经济观察网 据央视新闻消息，市场监管总局修订了《食品召回管理办法(征求意见稿)》，现向社会公开 征求意见。征求意见稿明确了召回范围，将不符合食品安全标准明确的安全指标、有证据证明可能危害 人体健康，以及属于法律法规规定的其他禁止生产经营情形的食品，纳入应当实施召回的范畴。同时确 定了召回形式。食品召回包含主动召回与责令召回两种形式，在公告公示流程、召回处置报告提交等方 面存在差异化要求，以保障食品召回工作精准、高效落实。食品生产经营者通过自检自查、公众投诉举 报、相关生产经营者通知、监督管理部门告知等方式知悉其生产的食品属于食品召回一级、二级、三级 规定情形的，应当立即停止生产经营，主动实施召回，并通过本单位网站或其他媒体和国家食品召回信 息公示平台发布召回公告，在召回食品处置结束后5个工作日内向市场监管部门报告食品召回和处置情 况；未依照本办法规定主动实施召回的，市场监管部门应当责令其召回，而食品生产经营者一旦接到责 令召回通知，则必须在国家食品召回信息公示平台上发布责令召回公告，且公告将强制带有"责令"字样 显著标识，以确保责令信息清晰醒目。 ...

记者今天了解到， 市场监管总局修订了《食品召回管理办法（征求意见稿）》，现向社会公开征求意 见。 征求意见稿明确了召回范围，将不符合食品安全标准明确的安全指标、有证据证明可能危害人体 健康，以及属于法律法规规定的其他禁止生产经营情形的食品，纳入应当实施召回的范畴。 同时确定 了召回形式。食品召回包含主动召回与责令召回两种形式，在公告公示流程、召回处置报告提交等方面 存在差异化要求，以保障食品召回工作精准、高效落实。食品生产经营者通过自检自查、公众投诉举 报、相关生产经营者通知、监督管理部门告知等方式知悉其生产的食品属于食品召回一级、二级、三级 规定情形的，应当立即停止生产经营，主动实施召回，并通过本单位网站或其他媒体和国家食品召回信 息公示平台发布召回公告，在召回食品处置结束后5个工作日内向市场监管部门报告食品召回和处置情 况；未依照本办法规定主动实施召回的，市场监管部门应当责令其召回，而食品生产经营者一旦接到责 令召回通知，则必须在国家食品召回信息公示平台上发布责令召回公告，且公告将强制带有"责令"字样 显著标识，以确保责令信息清晰醒目。 《办法》规定了生产委托方应当按照本办法规定主动实施食品 召回，并通知 ...

9月15日，2025年广东省食品安全宣传周主场活动在广州举行。据现场消息，截至今年8月底，全省共完 成食品抽检56.2万批次，总体合格率为98.3%，达到每千人6.5批次的年度任务要求。 在专项整治方面，广东扎实推进群众身边食品安全问题治理，今年以来，共检查各类校园食品经营主体 6.8万家次，责令改正3654家，立案231宗，对学校食堂、托幼机构食堂、集体用餐配送单位涉及的大宗 食材和复用餐饮具开展"双周检"，合格率为97.4%。 本届宣传周以"尚德守法 共享食安"为主题。会上发布了今年以来食品安全相关民生实事进展。截至8月 底，全省完成食用农产品快检614.2万批次，发现并处置问题产品5.9万批次；中小学食堂全流程检查评 价及供餐质量安全监测实现全覆盖。 同时，通过开展"小切口"的专业化职业化检查，对低价肉制品、举报投诉线索集中地区与企业开展风险 隐患排查，截至8月底，全省共检查肉制品（含速冻肉制品）食品生产经营主体10.7万家次，督促整改 问题8353个。此外，对"两超一非"、侵权假冒、虚假宣传、生产销售"三无""山寨"食品等违法行为严惩 重处，取缔无证生产经营54家，罚没2251.4万元，联合公安机关捣 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article emphasizes the proactive measures taken by the Zhenyuan County Market Supervision Bureau to enhance food and drug safety through a structured self-inspection and rectification process for enterprises [1][2][3] Group 2 - The implementation of a five-step work method, including selecting models, itemized inspections, establishing ledgers, comprehensive reviews, and supervision acceptance, has led to significant progress in self-regulation among food and drug production and operation units [1] - Enterprises are encouraged to conduct thorough inspections across all processes, including raw material procurement, production, storage, transportation, sales management, labeling, and personnel health, ensuring no hidden risks remain [1][2] - Each enterprise is required to maintain a detailed self-inspection and rectification ledger, documenting issues found, corrective measures, responsible personnel, and completion deadlines, with a zero-tolerance approach to identified risks [2] - A strict review process is in place to ensure accountability, with the county divided into four areas for comprehensive verification of self-inspections, rewarding thorough self-checks while penalizing inadequate ones [2] - A special inspection team has been established to conduct random checks on the effectiveness of self-inspections and rectifications, ensuring that the work is genuinely implemented and not merely formalistic [2] - As of now, 102 drug operating enterprises have completed risk inspections, rectifying 17 issues, while 395 food production and operation enterprises have conducted self-inspections, identifying and rectifying 68 issues [2] - The Zhenyuan County Market Supervision Bureau plans to continue strengthening daily supervision and establishing long-term mechanisms to maintain and improve food and drug safety [3]

Group 1 - The company is currently focused on the production and operation of health food business [1]

Core Insights - The article emphasizes the proactive measures taken by the Urumqi Market Supervision Bureau in Xinjiang to enhance food safety through training and examinations for food production and operation personnel [1] Group 1: Training and Implementation - The training program targets food production and operation enterprises, school canteens, medical institution canteens, elderly care facilities, and centralized dining units [1] - The training adopts a "batch and full coverage" model, focusing on the Food Safety Law, the implementation of food safety responsibilities, and food safety operation standards in catering services [1] - Key topics covered include raw material control, processing procedures, utensil disinfection, and emergency response, with an emphasis on practical issues identified during daily supervision [1] Group 2: Impact and Future Plans - A total of 7 training sessions have been conducted, reaching nearly 1,650 personnel involved in food safety [1] - The bureau plans to continue expanding the coverage of training and examinations, enhancing follow-up inspections and effectiveness evaluations to ensure food production and operation units fulfill their responsibilities [1]

Core Points - The State Council's Food Safety Office issued a notice to enhance food safety measures during the summer and flood seasons to ensure public health [1][2] - The notice emphasizes the importance of strict daily management, weekly inspections, and monthly assessments by food production and operation enterprises [1] - There is a focus on high-consumption food items such as rice, flour, oil, meat, eggs, milk, and seasonings, particularly for vulnerable groups like infants and the elderly [2] Group 1 - The notice requires local food safety offices to coordinate efforts and strengthen food safety work during critical periods [1] - Food enterprises must conduct comprehensive risk assessments covering environment, equipment, raw materials, and personnel health [1] - Effective measures must be taken to prevent food contamination and ensure compliance with food production standards [1] Group 2 - Increased regulatory oversight is mandated for food items with high consumption rates and for food distributed to disaster areas [2] - Non-compliant food products must be removed from the market and appropriate actions taken against violations [2] - The notice calls for enhanced emergency response, inter-departmental communication, and timely reporting of significant issues [2]

Core Viewpoint - The launch of the "National Food Safety Internal Whistleblower Reporting System" marks a significant step in China's food safety governance, encouraging internal personnel to report violations and enhancing social co-governance [1][2]. Group 1: System Overview - The system aims to mobilize internal personnel of food production and operation units to act as whistleblowers, thereby deepening regulatory oversight into hidden aspects of food production and distribution [1]. - It supports both real-name and anonymous reporting, utilizing advanced technology to protect whistleblower information and prevent retaliation [2]. Group 2: Incentives and Mechanisms - The system combines material and spiritual incentives for verified reports, with local market regulatory departments providing rewards for significant risk disclosures [2]. - The establishment of this system is seen as a key activation of the internal whistleblower mechanism, facilitating a collaborative approach to food safety oversight [2]. Group 3: Future Considerations - Continuous improvement of supporting measures is necessary to ensure the effectiveness of the whistleblower system, including refining feedback mechanisms for reported clues and promoting a culture of accountability in food safety [2][3]. - The expectation is that the system will harness collective efforts from society to enhance food safety, ensuring better protection for consumers [3].

Core Viewpoint - The Chinese market regulatory authority is intensifying efforts to monitor and control the misuse of food additives, emphasizing a zero-tolerance policy towards illegal practices in the food industry [1][2] Group 1: Regulatory Actions - The market regulatory authority will increase the frequency of food additive inspections and monitoring, focusing on illegal and excessive use [1] - In the first half of the year, 2.639 million batches of food were inspected, with 12,000 batches found to be non-compliant due to excessive use of food additives [1] - A total of 4,727 food production and operation enterprises were penalized for violations, with 65 ordered to suspend operations [2] Group 2: Specific Violations - The main issues identified in the inspections included the excessive use of sulfur dioxide, sweeteners, and dehydroacetic acid [1] - Ten companies faced severe penalties, including the revocation of production licenses and being placed on a serious violation blacklist [2] Group 3: Focus Areas - The inspections targeted major food categories such as rice, vegetables, and fruits, as well as health foods and infant formula, particularly in schools [1]

Core Viewpoint - The State Council's Food Safety Committee issued an opinion to establish an internal reporting reward mechanism for food safety risks, aiming to enhance internal supervision and improve food safety management within production and operation units [1][2]. Group 1: Benefits of the Internal Reporting Mechanism - The mechanism is expected to improve internal management quality by requiring companies to clarify reporting channels, verification processes, and reward standards, thus promoting self-inspection and internal management [2]. - It facilitates early detection and resolution of potential risks, as internal staff are most sensitive to anomalies in raw materials, processes, and equipment, allowing for proactive reporting of unsafe factors [2]. - The mechanism addresses new challenges posed by emerging business models such as online food delivery and live-streaming sales, enabling timely identification of hidden risks and illegal activities [2]. Group 2: Reporting Eligibility and Focus - Internal informants primarily include current employees under labor contracts, as well as former employees and temporary staff who have worked within the past year, encouraging collaboration from those familiar with internal operations [3]. - The reporting system focuses on four categories of violations: personnel violations, material risks, environmental hazards, and management loopholes, addressing the most concerning food safety issues [3]. Group 3: Protection of Whistleblower Rights - Measures to protect whistleblower identities include options for both real-name and anonymous reporting, ensuring information security and privacy [4]. - Whistleblowers will receive rewards for verified reports, with significant incentives for reporting major risks, promoting a culture of accountability [4]. - The system allows whistleblowers to track the progress of their reports in real-time, ensuring transparency in the handling of reported issues [4]. Group 4: Implementation Timeline - By the end of December 2025, the mechanism will be implemented in key areas and larger production units, with a broader rollout planned by the end of December 2026 to cover other food production and import/export entities [4].