这张新鲜出炉的榜单，就像给中国城市拍了一张2025年的"集体照"。照片里，前排的面孔我们很熟悉，北京、上海、深圳稳坐C位。但真正耐人寻味的，永 远是那些位次发生了微妙变化的"同学"。今天，咱们就盯着这三对"身位"变化聊聊：苏州凭什么压了成都一头？贵阳又是怎么跑到了福州前面？还有临沂和 洛阳，那一名的微弱优势，到底胜在了哪里？ | | 排名 | 爐市 | 排名 | 魔南 | 排名 | 爐市 | 排名 | 爐市 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 1 | 北京市 | 26 | 贸阳市 | ਦੀ | 临沂市 | 76 | 江门市 | | | 2 | 上海市 | 27 | 大连市 | 52 | 沼阳市 | 4 77 | 菏泽市 | | | 3 | 深圳市 | 28 | 福州市 | 53 | 唐山市 | 78 | 湖江市 | | | 4 | 广州市 | 29 | 哈尔滨市 | 54 | 隔州市 | 79 | 四阳市 | | | 5 | 杭州市 | 30 | 嘉兴市 | ਦੇ | 扬州市 | 80 | 连云港市 | | | 6 | 中 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent surpassing of Agricultural Bank's A+H share market value over Industrial and Commercial Bank (ICBC) has sparked discussions on how to measure the true value of global banks, emphasizing that metrics should go beyond mere market capitalization to include factors like operational resilience, risk management, and comprehensive strength [1][2] Group 1: Market Position and Valuation - ICBC's A/H share structure of "75/25" provides institutional resilience and mitigates market volatility, ensuring a balance between domestic capital dominance and international investor engagement [3] - Currently, ICBC's price-to-book ratio stands at 0.71, significantly lower than major international banks, indicating a valuation gap despite a high dividend yield of 5.8% for H shares and 4.2% for A shares, making it an attractive investment option [4] Group 2: Financial Performance and Growth - In the first half of 2025, ICBC reported a revenue of 4090.82 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 1.8%, and a net profit of 1688.03 billion yuan, maintaining its leading position among major banks [9] - The bank's total assets reached 52.32 trillion yuan, with a year-on-year growth of 7.2%, and customer deposits increased by 5.9% to 36.90 trillion yuan, showcasing robust growth [10] Group 3: Risk Management and Stability - ICBC maintains a non-performing loan ratio of 1.33% and a capital adequacy ratio of 19.54%, indicating strong risk management capabilities [11] - The bank's provision coverage ratio stands at 217.71%, providing a substantial buffer against potential loan losses, which is crucial in the context of rising global economic uncertainties [12]