Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of promoting Chinese culture globally, highlighting the role of art, particularly sculpture, in conveying Chinese stories and values to the world [1][2]. Group 1: Cultural Promotion through Art - The bronze sculpture "Purple Qi Comes from the East: Laozi Exits the Pass," created by renowned sculptor Wu Weishan, was unveiled at the National University of Arts in Russia, marking a significant cultural exchange between China and Russia [1][2]. - Wu Weishan has established numerous sculptures in various countries, including South Korea, Brazil, Germany, France, Italy, Greece, and Japan, showcasing Chinese culture and philosophy through art [2][3]. Group 2: Dialogue between Civilizations - Wu Weishan believes that art serves as a mirror of human civilization, allowing for a dialogue between different cultures and the sharing of universal values such as truth, goodness, and beauty [3][4]. - The artist's works often feature dialogues between historical figures from China and the West, such as Confucius and Socrates, to foster cultural resonance and understanding [5][6]. Group 3: Factors for Successful Cultural Export - Wu Weishan identifies four key factors that contribute to the successful international presence of his sculptures: the significant contributions of historical figures, increased global attention on China due to its economic development, unique cultural expressions, and the forward-looking dialogue value of the selected themes [7]. Group 4: Future Expectations for Cultural Exchange - The article discusses the need for China to actively implement the concept of building a community with a shared future for mankind, promoting mutual understanding and emotional connections through cultural and artistic exchanges [8]. - The establishment of alliances such as the "Silk Road National Art Museum Alliance" and the "BRICS National Art Museum Alliance" reflects China's commitment to international cultural collaboration [8][9]. Group 5: Challenges and Strategies in Cultural Dissemination - Wu Weishan highlights the challenges faced in promoting Chinese culture abroad, emphasizing the need for a two-way cultural exchange rather than a one-sided output [10][11]. - The article suggests that cultural dissemination should involve a comprehensive approach, showcasing both historical and contemporary Chinese achievements while adapting to the cultural contexts of different countries [11][12]. Group 6: Advice for Young Artists - Young artists are encouraged to deeply understand Chinese culture and the cultural backgrounds of the countries they wish to engage with, ensuring that their work is both meaningful and relatable [13]. - The importance of creating impactful art that represents China's image on the global stage is emphasized, as each piece can serve as a window into Chinese culture for international audiences [13].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the ongoing issue of box office manipulation in Chinese cinemas, particularly focusing on the recent "补票房" (supplementing box office) actions taken by cinemas that were found to have engaged in fraudulent practices during the Spring Festival period. This has led to significant financial implications for the industry, with the total amount of supplementary box office exceeding 2 billion yuan, marking one of the largest actions of its kind in history [1][5]. Group 1: Box Office Manipulation - "补票房" actions are a response to cinemas that engaged in fraudulent practices, such as inflating box office numbers, which were discovered through big data analysis [3][5]. - The concept of "影厅服务费" (theater service fee) was introduced to compensate cinemas for the operational costs of special screening rooms, but some cinemas exploited this by charging excessive fees that did not contribute to the official box office [4][5]. - The recent crackdown on these practices has revealed that many cinemas were charging service fees exceeding 30%, violating established regulations [5][6]. Group 2: Historical Context of Box Office Fraud - The term "偷票房" (stealing box office) refers to cinemas underreporting ticket sales to retain a larger share of revenue, a practice that has been prevalent since the implementation of the revenue-sharing system [6][8]. - The first major public awareness of box office fraud occurred with the release of "Avatar" in 2010, where it was estimated that over 20% of ticket sales were unreported [8]. - "挪票房" (moving box office) is another fraudulent practice where ticket sales from one film are reported under another, often to meet funding requirements or revenue-sharing agreements [9][10]. Group 3: Regulatory Measures and Industry Response - In response to the rampant box office fraud, the National Film Administration has implemented stricter regulations and is utilizing advanced technology for monitoring and enforcement [15][16]. - The industry has seen a reduction in the scale of box office fraud, with estimates suggesting that currently about 4% of total box office revenue may still be unreported [15][16]. - The involvement of fans and the public in monitoring box office practices has been highlighted as a significant factor in increasing transparency and accountability within the industry [14].