西贝贾国龙与罗永浩线上之争持续受到关注。 在被微博禁言后，1月17日21：06，西贝董事长贾国龙再发声，在朋友圈发布《回应二：预制菜和我为什么站出来？》。 据《南方都市报》报道，17日，罗永浩在朋友圈发文回应了有关同西贝和贾国龙的预制菜争端，其确认被平台禁言了15天。另外，罗永浩在朋友圈内容中 强调，其个人不会再回应这件事，" 相信跟预制菜透明化相关的法令法规也会尽快出台 。" 贾国龙：一百个百姓有一百个认知 按谁的标准执行？ 《每日经济新闻》记者了解到，这次发文中，贾国龙再次正面回应舆论风波，表达了上述自己对于外界讨论激烈的预制菜争议、百姓认知等问题。他表 示， 国家六部委2024年已明确说明，拥有中央厨房的连锁餐饮不属于预制菜范畴 ，西贝依法经营。 "说我不敢承认，请问，作为一家业内头部餐饮企业负责人，我能不能像罗永浩一样违背国家规定，愣说自己是预制菜？我如果这样说了，其他餐饮企业 怎么办？上级部门怎么看？" "说百姓认知没问题， 可一百个百姓有一百个认知，谁是标准？谁来定义？我按照谁的标准执行？ " 关于知情权，贾国龙提到，西贝是国内最早开展明厨亮灶的餐饮企业之一："我们制作过程在每个顾客眼睛里看着，这 ...

Core Viewpoint - The public dispute between Luo Yonghao and Jia Guolong highlights the tension between business strategies and consumer rights, particularly regarding the use of pre-prepared ingredients in the restaurant industry [18] Group 1: Company Responses - Jia Guolong publicly denied Luo Yonghao's accusations regarding the use of pre-prepared dishes and announced plans to sue him, while also opening the kitchens of 370 stores to scrutiny [2] - On January 15, Jia Guolong confirmed the closure of 102 stores, representing 30% of the total, citing losses exceeding 500 million yuan due to the negative publicity [5] - Jia Guolong demanded an apology and compensation from Luo Yonghao, claiming that the online attacks had severely impacted his employees [9][11] Group 2: Public and Media Reactions - The dispute escalated with both parties being silenced on social media, which added a dramatic twist to the ongoing "pre-prepared dish controversy" [3][13] - Public sentiment largely views the conflict as a deeper issue of business practices versus consumer rights, rather than a personal feud [18] - There is a general disappointment among the audience regarding the social media ban, as many were interested in the unfolding drama between the two business figures [18] Group 3: Industry Implications - The controversy has raised questions about transparency in the food industry, particularly concerning the use of frozen and pre-prepared ingredients [7][16] - Luo Yonghao suggested that the real reason for the business struggles lies within the company's operational failures rather than external criticism [7] - The incident may prompt regulatory changes regarding the transparency of food preparation practices in the restaurant sector [16]

Group 1 - The core event is the successful conclusion of the "Qinghai Family Feast" public recommended dish (snack) collection activity, which resulted in a list of 50 recognized dishes [1] - The recommended dish list includes traditional famous dishes such as roasted lamb skewers and various innovative fusion dishes that reflect local products and ethnic wisdom [1] - The list aims to facilitate public tasting and understanding of Qinghai's culinary culture, complementing previously released food maps and calendars [1] Group 2 - This activity serves as a successful collection and evaluation of food, as well as a vibrant organization and effective promotion of Qinghai's culinary heritage [2] - The published list will act as a warm guide for Qinghai's dining consumption, inspire innovation in restaurant operations, and serve as an important carrier for the integration of commerce, culture, and tourism [2] - The initiative is expected to strengthen the cultural foundation of Qinghai cuisine, enhance the quality and expansion of dining consumption, and promote the dissemination and exchange of the "Qinghai Family Feast" brand [2]

每经记者｜赵雯琪 每经编辑｜段炼 黄博文 西贝贾国龙与罗永浩线上之争持续受到关注。 在被微博禁言后，1月17日21：06，西贝董事长贾国龙再发声，在朋友圈发布《回应二：预制菜和我为什么站出来？》。 据《南方都市报》报道，17日，罗永浩在朋友圈发文回应了有关同西贝和贾国龙的预制菜争端，其确认被平台禁言了15天。另外，罗永浩在朋友圈内容中 强调，其个人不会再回应这件事，"相信跟预制菜透明化相关的法令法规也会尽快出台。" 贾国龙：一百个百姓有一百个认知 按谁的标准执行？ 《每日经济新闻》记者了解到，这次发文中，贾国龙再次正面回应舆论风波，表达了上述自己对于外界讨论激烈的预制菜争议、百姓认知等问题。他表 示，国家六部委2024年已明确说明，拥有中央厨房的连锁餐饮不属于预制菜范畴，西贝依法经营。 "说我不敢承认，请问，作为一家业内头部餐饮企业负责人，我能不能像罗永浩一样违背国家规定，愣说自己是预制菜？我如果这样说了，其他餐饮企业 怎么办？上级部门怎么看？" "说百姓认知没问题，可一百个百姓有一百个认知，谁是标准？谁来定义？我按照谁的标准执行？" 关于知情权，贾国龙提到，西贝是国内最早开展明厨亮灶的餐饮企业之一："我们制 ...

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing dispute between Luo Yonghao and Xibei's founder Jia Guolong regarding the use of pre-made dishes has escalated, leading to mutual accusations and a temporary ban on both parties from social media platforms [1][2][11]. Group 1: Background of the Dispute - The conflict began four months ago when Luo Yonghao claimed that most dishes at Xibei were pre-made after dining there, prompting Jia Guolong to deny the allegations and threaten legal action [5][11]. - After a brief hiatus, Jia Guolong reignited the dispute in January by asserting that Xibei does not serve pre-made dishes and accusing Luo of maliciously misrepresenting their food quality [11]. Group 2: Recent Developments - On January 17, Luo Yonghao confirmed he was banned from the platform for 15 days and interpreted this as a form of protection, stating he would no longer comment on the matter [1][12]. - Jia Guolong's response included claims of online harassment faced by his family and employees, demanding that Luo clarify his statements [8][11]. Group 3: Social Media Dynamics - Both Luo Yonghao and Jia Guolong have been banned from posting on social media, with the CEO of Weibo suggesting that future disputes should be handled through media interviews [2][12]. - A supporting account, @西北人心声, emerged to back Jia Guolong, although it was noted that the account's origin and device used differed from Jia's official communications [3][12].

1 个月前，西贝创始人 贾国龙在接受南周采访时还说他认识到错误了，说当时太冲动了，也不应该说"网络黑社会" …… 但这几天贾老板的表现截然相反，像是被带偏了节奏，刚认错没多久就翻脸，在朋友圈控诉"西贝被铺天盖地污蔑"。 他这几天的表现，不再赘述。可参考这几篇推文： 有句俗话说的很对，事出反常必有妖！ 1 月 15 日，@独立平 在微博发帖称西贝准备关闭 102 家门店，并配图西贝内部文件截图。当天下午，贾老板发朋友圈，证实网传的截图属实。配图正是@独立平 的帖子。 在同一天 17 点，@独立平 发帖自证，一个月前受邀去西贝呼和浩特基地参观。 网传和理记一起同行的其他大V，还有 李*旸、 项某刚等人。（ 对，就是前段时间被老罗骂"智障"的那个 。 ） 独立平是谁？ 多位业内人士和博主都已指出，@独立平 其实就是@理记。在理记大号被封后，用转世小号在微博活跃。 理记此人口碑极差、劣迹斑斑、 争议满身 。他曾针对江歌母亲江秋莲编造大量不实信息，无端指责江秋莲虚构事实、诈捐数千万元等，导致江秋莲长时间遭受网 络暴力。 在车圈，他曾吹捧理想 Mega 想蹭热度，被李想公开抵制，要求员工严禁与其接触，违者原地开除。在数码 ...

"现在我们来较量较量吧！"他傲慢地补充说，仿佛面对着某种黑暗的势力，向它挑战似的。 这是《罪与罚》里的段落。作为西贝商业帝国的建立者，贾国龙似乎也在病态的自大与不得 已的妥协之间不断进行凶猛的搏斗。 电影《梅兰芳》里有句话，讲做人，要"有头有尾有交代"。 去年9月西贝与罗永浩那场风波，本来舆论已经淡忘，贾国龙不知怎的又重新张扬起来。微博言之凿凿 要罗永浩"十点见"，但罗这次显得兴趣缺缺，罕见地要"多忍一忍"，贾国龙又回应，"千万别忍，这不 是咱俩性格"。 现在好了，微博依据《网络名人账号行为负面清单》第八条，对贾国龙和罗永浩的微博同步禁言。瓜吃 不着了，有点emo，罗永浩更是亏大了。不过明眼人都看得出来，俩人这次少量的你来我往中，有些东 西越界了，罗永浩提了不该提的人，贾国龙要找人做主，偏还往人身上扎刀子。 董师傅之前说过，投中网作者有自己的看法，有些观点和他不一致。昨天董师傅写了一篇文章，说贾国 龙是替罪羊。对此，我有些不同意见，贾国龙不是谁的替罪羊，他得为他自己的行为负责。 别的不讲，贾国龙在"有交代"上真得很执着。大家都淡忘的事，他又拿出来交代了一遍，虽然不得已戛 然而止。"认错"是权宜之计，所谓"念念 ...

Group 1 - The online dispute between Jia Guolong and Luo Yonghao has attracted significant public attention, with Jia Guolong responding to Luo's accusations against Xibei on his personal Weibo account [2] - Both parties were subsequently silenced on Weibo, indicating a shift in how public disputes may be handled in the future, as suggested by Weibo's CEO [5] - Jia Guolong appears to be leveraging the controversy to attract traffic and support for Xibei, despite the potential risks of a prolonged conflict with Luo Yonghao [7] Group 2 - OpenAI has warned investors that Elon Musk is expected to make deliberately outrageous statements, as their ongoing legal battle is set to escalate in April [8] - SAIC General Motors has issued a statement regarding malicious rumors targeting the Buick GL8 and other MPV models, attributing them to organized online campaigns [9] - The cross-border e-commerce sector has emerged as a new growth engine, with trade values through the Hong Kong-Zhuhai-Macao Bridge surpassing 300 billion yuan for the first time, marking a 40.1% year-on-year increase [10] Group 3 - In Hainan, the import of coffee beans and products has surged by 5.6 times, reflecting the benefits of tax exemptions and the region's growing coffee industry [11] - The Shanxi power grid has completed 16 key projects aimed at enhancing winter power supply capacity, increasing it by approximately 3 million kilowatts [12] - The establishment of a working group for commercial community service robots marks a new phase in the standardization efforts within this sector in China [15] Group 4 - Gree Electric has clarified that it is not involved in the production of storage chips, focusing instead on third-generation semiconductor manufacturing [16] - The popular tea brand Yulian Tea House has faced criticism for requiring customers to order food with drinks for takeout, which has been defended as an operational policy [17] - Hualgreen Bio plans to sign a framework agreement for the acquisition of a 100% stake in Queshan Huayuan Biotechnology, with the purchase price estimated at approximately 239 million yuan [18]

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing online dispute between Jia Guolong and Luo Yonghao has drawn significant attention, particularly following Jia's announcement to respond to Luo's allegations against Xibei, leading to both accounts being silenced on Weibo [1][3]. Group 1: Company Developments - Jia Guolong confirmed that Xibei will close 102 stores, accounting for 30% of its total locations, with the closure process expected to be completed in the first quarter of this year [7]. - Jia emphasized that all employees affected by the closures will receive their full wages, and customers with stored value cards can use them at other locations or request refunds immediately [7]. - The company has issued over 300 million yuan in consumer vouchers to attract customers back, although this has reportedly increased the company's financial risks [8]. Group 2: Market Performance - Xibei's business has seen a 50% year-on-year decline in January, indicating significant challenges in its operational performance [8]. - Jia stated that the issues facing the company are not solely related to pricing, asserting that market dynamics allow for diverse consumer preferences and price points [9]. Group 3: Industry Context - The Central Cyberspace Affairs Commission has issued guidelines to regulate the behavior of online influencers, specifically prohibiting organized online disputes that could escalate tensions and misuse public resources [3]. - Li Guoqing, founder of Dangdang, expressed willingness to assist Xibei during its challenging times, highlighting the broader industry concern regarding the sustainability of restaurant businesses amid economic pressures [10].

Core Viewpoint - The ongoing online dispute between Jia Guolong and Luo Yonghao has attracted significant attention, with both parties making public statements regarding accusations and responses related to the "pre-prepared food" controversy affecting Xibei [1][12]. Group 1: Company Responses - Jia Guolong announced on January 16 that he would respond to Luo Yonghao's accusations of defamation against Xibei, emphasizing that he and his employees have not reported Luo to the police despite facing personal attacks [3][10]. - Xibei has faced a significant decline in business, with sales dropping between 40% to 60% over the past four months, leading to the decision to close 102 stores, which represents 30% of its total outlets [7][10]. - The company has implemented various self-rescue measures, including issuing over 300 million yuan in consumer vouchers, but these efforts have not effectively reversed the negative trend, with a reported 50% year-on-year decline in business [7][10]. Group 2: Industry Standards and Public Perception - The "Xibei pre-prepared food controversy" highlights a critical lack of clear industry standards, which has led to public confusion and negative perceptions of pre-prepared food in the restaurant industry [12][15]. - Jia Guolong maintains that according to official definitions, Xibei's food does not fall under the category of pre-prepared food, yet this argument has not resonated with the public, exacerbating negative sentiment [14][15]. - The absence of authoritative standards has resulted in a cycle of public backlash and miscommunication, indicating a pressing need for regulatory bodies to establish clear guidelines for pre-prepared food to restore consumer trust and stabilize market expectations [16][17].