记者丨毕凤至 编辑丨曾静娇 近日，一款名为"死了么"的APP突然走红网络， #死了么APP下载量翻100多倍 #死了么APP真的能救命吗 等相关话题冲上微博热搜。目前该 APP位列苹果工具类付费榜首位。 公开信息显示，该应用是为独居人群打造的轻量化安全工具，用户需要设置紧急联系人并签到，若连续多日没在应用内签到，系统将于次日自 动发送邮件告知紧急联系人。 1月11日，"死了么APP"官方微博发文回应： 团队 由三名95后共同创立并独立运营。 为了让项目能够健康、持续地发展，并覆盖日益增长的短信、服务器等成本， 将基于成本推出8元的付费方案。 针对网友建议"产品名字'死了么'不好听，建议改成'活着么'"，文中表示，"都会认真研究和考虑。" "欢迎更多资本方关注和联系我们，我们会选择最能助力项目成长的机构或个人进行合作。" 企查查信息显示，月境（郑州）技术服务有限公司成立于2025年3月，法定代表人为郭某初， 注册资本10万元。 据蓝鲸新闻报道，这款产品从立项到上线，整个过程快得惊人。据该APP创始人之一的郭先生介绍，项目大约在2025年年中立项，而 APP的实 际开发时间不到一个月，初始投入成本仅"1000多块 ...

本文转载自澎湃新闻 值班 编辑｜ 宝珠 视觉 | 顾芗 近期，苹果应用商店一款名为"死了么"的App受到关注，该App团队1月11日作出最新回应： 感谢网友的热情支持以及媒体的关注报道，团队由三名95后共同创立并独立运营。 接下来，团队将把主要精力投入到产品打磨中，例如丰富短信提醒功能、考虑增加留言功能，并探索推 出更适老化的新产品。同时，也感谢网友对于APP新名称的积极建议，团队都会认真研究和考虑； 为了让项目能够健康、持续地发展，并覆盖日益增长的短信、服务器等成本，将基于成本推出 8 元的收 费方案。同时，团队也欢迎更多资本方关注和联系，会选择最能助力项目成长的机构或个人进行合作； 最后，团队想呼吁更多人关注独居群体，给予他们更多关怀与理解。 有网友发现，该软件关注度不高时是免费下载。不过另一网友1月1日晒出的截图显示，当时该软件已经 开始收费1元。而记者1月10日查询时，价格已经涨到了8元。 记者购买下载该软件后，发现该软件界面较为简洁。中间有一个"签到"按钮，并提醒"2日未签到，系统 将以用户的名义，在次日邮件通知用户的紧急联系人"。 据企查查，"死了么"App团队是一家叫月境（郑州）技术服务有限公司 ...

Core Viewpoint - Analysts are favoring SAP over Palantir for investment opportunities in the AI sector, citing valuation concerns as a primary reason for the differing outlooks on these companies [4][10]. Group 1: Palantir Technologies - Palantir's stock experienced a significant increase of 135% last year, but analysts predict a slowdown in growth by 2026 [2][12]. - The current market capitalization of Palantir is $423 billion, with a forward price-to-earnings ratio slightly below 182, one of the highest in the S&P 500 [3][6]. - Palantir's Rule of 40 score stands at 114%, indicating strong performance in customer acquisition across both government and private sectors [5]. Group 2: SAP - SAP is projected to have a 40% upside in its stock price over the next 12 months, with 12 out of 15 analysts rating it as a "buy" or "strong buy" [7][9]. - The current market capitalization of SAP is $281 billion, with a forward price-to-earnings ratio of 28.5, which is considered more attractive compared to Palantir's valuation [8][9]. - SAP's price-to-earnings-to-growth (PEG) ratio is 1.0, indicating a reasonable valuation for a growth stock, while Palantir's PEG ratio is nearly 2.9, suggesting less attractiveness [10].

近日，一款 名为"死了么"的App爆火。该 App 目前仅上线苹果应用商店，购买需要8元人 民币， 1月8日，该款App在苹果付费软件排行榜位列第一。 正如其名，这款App的功能非常简单。根据App Store下载页的功能介绍， 这是一款为独居 人群打造的轻量化安全工具。 软件不需注册登录，首次使用只需填写本人姓名与紧急联系 人邮箱即可。每天打开应用轻轻一点完成签到，后台自动监测状态。 . . 令日签到 1 2 日未签到,系统将以你的名义,在 次日邮件通知你的紧急联系人 签到即同意 隐私政策 和 用户协议 系统有一个异常未签到自动通知的功能， 如果用户连续2天没有在应用内签到，系统将于次 日自动发送邮件告诉对方。 也有网友说，这个名字很膈应，"建议不要叫死了么，改为活着么。" 工商信息显示，"死了么"App团队，是一家叫 月境（郑州）技术服务有限公司的微型公 司， 成立于去年3月份，注册资本10万元。 有网友担心，每天都要打卡，偶尔忘记了，系统会不会告诉我的紧急联系人："机主挂了， 随机吓死我朋友。" 还有网友发现，有博主晒出的截图是免费下载，不过此后开始收费1元， "今天涨价了，要 8元。" 于是有网友打趣 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by input method applications in the era of AI, highlighting user frustrations with accuracy and excessive advertisements, despite significant investments from major tech companies in enhancing these tools [2][4][14]. Group 1: User Experience Issues - Users are increasingly dissatisfied with input methods, reporting issues such as inaccurate word predictions and excessive advertisements, which detract from the overall user experience [2][4]. - A specific case is mentioned where a long-time user of Sogou Input Method uninstalled the app due to frequent incorrect suggestions, indicating a decline in basic functionality despite advanced AI features [4]. - Complaints about the voice recognition capabilities of input methods have also surfaced, with users noting that corrections often take longer than typing the text directly [4]. Group 2: AI Integration and Competition - Major input method providers, including Sogou, Baidu, and iFlytek, are engaged in a competitive race to integrate advanced AI capabilities into their products, aiming to enhance user experience and functionality [2][8][9]. - The input method market is characterized by a concentrated structure, with leading companies holding a combined market share of 84.4% as of July 2025, indicating a competitive landscape [8]. - Input methods are evolving from simple typing tools to becoming the primary interface for AI interactions, with companies aiming to position their products as essential gateways to AI capabilities [9][10]. Group 3: Commercialization and Privacy Concerns - Input methods face challenges in monetization, struggling with a "high traffic, low value" dilemma, which complicates their ability to generate revenue despite having a large user base [15][16]. - Privacy concerns are paramount, as input methods have been criticized for collecting unnecessary personal information, leading to regulatory scrutiny and the need for companies to adapt their data collection practices [16]. - Companies are implementing features that allow users to choose between different modes of data collection, balancing functionality with privacy protection [16]. Group 4: Future Directions - The future of input methods is seen as a shift towards becoming intelligent agents that can understand user intent and context, moving beyond basic text input to more complex interactions [12]. - Companies are exploring multi-modal input methods that incorporate voice, text, and images, which require sophisticated algorithms and technology to manage effectively [17].

每经编辑｜许绍航 向江林 近日，一款名为"死了么"的App爆火。该App目前仅上线苹果应用商店，购买需要8元人民币，1月8日，该款App在苹果付费软件排行榜位列第一。 这款软件不需注册登录，首次使用只需填写本人姓名与紧急联系人邮箱即可。每天打开应用轻轻一点完成签到，后台自动监测状态。 如果用户连续2天没有在应用内签到，系统将于次日自动发送邮件告诉对方。 "死了么"App爆火后，有网友担心，每天都要打卡，偶尔忘记了，系统会不会告诉我的紧急联系人："机主挂了，随机吓死我朋友。" 也有网友提出优化建议，有人提出可以改成通过短信通知紧急联系人、优化签到形式等，但更多网友认为软件名字"死了么"不好听，建议改成"活着么"。 此外，团队已在开发另一款新产品，郭先生将其描述为"软件版的小天才"。这款产品旨在让家长无需购买专门的儿童手表，只需在孩子手机上安装一个软 件，就能实时查看孩子的位置、设备电量、网络状态，甚至在孩子夜间出门、摔倒或发生车祸等意外时，第一时间收到警报。 尽管投入微小，但"死了么"APP已实现盈利。郭先生告诉蓝鲸记者，迅猛的增长也吸引了资本的关注。他表示，已经接触到一些个人、机构和身边朋友的 投资意向，目前 ...

鹭羽 发自 凹非寺 量子位 | 公众号 QbitAI Stack Overflow「真」凉透了吗？ 某种层面上是的——那个曾作为公共论坛的它，确实快死了。 在被ChatGPT为首的AI连续冲击下，Stack Overflow社区流量一路下滑。 就上个月来说，全站仅 6866个 新提问……啥概念呢，也就是和08年刚上线时差不多。 然而有趣的是另外一项数据：同期，Stack Overflow的 年营收不降反增 ，翻了一番，达到新高1.15亿美元。 公司亏损也在连年下降，从原先的8400万美元下降到2200万美元。 它赚钱的逻辑也很简单： "我们不生产知识，我们只是知识的搬运工。" 简单来说，就是把Stack Overflow丰富且高质量的数据卖给AI。 看上去，Stack Overflow并未如传言般被AI击垮，甚至反过来正靠AI赚得盆满钵满。 （doge） AI时代，Stack Overflow也在商业转型 诚然，ChatGPT、Claude等AI越来越强大的Coding能力，迅速带走了原属于Stack Overflow的高光。 从巅峰时期的程序员圣地，每个月都有30w+新问题层出不穷，到如今用户凋零、流量暴跌 ...

人民日报北京1月10日电 （记者刘温馨）工业和信息化部数据显示：2025年前11个月，我国软件业 务收入139777亿元，同比增长13.3%；软件业利润总额16954亿元，同比增长6.6%；软件业务出口568.9 亿美元，同比增长8.1%，增速连续9个月保持正增长。 ...

Core Insights - The article highlights six companies poised for significant growth in the tech sector, particularly in AI, data infrastructure, and cloud computing, with expectations of becoming global leaders by 2026 [1] Company Summaries 1. Palantir - Palantir is shifting from a government contract-focused business to a commercial AI software provider, achieving 121% growth in U.S. commercial revenue and 63% overall revenue growth year over year in Q3 2025 [2][3] - The growth is driven by its Artificial Intelligence Platform (AIP), with a shortened sales cycle due to intensive workshops, resulting in 204 deals worth at least $1 million, including 53 deals over $10 million last quarter [3] 2. Nvidia - Nvidia remains the leader in AI computing, valued at over $4.6 trillion, with a stock increase of over 1,350% in the past five years [6] - The company reported $57 billion in revenue for the latest quarter, marking a 22% increase from the previous quarter and a 62% increase year over year [6] 3. Advanced Micro Devices (AMD) - AMD is emerging as a strong competitor to Nvidia, with its MI300 series gaining traction among large customers [9] - Under CEO Lisa Su's leadership since 2014, AMD's market cap has surged from $2 billion to $350 billion [9] 4. MercadoLibre - MercadoLibre is positioned as the Amazon of Latin America, with a 39% year-over-year increase in net revenue in Q3 2025, marking 27 consecutive quarters of over 30% growth [10][11] - The company operates in e-commerce, financial services, fintech, and media, although it faces risks from geopolitical issues and regulatory challenges [11] 5. Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) - TSMC produces about 90% of the world's leading-edge chips, with increasing demand for its 3nm and 2nm nodes due to AI growth [12] - Goldman Sachs raised its price target for TSMC by 35%, predicting that AI computing demand will exceed supply into 2027 [12][13] 6. Micron - Micron's stock has risen over 17% since the start of the year, securing long-term supply contracts with AI chipmakers [14] - The company is expected to see DRAM prices increase by 55% to 60% quarter over quarter in 2026, benefiting from strong pricing power [14][16] Conclusion - The six companies are well-established players with solid growth prospects, expected to thrive in the AI revolution and provide sustainable returns [17]

Core Viewpoint - Windows 11 has been criticized for high resource usage, strict hardware requirements, and poor performance compared to older versions, particularly in a recent test where it ranked last across multiple benchmarks [1][33]. Group 1: Performance Testing Results - In boot speed tests, Windows 8.1 performed the best, while Windows 11 was the slowest, experiencing significant delays even after booting [6][8]. - Windows XP won the storage usage test with only 18.9GB used, while Windows 11 consumed 37.3GB, making it appear bloated [9]. - In memory management, Windows XP used only 0.8GB of memory while Windows 11 averaged 3.3GB, attributed to numerous background services [11]. - Windows 11 could only open 49 browser tabs in a test, ranking last, while Windows 8.1 opened 252 tabs [16]. - In battery life tests, Windows 11 was the first to shut down, while Windows XP had the longest battery life, with differences being minimal [17]. - Windows 11 ranked last in audio export and video rendering tests, with Windows 10 performing the best overall [19]. Group 2: Software and Benchmark Performance - In application launch speed tests, Windows 11 consistently ranked last across five different applications [21]. - Windows 11 managed to secure third place in web image loading tests but fell back to last in other web-related tests [24]. - In file transfer tests, Windows 11 achieved second place, just behind Windows 10 [26]. - In CPU-Z tests, Windows 11 showed slightly better single-core performance but lagged in multi-core performance compared to older systems [27]. - Windows 11 ranked third in CrystalDiskMark tests, while Windows XP took the top spot [29]. Group 3: Overall Assessment - The overall performance of Windows 11 was deemed "disastrous," with no wins in any of the tests conducted, leading to Windows 8.1 being declared the champion [33]. - The testing hardware was criticized for being outdated, which may not accurately reflect Windows 11's performance on modern systems [33]. - Despite the unfairness of the test conditions, the results have led to a reevaluation of Windows 8.1, with users expressing nostalgia for its performance [34].