Core Viewpoint - Recent investigations reveal that while "collective decision-making" processes appear to be followed, they often conceal corruption issues, with some officials manipulating these processes for personal gain [1][2][5] Group 1: Corruption Tactics - Some officials use "collective decision-making" as a facade to hide their corrupt practices, often involving pre-arranged agreements and interest bundling [2][5] - A case was highlighted where a town party secretary, after facing disciplinary action for previous misconduct, began to integrate personal interests into the collective decision-making process [2][3] - In a state-owned grain enterprise, three executives formed a corrupt partnership, manipulating decisions to benefit themselves financially [3][5] Group 2: Distortion of Procedures - The concept of "pre-decision preparation" has been twisted into "pre-arranged agreements," allowing officials to embed personal interests into decision-making [5][8] - Some officials bypass collective discussions by citing "superior's emphasis" or "efficiency priority," effectively making unilateral decisions [6][8] - Instances were reported where local leaders misused collective decision-making to facilitate personal projects, such as splitting contracts to favor relatives [6][7] Group 3: Recommendations for Improvement - Experts suggest tightening the constraints on "collective decision-making" processes to reduce opportunities for corruption, focusing on the accountability of key decision-makers [8][9] - Implementing a "three must-pass" mechanism for scientific validation, integrity checks, and legality reviews before collective decisions is recommended [8] - Enhancing transparency through technology, such as big data analysis, to identify abnormal decision-making patterns and ensure public access to decision-making information [9]

Core Viewpoint - The Sichuan Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection and Supervision is actively addressing new and hidden forms of corruption through innovative methods, including a series of original short dramas to raise awareness among party members and officials [1] Group 1: New and Hidden Corruption - New and hidden corruption poses significant challenges in the current anti-corruption fight, requiring enhanced identification and rectification efforts [1] - The Commission has established specialized working groups to improve the quality and efficiency of case handling, focusing on the nature, root causes, and mechanisms of corruption [1] Group 2: Case Studies and Investigations - A case in Xuyong County revealed that the local health center had illegally purchased medical equipment, leading to the discovery of significant financial irregularities through collaboration with auditing and market regulation departments [2] - The former director of the health center was sentenced to three years and three months in prison for bribery and money laundering, highlighting the consequences of hidden corruption [2] Group 3: Digital Empowerment in Supervision - Sichuan is enhancing its anti-corruption efforts through digital empowerment, integrating various data sources for better oversight and problem detection [3] - The use of big data supervision has proven effective in uncovering cases of new and hidden corruption, as demonstrated by the case of a former museum official who was found guilty of bribery through data analysis [4] Group 4: Systematic Approach to Governance - The Commission emphasizes a systematic approach to governance, linking supervision with reform, institutional improvement, and development to address the regional, systemic, and industry-specific characteristics of new and hidden corruption [4]