▲ "一带一路"是国家重大战略名称，禁止用于企业字号！ 共建"一带一路"是我国扩大对外开放的重大战略举措和经济外交的顶层设计。《企业名称登记管理规定实施办法》第十六条明确要求，企业名称不得使用 与国家重大战略政策相关的文字。除了禁止使用与国家重大战略政策相关的内容和文字，违反《企业名称登记管理规定》第十一条、《企业名称登记管理 规定实施办法》第十六条有关禁用情形的词汇也不宜用作企业字号。企业名称申报系统提供查询、比对和筛查服务，并依据禁限用规则、相同相近规则等 作出提示。申请人应根据提示申报，避免使用网络热词，以提高名称登记通过率。 小李想和朋友成立一家物流公司，关注到国家推进"一带一路"建设，认为既契合时事热点又关联物流行业，于是想起名叫**一带一路物流有限公司。因申 报名称中含有"一带一路"字样，申请被驳回。登记机关告知：申报的名称不符合企业名称登记管理相关规定要求，建议更换字号后重新申报，并提醒更换 合规字号，避免蹭热点、用热词。 ▲ 登记机关依职责对申请名称进行审查，重点核查是否含有禁限用词语、是否符合登记管理规定，并对名称整体进行综合研判，不符合规定的不予登 记。 小张发现某公司研发的科技项目特别火 ...

据悉，2023年11月，吉林省某有限公司因合同纠纷被九台法院判令向长春市二道区某设备商行支付钱款 及案件受理费。该公司上诉后，竟在二审期间向长春市市场监督管理局九台分局申请简易注销，提交的 《简易注销全体投资人承诺书》隐瞒未决诉讼及大额债务，谎称"无债权债务、无未了结事务"，并于 2024年2月获准注销。 2024年10月，案涉商行向九台市监局投诉，称该公司提交虚假材料骗取注销登记。九台市监局经调查， 多次尝试联系该公司未果后，于2025年1月作出《撤销登记决定书》。该公司不服，以程序违法、缺乏 事实依据为由诉至法院，请求撤销该决定书并准予注销。 中新网吉林新闻2月12日电 (刘夏)为维护市场登记管理秩序、保障债权人合法权益，近日，长春市九台 区人民法院审结一起公司诉市场监管部门工商登记纠纷案，驳回原告全部诉讼请求，明确虚假简易注销 登记可依法撤销。 关于程序合法性，相关法律法规未将听证作为撤销虚假登记的必经程序，九台市监局穷尽送达方式仍无 法联系该公司后，通过国家企业信用信息公示系统公告送达，符合法定程序；审批表无签字属程序瑕 疵，不影响撤销决定合法性。综上，依照《中华人民共和国行政诉讼法》第六十九条，法院 ...

Core Viewpoint - The rise of malicious returns in e-commerce, particularly in the clothing sector, is causing significant challenges for merchants, leading to increased operational costs and potential losses [2][6][11] Group 1: Malicious Returns Impact on Merchants - Merchants are facing difficulties with malicious returns, where items are returned after being worn or damaged, leading to financial losses [3][6] - A case study highlighted a merchant who experienced a high return rate, with items returned after being used for performances, resulting in unsellable goods [3][4] - The operational costs associated with returns, including logistics and handling, are increasing, which could lead to price hikes for consumers or threaten the viability of small businesses [6][11] Group 2: Legal and Regulatory Framework - Current laws, including the Civil Code and the upcoming Consumer Rights Protection Law, emphasize the principle of good faith, aiming to prevent the abuse of return policies by consumers [8][14] - Legal experts suggest that consumers who exploit return policies for profit may face legal consequences, including compensation for damages [8][14] - There is a call for improved regulatory measures to balance consumer rights with merchant protections, potentially through a consumer credit system to identify repeat offenders [13][14] Group 3: Merchant Strategies to Combat Returns - Merchants are adopting strategies such as using oversized tags to deter consumers from trying on items and returning them, although this may affect customer experience [10][12] - The effectiveness of these measures is still under evaluation, as they may lead to reduced sales and increased costs for merchants [12][13] - Experts recommend that merchants document the condition of items before shipping to strengthen their position in disputes over returns [9][14]

Group 1 - The article discusses the legal consequences of using false identities to register companies, emphasizing that such actions can lead to administrative penalties and legal liabilities, including civil, administrative, and criminal responsibilities [5][6]. - It highlights the importance of honesty in business registration, stating that submitting false information can result in penalties such as fines and revocation of business licenses, as outlined in various laws including the Company Law and the Market Entity Registration Management Regulations [6][7]. - A case study is presented where a company owner fabricated information to apply for a business name that did not comply with regulations, illustrating the risks associated with dishonest practices in company registration [7]. Group 2 - The article includes a reminder that the registration process should adhere to principles of honesty and integrity, encouraging businesses to create unique commercial identities based on trust for long-term development [6]. - It references specific legal provisions that allow taxpayers to apply for tax refunds in cases where vehicles or vessels have been stolen, scrapped, or lost, provided they have the necessary documentation [14]. - The article mentions the regulations regarding the duration of the fixed tax collection period, which is determined by provincial tax authorities but cannot exceed one year [17].

Core Viewpoint - The court ruled that intentionally concealing pre-existing medical conditions violates the principle of good faith, which constitutes an exemption from insurance liability [1][2]. Group 1: Case Summary - The case involved an employee, Fan, who concealed his history of epilepsy when applying for insurance coverage, leading to the rejection of his claim [1][2]. - Fan was diagnosed with epilepsy in 2023 and sought insurance compensation for medical expenses amounting to 82,800 yuan (approximately 12,000 USD) after surgery [2]. - The insurance company denied the claim based on the findings that Fan had previously been hospitalized for epilepsy in 2014 and 2020, indicating intentional concealment of his medical history [2]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The court emphasized that under the Labor Contract Law of the People's Republic of China, employees are required to disclose relevant personal information truthfully to their employers [3]. - The ruling serves as a warning to employees about the consequences of providing false information, which can lead to financial burdens in the event of medical claims [3].