智通财经8月2日电，埃隆·马斯克表示，在佛罗里达州陪审团裁定特斯拉需支付3.29亿美元与自动驾驶撞 车事故相关赔偿金后，特斯拉将提起上诉。 ...

马斯克：特斯拉将提出上诉。（此前佛罗里达州陪审团命令特斯拉须在无人驾驶事故案件中支付3.26亿 美元） ...

Tesla was told by a jury to pay $243 million over a 2019 Autopilot crash in Florida that killed a young woman and seriously injured her boyfriend https://t.co/6bOGjcgYou ...

格隆汇8月1日丨长城汽车(601633.SH)公布7月产销快报，销量总计104372台，同比增长14.34%。7月海 外销售41,088台，1-7月累计销售238,746台。7月新能源车销售34,593台，1-7月累计销售195,007台。 ...

机构：天风证券 研究员：吴立/孙潇雅 公司产业链布局，提升产业协同效应 盈利预测与估值 基于公司新能源领域科研能力及其在建构完善的自主产业链方面的持续投入与创新，未来公司业绩有望 继续取得增长。我们预计公司2025-2027营业总收入为88.66/97.24/106.72 亿元，分别同比 +12%/10%/10%；我们预计公司2025-2027 归母净利润为0.80/1.1/1.44 亿元，分别同比增长 58%/38%/31%。选取华域汽车、耐世特、捷众科技、拓普集团为可比公司，预计公司2025 去除联营公 司亏损后的归母净利润为1.4 亿元。考虑到港股的流动性折价，应给予其2025 年略低于平均估值的12 倍 PE，同时选取零跑汽车、小鹏汽车、理想汽车为五菱新能源可比公司，给予联营公司五菱新能源1.5 倍 PS，因此公司对应市值为23.1 亿元，目标价格为0.77 港元，给予"买入"评级。 风险提示：供应链资产规模增长不及预期、监管政策相关风险、平台客户数量增长不及预期、自有资金 水平不及预期、外汇风险、估值体系差异风险或港股市场流动性不及预期。 五菱汽车集团控股有限公司是一家专注汽车产业链业务的中国香港上 ...

穆迪确认特斯拉Baa3评级，前景展望稳定。 ...

Ford is recalling over 312,000 US vehicles over a defect with with their brakes that can increase the risk of a crash, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration said Friday.The issue involves an unexpected voltage disturbance, which may cause a current surge that shuts down a brake booster motor in the vehicle and leads to a loss of braking power, increasing the distance before a complete stop can be reached.Certain 2025 Lincoln Navigator, F-150, Expedition, Bronco and Ranger models are included in ...

Core Viewpoint - A Miami jury found Tesla partially responsible for a fatal crash involving its Autopilot technology, ordering the company to pay over $200 million in punitive damages to the victims [1]. Group 1: Legal Outcome - The jury determined that Tesla's technology failed, attributing significant responsibility to the company rather than solely to the distracted driver [1]. - This verdict concludes a four-year legal battle, which is notable as many similar cases against Tesla have either been dismissed or settled out of court [4][11]. - The case included allegations that Tesla concealed or lost critical evidence, which was later uncovered by a forensic data expert [5][7]. Group 2: Company Response - Tesla's legal team criticized the verdict, claiming it undermines automotive safety and jeopardizes the development of life-saving technology, and announced plans to appeal the decision [8][15]. - The company has faced scrutiny for its handling of data in previous crash cases, which it has denied [6]. Group 3: Public Perception and Trust - The verdict raises questions about Tesla's reputation for safety, especially as the company aims to promote its vehicles as safe for autonomous driving [2][9]. - The plaintiffs argued that Tesla's use of the term "Autopilot" misleads consumers about the capabilities of the technology, which does not equate to full self-driving [10][12]. - The case highlighted concerns about Tesla allowing drivers to misuse the Autopilot system, particularly on roads for which it was not designed [14].

Core Viewpoint - A jury in Miami has found Tesla partly liable for a fatal crash involving its Autopilot system, resulting in a compensation order of $329 million to the victims' family and an injured survivor [1][6]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The lawsuit focused on the responsibility for a deadly crash that occurred in Key Largo, Florida, involving a Tesla Model S driven by George McGee using Enhanced Autopilot [2]. - The trial began on July 14 in the Southern District of Florida, with the plaintiffs initially seeking around $345 million in damages [1]. Group 2: Incident Details - During the incident, McGee dropped his mobile phone and believed that the Enhanced Autopilot would automatically brake for obstacles, but the vehicle accelerated through an intersection at over 60 miles per hour, colliding with a parked car and its owners [3]. - Naibel Benavides, a 22-year-old, died at the scene, while her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, survived but sustained severe injuries including multiple broken bones and a traumatic brain injury [4]. Group 3: Tesla's Autopilot System - The plaintiffs' attorney criticized Tesla for designing the Autopilot system for controlled access highways but allowing its use in other environments, claiming that Tesla's misleading statements about the system's capabilities endangered lives [5]. - The verdict comes at a time when Tesla's CEO, Elon Musk, is attempting to position the company as a leader in autonomous vehicles, despite concerns about the safety of its self-driving technology [6]. Group 4: Market Reaction - Following the verdict, Tesla's shares fell by 1.5%, contributing to a 25% decline for the year, marking the largest drop among major tech companies [6].

In a major blow to Tesla, a Florida federal jury on Friday found Elon Musk's electric car company partly to blame for a 2019 crash that left a 22-year-old woman dead and her boyfriend seriously injured. The jury sided with the plaintiffs, awarding the family of Naibel Benavides Leon and her boyfriend, Dillon Angulo, a combined $329 million in total damages.The verdict marks a substantial setback for Tesla and its Autopilot driver-assistance feature that the attorneys for the plaintiffs said was engaged at ...