全国人大常委会法制工作委员会今天（23日）举行记者会。记者会上介绍，生态环境法典法律责任和附 则编草案将提请本次常委会二次审议，草案将进一步落实过罚相当原则。 五是完善生活垃圾处理单位未按照规定开展监测等法律责任，使企业事业单位有关监测的法律责任大体 平衡。 六是参照危险废物有关违法的罚款数额，对放射性污染防治相关罚款数额进行调整。 （文章来源：央视新闻） 二是将行政处罚五年追责期限的适用情形，明确为造成环境污染、生态破坏等危害后果的违法行为。 三是总结执法实践情况，对部分条文中的行政处罚规定，区分不同违法主体、违法情形，调整计罚标 准，作出相应修改完善。 四是将有关污染物排放口、编制生态环境影响报告、生态环境事故等方面的法律责任予以统一。 记者会上，发言人王翔介绍，常委会初次审议期间以及征求各方面意见过程中，有意见提出，污染防治 领域各单行法制定时间不同，有关罚款金额的规定区别较大，在编纂法典时应当充分考虑不同污染防治 领域罚款金额的平衡，要进一步落实过罚相当原则，避免"小过重罚"和"大过轻罚"。对此草案进一步修 改完善，要确保行政处罚与违法行为的事实、性质、情节以及危害程度相当，同时保持相类似违法行为 之 ...

将对化学物质、电磁辐射、光等新污染防治作出针对性规定 南都记者关注到，生态环境法典污染防治编草案设有九个分编，也是法典草案条款最多的一编。 南都讯 记者程姝雯 发自北京 生态环境法典污染防治编草案即将提交10月24日至28日召开的十四届全国 人大常委会第十八次会议审议。这一分编的内容，涉及公众关注的空气污染、水污染等生态环境污染防 治的制度性规定，备受社会各界关注。 今天（10月23日），南都记者从全国人大常委会法制工作委员会举行发言人记者会现场获悉，在今年4 月初次审议的基础上，根据各方面意见，污染防治编草案二次审议稿将做出多项修改，包括充实污染防 治工作总体要求，增加改善生态环境质量、保障公众健康的内容；加大农业农村污染防治资金保障力 度，加强农业面源污染防治；进一步加强重金属污染防治；完善挥发性有机物污染防治标准，加强重型 货车大气污染防治和机动车船等排放检验造假的监管，明确船舶的大气污染物排放状况等监督检查要 求；增加地下水状况调查评价的内容；进一步加强进入内河船舶的水污染防治；完善固体废物污染防治 规划和工业固体废物污染防治标准，强化建筑垃圾污染防治；明确取得放射性污染监测机构资质的条 件；完善化学 ...

加大农业农村污染防治资金保障力度 2025年4月，十四届全国人大常委会第十五次会议对生态环境法典草案进行了初次审议。根据各方面意 见，污染防治编草案二次审议稿拟作主要修改。充实污染防治工作总体要求，增加改善生态环境质量、 保障公众健康的内容。加大农业农村污染防治资金保障力度，加强农业面源污染防治。 同时，进一步加强重金属污染防治。完善挥发性有机物污染防治标准，加强重型货车大气污染防治和机 动车船等排放检验造假的监管，明确船舶的大气污染物排放状况等监督检查要求。增加地下水状况调查 评价的内容。 进一步加强进入内河船舶的水污染防治。完善固体废物污染防治规划和工业固体废物污染防治标准，强 化建筑垃圾污染防治。明确取得放射性污染监测机构资质的条件。完善化学物质污染防治制度。 针对地下水保护、油烟污染等突出问题完善相关法律责任 根据各方面意见，法律责任和附则编草案二次审议稿拟作主要修改。进一步落实过罚相当原则。做好相 类似违法行为之间法律责任的平衡。根据总则编、污染防治编的修改情况进行动态调整。 适当充实生态保护、绿色低碳发展方面的法律责任。针对地下水保护、油烟污染、光污染等方面突出问 题，完善相关法律责任。进一步完善 ...

"我们认真研究了上述意见，对草案进一步修改完善，确保行政处罚与违法行为的事实、性质、情节以及危害程度相当，同时保持相类似违法行为之间法律 责任的平衡，"王翔指出，主要有以下几个方面修改： 一是增加从重处罚、从轻减轻处罚、不予处罚等一般适用规定。二是将行政处罚五年追责期限的适用情形，明确为造成环境污染、生态破坏等危害后果的违 法行为。三是总结执法实践情况，对部分条文中的行政处罚规定，区分不同违法主体、违法情形，调整计罚标准，作出相应修改完善。四是将有关污染物排 放口、编制生态环境影响报告、生态环境事故等方面的法律责任予以统一。五是完善生活垃圾处理单位未按照规定开展监测等法律责任，使企业事业单位有 关监测的法律责任大体平衡。六是参照危险废物有关违法的罚款数额，对放射性污染防治相关罚款数额进行调整。 为防止生态环境领域"小过重罚"和"大过轻罚"，生态环境法典草案有何考量？针对第一财经记者的上述提问，王翔在回应时表示，常委会初次审议期间以及 征求各方面意见过程中，有意见提出，污染防治领域各单行法制定时间不同，有关罚款金额的规定区别较大，在编纂法典时应当充分考虑不同污染防治领域 罚款金额的平衡，要进一步落实过罚相当原则 ...

在大数据时代，如果一个人不慎越过法律的边界，会背负什么样的长远后果？更确切地说，如果一个人违反了《治安管理处罚法》，他/她的工作、生活 乃至子女的人生是否有可能因那一步之差而偏离理想的轨道？ 答案是：极有可能。 你或许自诩遵纪守法，笃定这与自己无关，但我们所讨论的违反《治安管理处罚法》等轻微违法行为，距离普通人并不远： 闯红灯，或是坐副驾没系安全带，违反了《道路交通安全法》。 再严重点的，你拿了别人的外卖、你拆错了他人的快递、你被邻居投诉扰民、你在微信群里转发了不实消息，都可能被视为违反《治安管理处罚法》，轻 则警告、罚款，重则拘留。这些都属于行政违法。根据国家统计局数据计算，每年有超800万人受到治安管理处罚。 公安档案里自此留下一笔。不要小看它：你想当公务员、考教师编、进央国企，很可能通不过政审；你去私企求职，开不出单位要求的无违法犯罪记录证 明；未来你的孩子考公时，也可能因为你年轻时的一次疏失被挡在门外。 央视还披露过一个案例：几年来，26岁的小王在高铁站、飞机场刷身份证时，读卡器总会发出刺耳的警报声。旁人的目光迅速聚拢在她脸上，让她有种 被"拿出来鞭笞一顿的感觉"。还有次，小王被辅警拦下来查身份证，对 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the ongoing efforts to strengthen the rule of law in market regulation, highlighting the importance of legal, credit, and intelligent supervision to address deep-seated contradictions and issues in the market [1] Group 1: Market Regulation Focus Areas - Key areas for enhancing market regulation include supporting the construction of a unified national market, addressing local protectionism, and tackling "involution" competition through effective legal governance [2] - There is a need for proactive responses to public concerns regarding food safety, drug safety, and industrial product quality [2] Group 2: Legal Framework Improvement - The draft amendment to the Price Law, the first since its implementation in 1998, aims to provide legal grounds for addressing "involution" competition by defining low-cost dumping practices [3] - The amendment seeks to establish a long-term governance mechanism to prevent irrational market competition driven by capital excess [3] Group 3: Regulatory Adaptation to New Business Models - The market regulatory authority is working to fill regulatory gaps for new business models, such as live e-commerce, and is enhancing the regulatory framework for platform algorithms [4] - This reflects the continuous improvement and dynamic updating of the market regulatory legal system [4] Group 4: Enforcement and Social Impact - The effectiveness of enforcement is crucial, as arbitrary enforcement and excessive penalties can undermine public trust in regulatory bodies [5] - The case of the "frog soup" incident illustrates issues of improper enforcement and abuse of power, highlighting the need for a balanced approach to regulation [5] - The regulatory authority plans to implement a list of first-time non-penalties and minor exemptions, aiming for a fair and humane enforcement approach [6]

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the systemic discrimination and lifelong consequences faced by individuals with administrative violations, emphasizing the need for legal reforms to address these issues and promote fairness in the justice system [4][16][84]. Group 1: Impact of Administrative Violations - Individuals with administrative violations experience significant emotional distress, including depression and regret, due to the stigma attached to their records [3][21]. - A case study illustrates how a minor traffic violation can lead to severe repercussions, such as being denied school admission due to a child's administrative record [9][11]. - The article highlights that administrative violations can have lifelong impacts, affecting employment opportunities and social standing, akin to a modern form of branding [13][16][62]. Group 2: Legal and Social Implications - The article critiques the principle of proportionality in punishment, arguing that the penalties for minor infractions often exceed the severity of the offense, leading to unjust lifelong consequences [17][50]. - It points out that the legal system often fails to differentiate between minor infractions and serious crimes, resulting in disproportionate penalties for individuals with administrative violations [11][51]. - The author calls for the removal of administrative records from public access and the establishment of a system to seal such records, particularly for minor offenses [64][76]. Group 3: Public Awareness and Legal Reforms - The article notes a growing public awareness and advocacy for reforming laws related to administrative violations, as evidenced by the significant public feedback during the revision of the Public Security Administration Punishment Law [81][83]. - The recent legal amendments indicate a shift towards protecting the rights of individuals with administrative violations, including provisions for sealing records [76][78]. - The author emphasizes the importance of continued public engagement and advocacy to ensure that legal reforms are implemented effectively and that the dignity of all individuals, including those with violations, is upheld [84][86].

Core Viewpoint - The establishment of a sealing system for minor criminal records is a key reform goal aimed at enhancing human rights judicial protection in China, as outlined in the recent document by the Central Committee [1][2]. Group 1: Legal Framework - The newly revised Public Security Administration Punishment Law formally establishes the sealing system for unlawful records, ensuring that such records are not disclosed to any individual or organization, except for specific state agencies for case handling [1]. - The connection between administrative violations and minor criminal offenses is highlighted, with the Public Security Administration Punishment Law often referred to as "small criminal law," indicating a close relationship between the two legal frameworks [2]. Group 2: Social Implications - The sealing system for minor criminal records is essential to prevent lifelong societal stigma for individuals with minor offenses, which can lead to significant social and economic disadvantages for them and their families [3][4]. - The implementation of this sealing system is expected to promote a more rational public perception of minor crimes, reducing systemic discrimination and fostering a more inclusive and harmonious society [4].