Workflow
证券投资者索赔
icon
Search documents
天风证券被立案,股民索赔可期
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-01 02:55
于天风证券涉嫌信息披露违法违规,被中国证监会立案调查,为维护证券投资者合法权益,上海汉联律 师事务所宋一欣律师向曾经购买过天风证券的证券投资者展开诉讼代理征集,代理投资者索赔诉讼,权 益受损的证券投资者可以向前述律师进行索赔登记。(宋一欣律师专栏) 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 2025年11月29日,天风证券(维权)股份有限公司(简称:天风证券,代码:601162)发布《关于收到 中国证券监督管理委员会立案告知书的公告》。因涉嫌信息披露违法违规、违法提供融资,根据《中华 人民共和国证券法》《中华人民共和国行政处罚法》等法律法规,中国证监会决定对公司立案。 根据《民法典》、《证券法》及最高人民法院的关于虚假陈述民事赔偿司法解释的规定,上市公司、控 股股东、实际控制人、董监高人员及其中介机构等因虚假陈述等的证券欺诈行为导致证券投资者权益受 损的,应承担民事赔偿责任,赔偿范围包括:投资差额、佣金、印花税等。权益受损的证券投资者可以 向有管辖权的法院提起民事赔偿诉讼。 2.以行政处罚决定为特征的前置条件取消后,投资者虽然可以直接诉讼,但由于调查手段有限,以立 案调查通知或行政监管措施决定作为直接 ...
立方数科被预处罚,股民索赔可期
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-12-01 02:52
由于立方数科涉嫌信息披露违法违规,被中国证监会预处罚,为维护证券投资者合法权益,上海汉联律 师事务所宋一欣律师向曾经购买过立方数科的证券投资者展开诉讼代理征集,代理投资者索赔诉讼,权 益受损的证券投资者可以向前述律师进行索赔登记。(宋一欣律师专栏) 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 宋一欣律师认为,立方数科案的索赔条件为:2022年4月25日至2025年4月28日期间买入立方数科股票或 债券等证券市场公开发行产品,并在2025年4月29日及之后卖出或继续持有的受损投资者,可以办理索 赔登记。(立方数科维权入口) 2025年11月29日,立方数科股份有限公司 (简称:立方数科、ST立方(维权),代码:300344)发布 《关于公司及相关人员收到行政处罚及市场禁入事先告知》及重大违法强制退市风险提示的公告》。 经中国证监会安徽证监局查明,立方数科等涉嫌违法的事实如下:立方数科通过开展代理业务、融资性 贸易、虚假贸易虚增营业收入、 营业成本、利润总额,导致立方数科披露的2021年至2023年年度报告 存在虚假记载。其中,2021年,虚增营业收入279,726,668.85元,占当年营业收入的50.0 ...
锦盛新材被处罚,股民索赔可期
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-11-17 02:01
登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 2025年11月15日,浙江锦盛新材(维权)料股份有限公司(简称:锦盛新材,代码:300849)发布《关 于公司及相关当事人收到行政处罚决定书的公告》。 经中国证监会浙江监管局查明,当事人涉嫌违法的事实如下:2021年12月 6日,锦盛新材与浙江宏祥建 设工程有限公司(以下简称浙江宏祥)签订《建设工程施工合同》,约定浙江宏祥承包"年产 6,000 万 套化妆品包装容器建设项目"厂房建设(以下简称 6,000 万套项目)。同日,浙江宏祥与阮钟炎签订 《工程项目内部承包经营协议》,将上述厂房建设交由阮钟炎实际承包。浙江宏祥仅按合同金额的一定 比例收取管理费,阮钟炎控制项目章、自主雇 员建设、自主采购与付款、自主与锦盛新材对接请款、 自负盈亏,实质系阮钟炎与锦盛新材开展业务。 经查,阮钟炎系锦盛新材实际控制人兼董事长阮荣涛 的侄子,阮荣涛正因为其与自己的叔侄关系,才指定将6,000万套项目交由阮钟炎实际承包,并要求浙 江宏祥在合同签订等安排中予以配合。根据《上市公司信息披露管理办法》第六十二条,阮钟炎系锦盛 新材关联自然人,上述交易构成关联交易。2022年上述关联交 ...
白银有色被处罚,股民索赔可期
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-11-03 02:51
2025年10月25日,白银有色(维权)集团股份有限公司(简称:白银有色,代码:601212)发布《关于 收到中国证券监督管理委员会甘肃监管局行政处罚决定书的公告》。 (律师对本案的提示与说明) 1.上述提示的索赔条件仅供参考,不涉及投资者任何证券投资决策和证券买卖建议。索赔的最终条件 将根据中国证监会行政处罚的结论进一步调整,并以相关法院最终生效的判决所认定的法律时点、赔付 对象、赔付范围、赔付标准、会计计算方式为准。 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 经中国证监会甘肃监管局查明,白银有色涉嫌违法的事实如下:2017年8月至2018年3月,白银有色陆续 购买30亿元理财产品,2019年上述理财产品未按期收回,至2024年12月收回本金及相关收益。白银有色 在2019年至2024年年度报告其他流动资产部分披露了30亿元理财产品的期初、期末余额,但未按照《公 开发行证券的公司信息披露内容与格式准则第2号——年度报告的内容与格式(2017年修订)》(证监 会公告〔2017〕17号)第四十一条第三项、《公开发行证券的公司信息披露内容与格式准则第2号—— 年度报告的内容与格式(2021年修订)》(证监 ...
东尼电子被预处罚,股民索赔可期
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-11-03 02:51
登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 2025年10月30日,浙江东尼电子股份有限公司(简称:东尼电子,代码:603595)发布《关于收到中国 证监会浙江监管局 <行政处罚事先告知书> 的公告》。 经中国证监会浙江证监局查明,东尼电子涉嫌违法的事实如下:一、东尼电子重大合同进展披露不及时 (事项一)。2023 年1月9日,东尼电子控股子公司湖州东尼半导体科技有限公司(以下简称东尼半导 体)与广东天域半导体股份有限公司(以下简称广东天域)签订《采购合同》,约定东尼半导体于2023 年5-12月期间按月向广东天域交付13.5万片6英寸碳化硅衬底,合同金额6.75亿元,占公司最近一期经审 计主营业务收入的51.84%。同月10日,公司《关于签订重大合同的公告》进行了披露。合同履行期 间,东尼半导体与广东天域的每月实际交付数量均未达到合同约定交付计划数量。截至2023年10月末, 东尼半导体仅完成前述合同交付进度的6.74%,已可以预见合同约定的交付计划无法按期完成。公司未 及时披露重大合同无法按期完成的事项,迟至2024年1月6日才在《关于重大合同的进展公告》中披露该 事项。二、东尼电子2022年年度报 ...
三七互娱被预处罚,股民索赔可期
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-11-03 02:51
Core Points - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) has issued a notice of administrative penalty to Sanqi Interactive Entertainment, citing multiple violations related to false disclosures in annual reports from 2014 to 2021 [1] - The violations include misrepresentation of shareholder holdings, failure to disclose related party transactions, and significant omissions in financial reporting [1] - The CSRC plans to impose penalties on Sanqi Interactive, its actual controller and chairman Li Weiwei, and other responsible personnel, including warnings and fines [1] Summary by Sections Company Violations - Sanqi Interactive Entertainment's annual reports from 2014 to 2020 contained false records regarding shareholder holdings [1] - The 2018 annual report failed to disclose the acquisition of Jiangsu Aurora's equity as a related party transaction, representing a major omission [1] - The indirect acquisition of Guangzhou Sanqi's equity in 2020 was also classified as a related party transaction, with false disclosures in a temporary announcement and the annual report [1] - Annual reports from 2018 to 2021 did not disclose related party transactions with Hainan Liyuan and other companies, indicating significant omissions [1] Legal Implications - Following the CSRC's notice, a lawyer from Shanghai Hanlian Law Firm is gathering claims from investors who purchased Sanqi Interactive's securities between March 31, 2015, and June 27, 2023, for potential civil compensation [2] - Investors who suffered losses can register for claims if they sold or continued to hold their securities after June 28, 2023 [2] - The conditions for claims may be adjusted based on the final conclusions of the CSRC's administrative penalties and court rulings [3]
清越科技被立案,股民索赔可期
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-11-03 02:50
宋一欣律师认为,清越科技案的索赔条件为:2025年11月1日前买入清越科技股票或债券等证券市场公 开发行产品,并在2025年11月1日及之后卖出或继续持有的受损投资者,可以办理索赔登记。 (律师对本案的提示与说明) 1.上述提示的索赔条件仅供参考,不涉及投资者任何证券投资决策和证券买卖建议。索赔的最终条件 将根据中国证监会行政处罚的结论进一步调整,并以相关法院最终生效的判决所认定的法律时点、赔付 对象、赔付范围、赔付标准、会计计算方式为准。 2.以行政处罚决定为特征的前置条件取消后,投资者虽然可以直接诉讼,但由于调查手段有限,以立 案调查通知或行政监管措施决定作为直接诉讼的依据起诉存在败诉的风险,所以,我作为专业律师提示 投资者:行政处罚决定仍然应当作为提起诉讼的必要前提之一。 登录新浪财经APP 搜索【信披】查看更多考评等级 2025年11月1日,苏州清越光电科技股份有限公司(简称:清越科技(维权),代码:688496)发布 《关于公司收到中国证券监督管理委员会立案告知书暨风险提示的公告》,称因公司涉嫌定期报告等财 务数据虚假记载,根据《中华人民共和国证券法》的有关规定,中国证券监督管理委员会决定对公司立 ...
美晨科技被处罚,股民索赔可期
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-11-03 02:43
Core Points - Shandong Meichen Technology Co., Ltd. has been penalized by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for financial misconduct involving inflated revenues and profits from 2014 to 2018 [1][2][3] Summary by Sections Company Misconduct - Meichen Technology acquired 100% of Hangzhou Saishi Garden Group Co., Ltd. in September 2014, which led to the latter becoming a wholly-owned subsidiary [2] - From 2014 to 2018, Saishi Garden inflated construction costs and completion percentages through false procurement and sales, resulting in a total inflated revenue of 1,437.78 million yuan and inflated profits of 657.96 million yuan [2] - The inflated revenues and profits for each year were as follows: - 2014: Revenue inflated by 23.66 million yuan (2.06% of reported revenue), profit inflated by 22.93 million yuan (17.91% of reported profit) - 2015: Revenue inflated by 372.64 million yuan (20.67%), profit inflated by 188.54 million yuan (75.64%) - 2016: Revenue inflated by 725.61 million yuan (24.60%), profit inflated by 259.58 million yuan (49.78%) - 2017: Revenue inflated by 215.19 million yuan (5.53%), profit inflated by 117.43 million yuan (15.49%) - 2018: Revenue inflated by 100.68 million yuan (2.88%), profit inflated by 69.49 million yuan (15.58%) [2] Regulatory Actions - The CSRC's Shandong Regulatory Bureau has ordered Meichen Technology and responsible personnel to rectify the situation, issue warnings, and impose fines [2] - The company has faced multiple notifications from the CSRC regarding the investigation and penalties, with the latest being an administrative penalty decision [3] Investor Implications - Investors who suffered losses due to the company's misconduct can seek civil compensation, which includes investment differences, commissions, stamp duties, and interest losses [3] - A lawyer from Shanghai Hanlian Law Firm is collecting claims from affected investors who purchased Meichen Technology's securities between March 12, 2015, and March 31, 2025 [3]
上海新阳被监管,股民索赔可期
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-10-27 05:30
Core Viewpoint - Shanghai Xinyang Semiconductor Materials Co., Ltd. has been found to have violated information disclosure regulations, leading to potential civil compensation claims from affected investors [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Findings - The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) discovered that Shanghai Xinyang failed to recognize the value and fair value changes of a financial derivative product worth 100 million yuan, resulting in an inflated net profit of approximately 13.53 million yuan for the first quarter report of 2024 [1]. - The company disclosed a correction announcement on August 17, 2024, regarding its first-quarter report for 2024, which did not include the necessary financial information related to the derivative [1]. Group 2: Investor Compensation - A lawyer from Shanghai Hanlian Law Firm is collecting claims from investors who purchased Shanghai Xinyang's securities between April 20, 2024, and August 16, 2024, and either sold or continued to hold them after August 17, 2024 [2]. - The conditions for compensation claims will be adjusted based on the conclusions of the CSRC's administrative penalties and the final court rulings regarding the legal time points, compensation objects, and standards [2]. Group 3: Legal Process and Requirements - The progress of civil compensation lawsuits will not be affected by whether the company is delisted, but entering bankruptcy proceedings may significantly impact the lawsuit's progress [3]. - Investors wishing to register for compensation must provide specific documentation, including a copy of their ID, original securities account information confirmation, and original transaction records [3].
海南华铁被监管,股民索赔可期
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-10-14 02:05
Group 1 - Hainan Huate Technology announced the termination of the "Computing Power Service Agreement" with Hangzhou X Company, citing significant changes in market conditions since the contract was signed [1] - The original agreement, signed on March 5, 2025, was valued at 3.69 billion yuan (including tax) for a service period of five years, but no purchase orders were received since the signing [1] - The Shanghai Stock Exchange issued a regulatory letter to Hainan Huate regarding the termination of the major contract, emphasizing the need for compliance from the company and its executives [1] Group 2 - Hainan Huate is facing potential legal actions from investors due to alleged violations of information disclosure laws, with a lawyer actively seeking to represent affected investors for compensation claims [2] - The conditions for investor compensation claims include purchases made between March 5, 2025, and September 30, 2025, with claims possible for those who sold or continued to hold shares after October 1, 2025 [2] - Legal proceedings may be influenced by the company's administrative penalties, and investors are advised to consider these factors before initiating lawsuits [3]