Core Points - The 2025 draft guidelines for the production licensing review of special medical purpose formula foods have been publicly solicited for opinions by the State Administration for Market Regulation [1] - Special medical purpose formula foods are designed to meet the specific nutritional needs of individuals with dietary restrictions, digestive absorption disorders, metabolic disorders, or specific disease states [1] - The new draft clarifies the types of special medical foods, the qualifications and responsibilities of company leaders, food safety directors, and food safety personnel, and establishes a dynamic management mechanism for food safety risk prevention [1] Group 1 - The draft specifies the requirements for clean and quasi-clean working areas, including maintaining dryness during the production of solid products to prevent microbial growth and contamination [1] - To ensure product uniformity and sterilization effectiveness, the draft introduces monitoring requirements for key equipment operation status, fault alarms, and effective manual monitoring measures [1] Group 2 - The draft emphasizes the management of allergen risks, clarifying special requirements for the storage and labeling of allergenic substances to avoid contamination [2] - It also mandates stricter raw material management, requiring companies to establish monitoring mechanisms for risk substances in raw materials and implement risk monitoring or inspection measures [2] - Additionally, there are enhanced requirements for the on-site audit of suppliers of food packaging materials and associated containers to ensure effective traceability [2]

Core Viewpoint - The meeting organized by Dongying City Food and Drug Safety Office aims to enhance the regulatory oversight of key food products, including meat and meat products, and to improve food safety risk prevention capabilities [1][3]. Group 1: Regulatory Actions - Various departments reported on their food safety regulatory activities for the year, analyzing existing risk issues and discussing key risks [3]. - The overall food safety situation in the city has remained stable and positive, despite ongoing concerns regarding adulteration in meat products and pesticide residues in agricultural products [3]. Group 2: Risk Management Strategies - Departments are required to conduct comprehensive reviews and in-depth assessments of identified risk points, establishing risk and responsibility lists to focus on prevention measures [3]. - Special rectification actions will be undertaken to enhance regulatory effectiveness, particularly in critical areas of oversight [3]. - The implementation of the "Opinions on Further Strengthening the Whole Chain Regulation of Food Safety" will be emphasized to improve collaborative mechanisms and ensure a unified approach to food safety management [3].

Core Viewpoint - The State Council's Food Safety Committee issued guidelines to establish an internal reporting reward mechanism for food safety risks, aiming to enhance internal supervision and improve food safety management within production and operation units [1] Group 1: Benefits of the Internal Reporting Mechanism - The mechanism promotes improved internal management quality and efficiency by requiring companies to clarify reporting channels and corrective processes, thus enhancing self-inspection and internal management [2] - It facilitates early detection and resolution of potential risks, leveraging the sensitivity of internal staff to identify unsafe factors, thereby addressing risks at an early stage [2] - The mechanism addresses new challenges posed by evolving business models such as online food delivery and live-streaming sales, allowing for better identification of hidden risks and illegal activities [2] Group 2: Reporting Eligibility and Focus - Internal informants primarily include current employees under labor contracts, as well as former employees and temporary staff who are familiar with the operations [3] - The reporting system focuses on four main categories of violations: personnel violations, material risks, environmental hazards, and management loopholes [3] Group 3: Protection of Whistleblowers - Measures are in place to protect the personal information of whistleblowers, allowing for both real-name and anonymous reporting to ensure confidentiality [4] - Whistleblowers will receive rewards for verified reports, with significant incentives for reporting major risks [4] - The system allows whistleblowers to track the progress of their reports in real-time, ensuring transparency in the handling of their concerns [4] Group 4: Implementation Timeline - By the end of December 2025, the mechanism will be implemented in key sectors and larger production units, with a broader rollout planned by the end of December 2026 [4]

Core Viewpoint - The revision of the "Regulations on the Supervision and Management of Food Safety Responsibilities of Food Production and Operation Enterprises" aims to enhance the accountability of food enterprises and improve risk prevention capabilities to ensure public food safety [1][2]. Group 1: Strengthening Responsibilities - The revision emphasizes the responsibilities of food production and operation enterprises, particularly the main responsible persons and food safety management personnel [1]. - Enterprises are required to establish a long-term mechanism for implementing their responsibilities, ensuring that these responsibilities are not merely theoretical [1]. - The new regulation mandates that the food safety director must be a member of the enterprise's management team, clarifying their role and ensuring effective performance of duties [1]. Group 2: Risk Prevention Measures - The revised regulations enhance dynamic management of risks, promoting the establishment of routine risk prevention systems within enterprises [2]. - A comprehensive food safety risk control checklist has been created to guide enterprises in developing their own risk management systems [2]. - The regulations require daily inspections, weekly assessments, and monthly reviews to be documented and archived, ensuring traceability and rectification of potential risks [2]. - In case of identified risks, enterprises must halt operations and report to local market regulatory authorities to prevent escalation of risks [2].

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the release of risk prevention guidelines by the State Administration for Market Regulation to enhance food safety responsibilities among infant formula milk powder manufacturers [1][3] - The guidelines focus on the risks posed by Bacillus cereus and Cronobacter sakazakii, which are significant foodborne pathogens affecting infant formula, especially for vulnerable infants [1][2] - The guidelines utilize the Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Points (HACCP) principles to systematically analyze potential risk factors in the production process, providing targeted monitoring and prevention measures [2] Group 2 - The guidelines serve as a management tool for infant formula manufacturers to identify and effectively control risks, thereby improving their food safety risk management capabilities [2] - This initiative is part of a broader effort to promote high-quality development in the infant formula milk powder industry [2]