Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the poor performance of Guolian An Fund's manager Pan Ming, highlighting that several funds under his management have consistently underperformed, leading to investor dissatisfaction and market skepticism regarding his management capabilities [1][2]. Fund Performance Summary - Pan Ming manages six funds, all of which he oversees independently. The Guolian An Science and Technology Innovation Mixed Fund (LOF) has a five-year return of -35.26%, significantly underperforming its benchmark by over 20% [2][12]. - The Guolian An Science and Technology Innovation LOF has a cumulative return of -26.03% since its inception on March 20, 2020, with a unit net value of only 0.7397 yuan as of July 9, 2025 [6][7]. - The fund's management fees from March 2023 to December 2024 amounted to 6.21 million yuan, while the total management fees for 2021 and 2022 reached 15 million yuan [6][8]. Benchmark Comparison - The performance benchmark for the Guolian An Science and Technology Innovation LOF is a composite of various indices, with a benchmark return of -11.74% over the same five-year period, indicating a significant underperformance of -23.52% compared to the benchmark [2][12]. - Other funds managed by Pan Ming, such as Guolian An Preferred Industry Mixed Fund and Guolian An Technology Power Stock Fund, also show similar underperformance, with returns of -34.10% and -32.25% respectively, against their benchmarks [2][12]. Regulatory Context - In May 2023, the China Securities Regulatory Commission introduced a new action plan aimed at improving the quality of public funds, which includes a mechanism linking fund performance to management fees. This could impact Pan Ming's management fees if performance does not meet expectations [12].

Core Viewpoint - The "Action Plan" for promoting the high-quality development of public funds marks a significant reform in the public fund industry, shifting the focus from scale to investor-centric goals, indicating a new phase in the industry's evolution [1] Group 1: Floating Management Fee Model - The "Action Plan" introduces a performance-linked floating management fee model, addressing previous criticisms of fixed fees regardless of fund performance [3] - The new model allows for differentiated management fees based on the fund's performance relative to a benchmark, with three tiers of fees depending on the annual excess return [3][4] - This model aims to ensure that fund products are accountable to each new investor, promoting long-term holding of fund products [4] Group 2: Benchmark Selection - The Huazhong Fund has chosen the CSI 800 index as the performance benchmark for its floating fee products, which offers broader coverage and a more balanced representation of both value and growth styles compared to other indices [6] - The CSI 800 index includes both undervalued blue-chip stocks and growth companies, reflecting a combination of past and future economic structures [6] Group 3: Fund Manager Profile - Fund manager Luan Chao, known for his balanced growth investment approach, combines top-down industry allocation with bottom-up stock selection, focusing on sustainable profit growth [8] - Luan Chao emphasizes a cyclical perspective, identifying investment directions based on macro, industry, and company cycles [8] - His investment strategy includes a focus on industries with upward trends and companies with strong competitive advantages, leading to a selective stock pool [8][10] Group 4: Research and Investment Platform - Huazhong Fund is recognized as a leading growth investment platform, having pioneered industry chain investment strategies and being an early investor in key sectors like 5G and electric vehicles [12] - The fund's research team has a global perspective, leveraging insights from international markets to identify growth opportunities in the technology sector [12][13] - The strong research capabilities of the team are expected to support Luan Chao's potential for excess returns, aligning the interests of fund managers and investors [13]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the release of the "Action Plan for Promoting the High-Quality Development of Public Funds," which aims to address industry pain points and shift the focus from "scale" to "returns" in the public fund industry, enhancing investor experience and safety [1][2]. Group 1: Key Measures of the Action Plan - The plan emphasizes the need to strengthen the binding of interests between fund companies and investors, introducing a floating management fee model linked to fund performance to counteract the "guaranteed returns" phenomenon [2][3]. - Fund companies are required to establish a performance-based floating management fee mechanism, where fees are adjusted based on the fund's performance relative to a benchmark, promoting long-term investment strategies among investors [2][3]. - The plan mandates that leading fund management institutions issue floating fee funds, with a target of at least 60% of new active management equity fund issuances [3]. Group 2: Performance Evaluation and Incentives - The plan calls for a comprehensive overhaul of the performance evaluation system, focusing on long-term investment returns rather than short-term metrics, with a minimum of 50% weight on investment returns for company executives and 80% for fund managers [5][6]. - Fund companies must implement a salary management mechanism linked to investment returns, ensuring that fund managers' compensation reflects their performance over a longer period [6][7]. - The emphasis on long-term performance aims to stabilize fund products and encourage the inflow of long-term capital into the market [6][7]. Group 3: Innovation and Market Vitality - The plan encourages the innovation and development of equity funds, proposing a rapid registration mechanism for equity fund products to enhance market liquidity and attract long-term investments [8][9]. - It supports the development of various index funds and thematic investment products, aiming to diversify investment options and improve market stability [8][9]. - The plan also introduces a classification evaluation mechanism for fund sales institutions, prioritizing those with strong performance metrics in product approvals and licensing [10]. Group 4: Enhancing Investor Services - The plan requires public fund institutions to improve their investor service capabilities and strengthen core research and investment capabilities [11][12]. - It supports the development of a direct sales service platform for institutional investors and outlines regulations for investment advisory services [12]. - The focus on enhancing investor services aims to build trust and confidence in public funds, ultimately benefiting the capital market [12][13]. Group 5: Risk Control and Compliance - The plan emphasizes the importance of risk control and compliance, proposing measures to enhance internal management and accountability within fund companies [13]. - It aims to create a stable and self-regulating industry environment by improving governance structures and addressing violations [13]. - The overall goal is to establish a robust ecosystem that attracts long-term capital and supports the healthy development of the capital market [13].

Core Viewpoint - The recently released "Action Plan for Promoting the High-Quality Development of Public Funds" includes 25 measures aimed at addressing industry pain points and enhancing the overall management and performance of public funds [1][2]. Summary by Sections Fund Fee and Manager Compensation Reform - The action plan emphasizes a shift towards a floating management fee model for actively managed equity funds, linking fees to fund performance against benchmarks [4][6]. - Specific measures include establishing a floating fee mechanism based on performance, with different fee rates applicable depending on the fund's performance relative to its benchmark [4][5]. - Fund managers' compensation will be tied to fund performance, with penalties for underperformance and rewards for exceeding benchmarks [9][10][12]. Strengthening Interest Alignment - The plan aims to enhance the alignment of interests among fund companies, managers, and investors by increasing the proportion of personal investments by fund managers in their own products [15][16]. - It proposes a comprehensive evaluation system that includes long-term performance metrics, ensuring that fund managers focus on sustainable returns rather than short-term gains [12][17]. Stability of Investment Style - The action plan addresses issues of investment style drift by requiring clear performance benchmarks for each fund, ensuring that investment behavior aligns with the fund's stated objectives [19][20]. - It emphasizes the importance of long-term assessments, with a minimum of 80% weight on three-year performance metrics to discourage short-term trading behaviors [20][21]. Fund Sales and Evaluation Requirements - The plan calls for improved investor service capabilities, including the establishment of regulations for fund advisory services and a centralized platform for institutional investors [22][23]. - It introduces a classification and evaluation mechanism for fund sales institutions, focusing on long-term performance and investor outcomes [24]. Governance Improvement - The action plan highlights the need for enhanced governance within fund companies, including better accountability for major shareholders and board members [26][28]. - It proposes reforms to improve the independence and effectiveness of fund company governance structures, aiming to prevent conflicts of interest and ensure compliance [26][27]. Encouragement for Growth and Innovation - The plan encourages fund companies to strengthen their research capabilities and adopt new technologies, such as AI and big data, to enhance operational efficiency [29][30]. - It supports the establishment of employee stock ownership plans and promotes mergers and acquisitions to foster industry consolidation and innovation [31].