近年来，为防范电信诈骗、洗钱等风险，银行开卡流程趋严，但部分网点"层层加码"或"一刀切"过度限 制交易额度等问题亦引发关注。 随后，记者询问业务往来具体是指哪些内容，工作人员解释，理财、定期、房贷、对公或者是办理信用 卡都属于业务往来，如果有认识的客户经理也可以。记者进一步询问，提供社保公积金缴纳证明等其他 辅助材料是否可以办理，工作人员称："我们不看这些。" 最终，记者并未成功办理一类卡离开了银行，全程对话3分钟左右，其间并未让记者取号，也未核对记 者任何身份信息。 惠州情况如何？南都N视频记者实地走访惠州9家银行，以办理一类储蓄卡并开通网银为目标，从办事 效率、合规性、防诈执行、服务质量四大维度展开测评，体验银行办卡服务和流程是否合规，是否便 利，有没有存在"层层加码"现象。 结果显示，被测评银行在反诈宣传方面表现优异，9家银行网点工作人员在办理开卡业务时，均主动向 记者介绍防诈骗教育宣传。因把握风险防控与金融便民的尺度不一，9家银行中，7家为记者办理了不同 额度的一类卡，华夏银行惠州分行、兴业银行惠州分行分别以新用户办不了一类卡和只有业务相关的客 户才能办理一类卡为由，向记者表示只能办理二类卡。 成功办 ...

近年来，为防范电信诈骗、洗钱等风险，银行开卡流程趋严，但部分网点"层层加码"或"一刀切"过度限 制交易额度等问题亦引发关注。 惠州情况如何？南都N视频记者实地走访惠州9家银行，以办理一类储蓄卡并开通网银为目标，从办事 效率、合规性、防诈执行、服务质量四大维度展开测评，体验银行办卡服务和流程是否合规，是否便 利，有没有存在"层层加码"现象。 结果显示，被测评银行在反诈宣传方面表现优异，9家银行网点工作人员在办理开卡业务时，均主动向 记者介绍防诈骗教育宣传。因把握风险防控与金融便民的尺度不一，9家银行中，7家为记者办理了不同 额度的一类卡，华夏银行惠州分行、兴业银行惠州分行分别以新用户办不了一类卡和只有业务相关的客 户才能办理一类卡为由，向记者表示只能办理二类卡。 成功办理一类卡的7家银行中，5家银行从取号到办理完成时间在30分钟以内，部分银行耗时50分钟。 测评网点：惠州农商行中心支行 14时47分，记者在窗口办理一类卡时，另一工作人员以其他客户卡片出现问题为由，叫走正在为记者办 理业务的工作人员，并让记者去自助办卡机，有其他工作人员为记者服务。 自助办卡机前，工作人员全程帮助记者填写信息。在记者询问是否需要签 ...

近年来，为防范电信诈骗、洗钱等风险，银行开卡流程趋严，但部分网点"层层加码"或"一刀切"过度限 制交易额度等问题亦引发关注。 惠州情况如何？南都N视频记者实地走访惠州9家银行，以办理一类储蓄卡并开通网银为目标，从办事 效率、合规性、防诈执行、服务质量四大维度展开测评，体验银行办卡服务和流程是否合规，是否便 利，有没有存在"层层加码"现象。 结果显示，被测评银行在反诈宣传方面表现优异，9家银行网点工作人员在办理开卡业务时，均主动向 记者介绍防诈骗教育宣传。因把握风险防控与金融便民的尺度不一，9家银行中，7家为记者办理了不同 额度的一类卡，华夏银行惠州分行、兴业银行惠州分行分别以新用户办不了一类卡和只有业务相关的客 户才能办理一类卡为由，向记者表示只能办理二类卡。 成功办理一类卡的7家银行中，5家银行从取号到办理完成时间在30分钟以内，部分银行耗时50分钟。 测评网点：浙商银行惠州分行 总耗时：约14分钟 总得分：95分 8月14日下午，记者致电浙商银行惠州分行客服咨询一类卡开办流程，电话中工作人员答复仅需提供身 份证及实名制手机号码即可办理。 当日15时09分，记者来到浙商银行惠州分行网点，大厅内办理业务人员较 ...

近年来，为防范电信诈骗、洗钱等风险，银行开卡流程趋严，但部分网点"层层加码"或"一刀切"过度限 制交易额度等问题亦引发关注。 惠州情况如何？南都N视频记者实地走访惠州9家银行，以办理一类储蓄卡并开通网银为目标，从办事 效率、合规性、防诈执行、服务质量四大维度展开测评，体验银行办卡服务和流程是否合规，是否便 利，有没有存在"层层加码"现象。 结果显示，被测评银行在反诈宣传方面表现优异，9家银行网点工作人员在办理开卡业务时，均主动向 记者介绍防诈骗教育宣传。因把握风险防控与金融便民的尺度不一，9家银行中，7家为记者办理了不同 额度的一类卡，华夏银行惠州分行、兴业银行惠州分行分别以新用户办不了一类卡和只有业务相关的客 户才能办理一类卡为由，向记者表示只能办理二类卡。 成功办理一类卡的7家银行中，5家银行从取号到办理完成时间在30分钟以内，部分银行耗时50分钟。 工作人员首先向记者确认办卡用途，随后表示可以办理一类卡，不过额度只有1000元，使用数月后，可 根据银行流水调整，记者主动询问有社保公积金缴纳证明是否可以提高额度，工作人员说："新用户基 本上都是这个额度，日常消费也够了。" 办卡过程中，工作人员让记者手持身 ...

Core Insights - The article evaluates the banking services in Huizhou, focusing on the process of opening a type one savings account and online banking access, highlighting the balance between risk prevention and customer convenience [5][14]. Evaluation Results - Among the nine banks assessed, seven successfully opened type one accounts, with performance scores varying significantly. The top two banks, Everbright Bank and Zheshang Bank, scored 95 points each, completing the process in under 15 minutes without any bundled sales [7][11]. - The remaining banks scored between 70 to 80 points, with issues primarily related to the requirement of additional documentation beyond basic identification [7][11]. - Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank and Dongguan Bank scored the lowest, with lengthy and complicated processes requiring multiple supporting documents [7][11]. Efficiency of Service - The time taken to open an account varied from 11 minutes to 50 minutes across different banks, with the longest wait times observed at Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank and Dongguan Bank [8][9]. - The fastest service was provided by Everbright Bank, completing the process in just 11 minutes, while the slowest was Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank, taking 50 minutes due to extensive verification procedures [9][10]. Compliance and Regulations - Overall compliance was satisfactory, with most banks requiring additional information such as social security and employment details during the account opening process [11][12]. - Notably, Guangfa Bank was the only institution to charge a 10 yuan service fee for account opening, which would be refunded after a specified period of maintaining a minimum balance [12][14]. Fraud Prevention Measures - All banks included fraud prevention education as a mandatory part of the account opening process, with limits on daily transaction amounts ranging from 1,000 to 5,000 yuan for the newly opened accounts [14][15]. - Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank's new type one account could only be used for in-branch transactions, highlighting a stringent approach to fraud prevention [14]. Service Quality - Several banks, including Everbright Bank and Zheshang Bank, demonstrated high service quality, while issues arose at Dongguan Bank and Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank, where staff were distracted by other customer needs during the account opening process [16][17]. - The overall customer experience varied, with some banks providing a seamless process while others faced challenges due to staff availability and procedural delays [16][17].

Core Insights - The article discusses the tightening of bank card application processes in response to risks such as telecom fraud and money laundering, highlighting issues of excessive restrictions and inconsistent practices across different bank branches [1] Group 1: Bank Evaluation - A survey was conducted in Zhuhai, where seven banks were evaluated on their compliance, efficiency, fraud prevention execution, and service quality while processing applications for a type of savings card with a daily transfer limit of 50,000 yuan [1] - The results showed a significant disparity among the banks, with some achieving high scores (up to 95) for efficient service and smooth processes, while others scored as low as 55 due to lengthy procedures and excessive restrictions [1] Group 2: Case Study - China Everbright Bank - On June 25, a reporter visited China Everbright Bank's Gongbei branch to experience the process of applying for a type of savings card, which took about one hour [3] - Initially, the bank was cautious and set a transfer limit of 5,000 yuan, citing regulations from the People's Bank of China, which restricts new cardholders' daily transfer limits [5] - After persistent requests, the bank eventually allowed the application for a type of savings card, but required extensive verification of the applicant's financial situation and purpose for the card [6] Group 3: Application Process - The application process involved multiple steps, including identity verification and inquiries about the applicant's financial plans, which led to the bank initially refusing the application due to insufficient verification of the intended use of funds [5][6] - After further discussion and assurance from the applicant, the bank allowed the application, but still imposed a 5,000 yuan limit on mobile and online transfers [6] - The overall process, including the application and account setup, took approximately 20 minutes, with the bank also promoting its mobile app and additional services during the interaction [7]