Core Viewpoint - The company, Jinju Group, plans to enhance its financing efficiency and optimize its debt structure by applying for the qualification to issue various debt financing instruments in the interbank market, with a total issuance limit of up to 40 billion yuan [1][2] Group 1 - The company has approved a proposal to register and issue debt financing tools at the 20th meeting of the 7th Board of Directors held on March 30, 2026 [1] - The registration project includes a unified registration for various non-financial corporate debt financing instruments (DFI) [1] - The types of instruments to be issued include but are not limited to super short-term financing bills, short-term financing bills, medium-term notes, perpetual medium-term notes, targeted debt financing tools, and asset-backed notes [1] Group 2 - The total issuance scale is capped at a maximum of 40 billion yuan during the effective period of the issuance [1] - The bond terms will be determined based on the type of instruments issued, with medium-term notes and perpetual medium-term notes having terms exceeding one year, short-term financing bills not exceeding 12 months, and super short-term financing bills not exceeding 9 months [1]

Investment Rating - The industry investment rating is "Overweight," indicating that the growth level of the industry is expected to exceed that of the CSI 300 index over the next six months [3][37]. Core Views - The securities sector experienced a decline of 2.79% this week, underperforming the CSI 300 index by 0.60 percentage points but outperforming the Shanghai Composite index by 0.59 percentage points. The current price-to-book (PB) ratio for the brokerage sector is 1.23 times [1]. - The report highlights that the overall performance of brokerages is expected to improve in 2025 due to active market trading, a recovery in equity markets, and the integration of the industry, which is anticipated to enhance profits. The China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) is also focusing on the "14th Five-Year Plan" for capital markets, emphasizing the need for long-term funding and investor returns [2][3]. - Regulatory encouragement for industry consolidation is noted, with mergers and acquisitions seen as effective means for brokerages to achieve external growth and improve competitiveness [6]. Summary by Sections Securities Weekly Data Tracking - The report tracks various segments of the brokerage business, including brokerage, investment banking, asset management, credit, and proprietary trading [9]. Insurance Weekly Data Tracking - The insurance sector saw a decline of 1.99%, outperforming the CSI 300 index by 0.20 percentage points and the Shanghai Composite index by 1.39 percentage points. The focus is on developing commercial health insurance and long-term care insurance, as well as enhancing the catastrophe insurance system [7][8]. Industry Dynamics - The report discusses the regulatory environment and its impact on the securities and insurance sectors, emphasizing the importance of high-quality development and the need for insurance companies to focus on core business areas [7][8][31].

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Views of the Report - The issuing guidance rates announced by the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors (NAFMII) during the period from March 16th to March 22nd showed a divergence, with most rates for medium - and short - term maturities decreasing and most for long - term maturities increasing, with an overall change range of -2 BP to 1 BP [1][51]. - The issuance scale of credit bonds continued to increase on a week - on - week basis and was at a historically high level. Corporate bonds remained at zero issuance, the issuance amount of private placement notes decreased, and the issuance amounts of other varieties increased. The net financing of credit bonds increased on a week - on - week basis [1][51]. - In the secondary market, the trading volume of credit bonds increased on a week - on - week basis, with the trading volume of corporate bonds decreasing and that of other varieties increasing [1][51]. - The yields of credit bonds declined overall, with a larger decline in the medium - and short - term [1][51]. - In terms of credit spreads, the medium - and short - term credit spreads of medium - and short - term notes and corporate bonds generally narrowed, while the long - term spreads widened; the 5 - year credit spread of urban investment bonds widened, and most spreads of other maturities narrowed [1][51]. - From an absolute return perspective, the relatively strong allocation demand will drive the credit bond market to continue its recovery. Although fluctuations and adjustments are inevitable under the influence of multiple factors, the conditions for a full - scale bear market in credit bonds are still insufficient. In the long run, future yields are still in a downward channel, and the idea of increasing allocation during adjustments is still feasible [1][51]. - From a relative return perspective, the compression space of credit spreads at all maturities is insufficient at present, and the cost - effectiveness of most varieties for allocation is not high. The coupon strategy in the current allocation should be cautious, while the trading strategy can be moderately optimistic. The key to bond selection is to focus on the trend of interest - rate bonds and the coupon value of individual bonds [1][51]. - The end - of - quarter factor may cause some disturbances. Considering the possible volatile market in the near future, it is necessary to coordinate and transform the allocation and trading strategies in line with the trend. Attention should also be paid to the effectiveness of growth - stabilizing policies, the impact of the equity market on the bond market, and the influence of changes in the capital market and supply - demand pattern on market sentiment [1][51]. - The central and local governments are continuously and actively optimizing real - estate policies, which have played a positive role in promoting the stabilization of the real - estate market. For real - estate bonds, investors with higher risk tolerance can consider early layout, focusing on enterprises with outstanding new financing and sales recovery, and balancing risks and returns. The focus of allocation should be on central and local state - owned enterprises with stable historical valuations and excellent performance, as well as high - quality private enterprise bonds with strong guarantees. Longer durations can be used to increase returns, and trading opportunities from the valuation repair of oversold real - estate enterprise bonds can also be appropriately explored [2][52][53]. - For urban investment bonds, the possibility of default is low, and they can still be a key allocation variety for credit bonds. The debt resolution has achieved remarkable results, and the reform and transformation of financing platforms are in the final stage. Attention can be paid to the reform and transformation opportunities of "entity - type" financing platforms [3][53]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 Primary Market Situation 3.1.1 Issuance and Maturity Scale - From March 16th to March 22nd, a total of 482 credit bonds were issued, with an issuance amount of 396.635 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 17.70%. The net financing of credit bonds was 92.633 billion yuan, an increase of 11.306 billion yuan on a week - on - week basis [12]. - By variety, corporate bonds had zero issuance with a net financing of -9.783 billion yuan, an increase of 0.999 billion yuan on a week - on - week basis; 182 corporate bonds were issued, with an issuance amount of 138.026 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 19.10%, and a net financing of 45.560 billion yuan, an increase of 28.919 billion yuan on a week - on - week basis; 148 medium - term notes were issued, with an issuance amount of 124.231 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 3.52%, and a net financing of 53.343 billion yuan, a decrease of 6.639 billion yuan on a week - on - week basis; 122 short - term financing bills were issued, with an issuance amount of 119.022 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 46.39%, and a net financing of 9.016 billion yuan, a decrease of 1.171 billion yuan on a week - on - week basis; 30 private placement notes were issued, with an issuance amount of 15.356 billion yuan, a week - on - week decrease of 22.38%, and a net financing of -5.503 billion yuan, a decrease of 10.802 billion yuan on a week - on - week basis [12]. 3.1.2 Issuance Interest Rates - The issuing guidance rates announced by the NAFMII showed a divergence, with most rates for medium - and short - term maturities decreasing and most for long - term maturities increasing, with an overall change range of -2 BP to 1 BP. By maturity, the rate change range for 1 - year varieties was -1 BP to 1 BP, for 3 - year varieties was -2 BP to 0 BP, for 5 - year varieties was -1 BP to 1 BP, and for 7 - year varieties was -2 BP to 1 BP. By rating, the rate change range for key AAA - rated and AAA - rated varieties was -1 BP to 1 BP, for AA + - rated varieties was 0 BP to 1 BP, for AA - rated varieties was -2 BP to -1 BP, and for AA - - rated varieties was -1 BP to 1 BP [13]. 3.2 Secondary Market Situation 3.2.1 Market Trading Volume - From March 16th to March 22nd, the total trading volume of credit bonds was 980.127 billion yuan, a week - on - week increase of 10.10%. The trading volumes of corporate bonds, corporate bonds, medium - term notes, short - term financing bills, and private placement notes were 17.686 billion yuan, 382.526 billion yuan, 358.574 billion yuan, 162.769 billion yuan, and 58.572 billion yuan respectively. The trading volume of credit bonds increased on a week - on - week basis, with the trading volume of corporate bonds decreasing and that of other varieties increasing [16]. 3.2.2 Credit Spreads - For medium - and short - term notes, most varieties' credit spreads widened. Specifically, the 1 - year AAA - rated variety's credit spread widened, while those of other varieties narrowed; for the 3 - year period, the credit spreads of AAA - rated and AA + - rated varieties widened, while those of other varieties narrowed; the 5 - year and 7 - year credit spreads widened [19]. - For corporate bonds, most varieties' credit spreads widened. Specifically, for the 1 - year and 3 - year periods, the credit spread of the AAA - rated variety widened, while those of other varieties narrowed; the 5 - year and 7 - year credit spreads widened [26]. - For urban investment bonds, the credit spreads of each variety showed mixed trends. Specifically, for the 1 - year and 7 - year periods, the credit spread of the AAA - rated variety widened, while those of other varieties narrowed; for the 3 - year period, the credit spreads of AAA - rated and AA + - rated varieties widened, while those of other varieties narrowed; the 5 - year credit spread widened [29]. 3.2.3 Term Spreads and Rating Spreads - For AA + medium - and short - term notes, the 3Y - 1Y term spread widened by 0.79 BP, the 5Y - 3Y term spread widened by 1.52 BP, and the 7Y - 3Y term spread narrowed by 1.65 BP. The 3Y - 1Y term spread was at a historically low - to - medium percentile, at the 25.8% percentile; the 5Y - 3Y term spread was at the 28.3% percentile; the 7Y - 3Y term spread was at the 35.0% percentile. In terms of rating spreads, the (AA - )-(AAA) spread of 3 - year medium - and short - term notes narrowed by 2.00 BP, the (AA)-(AAA) spread narrowed by 2.00 BP, and the (AA + )-(AAA) spread remained the same as the previous period. The (AA - )-(AAA) spread was at a historically low level, at the 0.6% percentile; the (AA)-(AAA) spread was at the 5.0% percentile; the (AA + )-(AAA) spread was at the 1.6% percentile [36]. - For AA + corporate bonds, the 3Y - 1Y term spread widened by 0.41 BP, the 5Y - 3Y term spread widened by 2.31 BP, and the 7Y - 3Y term spread widened by 2.39 BP. The 3Y - 1Y term spread was at a historically low - to - medium percentile, at the 27.1% percentile; the 5Y - 3Y term spread was at the 25.8% percentile; the 7Y - 3Y term spread was at the 33.8% percentile. In terms of rating spreads, the (AA - )-(AAA) spread of 3 - year corporate bonds narrowed by 2.00 BP, the (AA)-(AAA) spread narrowed by 2.00 BP, and the (AA + )-(AAA) spread narrowed by 2.00 BP. The (AA - )-(AAA) spread was at a historically low level, at the 0.1% percentile; the (AA)-(AAA) spread was at the 5.2% percentile; the (AA + )-(AAA) spread was at the 3.0% percentile [41]. - For AA + urban investment bonds, the 3Y - 1Y term spread widened by 0.40 BP, the 5Y - 3Y term spread widened by 1.07 BP, and the 7Y - 3Y term spread widened by 0.07 BP. The 3Y - 1Y term spread was at a historically low - to - medium percentile, at the 23.0% percentile; the 5Y - 3Y term spread was at the 20.4% percentile; the 7Y - 3Y term spread was at the 37.7% percentile. In terms of rating spreads, the (AA - )-(AAA) spread of 3 - year urban investment bonds narrowed by 2.00 BP, the (AA)-(AAA) spread narrowed by 2.00 BP, and the (AA + )-(AAA) spread narrowed by 1.00 BP. The (AA - )-(AAA) spread was at a historically low level, at the 2.1% percentile; the (AA)-(AAA) spread was at the 0.5% percentile; the (AA + )-(AAA) spread was at the 0.5% percentile [44]. 3.3 Credit Rating Adjustment and Default Bond Statistics 3.3.1 Credit Rating Adjustment Statistics - According to iFinD statistics, during the period from March 16th to March 22nd, the ratings (including outlooks) of 2 companies were adjusted, with 1 downgraded and 1 upgraded [48]. 3.3.2 Default and Extended - Maturity Bond Statistics - There were no defaults of credit bonds under any issuer during the period from March 16th to March 22nd. There were also no extended - maturity credit bonds under any issuer during this period [50]. 3.4 Investment Views - The same as the core views of the report, including the analysis of primary and secondary markets, yield, credit spreads, and investment strategies from absolute and relative return perspectives, as well as investment suggestions for real - estate bonds and urban investment bonds [1][51][52][53].

Core Viewpoint - China Coal Energy Co., Ltd. has received approval to issue debt financing tools totaling up to RMB 40 billion, including medium-term notes, with a validity period until December 31, 2027 [1] Group 1 - The company’s board approved the issuance of debt financing tools at the annual shareholders' meeting on June 27, 2025, with a total amount not exceeding RMB 40 billion [1] - The company has received a registration notice from the China Interbank Market Dealers Association, allowing it to register medium-term notes amounting to RMB 5 billion, valid for two years from the date of the notice [1] - The underwriting for the medium-term notes will be jointly led by CITIC Securities Co., Ltd., Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and CITIC Bank [1] Group 2 - The company will issue medium-term notes in accordance with the registration notice and relevant regulations, ensuring proper information disclosure [2]

Core Viewpoint - China Coal Energy Co., Ltd. has received approval for the registration of medium-term notes amounting to RMB 50 billion, as part of a broader authorization to issue debt financing tools totaling up to RMB 400 billion until December 31, 2027 [1][2]. Group 1 - The company's board approved the issuance of debt financing tools at the 2024 annual shareholders' meeting on June 27, 2025, with a total limit of RMB 400 billion [1][2]. - The registered amount for the medium-term notes is RMB 50 billion, valid for two years from the date of the acceptance notice issued by the China Interbank Market Dealers Association [1][2]. - The underwriting for the medium-term notes will be jointly led by CITIC Securities Co., Ltd., Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and CITIC Bank [1][2]. Group 2 - The company plans to issue the medium-term notes in tranches during the registration validity period and will disclose the issuance results through channels recognized by the Dealers Association [3][4]. - The issuance will comply with the relevant rules and guidelines for non-financial corporate debt financing tools [4].

Core Viewpoint - China Coal Energy Company Limited has received approval to issue debt financing tools totaling up to RMB 40 billion, with a resolution valid until December 31, 2027 [1] Group 1: Debt Financing Authorization - The company’s annual general meeting approved the proposal to continue granting general authorization for issuing debt financing tools [1] - The approved debt financing tools include, but are not limited to, medium-term notes [1] Group 2: Medium-Term Notes Registration - The company has received a registration notice from the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors, allowing it to register medium-term notes amounting to RMB 5 billion [1] - The registration is valid for two years from the date of the notice, and the company can issue medium-term notes in installments during this period [1] - The joint lead underwriters for the medium-term notes are CITIC Securities Co., Ltd., Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and CITIC Bank [1]

Core Viewpoint - The company, China Coal Energy (01898), has received a registration notice from the National Association of Financial Market Institutional Investors, allowing it to issue medium-term notes totaling RMB 5 billion [1] Group 1 - The registered amount for the medium-term notes is RMB 5 billion, valid for two years from the date of the registration notice [1] - The joint lead underwriters for this issuance are CITIC Securities, Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and CITIC Bank [1] - The company can issue the medium-term notes in tranches during the validity period and must disclose the issuance results through approved channels [1]

Core Viewpoint - China Coal Energy (601898.SH) has received a registration notice from the China Interbank Market Dealers Association for its medium-term notes, allowing the company to issue up to RMB 5 billion in registered notes over the next two years [1] Group 1 - The registered amount for the medium-term notes is RMB 5 billion, valid for two years from the date of the registration notice [1] - The joint lead underwriters for the issuance are CITIC Securities Co., Ltd., Industrial and Commercial Bank of China, and China CITIC Bank [1] - The company plans to issue the medium-term notes in tranches during the registration period and will disclose the issuance results through approved channels [1] Group 2 - The company will issue the medium-term notes in accordance with the relevant rules and guidelines, including the Non-Financial Enterprise Debt Financing Instruments Registration and Issuance Rules [1] - The company is committed to ensuring proper information disclosure as required by the registration notice [1]

Group 1 - The company announced a medium-term note registration amounting to RMB 5 billion [1] - The registration validity period is two years from the date of the acceptance registration notice [1]

1. Report Industry Investment Rating No relevant content provided. 2. Core Viewpoints of the Report - In late Q1, institutional behavior in the bond market has changed. The allocation disk has strong buying power, while funds and wealth management products are relatively weak. The "fixed - income +" products are facing significant redemption pressure, and the bond market strategy focuses on short - term 3 - 5y term spread compression and long - term opportunities after over - decline [1][3][4]. 3. Summary by Directory 3.1 First Quarter: Characteristics of Bond Buying by Various Institutions 3.1.1 Overall Bond Buying by Institutions in Q1: Strong Allocation Disk, Weak Funds and Wealth Management - **Allocation Disk**: Large banks significantly increased net purchases of government bonds over 5y. Small and medium - sized banks increased net purchases of 30y government bonds and 20y local bonds. Insurance companies, driven by dividend - paying insurance, included 3 - 5y Tier 2 and perpetual bonds in their top five holdings [13]. - **Trading Disk**: Securities firms' net purchases were in line with seasonality, with a significant reduction in duration, more allocation to 1y interest rates and Tier 2 and perpetual bonds, and reduction of ultra - long bonds. Funds still focused on credit coupons, increasing the proportion of 1 - 5y credit and Tier 2 and perpetual bonds [13]. - **Bank Wealth Management**: In Q1, due to the priority of "deposit rush" tasks in the banking system, the scale growth of bank wealth management was weak, and the net purchases of direct investment and entrusted investment in the secondary market both increased less. In terms of structure, direct investment shortened the term, and entrusted investment increased the exploration of spreads in policy - financial bonds [14]. 3.1.2 By Institution: Insurance Enters the Allocation Window at the End of the Quarter, and Wealth Management Will Follow in Q2 - **Banks**: They have a strong demand for long - term bonds. At the end of the quarter, the pressure to realize profits is not large, and there is still a need for bond allocation in the future [18]. - **Insurance**: The "good start" funds entered the allocation window in March, and the bond - allocation progress is slower than last year, with potential for further allocation. Attention should be paid to the spread compression opportunities of ultra - long local bonds in Q2 [23]. - **Funds**: From the end of Q1 to Q2, there is usually a seasonal recovery in bond - buying power. In Q2, it is conducive to the spread compression of policy - financial bonds [25][28]. - **Wealth Management**: It is expected to see scale growth and a peak season for bond allocation in Q2. Attention can be paid to the spread compression opportunities of Tier 2 and perpetual bonds [29]. - **Securities Firms**: They continue to short - sell 30y government bonds and start to buy 50y government bonds [30]. 3.2 "Fixed - Income +" Redemption: How Big Is the Pressure? 3.2.1 Recent "Fixed - Income +" Redemption: Greater Pressure than in November 2025 and January 2026, Close to the Russia - Ukraine Conflict Period - In March, the equity market declined, and the Shanghai Composite Index fell below 4000 points, leading to a significant increase in the redemption pressure of "fixed - income +" funds. The redemption pressure is stronger than in the previous two rounds and is close to that during the Russia - Ukraine conflict [34][41]. 3.2.2 When Will the Redemption Ease? Pay Attention to the Policy - making Layer's Expectations for Market Stability and the Use of Tools - The central bank recently held a party committee meeting, showing an earlier demand to maintain the stable operation of the stock market. Looking back at the situation after the Russia - Ukraine conflict in 2022, relevant meetings and policies helped stabilize the market. The central bank has innovated a series of financial policies to support the stable operation of the capital market. In the future, attention should be paid to the changes in the "claims on other financial corporations" item [43][44][47]. 3.3 Bond Market Strategy: Focus on 3 - 5y Term Spread Compression in the Short - Term and Seize Opportunities after Over - Decline in the Long - Term 3.3.1 This Week: α Spread Compression for Bonds within 5y - This week, the short - term bonds performed well. The certificate of deposit (CD) yield dropped close to 1.5%, driving the α spread compression of bonds within 5y [48]. 3.3.2 Short - Term: Limited Downward Space for 1y Bonds, Potential for Continuous Compression of 3 - 5y Spreads - The space for 1y short - term leverage to capture interest rate spreads has been extremely compressed, and the focus of bond selection may shift to 3 - 5y bonds. CDs may fluctuate at a low level of 1.5 - 1.55% in the short term, and attention should be paid to the marginal changes in funds at the end of the quarter [51][56]. 3.3.3 Long - Term: 10y Government Bonds to Fluctuate between 1.8% - 1.85%, 30y Government Bonds' Sentiment to Stabilize, Pay Attention to Over - Decline Recovery - **10y Government Bonds**: It is expected to fluctuate in a narrow range of 1.8% - 1.85%. It is recommended to hold existing assets and gradually increase positions for incremental funds if the yield continues to rise. - **30y Government Bonds**: The core fluctuation range of the 30 - 10y active bond spread may be 40 - 50bp. Traders can pay attention to trading opportunities when the spread widens to over 50bp, and allocators can gradually enter the market when the 30y government bond yield rises above 2.3%. Attention can also be paid to the spread - mining value of 4 - 5y China Development Bank bonds, 10y China Development Bank bonds, and 20y local bonds [57][60][61]. 3.4 Interest - Rate Bond Market Review: CDs Hit a New Low, and the Yield Curve Steepened - **Funding**: The central bank's open - market operations (OMO) had a net injection, and the funding situation was balanced and loose [76]. - **Primary Issuance**: The net financing of government bonds and local bonds increased, while that of policy - financial bonds and inter - bank CDs decreased [80]. - **Benchmark Changes**: The term spreads of government bonds and China Development Bank bonds both widened [86].