经审核委员会的推荐建议，董事会决议委任栢淳会计师事务所有限公司为公司新核数师，以填补安永辞 任后的临时空缺，自2025年8月27日起生效，任期直至公司下届股东周年大会结束为止。 世纪联合控股(01959)发布公告，经公司与安永会计师事务所就建议更换核数师进行讨论后，应董事会 要求，安永同意辞任公司核数师，自2025年8月27日起生效。 ...

英国国家统计局21日公布的数据显示，在截至7月份的财政年度里，英国政府的公共借款总额已经达到 600亿英镑，高于上个财年同期67亿英镑。截至7月底，英国政府的净债务与GDP的比例为96.1%，高于 去年同期0.5个百分点。英国的财政年度从今年4月份开始计算。 为缓解财政紧张状态，英国政府在去年秋季预算中，大幅增加了税收。但最新的数据表明，英国政府的 公共财政紧张状况并没有明显缓解。 英国财政部也可能选择另一条相反的路径，不是增税，而是减税。从短期来看，这将显著放大英国的财 政压力，但从长期来看，将有利于经济增长，从而在根本上有利于财政的整固。 英国财政部在去年已经就第一个方案进行了尝试，但效果不明显。今年会不会尝试第二个方案，英国媒 体均不看好。但不管英国政府采取何种路径，短期来看，英国的财政压力都将进一步加大，从而推动英 国的国债市场收益率进一步上行。这可能会限制英镑对非美元主要货币的升幅。 资讯编辑：刘佳惠 021-26093916 资讯监督：乐卫扬 021-26093827 资讯投诉：陈跃进 021-26093100 英国政府财政紧张状况未获明显缓解的主要原因是，尽管加税增加了政府的收入，但同时期政府的 ...

证券日报网讯 8月26日晚间，启迪药业发布公告称，公司董事会同意变更会计师事务所，拟聘任希格玛 会计师事务所（特殊普通合伙）为公司2025年度财务报告审计机构及内部控制审计机构。公司已就变更 会计师事务所事项与前后任会计师事务所进行了充分沟通，前后任会计师事务所已明确知悉该事项并确 认无异议。 （编辑 李家琪） ...

中证报中证网讯（王珞）8月19日，由财政部主办的第四届全国会计知识大赛第一赛程注册会计师行业 和代理记账行业口试选拔赛在上海国家会计学院举办。天职国际会计师事务所（简称"天职国际"）在本 次比赛中夺得行业第一，并荣获"组织奖"，参赛队员亦斩获个人奖项2金2银，以绝对优势彰显了其在行 业内的领军地位和卓越的人才培养实力。 在注册会计师行业与代理记账行业的选拔中，天职国际代表队表现突出。早在7月26日举行的选拔笔试 中，该所的4名选手总成绩已位列各参赛队伍之首，为后续口试阶段的优异表现奠定了基础。 以赛促学推动行业人才队伍建设 本次大赛的举办旨在宣传会计改革发展成果，普及财会法律法规知识，在全行业营造知法懂法守法的良 好氛围，推动财会专业人才队伍建设。今年正值我国首部《会计法》颁布40周年与新修改的《会计法》 施行1周年，此次赛事也被视为对多年来行业改革与发展成果的一次系统展示。 据了解，整个大赛分为两个赛程，第一赛程由各地区、各行业主管部门组织初赛选拔，优胜队伍获得晋 级资格，进入第二赛程的全国复赛。 天职国际在此次行业选拔赛中的表现，显示出其在专业培训与人才梯队建设上已形成一套有效体系。该 所长期以来坚持"专 ...

Core Viewpoint - The case of financial fraud involving Zeda Yisheng has seen a significant development, with three intermediary institutions filing a lawsuit against 39 accomplices, marking a complete accountability loop in China's capital market for the first time [1][5][6]. Group 1: Background of the Case - Zeda Yisheng, under the service of Dongxing Securities, Tianjian Accounting Firm, and Kangda Law Firm, successfully listed on the STAR Market in June 2020, but was later found to have committed financial fraud [5]. - From 2016 to 2019, Zeda Yisheng inflated its revenue by 342 million yuan and profit by 187 million yuan, with further inflation of revenue and profit in 2020 and 2021 [5][6]. Group 2: Legal Actions and Financial Implications - The three intermediary institutions have initiated a lawsuit seeking a total of 372 million yuan in compensation from the 39 defendants, which includes 37 companies and 2 individuals [1][6]. - The compensation sought represents 95% of the 388 million yuan previously paid to investors by the intermediary institutions after their administrative penalties [8]. Group 3: Responsibility and Accountability - The lawsuit aims to clarify the responsibility chain, allowing intermediary institutions to pursue those who directly assisted in the fraud, aligning with the principle of fault liability in the Civil Code [6][10]. - The case signals a shift from punishing the end parties (listed companies/intermediaries) to targeting the source (trading partners), potentially disrupting the previous "subcontracting" of fraud [6][10]. Group 4: Challenges in Legal Proceedings - Key evidence for the intermediary institutions includes proving that the third parties were aware of Zeda Yisheng's fraudulent intentions and establishing a direct link between improper transactions and the fraudulent outcomes [8][9]. - The difficulty of providing sufficient evidence may impact the success of the claims, with expectations that third parties may only bear partial responsibility [8][9]. Group 5: Future Implications and Recommendations - If the intermediary institutions succeed in their claims, it could set a precedent for similar cases, reshaping market behavior and increasing the costs associated with financial fraud [10]. - Recommendations for enhancing the motivation of intermediary institutions to make advance payments include establishing industry mutual aid funds and simplifying the legal processes for claims [12][14].

Core Viewpoint - The case of Zeda Yisheng's financial fraud has led to a significant legal development where three intermediary institutions are suing 39 accomplices for a total of 372 million yuan, marking a complete accountability loop in China's capital market [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Developments - The three intermediary institutions, Dongxing Securities, Tianjian Accounting Firm, and Kangda Law Firm, have filed lawsuits against 39 defendants, including 37 companies and 2 individuals, for their alleged involvement in Zeda Yisheng's financial fraud [1][4]. - The lawsuit represents the first instance in China where intermediaries can seek compensation from third parties after making advance payments to investors [1][5]. - Legal experts suggest that if the intermediaries win, it could set a significant precedent for similar cases, establishing a standard for accountability in financial fraud [2][5]. Group 2: Financial Details - The total amount being claimed in the lawsuits is 372 million yuan, with Dongxing Securities seeking 215 million yuan, Tianjian Accounting Firm 123 million yuan, and Kangda Law Firm 33.49 million yuan [4]. - The intermediaries had previously compensated investors approximately 388 million yuan, which included a punitive commitment of 105 million yuan from Dongxing Securities [3][6]. Group 3: Challenges and Evidence - The success of the intermediaries' lawsuits hinges on their ability to provide evidence of the defendants' subjective fault and the direct causal relationship between their actions and the damages incurred [1][6]. - Key evidence required includes abnormal transaction records, communication documents, and proof of financial flows that indicate complicity in the fraud [6][7]. - Experts believe that the third parties may only bear partial responsibility due to the intermediaries' own faults and the need for shared accountability among all parties involved [6][7]. Group 4: Market Implications - The case has prompted a reevaluation of how to effectively hold "fraud accomplices" accountable, suggesting a multi-faceted governance system that includes civil compensation, administrative regulation, and criminal liability [2][8]. - Recommendations for enhancing the willingness of intermediaries to make advance payments include establishing specialized liability insurance for false statements and simplifying the judicial recovery process [2][9]. - The case signals a shift from punishing the end parties (listed companies/intermediaries) to targeting the source of fraud (third-party accomplices), potentially reshaping market behavior and compliance awareness [5][7].

Core Viewpoint - The company, 格尔软件, is involved in multiple lawsuits related to claims for compensation from various parties, including accounting and legal firms, following the fraudulent activities of a related company, 泽达易盛, which faced severe penalties from regulatory authorities [1][3]. Group 1: Lawsuit Details - The company received notifications regarding three lawsuits filed by 天健会计, 东兴证券, and 康达律所, which are seeking compensation related to the fraudulent activities of 泽达易盛 [1][2]. - The total amount claimed in the lawsuits includes approximately 123.46 million yuan for案件一, 215.33 million yuan for案件二, and 33.49 million yuan for案件三, summing up to a total of approximately 372.28 million yuan [3]. - The company is one of 39 defendants in these lawsuits, which have not yet gone to trial, and the impact on the company's profits remains uncertain [3]. Group 2: Background on 泽达易盛 - 泽达易盛 was penalized by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) for fraudulent issuance and violations of information disclosure, leading to investor lawsuits against the company and its intermediaries [1][3]. - The CSRC has categorized 泽达易盛's case as a significant example of investor protection, highlighting the serious nature of the fraud and the subsequent administrative penalties imposed [3]. - 泽达易盛 was delisted from the Shanghai Stock Exchange on July 7, 2023, following these violations [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal actions taken by Tianjian Accounting Firm, Dongxing Securities, and Kangda Law Firm against 39 defendants, including Geer Software, for a total claim amount of approximately 372 million yuan, stemming from the fraudulent issuance case of Zeda Yisheng [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Claims - Geer Software is one of the defendants in three lawsuits filed by the aforementioned firms, which are seeking to recover losses after compensating investors a total of 493 million yuan [2][4]. - The lawsuits involve three separate cases with claimed amounts of 1,234.55 million yuan (principal 1,175.576 million yuan, interest 58.974 million yuan), 2,153.32 million yuan, and 334.855 million yuan respectively [4]. - The lawsuits are a continuation of the Zeda Yisheng fraudulent issuance case, where the three firms acted as intermediaries during Zeda Yisheng's IPO [4][5]. Group 2: Background of Zeda Yisheng Case - Zeda Yisheng was listed on the Sci-Tech Innovation Board on June 23, 2020, and was found to have committed financial fraud both before and after its listing [5]. - The company inflated its operating income by 342 million yuan and profits by 187 million yuan from 2016 to 2019, and continued to falsify financial statements in its 2020 and 2021 annual reports [5][7]. - In April 2023, Zeda Yisheng faced administrative penalties from the China Securities Regulatory Commission, leading to investor lawsuits against the company and its intermediaries [7]. Group 3: Implications of the Legal Actions - The lawsuits represent a significant development in the accountability mechanisms within the capital market, as intermediaries shift from passive compensation to actively pursuing those responsible for the fraud [7]. - The case is seen as a breakthrough in establishing a "responsibility closed loop," where all parties involved in the fraudulent activities may face legal consequences [7]. - The actions signal a dynamic balance in the responsibilities of intermediaries, where diligent parties can mitigate losses through recovery efforts, while negligent parties expose their risk management failures [7].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the legal actions taken against Gel Software and other parties involved in the fraudulent issuance and information disclosure violations related to Zeda Yisheng Technology Co., Ltd, highlighting the financial implications and the ongoing litigation process [2][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - On August 12, Gel Software announced that it, along with 38 other defendants, is being sued for a total of approximately 37,227.26 million yuan across three cases related to fraudulent issuance and information disclosure violations [2]. - The three cases involve claims of 12,345.51 million yuan, 21,533.20 million yuan, and 3,348.55 million yuan respectively, with the total amount claimed being 37,227.26 million yuan [2]. - The plaintiffs include Dongxing Securities, Tianjian Accounting Firm, and Beijing Kangda Law Firm, all of which were intermediaries in Zeda Yisheng's initial public offering [4]. Group 2: Background and Financial Impact - In April 2023, Zeda Yisheng was penalized by the China Securities Regulatory Commission for fraudulent issuance and information disclosure violations, leading to investor lawsuits against Zeda Yisheng and its intermediaries [4]. - Following the penalties, Dongxing Securities, Tianjian Accounting, and Kangda Law Firm collectively paid approximately 493 million yuan to investors and the regulatory authority, prompting them to seek recovery of these costs through litigation against other involved parties [4]. - Gel Software's involvement stems from business transactions with Zeda Yisheng in 2018 and 2020, which were later found to lack commercial substance during a self-examination process [4].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the upcoming legal disputes involving Tianjian Accounting Firm, specifically two lawsuits initiated by former chief partner Wang Guohai, focusing on partnership disputes and withdrawal issues [2][3]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - On August 8, 2025, the Hangzhou West Lake District People's Court will hear two lawsuits against Tianjian Accounting Firm, both filed by Wang Guohai [2]. - The lawsuits are categorized as a withdrawal dispute and a partnership dispute [2][3]. - The court sessions are scheduled for 9:30 AM and 4:30 PM on the same day, with specific case numbers assigned [3]. Group 2: Leadership Changes - Tianjian Accounting Firm held its 2024 partner conference on January 8-9, 2024, where Wang Guohai was elected as the executive partner (chief partner) [3]. - The conference also resulted in the election of 13 members to the fifth partner management committee and five members to the supervisory committee [3]. - On December 19, 2024, it was announced that Wang Guohai would no longer serve as chief partner, with Zhong Jianguo appointed as the new chief partner [4].