老旧小区加装电梯

Search documents
“垂直困境”:老旧小区加装电梯的“高低之争”
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-07-02 03:04
Core Viewpoint - The installation of elevators in old residential buildings in China is a complex issue that highlights the conflicting interests of residents on different floors, leading to disputes and challenges in implementation [2][9][13] Group 1: Elevator Installation Challenges - The process of adding elevators is often met with resistance from lower-floor residents who perceive it as a threat to their property value and quality of life, while higher-floor residents view it as a necessity [2][5] - Legal disputes frequently arise, with higher-floor residents suing lower-floor residents for obstructing elevator installation, indicating a significant divide in interests [5][6] - The lack of a unified homeowners' organization in large old communities complicates the decision-making process and increases communication costs [5][10] Group 2: Policy and Government Initiatives - The Sichuan provincial government has implemented policies to promote elevator installation, including financial support and regulatory frameworks to facilitate the process [13][15] - Nationally, there is a significant market potential for elevator installation, estimated at approximately 2.6 trillion yuan, which presents opportunities for elevator manufacturers and service providers [15] - The government aims to enhance the living conditions of residents, particularly the elderly, through initiatives that include elevator installations as part of broader urban renewal efforts [13][15] Group 3: Community Dynamics and Social Impact - The social dynamics within communities are strained due to the conflicts over elevator installations, leading to a deterioration of neighborly relations [6][8] - Successful elevator installations can significantly improve residents' quality of life and foster a sense of community, bridging the emotional gap created by building height differences [15] - Innovative community practices, such as pre-defined maintenance funding plans, have emerged to address long-term operational challenges associated with newly installed elevators [11][12]
老旧小区装电梯遇采光纠纷如何解决?最高法发布典型案例
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-05-26 07:25
Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the importance of judicial support in resolving disputes related to the installation of elevators in old residential communities, highlighting the need for mutual understanding among neighbors [1][2][3] - The case involving the installation of an elevator in a residential building in Wuxi illustrates the legal process and community consensus required for such projects, as the majority of homeowners agreed to the installation [2][3] - The court ruling reinforces the principle that neighboring property owners should accommodate reasonable uses of property that enhance living conditions, particularly for vulnerable groups like the elderly and children [2][3] Group 2 - The second case discusses the obligation of property management companies to facilitate the installation of electric vehicle charging stations, reflecting the growing demand for sustainable energy solutions [4][5][6] - The court determined that property management companies must support homeowners' requests for charging facilities, aligning with national energy-saving initiatives and enhancing residents' living experiences [5][6] - This ruling serves as a precedent for addressing the installation challenges of charging infrastructure, promoting environmental sustainability while protecting homeowners' rights [6][7]
果然收不上钱了
猫笔刀· 2024-07-12 14:14
昨晚的文章发出后,有东莞的网友说李嘉诚在当地开发的海逸豪庭,是一个持续多年的项目,拿地成本很低,就算打折卖依然是赚钱的。 我去网上搜了一下,确实,1999年拿的地,然后就一直闲置在手里不开发。甚至2006年的时候因为长期闲置被政府追加过一笔7915万的罚款,可即便交了 罚款,依然开发的很慢,墨墨迹迹拖到2024年依然没有卖完。 这还真就是李嘉诚做生意的风格,之前在北京、上海、广州、重庆、成都也因为拿了地后拖着多年不开发而搞到天怒人怨,真的是一个重利益,责任感淡 漠的商人,也难怪乎社会口碑不好,一直有人对他骂骂咧咧的。 政府把地卖给开发商当然是希望尽快开发建设,李嘉诚捂盘不卖本质上就是拿着筹码让别人给自己抬轿,假如开发商都像他这样,中国的城市化进度连现 在的1/3都没有。 通常富豪的资产达到一定程度后,或多或少会希望得到社会的正面评价和历史肯定,像他们李家首富那么多年,行商还这么锱铢必较,真不多见。很多时 候我都佩服老李头的战略眼光和风险意识,但真不喜欢他这个人。 …… 这几天看到一条新闻,可能在未来具备一定的普遍性。 事情讲的是北京某个老旧小区2018年的时候加装电梯,总成本65万,政府补贴30万,电梯公司自 ...