据媒体披露，近期多地银行业协会通过召开座谈会、发布自律公约等形式，部署整治金融业反"内卷"工 作；日前已有多家银行在年中经营工作会议中部署安排了反"内卷"工作。 金融业的"内卷式"竞争，主要表现为同质化竞争、过度降价，以及过分关注短期业绩，忽视风险管控， 容易引发行业效率下降，甚至形成恶性循环。其危害相当严重，最直接的后果是在净息差不断收窄的态 势下，推高了金融业筹资成本，导致经营利润减少，盈利能力和抗风险能力下降，可能加大金融风险隐 患，甚至恶化全行业经营生态。"内卷式"竞争是一种变异的金融乱象，如果金融业不顾后果盲目扩张规 模和实施服务"倾销"，致使低价劣质竞争泛滥，将削弱行业创新动能，给金融业高质量发展制造障碍。 诱发金融业"内卷式"竞争的原因有多方面。其一，经济金融资源"蛋糕"总量不足，各金融机构为挣得更 多"蛋糕"，受规模和业绩等考核压力影响，不惜降价"销售"，比如消费贷、经营贷利率越来越低，还 有"手工结算"等非正常经营操作。其二，金融机构数量多，一定程度上存在"僧多粥少"问题，服务同质 化明显。其三，一些大型企业在与金融机构博弈中话语权较高，利用金融机构之间的非理性竞争，迫使 金融机构提供降价服 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese financial industry is undergoing a "de-involution" movement aimed at preventing vicious price wars and unfair competition, with regulatory bodies and financial institutions actively responding to optimize market competition and enhance service capabilities for the real economy [1][2][6]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The Central Political Bureau of the Communist Party of China has emphasized the need to advance the construction of a unified national market and to govern disorderly competition in enterprises [1]. - The China Futures Association has released a draft regulation targeting improper competitive behaviors in futures brokerage, marking the first industry standard in the financial "de-involution" movement [2]. - Local regulatory bodies, such as the Guangdong Financial Regulatory Bureau, have issued negative lists for "involution-style" competition and are guiding industry associations to develop self-regulatory agreements against unfair competition [2]. Group 2: Industry Responses - Financial institutions, particularly banks, have quickly responded to the "de-involution" initiative, with several banks holding meetings to promote the concept and implement measures against "involution-style" competition [4]. - Experts suggest that banks must shift from a scale-oriented approach to a value-oriented strategy, integrating innovation, risk control, and organizational capabilities to enhance core competitiveness [4]. Group 3: Sector-Specific Measures - In the securities sector, there is a focus on improving the underwriting process for bonds, with the interbank market association strengthening self-regulation and increasing penalties for violations [3]. - Securities firms are encouraged to reform incentive mechanisms and shift evaluation criteria from scale to quality, thereby reducing the emphasis on size and introducing quality metrics [5]. Group 4: Long-term Implications - The "de-involution" movement is expected to reshape the competitive landscape of the financial industry, promoting a transition from price-based competition to value-based competition, which could lead to improved efficiency and quality in the sector [6]. - The new regulations aim to balance standardization with market vitality, ensuring healthy industry development while protecting investor rights and serving the real economy [6].

Core Viewpoint - The China Interbank Market Dealers Association has issued a notice to regulate the bond issuance and underwriting process, addressing issues such as distorted pricing and non-market-based issuance practices [1][2]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The notice emphasizes that lead underwriters must establish internal management systems for underwriting quotes, ensuring that they do not participate in bidding with quotes below cost [1][2]. - The association has initiated self-discipline investigations into six institutions, including China Galaxy Securities and GF Securities, due to abnormal pricing in a bond project, highlighting the need to maintain fair competition in the bond market [2]. Group 2: Market Trends - The ongoing regulatory efforts to curb irrational low-price competition in the bond underwriting market align with the broader trend of "anti-involution" in the financial industry, aiming to guide the market towards rational and sustainable development [3]. - Major banks, including ICBC and GF Bank, have publicly committed to resisting "involution" competition and adhering to long-term operational principles, reflecting a shift in industry focus towards stability and risk management [3].

Market Overview - The A-share major indices showed mixed performance, with the Shanghai Composite Index up by 0.52% at 3628.53 points, while the Shenzhen Component Index fell by 0.06% and the ChiNext Index decreased by 0.71% [1] - The total trading volume in the Shanghai and Shenzhen markets reached 110.22 billion yuan, a decrease of 43.6 billion yuan compared to the previous day, with over 2000 stocks rising [1] Sector Performance - The film and cinema sector experienced a significant rally, with stocks like Happiness Blue Ocean achieving five consecutive trading limits, and Jin Yi Film and Ciweng Media hitting the daily limit. The summer box office surpassed 5.5 billion yuan, with "Nanjing Photo Studio" grossing over 600 million yuan [1] - The overnight international oil price increased by over 3%, leading to a rise in oil and gas stocks, with Keli Co. and Tongyuan Petroleum both rising by over 5% [1] - The innovative drug sector maintained its momentum, with Dongcheng Pharmaceutical and Chenxin Pharmaceutical hitting the daily limit [1] - The financial sector saw a "de-involution" trend, with bank stocks generally rising, including Ping An Bank and Postal Savings Bank, both increasing by nearly 2% [1] Declining Sectors - The battery sector faced significant declines, with Xinyu Ren and Zhengye Technology both dropping by over 5% [1] - The diversified financial concept stocks fell, with Nanhua Futures decreasing by nearly 7% and Zhongyou Capital dropping by nearly 6% [1] - The rare earth permanent magnet concept stocks also saw widespread declines, with Shenghe Resources and Huahong Technology both falling by over 6% [1]

Core Viewpoint - The financial industry is launching a campaign against "involution" competition, promoting healthy development by resisting unfair competition methods and focusing on service differentiation rather than price competition [1][2][3] Group 1: Involution Competition Resistance - Financial regulatory bodies in Guangdong, Anhui, Ningxia, and Zhejiang have initiated measures to combat "involution" competition, including the establishment of self-regulatory agreements [1][2] - The Guangdong financial sector has released a negative list of "involution" competition practices to guide industry associations in formulating self-regulatory agreements [1] - Various regions, including Anhui and Ningxia, are advocating for compliance, focusing on optimizing financial service quality, and enhancing industry self-discipline [1][2] Group 2: Price Competition Issues - The financial industry's "involution" is primarily reflected in price competition, with phenomena such as consumer loan rates dropping below 3% and low-price customer acquisition strategies leading to a vicious cycle [3] - The net interest margin of commercial banks has declined to a historical low of 1.43% in the first quarter of this year due to aggressive pricing strategies [3] Group 3: Opportunities in Differentiation - The root cause of "involution" is homogeneous competition, and the key to breaking this cycle lies in innovation [4] - Financial institutions are encouraged to explore untapped markets, enhance service quality, and leverage digital transformation to create differentiated competitive advantages [4] Group 4: Focus on Service and Innovation - Banks are advised to shift their competitive focus towards product innovation and service enhancement, particularly in supporting small and micro enterprises, rural revitalization, and technological innovation [5] - Smaller banks should adopt differentiated competition strategies, leveraging their flexibility and personalized services to meet local customer needs [5] Group 5: Digital Transformation - Digital transformation is seen as a crucial method to improve service efficiency, shifting from a "data finds people" approach to a "people find data" model [6] - This transformation allows business personnel to directly utilize retail credit operation dashboards, significantly enhancing service efficiency [6]