Core Viewpoint - Recent actions by the internet regulatory authorities to address issues with online platforms have garnered public support, highlighting the urgent need for improvements in trending topics and hot lists [1] Group 1: Issues with Trending Topics - Some trending topics are artificially created through financial means, misleading the public and violating communication principles [2] - The presence of misleading information and sensationalized content in trending topics disrupts the online ecosystem and diminishes the value of genuine content [3] Group 2: Responsibility of Algorithms - Algorithms, designed by humans, should be held accountable and subject to public oversight, as they play a crucial role in determining trending topics [3] - The "black box" nature of algorithms is not a valid excuse for evading supervision, and trending topics should not facilitate rumors, panic, or online violence [3] Group 3: Influence on Public Perception - Trending topics serve as a filter for information and significantly shape public perception, thus they should promote correct guidance and values [4] - Commercial platforms driven by profit motives often prioritize attention-grabbing content over responsible reporting, which can mislead the public and undermine mainstream values [4] - A shift away from a "traffic-first" mentality is necessary for platforms to gain true market and user trust [4]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the articles emphasizes the need for effective governance of algorithmic recommendations to address issues such as the promotion of low-quality content, information bubbles, and polarization of opinions [1][2][3] - The Chinese government has initiated a special action called "Clear and Bright: Governance of Typical Algorithm Issues on Online Platforms" to tackle algorithm misuse, which includes addressing problems like information bubbles and the infringement of workers' rights [1][2] - The implementation of the "Internet Information Service Algorithm Recommendation Management Regulations" in 2022 has set user rights protection requirements for algorithm service providers, prohibiting excessive recommendations and manipulation of rankings [1][2] Group 2 - Algorithm governance is recognized as a long-term and systematic project that requires a balance between promoting technological innovation and effective regulation [2][3] - The rapid iteration and self-learning capabilities of algorithms outpace existing regulatory measures, leading to gaps in oversight for emerging technologies and risks [2] - There is a call for a regulatory framework that adapts to technological advancements, with increased scrutiny on mature applications while allowing innovation space for nascent technologies [2] Group 3 - The challenge of algorithm governance is a global issue that impacts not only the online ecosystem but also national economic development and social stability [3] - Individuals are encouraged to enhance their digital literacy and critical thinking skills to create their own information defenses [3] - The articles advocate for improved algorithm regulation to ensure that technological innovation occurs alongside the management of potential social risks [3]