极目新闻通讯员 陈小微 邮储银行湖北省分行始终坚守"金融为民、服务实体"初心，秉持"应降尽免、应免尽免"原则，通过持续 落实支付手续费减免、推动融资成本下降等一系列措施，将政策红利精准直达小微企业、个体工商户及 广大民众，为经济社会高质量发展注入源源不断的金融暖流。 构建立体化降费体系，政策红利覆盖更广 信贷融资降成本，直达实体经济。紧跟贷款市场报价利率（LPR）变化，对普惠型小微企业贷款内部资 金转移定价（FTP）给予75BP的优惠。2025年以来，小企业贷款加权平均利率较上年下降超过50BP。 主动承担贷款办理中涉及的抵押评估费、登记费、公证费等费用，坚决杜绝各类"隐性收费""搭车收 费"行为，切实减轻企业融资负担。 在降费政策执行层面，该行在全面落实国家四部委相关要求及行业协会倡议基础上，积极拓宽降费受益 面，着力打造"对公对私全覆盖、线上线下同优惠"的立体化降费网络，核心举措主要聚焦三大领域。 支付通道让利，惠及千企万户。对小微企业和个体工商户，单笔10万元（含）以内的对公行内转账实行 免费；同金额对公跨行转账手续费享受九折优惠。询证函手续费实行五折优惠。全面取消支票、本票、 银行汇票的工本费、挂失费 ...

"农行陕西分行致力于提供全链条、多维度的金融支持。"上述农行陕西分行相关负责人表示。 本报讯 （记者殷高峰）《证券日报》记者从中国农业银行股份有限公司陕西省分行（以下简称"农行陕西分行"）获悉， 2025年，农行陕西分行深刻把握陕西作为能源大省的省情特点，将支持能源化工产业特别是煤化工产业的绿色低碳转型，作为 服务地方经济高质量发展的"头号工程"和"主战场"。截至2025年11月，农行陕西分行审批陕西省属企业煤炭转型升级重点项目 贷款251.5亿元、实现投放81.22亿元。 陕煤集团榆林化学有限责任公司（以下简称"榆林化学"）二期项目就是其中的一个典型。榆林化学二期项目作为国家能源 发展规划的重点项目，农行陕西分行为该项目审批了100亿元固定资产贷款和50亿元项目前期贷款，实现国有大行首家审批， 同时也成为该项目首次获批的百亿元融资。截至目前，具体负责此项业务的中国农业银行股份有限公司榆林分行（以下简 称"农行榆林分行"）已为榆林化学二期项目建设投放贷款14.07亿元。此外，农行榆林分行紧跟项目建设多元化金融服务需求， 为项目开立农民工工资专用账户21户，累计代发工资人数950人次，办理农民工工资支付保函6笔 ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the tightening of bank account opening processes in response to risks such as telecom fraud and money laundering, highlighting concerns over excessive restrictions and inconsistent practices across different bank branches [2] Group 1: Bank Evaluation - A survey was conducted at nine banks in Huizhou to assess the efficiency, compliance, anti-fraud execution, and service quality of their account opening processes [2] - All nine banks demonstrated strong anti-fraud education efforts, with staff proactively informing customers about fraud prevention during the account opening process [2] - Out of the nine banks, seven successfully issued different tiers of primary savings accounts, while two banks (Huaxia Bank and Industrial Bank) cited specific restrictions preventing new users from obtaining primary accounts [2] Group 2: Specific Bank Case Study - At Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank's central branch, the total time taken for account opening was approximately 50 minutes, with a score of 65 points in the evaluation [3] - The bank required various documents for account opening, including proof of social security and housing arrangements, which added to the processing time [3] - Staff recommended a passbook instead of a primary account due to limitations on online banking capabilities for new primary accounts, indicating a potential gap in service offerings [5]

Core Insights - The article evaluates the banking services in Huizhou, focusing on the process of opening a type one savings account and online banking access, highlighting the balance between risk prevention and customer convenience [5][14]. Evaluation Results - Among the nine banks assessed, seven successfully opened type one accounts, with performance scores varying significantly. The top two banks, Everbright Bank and Zheshang Bank, scored 95 points each, completing the process in under 15 minutes without any bundled sales [7][11]. - The remaining banks scored between 70 to 80 points, with issues primarily related to the requirement of additional documentation beyond basic identification [7][11]. - Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank and Dongguan Bank scored the lowest, with lengthy and complicated processes requiring multiple supporting documents [7][11]. Efficiency of Service - The time taken to open an account varied from 11 minutes to 50 minutes across different banks, with the longest wait times observed at Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank and Dongguan Bank [8][9]. - The fastest service was provided by Everbright Bank, completing the process in just 11 minutes, while the slowest was Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank, taking 50 minutes due to extensive verification procedures [9][10]. Compliance and Regulations - Overall compliance was satisfactory, with most banks requiring additional information such as social security and employment details during the account opening process [11][12]. - Notably, Guangfa Bank was the only institution to charge a 10 yuan service fee for account opening, which would be refunded after a specified period of maintaining a minimum balance [12][14]. Fraud Prevention Measures - All banks included fraud prevention education as a mandatory part of the account opening process, with limits on daily transaction amounts ranging from 1,000 to 5,000 yuan for the newly opened accounts [14][15]. - Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank's new type one account could only be used for in-branch transactions, highlighting a stringent approach to fraud prevention [14]. Service Quality - Several banks, including Everbright Bank and Zheshang Bank, demonstrated high service quality, while issues arose at Dongguan Bank and Huizhou Rural Commercial Bank, where staff were distracted by other customer needs during the account opening process [16][17]. - The overall customer experience varied, with some banks providing a seamless process while others faced challenges due to staff availability and procedural delays [16][17].

Core Viewpoint - The evaluation of seven banks in Zhuhai revealed significant disparities in their card issuance processes, with some banks excelling in service quality while others faced criticism for excessive restrictions and inefficiencies [1][3][6]. Group 1: Evaluation Results - The evaluation showed a clear tiered scoring among the banks, with China Merchants Bank and Xiamen International Bank both achieving the highest score of 95, demonstrating effective risk management and customer service [6][16]. - The lowest score was 55, attributed to banks like China Everbright Bank and Shanghai Pudong Development Bank, which exhibited lengthy processes and excessive restrictions on transaction limits [7][12][16]. Group 2: Efficiency and Process - The time taken to open a bank account varied significantly, with the fastest being 10 minutes at Xiamen International Bank, while some banks took up to 64 minutes due to inefficient processes [11][12][13]. - The average waiting time and processing time for account opening were inconsistent across different banks, highlighting a lack of standardization in service efficiency [11][26]. Group 3: Compliance and Service Quality - Overall compliance performance was strong, with four banks receiving full marks for not engaging in bundling sales or requiring unnecessary app downloads [16][17]. - However, some banks, such as China Everbright Bank and China CITIC Bank, faced criticism for requiring customers to follow social media accounts or download apps, negatively impacting user experience [17][21][22]. Group 4: Transaction Limits - The initial transaction limits varied widely, with Xiamen International Bank allowing a limit of 50,000, while others like China CITIC Bank set limits as low as 1,000 [22][24]. - The inconsistency in transaction limits reflects the banks' varying interpretations of regulatory guidelines aimed at preventing fraud and money laundering [22][23][24]. Group 5: Documentation Requirements - The documentation required for account opening was not standardized, leading to confusion and delays as different banks requested varying levels of information [26][27][30]. - This lack of uniformity in documentation requirements contributed to a frustrating experience for customers, as they faced different expectations at each bank [26][30].