大家好我是大鱼 谁才是特斯拉 真正的主人？ 是砸下 真金白银 的股东 还是一名法官？ 这正是马斯克 560亿美元薪酬案 终极对决的核心 就在稍早的 德拉瓦州 最高法院庭审上 风向似乎 出现了惊人逆转 大法官的 几个犀利提问 对初审法官 简直是灵魂拷问 也让特斯拉律师 的三大「致命反击」 招招见血 这场世纪 官司的最终章 究竟藏着 什么玄机呢？ 大家不要错过 今天的精彩内容 OK let's go 特斯拉的股票 周三收盘是435.15% 全天上涨了 5.91%美元 涨幅是1.38% 成交量是 7122万股 第一部分 谁是特斯拉 真正的主人？ 今天有个刚出炉的 一个大消息 关于马斯克那 560亿美元薪酬 案的终极对决 就在十几个小时前 在德拉瓦州最高法院 打响了最后一战 我先直接说结论 庭审的气氛 对特斯拉可以说 是相当有利 当然最终判决 还要等最多90天 才能知道 但从现场传出的消息 尤其是几位大法官 向对方律师 提出的问题来看 风向是吹的 这场官司的核心 早就不只是 钱的问题了 而是一个根本问题 一家公司 到底是谁说了算？ 是真金白银投钱 进去的股东 还是一个法官？ 而这一次 在最高法院的法庭上 特斯拉的律师 ...

SAN DIEGO, Oct. 08, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Shareholder rights law firm Johnson Fistel, PLLP has launched an investigation into whether the board members of WideOpenWest, Inc. (NYSE: WOW) breached their fiduciary duties in connection with the proposed sale of the company to DigitalBridge Group, Inc. and Crestview Partners. If you own WOW! shares and believe this proposed transaction undervalues your investment, please consider joining our investigation. To participate or learn more, you can click or copy a ...

SAN DIEGO, Oct. 03, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Shareholder rights law firm Johnson Fistel, PLLP, is investigating whether BellRing Brands, Inc. (NYSE: BRBR), or any of its executive officers, violated securities laws by misrepresenting or failing to timely disclose material information to investors. What if I purchased BRBR securities? If you purchased securities and suffered losses on your investment, join our investigation now: [Click Here to Join the Investigation] Or for more information, contact Jim Bake ...

美国证券交易委员会（SEC）推翻了一项长期政策，允许上市公司禁止股东发起集体诉讼，并要求股东 通过仲裁解决争议。 SEC主席Paul Atkins表示，此举旨在减轻企业合规负担，并使公开上市对更多公司更具吸引力，以促进 IPO复兴。然而，这一政策转变引发了对投资者保护的担忧。民主党议员和投资者权益倡导组织警告 称，此举将削弱股东权利，损害美国资本市场的优势。尽管特拉华州目前禁止在联邦证券索赔中使用仲 裁，但其他州的宽松立场可能为SEC新政提供实践空间。集体诉讼的高额和解金（2024年达37亿美元） 是辩论焦点，反对者认为这比SEC执法行动更能弥补投资者损失。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing conflict between the controlling shareholder of Zhenxin Technology and the board of directors has escalated, leading to the rejection of three key proposals at the 2024 annual general meeting, with the controlling shareholder voting against them [2][4][6]. Group 1: Shareholder Meeting Dynamics - The 2024 annual general meeting of Zhenxin Technology was marked by strict entry protocols, with only shareholders who met specific criteria allowed to attend, leading to tensions and disputes during the meeting [4][6]. - The controlling shareholder, Guoteng Electronics Group, voted against the annual board and supervisory reports, as well as the proposal to appoint an auditing firm, resulting in the failure of these proposals [6][8]. - High Hong, the chairman of Guoteng Electronics Group, claimed that the vote against the proposals was based on substantial reasons rather than emotions, criticizing the board for prioritizing its interests over those of the shareholders [8][16]. Group 2: Board Composition and Governance Issues - A significant point of contention arose when Guoteng Electronics Group's proposal to increase the number of board members was rejected by Zhenxin Technology's board, which led to accusations of governance issues and lack of communication [9][10]. - High Hong expressed concerns about the board's decision-making process, particularly regarding executive compensation amidst a significant decline in net profit, highlighting a 44% drop in profits while the chairman's salary increased by approximately 10.6% [8][9]. - The board's refusal to submit Guoteng Electronics Group's proposals for discussion was seen as a violation of shareholder rights, with accusations of a lack of transparency and communication from the board [10][14]. Group 3: Historical Context and Ongoing Disputes - The conflict between the controlling shareholder and the board has historical roots, with unresolved issues dating back to a protracted legal battle over the dissolution of Guoteng Electronics Group [2][22]. - High Hong noted that he had not participated in any shareholder meetings since 2018, raising concerns about the governance and communication breakdown between the controlling shareholder and the board [16][19]. - The lack of face-to-face communication between the parties over the past nine years has exacerbated tensions, with both sides accusing each other of failing to engage in meaningful dialogue [22][24]. Group 4: Future Outlook and Company Development - Despite the ongoing disputes, both parties expressed a desire for Zhenxin Technology to develop positively, acknowledging the challenges posed by limited financing and operational constraints [26][27]. - The management team is striving to maintain profitability and growth under difficult circumstances, emphasizing the need for substantial investment to capitalize on emerging opportunities in the industry [26][27].