social diversity [16]
推动全球科技发展共识 弥合“智能鸿沟”
人民网-国际频道 原创稿· 2025-08-08 09:12
Core Viewpoint - The Chinese government has proposed the establishment of a World Artificial Intelligence Cooperation Organization to address the rapid evolution of AI technology and its implications for global governance and safety [1][2][3] Group 1: Strategic Significance - The initiative aims to enhance technological collaboration and innovation while contributing to a global AI governance framework and addressing safety risks systematically [1] - The organization is seen as a necessary response to the dual-edged nature of AI technology, promoting global consensus on technological development and bridging the "intelligence gap" [1][2] Group 2: Global Impact and Cooperation - AI's borderless nature means that breakthroughs or failures in one country can have global repercussions, necessitating international cooperation [2] - The establishment of the organization will facilitate policy coordination among governments, experience sharing among enterprises, and collaborative research efforts, fostering a new paradigm of "co-governance and shared benefits" [2][3] Group 3: Addressing the "Intelligence Gap" - The organization aims to shift technology development from "monopolistic enjoyment" to "common prosperity," promoting equitable access to AI technologies [3] - It will work towards creating mechanisms for technology sharing, establishing fair rule-making platforms, and building AI capacity in developing countries, transforming them from mere "receivers" to active "participants" [3]
以普惠包容的人工智能发展和治理弥合数字鸿沟
Ren Min Ri Bao· 2025-08-05 22:21
Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the urgent need to bridge the digital divide exacerbated by the rapid development of artificial intelligence and digital technologies, which significantly impacts global economic growth and social equity [1][2][9]. Group 1: Digital Divide - The digital divide manifests in three dimensions: access, usage, and capability, leading to a more pronounced "intelligent divide" as AI technology evolves [1][2]. - By the end of 2024, nearly 2.6 billion people globally will still lack internet access, representing one-third of the world's population, with only 35% of the least developed countries having internet users [2]. - The disparity in digital technology usage is evident, with high-income countries having 93% internet usage compared to only 39% in landlocked developing countries [2]. Group 2: International Cooperation - International organizations are enhancing collaborative mechanisms to address the challenges posed by the digital divide, with major countries implementing digital strategies to improve infrastructure and digital literacy in underserved areas [3]. - China is actively participating in global digital governance, promoting infrastructure development in partner countries through initiatives like the Belt and Road Initiative, significantly improving network coverage and digital capabilities in Africa [3]. Group 3: AI Challenges and Opportunities - The development of AI presents both challenges and opportunities in bridging the digital and intelligent divides, with issues such as data concentration and regulatory discrepancies hindering progress [5][6]. - AI technology can enhance resource sharing and digital literacy, with innovations like lightweight models enabling effective applications in resource-limited areas [6]. Group 4: Collaborative Efforts - Bridging the digital and intelligent divides requires a concerted effort from governments, businesses, and international organizations to create an inclusive AI ecosystem and enhance digital literacy [7][8]. - There is a call for open resource sharing and collaboration to develop adaptable AI technologies that cater to the needs of developing regions [7][8].
外交部:数字红利不能成为数字霸权 智能革命不应扩大智能鸿沟
news flash· 2025-05-13 06:39
Core Points - The Chinese government emphasizes that digital dividends should not lead to digital hegemony and that the intelligent revolution should not widen the digital divide [1] Group 1 - The second phase of the Artificial Intelligence Capacity Building Seminar commenced in Beijing on May 12, with participation from nearly 40 countries and international organizations [1] - This seminar is part of the implementation of the Global Artificial Intelligence Governance Initiative and aims to strengthen international cooperation in AI capacity building [1] - China advocates for fair and inclusive global development in artificial intelligence and aims to be a promoter and pioneer in international cooperation on AI capacity building [1] Group 2 - The Chinese government is committed to the principles of consultation, contribution, and shared benefits, aiming to enhance communication and cooperation with various parties [1] - The goal is to provide public goods to the international community and share the benefits of AI with developing countries [1] - The focus is on ensuring that artificial intelligence better serves global development [1]