Core Viewpoint - The special shareholders' meeting of China High-Speed Transmission (00658.HK) has been postponed to June 30, 2028, at the request of its major shareholder, Fengsheng Holdings (00607.HK), amidst ongoing conflicts between the two parties [2][5][6]. Group 1: Meeting Postponement - The decision to postpone the special shareholders' meeting was made after careful consideration of recent significant developments, including petitions from approximately 8,000 employees and concerns from major suppliers and customers about potential operational instability [3][7]. - This is the second time the special shareholders' meeting has been postponed to 2028, with the first postponement occurring in June 2023 for similar reasons [4][6]. Group 2: Conflict Background - The conflict between Fengsheng Holdings and China High-Speed Transmission escalated in March 2023, when Fengsheng proposed to remove the chairman and another director from the board, citing changes in the governance of a key subsidiary, Nanjing High-Speed Gear Manufacturing Co., Ltd. [5][6]. - China High-Speed Transmission maintains that it still controls Nanjing High-Speed Gear, despite Fengsheng's claims, and has pointed to significant unpaid receivables as a point of contention [6][7]. Group 3: Legal and Regulatory Considerations - The postponement of the meeting raises questions about compliance with reasonable notification principles, as the announcement was made less than 14 hours before the scheduled meeting, causing inconvenience to shareholders who had already arrived [8][11]. - Legal experts have noted that while Hong Kong company law allows flexibility in meeting arrangements, the significant delay and location choice may violate principles of fairness and reasonable notice to shareholders [9][10].

大家好我是大鱼 谁才是特斯拉 真正的主人？ 是砸下 真金白银 的股东 还是一名法官？ 这正是马斯克 560亿美元薪酬案 终极对决的核心 就在稍早的 德拉瓦州 最高法院庭审上 风向似乎 出现了惊人逆转 大法官的 几个犀利提问 对初审法官 简直是灵魂拷问 也让特斯拉律师 的三大「致命反击」 招招见血 这场世纪 官司的最终章 究竟藏着 什么玄机呢？ 大家不要错过 今天的精彩内容 OK let's go 特斯拉的股票 周三收盘是435.15% 全天上涨了 5.91%美元 涨幅是1.38% 成交量是 7122万股 第一部分 谁是特斯拉 真正的主人？ 今天有个刚出炉的 一个大消息 关于马斯克那 560亿美元薪酬 案的终极对决 就在十几个小时前 在德拉瓦州最高法院 打响了最后一战 我先直接说结论 庭审的气氛 对特斯拉可以说 是相当有利 当然最终判决 还要等最多90天 才能知道 但从现场传出的消息 尤其是几位大法官 向对方律师 提出的问题来看 风向是吹的 这场官司的核心 早就不只是 钱的问题了 而是一个根本问题 一家公司 到底是谁说了算？ 是真金白银投钱 进去的股东 还是一个法官？ 而这一次 在最高法院的法庭上 特斯拉的律师 ...

Core Viewpoint - Johnson Fistel, PLLP has initiated an investigation into potential breaches of fiduciary duties by the board members of WideOpenWest, Inc. (WOW!) regarding the proposed sale of the company to DigitalBridge Group, Inc. and Crestview Partners [1] Company Overview - WideOpenWest, Inc. announced a definitive merger agreement on August 11, 2025, where investment funds affiliated with DigitalBridge and Crestview will acquire all outstanding shares of WOW! common stock not already owned by Crestview for $5.20 per share, valuing the company at approximately $1.5 billion [3][4] - Crestview currently owns about 37% of WOW!'s outstanding shares and controls a majority of the board seats, which raises potential conflicts of interest in the negotiation and approval of the transaction [4] Financial Aspects - The proposed offer of $5.20 per share represents a premium to WOW!'s recent trading price but may still undervalue the company considering its strategic position, assets, and growth potential [4]

Core Viewpoint - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is investigating potential securities law violations by BellRing Brands, Inc. related to misleading statements or failure to disclose material information to investors [1][3]. Investigation Details - The investigation centers on whether BellRing's prior statements were misleading, particularly in light of disclosures made during the Q2 2025 earnings call on May 6, 2025, where the company anticipated a reduction in retailer trade inventory levels for Q3 [3]. - BellRing indicated that several major retailers had reduced their weeks of supply, which is expected to create a mid-single-digit headwind for third-quarter growth [3]. - The company now expects Q3 net sales growth in the low-single-digit range, primarily driven by Premier Protein, while other segments are projected to be flat or decline [3]. Legal Context - Individuals with nonpublic information regarding BellRing are encouraged to assist in the investigation or consider the SEC Whistleblower program, which may offer rewards for original information leading to successful recoveries [4]. Firm Background - Johnson Fistel, PLLP is a nationally recognized shareholder rights law firm with a strong track record in securities class action lawsuits, having recovered approximately $90.725 million for clients in 2024 [6].

Core Viewpoint - The SEC has overturned a long-standing policy allowing public companies to prohibit shareholders from initiating class action lawsuits, instead requiring arbitration for dispute resolution [1] Group 1: SEC Policy Change - The SEC's new policy aims to reduce compliance burdens for companies and make public listings more attractive, potentially reviving IPO activity [1] - SEC Chairman Paul Atkins emphasized that the change is intended to promote a more favorable environment for companies considering going public [1] Group 2: Investor Protection Concerns - The policy shift has raised concerns among Democratic lawmakers and investor advocacy groups, who argue it will weaken shareholder rights and undermine the advantages of U.S. capital markets [1] - Critics highlight that the high settlement amounts from class action lawsuits, projected to reach $3.7 billion in 2024, are more effective in compensating investors than SEC enforcement actions [1] Group 3: State Regulations - While Delaware currently prohibits the use of arbitration in federal securities claims, other states with more lenient stances may provide practical space for the SEC's new policy [1]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing conflict between the controlling shareholder of Zhenxin Technology and the board of directors has escalated, leading to the rejection of three key proposals at the 2024 annual general meeting, with the controlling shareholder voting against them [2][4][6]. Group 1: Shareholder Meeting Dynamics - The 2024 annual general meeting of Zhenxin Technology was marked by strict entry protocols, with only shareholders who met specific criteria allowed to attend, leading to tensions and disputes during the meeting [4][6]. - The controlling shareholder, Guoteng Electronics Group, voted against the annual board and supervisory reports, as well as the proposal to appoint an auditing firm, resulting in the failure of these proposals [6][8]. - High Hong, the chairman of Guoteng Electronics Group, claimed that the vote against the proposals was based on substantial reasons rather than emotions, criticizing the board for prioritizing its interests over those of the shareholders [8][16]. Group 2: Board Composition and Governance Issues - A significant point of contention arose when Guoteng Electronics Group's proposal to increase the number of board members was rejected by Zhenxin Technology's board, which led to accusations of governance issues and lack of communication [9][10]. - High Hong expressed concerns about the board's decision-making process, particularly regarding executive compensation amidst a significant decline in net profit, highlighting a 44% drop in profits while the chairman's salary increased by approximately 10.6% [8][9]. - The board's refusal to submit Guoteng Electronics Group's proposals for discussion was seen as a violation of shareholder rights, with accusations of a lack of transparency and communication from the board [10][14]. Group 3: Historical Context and Ongoing Disputes - The conflict between the controlling shareholder and the board has historical roots, with unresolved issues dating back to a protracted legal battle over the dissolution of Guoteng Electronics Group [2][22]. - High Hong noted that he had not participated in any shareholder meetings since 2018, raising concerns about the governance and communication breakdown between the controlling shareholder and the board [16][19]. - The lack of face-to-face communication between the parties over the past nine years has exacerbated tensions, with both sides accusing each other of failing to engage in meaningful dialogue [22][24]. Group 4: Future Outlook and Company Development - Despite the ongoing disputes, both parties expressed a desire for Zhenxin Technology to develop positively, acknowledging the challenges posed by limited financing and operational constraints [26][27]. - The management team is striving to maintain profitability and growth under difficult circumstances, emphasizing the need for substantial investment to capitalize on emerging opportunities in the industry [26][27].