- The report includes the construction of the RSI (Relative Strength Index) factor, which is calculated using the formula: $ RSI = 100 - 100 / (1 + RS) $, where RS represents the ratio of average gains to average losses over a 12-day period. RSI values above 70 indicate an overbought market, while values below 30 suggest an oversold market [2] - The report also introduces the calculation of net subscription (NETBUY), defined as $ NETBUY(T) = NAV(T) - NAV(T-1) * (1 + R(T)) $, where NETBUY(T) represents the net subscription amount, NAV(T) is the ETF's net asset value on day T, and R(T) is the return on day T [2] - The report tracks various ETFs categorized into "Broad-based" and "Thematic" indices, such as CSI 300, CSI 500, and industry-specific indices like non-bank financials, dividends, and China internet sectors. It provides daily performance metrics, including RSI values, net subscription amounts, and institutional holding percentages [2][4][7] - The RSI factor is evaluated as a useful indicator for identifying market conditions, such as overbought or oversold states, aiding in short-term trading decisions [2] - The net subscription metric is assessed as a valuable measure for understanding fund flows and investor sentiment towards specific ETFs [2] - RSI values for various ETFs range from 11.05 to 77.25, reflecting diverse market conditions across different indices and sectors [4][7] - Net subscription values vary significantly, with some ETFs showing positive inflows while others exhibit outflows, indicating mixed investor sentiment across different funds [4][7]

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a performance comparison benchmark element library for public funds aims to standardize the selection and use of indices, enhancing the comparability of fund performance across products [1][2]. Group 1: Benchmark Library Structure - The benchmark library is divided into two categories: Category One and Category Two, encompassing a total of 141 indices, including 69 core indices in Category One and 72 indices in Category Two, covering mainstream investment targets in A-shares and Hong Kong stocks [1][2]. - Category One includes indices that are highly representative and widely recognized, encouraging fund managers to select and use them in developing actively managed funds [2][3]. - Category Two focuses on innovation and differentiation, including indices with certain usage frequency and larger market capitalization, effectively supplementing Category One [1][2]. Group 2: Inclusion Criteria for Indices - Category Two indices must meet several standards, such as having a single constituent's weight not exceeding 20% for broad-based indices and at least 30 constituents for non-broad-based indices [3][4]. - Category One indices must meet Category Two standards and have an average free float market capitalization of at least 10,000 billion yuan over the past year, along with other relevant standards [3][4]. Group 3: Selection Principles for Different Index Types - For broad-based indices, selection is based on representativeness, investability, and coverage, requiring at least 10 actively managed funds to use the index as a benchmark [4][5]. - Industry theme indices must cover key strategic emerging industries or areas strongly supported by national policies, with a focus on market recognition and expert committee approval [4][5]. - Strategy indices should clearly reflect specific strategy factors or styles, with sufficient differentiation in risk and return profiles [5][6]. Group 4: Dynamic Adjustment of the Benchmark Library - The benchmark library is not static; it will undergo quarterly evaluations for the entry and exit of indices and semi-annual assessments for adjustments between the two categories [7]. - Indices in Category Two that meet Category One standards may be promoted to Category One, while those in Category One that no longer meet standards may be demoted [7]. - The expert group responsible for these evaluations consists of representatives from various industry institutions, ensuring a fair and transparent process [7].

Core Viewpoint - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has solicited public opinions on the "Guidelines for Performance Comparison Benchmarks of Publicly Raised Securities Investment Funds," while the Asset Management Association of China (AMAC) has issued a performance comparison benchmark element library to institutions [1] Group 1: Benchmark Libraries - The performance comparison benchmark element library is divided into two categories: Category One and Category Two, which include broad-based indices, industry thematic indices, and strategy indices [1] - Category One contains 69 indices, while Category Two includes 72 indices, covering various market types such as domestic cross-market, domestic single-market, and specific sectors [1] Group 2: Guidelines and Regulations - The Category One library includes performance comparison benchmarks that are highly representative and widely recognized, encouraging fund managers to select and use them in a standardized manner when developing actively managed funds [1] - Fund managers intending to use indices from Category Two must explain their considerations during product registration, and those using indices outside the benchmark library must also provide justification and ensure compliance with the relevant guidelines [1]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current investment landscape in China, highlighting the balance between high-growth sectors and stable broad-based indices as investors navigate market volatility [1][2]. Group 1: Broad-based Indices - Broad-based indices serve as a stable foundation for investment, reflecting the overall market performance and helping to mitigate risks associated with concentrated investments [2][3]. - The CSI A500 Index exemplifies a balanced approach, covering all primary and secondary industries, with significant weights in electronics, power equipment, pharmaceuticals, and computers, which are expected to benefit from profit recovery [3]. - Since July, the CSI A500 Index has increased nearly 10%, with the A500 ETF (159361) being the only product in its category to achieve net inflows of approximately 3 billion yuan, bringing its total size to over 18 billion yuan [3]. Group 2: Thematic Indices - For investors seeking higher returns, thematic indices focusing on specific sectors can complement broad-based indices, allowing for a more dynamic investment strategy [4]. - The humanoid robotics sector has gained significant attention, with the corresponding ETF tracking the National Robotics Industry Index showing a cumulative increase of 27.8% over four months, outperforming similar indices [4][5]. - The innovative drug sector has also seen remarkable growth, with the Hang Seng Innovative Drug Index experiencing a year-to-date increase of over 110%, driven by a surge in overseas licensing transactions [5][6]. - The Hang Seng Innovative Drug ETF (159316) tracks an index that exclusively focuses on innovative drug companies, providing a pure investment vehicle for this rapidly growing sector [6].