能源行业
Search documents
机构风向标 | 嘉化能源(600273)2025年二季度已披露持股减少机构超10家
Xin Lang Cai Jing· 2025-08-06 01:07
2025年8月6日,嘉化能源(600273.SH)发布2025年半年度报告。截至2025年8月05日,共有39个机构投资 者披露持有嘉化能源A股股份,合计持股量达6.58亿股,占嘉化能源总股本的48.48%。其中,前十大机 构投资者包括浙江嘉化集团股份有限公司、香港中央结算有限公司、济南汇正投资合伙企业(有限合 伙)、兴业银行股份有限公司-富国兴远优选12个月持有期混合型证券投资基金、中国建设银行股份有限 公司-富国新动力灵活配置混合型证券投资基金、中国工商银行股份有限公司-富国文体健康股票型证券 投资基金、中国银行股份有限公司-易方达中证红利交易型开放式指数证券投资基金、交通银行股份有 限公司-景顺长城中证红利低波动100交易型开放式指数证券投资基金、中国工商银行股份有限公司-富 国中证红利指数增强型证券投资基金、天弘中证红利低波动100ETF,前十大机构投资者合计持股比例 达47.35%。相较于上一季度,前十大机构持股比例合计上涨了1.78个百分点。 公募基金方面,本期较上一期持股增加的公募基金共计4个,包括博时中证红利低波100ETF、中欧中证 红利低波动100指数发起A、天弘安康颐利混合A、大成中证红 ...
嘉化能源:8月5日召开董事会会议
Mei Ri Jing Ji Xin Wen· 2025-08-05 09:41
嘉化能源(SH 600273,收盘价:9.16元)8月5日晚间发布公告称,公司第十届第十三次董事会会议于 2025年8月5日在公司南湖区南湖大道槜李路嘉南美地1号楼29层会议室以现场和通讯相结合的方式召 开。会议审议了《关于召开公司2025年第二次临时股东大会的议案》等文件。 (文章来源:每日经济新闻) 2025年1至6月份,嘉化能源的营业收入构成为:化工行业占比74.3%,能源占比18.35%,其他业务占比 5.74%,港口业务占比1.61%。 ...
胜通能源龙虎榜数据(8月5日)
Zheng Quan Shi Bao Wang· 2025-08-05 09:03
Core Viewpoint - Victory Energy's stock dropped by 9.55% with a trading volume of 749 million yuan and a volatility of 22.15% on the day, indicating significant market activity and potential investor concern [2]. Trading Activity - The stock had a turnover rate of 73.67%, with institutional investors net selling 46.48 million yuan and total net selling from brokerage seats amounting to 5.15 million yuan [2]. - The stock was listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange's watchlist due to its daily volatility of 22.15%, turnover rate of 73.67%, and a daily decline deviation of -10.32% [2]. - The top five trading departments accounted for a total transaction of 184 million yuan, with buying transactions at 66.02 million yuan and selling transactions at 118 million yuan, resulting in a net selling of 51.63 million yuan [2]. Institutional Activity - Among the trading departments, two institutional specialized seats were involved, with a total buying amount of 1.23 million yuan and selling amount of 47.71 million yuan, leading to a net selling of 46.48 million yuan [2]. - Over the past six months, the stock has appeared on the watchlist six times, with an average price drop of 1.42% the day after being listed and an average decline of 5.04% over the following five days [2]. Capital Flow - The stock experienced a net outflow of 173 million yuan in principal funds today, with a significant outflow of 116 million yuan from large orders and 57.44 million yuan from major orders [2]. - In the past five days, the net outflow of principal funds totaled 22.71 million yuan [2].
湖北能源: 2025-048 关于部分限制性股票回购注销完成的公告
Zheng Quan Zhi Xing· 2025-08-04 16:36
证券代码:000883 证券简称:湖北能源 公告编号:2025-048 湖北能源集团股份有限公司 关于部分限制性股票回购注销完成的公告 本公司及董事会全体成员保证信息披露的内容真实、准确和完整,没有虚 假记载、误导性陈述或者重大遗漏。 特别提示: 邓诗军先生、刘家祥先生、许甲清先生已正常退休,不再具备激励对 象资格,且公司 2021 年限制性股票激励计划第三个解除限售期的业 绩未达到考核要求,根据公司《2021 年限制性股票激励计划》相关 规定,由公司对已退休的 5 名激励对象所持的 635,800 股及其他 172 名激励对象所持的 17,638,170 股,合计 18,273,970 股已获授但尚未 解锁的限制性股票予以回购注销。 司总股本 6,499,723,456 股的比例为 0.28%,注销日期为 2025 年 8 月 1 日。 励对象覃辉、邓诗军、刘家祥、许甲清所持限制性股票按照 2021、 加回购时中国人民银行公布的同期存款基准利率计算的利息予以回 购;已退休的授予预留限制性股票的激励对象彭吉银先生所持限制性 股票按照 2022、2023 及 2024 年度利润分配后调整的授予价格,即 息予以回 ...
胜通能源连收4个涨停板
Zheng Quan Shi Bao Wang· 2025-08-04 02:00
近日该股表现 | 日期 | 当日涨跌幅(%) | 换手率(%) | 主力资金净流入(万元) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 2025.08.01 | 9.98 | 6.97 | 2953.57 | | 2025.07.31 | 10.03 | 6.82 | 3600.00 | | 2025.07.30 | 9.99 | 26.52 | 6662.80 | | 2025.07.29 | -0.85 | 4.34 | -113.72 | | 2025.07.28 | 1.05 | 6.42 | 25.65 | | 2025.07.25 | 0.00 | 9.46 | -296.74 | | 2025.07.24 | 1.84 | 5.12 | 262.39 | | 2025.07.23 | -0.87 | 4.61 | -101.42 | | 2025.07.22 | -0.29 | 4.96 | -186.63 | | 2025.07.21 | 1.36 | 5.46 | -45.75 | 注:本文系新闻报道,不构成投资建议,股市有风险,投资需谨慎。 (文章来源:证券时报网) 胜通能 ...
中注协就可持续信息鉴证业务基本准则公开征求意见,城市商业医疗险新规下发
Xinda Securities· 2025-08-02 14:52
中注协就可持续信息鉴证业务基本准则公开征求意见,城市商业医疗险新规下 发 [Table_Industry] ESG 周报 [2T0a2b5l年e_8Re月po2rt日Date] [Table_ReportType] 行业周报 [ETSaGble_StockAndRank] 投资评级 —— 上次评级 —— 郭雪 环保公用联席首席分析师 执业编号:S1500525030002 吴柏莹 环保行业分析师 执业编号:S1500524100001 邮 箱:wuboying@cindasc.com 信达证券股份有限公司 CINDA SECURITIES CO.,LTD 北京市西城区宣武门西大街甲127号金隅大厦B 座 邮编:100031 证券研究报告 [Table_Title] 中注协就可持续信息鉴证业务基本准则公开征求意 行业研究 见,城市商业医疗险新规下发 [Table_ReportDate] 2025 年 08 月 2 日 本期内容提要: [Ta[Tbalbel_热eS_u点Smum聚mamr焦ya]:ry] 邮 箱:guoxue @cindasc.com 国内:中注协就可持续信息鉴证业务基本准则公开征求意见。7 月 ...
设立隔离机制助力高效绿色转型的力量
3 6 Ke· 2025-08-01 06:03
Core Insights - Solvay successfully completed a strategic business split in 2023, creating two independent companies: Solvay and Syensqo, aimed at enhancing strategic focus and growth opportunities [2][3] - The new Solvay focuses on stable, foundational businesses with limited growth potential, while Syensqo targets rapidly growing markets with differentiated products [2][3] - The split allows for clearer asset management and operational clarity, enabling each company to leverage its core strengths and respond flexibly to market opportunities [3] Group 1: Business Strategies - Companies can effectively manage ESG-heavy assets by isolating them, which accelerates the transition to sustainable business models while addressing traditional asset challenges [4][21] - The strategy of separating ESG-heavy assets can help companies focus on key issues without sacrificing operational efficiency, thus promoting healthy growth across business units [4][21] - Solvay's approach serves as a model for other companies facing ESG challenges, particularly those with traditional, high-impact businesses [3][4] Group 2: Quadrant Strategies - **First Quadrant**: Keeping ESG-heavy assets within independent business units allows companies to maintain ownership while achieving strategic focus with minimal complexity [7][23] - **Second Quadrant**: Selling and leasing back ESG-heavy assets reduces direct sustainability responsibilities while retaining operational control, though it carries a risk of "greenwashing" [9][24] - **Third Quadrant**: Divesting ESG-heavy assets into independent entities involves high complexity but can release value and allow both the parent company and the new entity to focus on their core strengths [12][25] - **Fourth Quadrant**: Complete divestment of ESG-heavy assets enables companies to fully transfer environmental responsibilities, facilitating a shift towards sustainable growth, albeit with potential reputational risks [14][26] Group 3: Benefits of the "Ring-Fencing" Strategy - The "ring-fencing" strategy allows for tailored sustainable strategies for different business entities, enhancing the effectiveness of sustainability initiatives [17][20] - It improves stakeholder communication, enabling companies to engage effectively with investors and regulators, thus enhancing financing capabilities and brand credibility [18][20] - This approach attracts and retains talent, particularly among younger employees who prioritize alignment with corporate values [19][20]
美国财长贝森特:韩国将购买美国能源。不知道印度方面会如何发展。整个贸易团队对印度感到沮丧。
news flash· 2025-07-31 11:38
不知道印度方面会如何发展。 整个贸易团队对印度感到沮丧。 美国财长贝森特:韩国将购买美国能源。 ...
欧美新关税协议能兑现吗?
Guo Ji Jin Rong Bao· 2025-07-30 11:31
Group 1 - The agreement between the US and EU involves a 15% tariff on most EU exports to the US, a reduction from the previously threatened 30% [1][3] - The EU is expected to invest $600 billion in the US and purchase $750 billion worth of energy products, which has sparked criticism within the EU [1][3][11] - The agreement is seen as a political victory for Trump, as it reflects a shift in US trade policy and a compromise from the EU under pressure [3][4][7] Group 2 - The 15% tariff is viewed as a challenge for some, but it retains access for the EU to the US market, which is crucial for European economies [4][5] - The impact of the tariff is asymmetric; while it may significantly affect export-oriented industries like the German automotive sector, the overall economic impact on the EU is considered manageable [5] - There are significant internal divisions within the EU regarding the agreement, with some member states expressing dissatisfaction and others accepting it more readily [8][9] Group 3 - The $750 billion energy purchase plan is controversial, as it requires the EU to double its energy imports from the US compared to previous years, raising questions about feasibility [11][12][13] - The energy procurement is complicated by the fact that most energy purchases are handled by private companies, which are driven by market conditions rather than EU directives [13] - Some analysts suggest that the energy procurement could be spread over a longer period, potentially aligning with market realities and easing the burden on EU companies [14]