Core Viewpoint - The increasing reliance on AI-generated content detection in universities has led to significant challenges for students, as many AI detection tools and "AI rate reduction" software have proven ineffective, often resulting in higher AI content scores after usage [1][2][3]. Group 1: Student Experiences - Students have reported that using AI rate reduction software often leads to increased AI content scores and higher plagiarism rates, contrary to their expectations [1][2]. - Specific cases highlight that students have spent money on these tools, only to find their papers returned as unqualified due to high AI content scores [2][3]. - The inconsistency in AI detection results across different platforms has caused confusion and frustration among students, leading to multiple revisions and additional costs [3][4]. Group 2: Detection Methodology - AI detection models assess content based on indicators like "perplexity" and "burstiness," with AI-generated text typically exhibiting smoother patterns compared to the more variable nature of human writing [4][5]. - Current detection methods are not foolproof, with a significant risk of false positives, indicating that the accuracy of AI content detection remains low [5][6]. - Experts suggest that while AI can assist in content generation, reliance on it for academic writing undermines academic integrity and may lead to issues of plagiarism [5][6]. Group 3: Academic Integrity - The use of AI in writing is viewed as a potential violation of academic integrity, with many institutions having clear policies against such practices [5][6]. - Faculty members are often able to discern AI-generated content during thesis defenses, emphasizing the importance of genuine understanding and engagement with the material by students [6].

以下文章来源于APPSO ，作者发现明日产品的 APPSO . AI 第一新媒体，「超级个体」的灵感指南。 #AIGC #智能设备 #独特应用 #Generative AI 本文来自微信公众号： APPSO （ID：appsolution） ，作者：appso，原文标题：《为了证明没用 AI 我把论文改得面目全非，这届毕业生快被 AI 检测逼疯了｜附降重指南》，题图来自：AI生成 "天临七年"，毕业论文除了查重之外又多了一道关卡——AIGC检测 （人工智能生成内容检测） 。 为了避免学术不端，不少高校开始把AIGC检测结果作为论文能否通过的要求之一。 作为一名刚刚结束答辩的毕业生，前一段时间可是和AIGC检测周旋了许久。经历了"检测—修改— 再检测—再改"的痛苦循环后，终于从61.7%降到0%。 这个过程之所以这么让人崩溃，是因为AIGC检测真的不讲武德： 有些明明是自己一个字一个字敲下的，也会被整段标红，判定为AI生成；在这一个平台上测出的 10%，换个平台又可能测出100%；而哪怕是在同一个平台，同一个段落这次测是0%，下次可能就 变成100%。 这不禁让我深深怀疑，当前的AIGC检测和它最初的目的是否已 ...

"天临七年"，毕业论文除了查重之外又多了一道关卡——AIGC检测（人工智能生成内容检测）。 为了避免学术不端，不少高校开始把AIGC检测结果作为论文能否通过的要求之一。 作为一名刚刚结束答辩的毕业生，前一段时间可是和AIGC检测周旋了许久。经历了"检测—修改—再检测—再改"的痛苦循环后，终于从61.7%降到0%。 这个过程之所以这么让人崩溃，是因为AIGC检测真的不讲武德： 有些明明是自己一个字一个字敲下的，也会被整段标红，判定为AI生成；在这一个平台上测出的10%，换个平台又可能测出100%；而哪怕是在同一个平 台，同一个段落这次测是0%，下次可能就变成100%。 上网一搜，发现一样被AIGC检测折磨的毕业生不在少数，大家都叫苦不迭。 | 77- | MMM 广东 4月29日 | | ம் 1708 | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 手打论文ai率78%,用ai改过之后降到17%,ai比我像人... | | | | | 登录 侧目倾听 江西 4月29日 | | 277 | | | 绷不住了哈哈哈 | | | | 。 狼桥噩梦 山东 4月29日 | | | 1281 ל | 23 ...

Core Insights - The rise of AIGC detection for graduation theses has led to a new industry chain, with universities implementing AI content detection standards for students' papers [1][2] - Many students are using AI tools for various aspects of thesis writing, prompting universities to explore different AIGC detection requirements [2][3] - A gray market has emerged, where individuals and small agencies offer services to reduce AI content in theses, often at low prices [3][4] Group 1: AIGC Detection Implementation - Several universities, including Sichuan University and Beijing Normal University, have set limits on AI-generated content in theses, with humanities and social sciences capped at 20% and sciences at 15% [1] - Institutions like Fudan University require students to disclose the use of AI tools in their thesis commitment forms before defense [1][2] - The AIGC detection services are being offered alongside traditional plagiarism checks by academic websites such as CNKI, Weipu, and PaperPass [2][3] Group 2: Emergence of Gray Market - A significant number of students are turning to "降手" (AI reduction service providers) who charge around 10 yuan per 1000 characters to modify AI-detected content [4][6] - The market for these services has seen a surge, with many new entrants offering low-cost solutions, leading to a chaotic environment [10][11] - Some service providers are using AI tools themselves to modify texts, which raises questions about the effectiveness of these services [11][12] Group 3: Student Experiences and Challenges - Many students report dissatisfaction with the services, experiencing no reduction in AI detection rates or receiving poorly modified texts that distort original meanings [6][7] - The lack of objective metrics for AI content detection complicates the process, leading to confusion and frustration among students [7][8] - Students often face challenges in obtaining refunds or satisfactory service, as many providers operate on a low-cost model with minimal accountability [8][9]

以下文章来源于数字生命卡兹克 ，作者数字生命卡兹克 数字生命卡兹克 . 努力分享一些很新、很酷的AI干货，愿我们永远对世界保持好奇。 我其实一直都很赞成AI的快速发展，很少会看到，让我眉头一皱的AI应用场景。 甚至会有点出离了愤怒。 因为可能本心是好的，但是这个方法，却把好心，变成了一个让我非常痛心却又觉得无奈的事件。 这个事情就是，马上毕业季了，很多的学校， 为了整治学术不端行为，所以对学生们的论文，除了原来的查重检测之外，引入了AIGC检测。 大概就是用一些所谓的AI检测工具，来检测你的论文里，AI生成的含量有多少。 如果你的AIGC检测比例，如果高于一定的指标，就会无法毕业。 起初我以为这种只是一些造谣的图，在我实际查证之后，我发现，是真的。 已经有多所大学，启动了AIGC检测，并且有明确的指标。 本文来自微信公众号： 数字生命卡兹克 ，作者：数字生命卡兹克，原文标题：《看到现在的毕业生被AIGC查重折磨，我有话想说。》，题图来自： AI生成 比如4月9日，四川大学教务处发布的《关于开展2025届本科毕业论文（设计）学术不端行为检测工作的通知》中，就明确提到了，20%和15%这两个 比例。 不止一个，还 ...

Group 1 - The article discusses the implementation of AIGC detection tools in universities to combat academic misconduct, particularly in student thesis submissions [4][9][10] - Several universities have set specific thresholds for AIGC detection, such as 20% and 15%, which can impact students' graduation eligibility [10][6] - The author expresses concern over the effectiveness and reliability of AIGC detection methods, arguing that they may misjudge human-written content as AI-generated [20][22][62] Group 2 - The article critiques the underlying algorithms of AIGC detection tools, categorizing them into three main types: perplexity and entropy analysis, machine learning classifiers, and syntactic and stylistic feature modeling [26][35][39] - The author highlights the absurdity of using AI to judge AI-generated content, emphasizing that the detection systems often fail to account for the nuances of human writing [21][34][66] - There is a significant concern that educational institutions may not fully understand the limitations of these detection tools, leading to unfair consequences for students [55][56][62] Group 3 - The article argues that the reliance on AIGC detection tools reflects a broader trust crisis in the educational system regarding the use of AI [64][67] - The author believes that the current approach to AIGC detection prioritizes algorithmic judgment over human effort and creativity, which could stifle genuine academic expression [70][73] - The piece concludes with a warning about the potential future where individuals may feel compelled to prove their originality through surveillance rather than trust [71][72]

Group 1 - The core issue revolves around the increasing use of AI tools in education, leading to concerns about academic integrity and the effectiveness of AI detection systems [1][2][3] - Reports indicate that classic literary works have high AI-generated content similarity rates, with examples showing 62.88% for "Lotus Pond Moonlight" and 52.88% for "The Wandering Earth" [1] - Educational institutions are responding by implementing regulations on AI usage in assignments, with some universities prohibiting direct use of AI-generated content in theses [2][3] Group 2 - The phenomenon of "using AI to detect AI" raises questions about the accuracy of current detection methods and their ability to distinguish between original and AI-generated content [2][3] - There are emerging tools designed to reduce AI detection rates in written work, indicating a cycle of AI usage and countermeasures in academic settings [3] - The over-reliance on AI tools in education may undermine students' critical thinking and creativity, prompting a need for a balanced approach to AI integration [4] Group 3 - The integration of AI in education is seen as an unstoppable trend, with a focus on fostering AI literacy and talent among students [4][5] - Educational reforms are underway, with initiatives like the Nanjing AI Education Action Plan aiming for 100% AI course coverage in primary and secondary schools by 2027 [5] - There is a call for a comprehensive and scientific approach to AI education, emphasizing the importance of developing a healthy understanding of human-AI collaboration [5]

我其实一直都很赞成AI的快速发展，很少会看到，让我眉头一皱的AI应用场景。 甚至会有点出离了愤怒。 因为可能本心是好的，但是这个方法，却把好心，变成了一个让我非常痛心却又觉得无奈的事件。 这个事情就是，马上毕业季了，很多的学校，为了整治学术不端行为，所以对学生们的论文，除了原来的查重检测之外，引入了AIGC检测。 大概就是用一些所谓的AI检测工具，来检测你的论文里，AI生成的含量有多少。 如果你的AIGC检测比例，如果高于一定的指标，就会无法毕业。 起初我以为这种只是一些造谣的图，在我实际查证之后，我发现，是真的。 已经有多所大学，启动了AIGC检测，并且有明确的指标。 比如4月9日，四川大学教务处发布的《关于开展2025届本科毕业论文（设计）学术不端行为检测工作的通知》中，就明确提到了，20%和15%这两个比 例。 不止一个，还有很多。 如果你去Google上搜一个关键局： 关于2025届本科毕业论文(设计)试行AIGC检测的通知。 你就能看到，大概有哪些学校，在开始实行AIGC检测了。 你如果去小红书在看看，搜索关键词：AIGC论文。 能搜到一大堆的吐槽贴，还有掺杂在里面想捞一笔的所谓几款钱降重的广告。 ...