Core Insights - The article emphasizes that capital operations are not merely supplementary but essential for a company's survival and growth in a rapidly changing market environment [1][12] - It argues that understanding the true purpose and significance of capital operations is crucial for companies to thrive beyond mere luck [1][12] Group 1: Purpose of Capital Operations - Capital operations serve as a catalyst for strategic upgrades, enabling companies to break through growth ceilings through mergers, financing, and structural optimization [6][12] - They act as a high-level scheduling platform for resource allocation, allowing for the optimization and reconfiguration of resources to create synergies [7][8] - Capital operations function as an invisible engine for market value management and investor relations, helping companies gain market trust and manage their stock prices effectively [9][12] Group 2: Risk Management - Capital operations are essential for risk management and survival strategies, providing companies with a firewall against unforeseen crises and market fluctuations [10][11] - They help in diversifying financing channels and balancing equity and debt financing to prevent financial instability [10][11] Group 3: Strategic Importance - The article posits that capital operations are integral to building a company's competitive edge, risk resilience, and sustainable growth capabilities [12][14] - It highlights the need for companies to incorporate capital operations into their core strategic planning to navigate future uncertainties [12][14]

Group 1 - The article discusses the concepts of "cutting leeks" and "shareholder cashing out," highlighting their essential differences and impacts on the capital market [1][4] - "Cutting leeks" refers to manipulating stock prices and using false information to lure retail investors into buying at high prices, ultimately leading to their losses [5][6] - In contrast, "shareholder cashing out" involves major shareholders legally or through gray methods reducing their stakes to realize wealth, often at the expense of minority investors [6][7] Group 2 - The operators of "cutting leeks" are typically short-term capital players like speculators and quantitative institutions, aiming for quick profits, while "shareholder cashing out" is conducted by major shareholders or actual controllers [7][8] - The legality of these actions differs significantly; "cutting leeks" often involves illegal market manipulation, while "shareholder cashing out" appears compliant but may involve misleading disclosures [7][8] - Victims of "cutting leeks" are primarily retail investors, while "shareholder cashing out" affects not only them but also the company's small shareholders and long-term value [7][8] Group 3 - The article describes complex capital operations that combine both "cutting leeks" and "shareholder cashing out," leading to increased market unfairness and risk [9] - Examples include market value management disguising cashing out and high-premium acquisitions of related party assets, which distort market pricing [9] - Regulatory loopholes in the capital market, such as bulk trading and convertible bonds, can be exploited by unscrupulous shareholders for capital arbitrage [10] Group 4 - The article emphasizes the need for investors to recognize warning signs, especially when shareholder reductions coincide with positive performance forecasts [10] - Investors should scrutinize the true sources of shareholder buy-in funds and their fulfillment records to avoid being misled by false promises [10] - The conclusion stresses that both "cutting leeks" and "shareholder cashing out" ultimately harm small investors and disrupt the normal functioning of the capital market [11]

"欲穷千里目，更上一层楼。"在资本市场的世界里，境外资金的进入就像是一次高空跳跃，既充满了诱惑，也充满了未知的挑战。近些年来，随着全球资本 流动的加速，境外资金涌入中国股市的现象愈加明显。很多投资者和企业家看到的是机遇，但如果你要问境外资金是否能轻松拿下中国上市公司的控股权， 那答案并非那么简单。背后，存在着多个监管、法律以及政策的"高墙"，这些壁垒并不是每一个境外投资者都能轻松跨越的。 美国更好并购集团 美国更好并购集团（Goheal）在多次并购案例中，深知境外资金收购中国上市公司面临的复杂局面，特别是监管层的严格把控。因此，作为企业和投资者的 战略顾问，Goheal始终提醒客户，想要顺利实现控股权收购，必须认真了解并应对这四道墙。 第一道墙：外资准入的法规壁垒 在中国资本市场，外资收购的法律规定一向严苛。根据《外商投资法》和相关法规，境外资金并不自动享有收购中国上市公司控股权的权利。尤其是涉及到 战略性行业，外资的股权比例和持股结构更是受到严格限制。 对于一般行业的公司，外资投资者最多可以持有30%的股份，但如果是涉及国家安全、金融、能源等敏感行业，外资的持股比例往往会被限定得更加严格。 此外，外资收购中 ...

Core Viewpoint - The landscape of capital market acquisitions has evolved from simple resource integration to complex strategic maneuvers, where acquiring controlling stakes in companies involves navigating regulatory barriers and employing flexible capital strategies [1][5]. Group 1: Evolution of Acquisition Strategies - Traditional mergers and acquisitions are now often characterized as "wild," utilizing capital tactics to bypass industry entry restrictions and achieve complete control over target companies [5]. - The rapid development of the capital market has provided unprecedented operational space for capital players, allowing them to circumvent industry entry barriers through innovative financial strategies [6][12]. Group 2: Alternative Approaches to Control - Capital players often resort to "curve-saving" methods to achieve control over target companies, avoiding direct confrontations with regulatory barriers while still gaining significant influence [6][7]. - Examples include technology companies acquiring related firms or using equity penetration strategies to quickly gain control over sensitive industry companies without violating regulations [6]. Group 3: Strategic Mechanisms for Control - Clever design of equity structures allows capital players to gain effective control over target companies by acquiring significant shares and forming agreements with management, thus bypassing strict industry entry requirements [9]. - Leveraged buyouts enable capital players to maximize capital efficiency while controlling target companies, often utilizing debt financing and shareholder loans to reduce acquisition costs [10]. - Strategic partnerships and mergers within the industry help capital players gradually increase market share and competitiveness, often through alliances that facilitate entry into restricted markets [11]. Group 4: Regulatory Challenges and Opportunities - Industry entry policies can act as both a hindrance and a safeguard, presenting challenges for capital players while also protecting market fairness [12]. - The ongoing conflict between industry entry regulations and capital operations is expected to remain a central issue, prompting stakeholders to consider how to balance compliance with the need for capital mobility [12].

"工欲善其事，必先利其器。"在并购重组这场博弈中，预算就是那把最锋利的器——握得不稳，轻则效率低下，重则全盘皆输。 在当下这个资本流动速度堪比高铁、监管规则日新月异的时代，上市公司要想通过并购重组撬动市值、突破增长天花板，一份"既合规又灵活"的预算方案， 是所有动作顺利落地的"点睛之笔"。但很多企业家一脚迈进交易谈判桌，才发现：预算不是你想调就能调的，有些地方动一分都可能触碰红线；而有些却能 巧妙布局、灵活调整，甚至成为交易的"润滑剂"。 美国更好并购集团 美国更好并购集团（Goheal）在多年操盘并购项目的实战中，早已摸清了这套游戏的"预算准则"。今天，我们不妨来场"预算显微镜"之旅，逐帧拆解并购重 组中哪些花得值、哪些花不得、哪些还能花得更聪明。 能调的，不只是价格 在资本市场，预算并不是写死的"表格"，而是随着交易进程动态流动的"肌体"。最有弹性的部分，往往藏在交易的外围，但作用却不容小觑。 比如说，尽职调查。这本是个"看家本领"，但不是一成不变的流程。美国更好并购集团（Goheal）在处理一家科技型标的时，就根据其数据清晰度、大额订 单确认透明度，主动建议客户缩减法律尽调范围，把预算更多投向了IT系统 ...

Core Insights - The article discusses the complexities and challenges of cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) in the Hong Kong capital market, emphasizing the need for preparedness to navigate these challenges [1][4]. Legal and Regulatory Framework Conflicts - In Hong Kong, acquiring control of listed companies requires compliance with both the "Code on Takeovers and Mergers" and specific regulatory requirements from mainland China, such as the State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission's Order No. 36, which can create conflicting compliance challenges [5]. - The dual compliance requirements often place acquirers in a dilemma, particularly in shell transactions involving complex asset structures that may trigger scrutiny under mainland regulations [5]. - Antitrust reviews present another significant challenge, as cross-border acquisitions often require multiple reviews across jurisdictions, complicating the approval process [5]. Cross-Border Capital Flow Challenges - Foreign exchange controls in mainland China pose a major challenge, requiring detailed disclosures that conflict with Hong Kong's confidentiality regulations [6]. - The execution rate of earn-out agreements in cross-border M&A is often below 40% due to foreign exchange limits, leading to risky practices that compromise transaction legality and transparency [6]. - Valuation discrepancies between A-share and Hong Kong markets can range from 30% to 50%, increasing the risk of goodwill impairment during audits for state-owned acquisitions [6]. Governance Power Dynamics - Cross-border M&A involves a struggle for governance and control, with foreign shareholders often leveraging anti-takeover measures to secure board positions, while mainland acquirers seek to influence governance structures [7]. - Conflicts arise between Hong Kong's "super voting shares" and mainland's "one share, one vote" principle, complicating shareholder structure designs [7]. - ESG factors are increasingly important to international investors, but differing focuses on long-term versus short-term performance between Hong Kong and mainland acquirers can create governance gaps post-acquisition [7]. Cultural Differences - Cultural differences, such as the decision-making pace between mainland and Hong Kong entities, can lead to significant delays in transaction processes, with a 57% delay rate in signing key documents [8]. - Misaligned risk perceptions contribute to M&A failures, with Hong Kong investors prioritizing long-term brand value while mainland capital often seeks short-term returns, leading to management challenges post-acquisition [8]. - A staggering 87% of cross-border M&A experiences significant turnover in core teams within three years, posing a major management challenge for acquirers [8]. Solutions to International Challenges - The article suggests a three-pronged solution involving a "pre-communication mechanism for domestic approvals, a Hong Kong SPV firewall, and multi-currency payment channels" to effectively address the challenges of cross-border M&A [10]. - The Goheal Group, with its extensive experience in cross-border M&A, offers tailored solutions to help clients navigate complex legal, regulatory, and cultural challenges [10].

智通财经APP讯，德林控股(01709)公布，于2025年3月31日(交易时段后)，该公司(作为卖方)与各投资者 订立买卖协议，该公司拟向各投资者出售合共3152股待售股份(相当于本公告日期DL Digital Family Office已发行股本约28.0%)，按DL Digital Family Office 100%股权的隐含估值约3500万美元计算，总代 价为约980万美元(即每股DL Digital Family Office股份 3,109美元)。 公告称，该公司透过突触科技有限公司及DL Digital Family Office (HK) Limited (均为DL Digital Family Office的附属公司)一直与多个战略合作伙伴合作，开发及优化人工智能驱动的数字咨询服务平台，即 DLiFO平台(DLiFO)，该平台将运用尖端人工智能，提供精细化的投资策略及客户互动，并进一步将人 工智能代理扩展至以神经科学为基础的人工智能广泛应用于投资及金融服务领域。 董事会认为，订立买卖协议将为订约方提供更大的商业框架，以促进公司、 Qraft Technologies及投资者 在开发专有人工智 ...

Goheal：上市公司资本运作如何推动企业国际化？全球视角解析！ "登泰山而小天下。"——要想在全球市场站稳脚跟，企业必须跳出本土市场的局限，登上资本运作的高地，才能俯瞰更广阔的商业版图。近年来，越来越多 的企业通过资本运作加速国际化进程，从收购海外企业、跨境并购到资本市场融资，资本手段成为企业出海的关键引擎。 美国更好并购集团 美国更好并购集团（Goheal）长期关注全球资本运作的趋势，为企业提供专业并购与国际化布局的策略支持。在当前全球竞争格局下，资本运作如何成为企 业国际化的助推器？有哪些成功经验可以借鉴？让我们从全球市场的角度，深入剖析资本如何塑造企业的全球化未来。 资本运作：打开国际市场的金钥匙 国际化并非简单的"走出去"，而是资本、资源、人才、技术等多维度的全球配置。资本运作在其中扮演着重要角色，帮助企业突破本土市场的限制，快速占 领全球市场份额。企业若仅靠内生增长实现全球扩张，往往步履蹒跚，而借助资本市场的力量，则能事半功倍。美国更好并购集团（Goheal）观察到，在全 球市场上，许多企业通过收购兼并、股权投资、海外上市等方式，实现了业务国际化和品牌的全球影响力。 资本市场的全球化，也为企业的国 ...