共享充电宝

Search documents
新华视点丨快递计重、停车计时等“向上取整”,合理吗?
Xin Hua She· 2025-07-11 11:50
Core Viewpoint - The practice of "rounding up" in pricing, such as charging for 3 kg for a 2.1 kg package, raises concerns about consumer rights and compliance with regulations in various industries, including express delivery and parking services [1][4]. Group 1: Industry Practices - The "rounding up" pricing method has become a common practice in the express delivery industry, with different companies adopting varying standards for weight measurement [2][4]. - Some express companies, like EMS, charge based on the actual weight, while others, such as SF Express, have specific rounding rules based on weight thresholds [2][4]. - Similar "rounding up" practices are observed in parking fees and shared services, where charges are often based on minimum time increments [3][4]. Group 2: Regulatory Framework - Existing regulations, such as the "Guidelines for Express Business Operations" by the State Post Bureau, require express companies to use accurate measurement tools and inform customers of pricing standards [4][5]. - New national standards effective from April 2024 mandate that billing weight must retain at least one decimal place, emphasizing the need for transparency in pricing [4][5]. Group 3: Consumer Rights and Legal Implications - Legal experts argue that "rounding up" without clear disclosure may constitute a form of price inflation and violate consumer protection laws [5][6]. - The principle of fair trading is compromised when companies charge more than the actual service cost, leading to potential legal challenges against such practices [5][6]. Group 4: Recommendations for Improvement - Companies are encouraged to establish fair pricing standards and improve transparency in their billing practices to protect consumer rights [6][7]. - The implementation of advanced technology for accurate measurement and billing is recommended to enhance service quality and compliance with regulations [6][7].
充电宝厂商“爆雷”,都是电芯惹的祸?
首席商业评论· 2025-07-04 03:55
3C认证为何2024年才出? 近期,充电宝企业的焦虑情绪或许比盛夏酷暑更甚。 7月2日,国内充电宝召回风波持续升级,涉事品牌罗马仕的法定代表人再度变更。据天眼查及多家媒体信息,2025年4月23日,雷社杏接替雷桂斌担任罗马仕法定 代表人;仅两个多月后,雷社杏于7月2日卸任,由雷杏容接任。这一系列频繁更替,正值罗马仕因充电宝存在自燃风险遭多所高校禁用、启动大规模产品召回、 3C认证被暂停的危机漩涡之际。随着舆论持续发酵,据媒体统计,罗马仕每月营收损失或达1亿元。 都是电芯惹的祸? 7月3日午夜, 充电宝品牌罗马仕官微发出声明:暂时否认倒闭。虽然回应了之前倒闭的传闻,但他们家的产品在短期内肯定是没人会买了,如今的在线店铺也只 有数据线在卖了。 与此同时,深陷召回风波的充电宝企业正忙于处理消费者的退换需求,而多家快递企业紧接着将召回的充电宝列入收寄禁区。另一家涉事品牌安克为此不得不投 入逾10万个专用防火安全袋,保障召回产品的安全回收。 这场充电宝行业的信任危机,源于6月媒体披露的一则紧急通知:民航局发布公告,自6月28日起,禁止旅客携带无3C标识、标识不清或已被召回的充电宝乘坐境 内航班。这一规定出台后,曾因便携 ...
充电宝暴雷,击穿了消费品信任底线
3 6 Ke· 2025-07-04 02:20
Core Insights - The charging treasure industry has faced a significant crisis, transforming from a "necessity" to a "dangerous product" due to safety concerns, leading to widespread consumer anxiety and brand trust issues [1][4][22] - The incident highlights the structural collapse of the industry driven by low-price competition and the erosion of brand trust [4][11][29] Industry Overview - The rapid growth of the charging treasure market is linked to the rise of smartphones, with the number of manufacturers increasing from 500 to 3000 within a year due to high demand [5][7] - In 2023, the global charging treasure market reached $3.29 billion, with projections of $3.41 billion by 2030, and China being the largest production and sales market [7][8] Crisis Details - In June 2025, multiple universities in Beijing reported that a specific model of charging treasure was prone to explosions, prompting major recalls from brands like Romoss and Anker Innovation [2][4] - The China Civil Aviation Administration banned the transport of non-3C certified charging treasures on domestic flights, leading to a halt in sales and distribution [2][18] Consumer Behavior - Consumers are increasingly prioritizing safety and quality over price, indicating a shift towards a "quality-price ratio" rather than just "cost-effectiveness" [12][29] - The crisis has led to a consumer awakening, where trust in brands is becoming essential, and safety is now a baseline expectation rather than a selling point [12][30] Brand Trust and Compliance - The incident has raised awareness about the importance of 3C certification, with consumers now more vigilant about product safety and compliance [14][19] - Brands must ensure transparency and accountability in their supply chains to rebuild consumer trust, as the loss of trust can be difficult to recover from [20][29] Future Implications - The charging treasure crisis serves as a warning for the entire consumer goods industry, emphasizing the need for a focus on quality and safety to regain consumer confidence [22][31] - The industry is moving towards a new phase where trust and quality will be the primary competitive advantages, rather than price [27][31]
共享充电宝3C认证调查:小电、悦快闪充等品牌不达标
Qi Lu Wan Bao Wang· 2025-07-03 07:52
记者了解到,3C认证,是指中国强制性产品认证,是中国政府为保护消费者人身安全和国家安全、加 强产品质量管理、依照法律法规实施的一种产品合格评定制度。其核心是通过制定统一的技术规范、实 施规则和合格评定程序,对涉及健康、安全、电磁兼容等方面的产品进行强制性认证。涵盖家电、电子 产品、汽车零部件、安全玻璃、电线电缆等近20大类100多种产品。 而针对调查中发现"悦闪快充"共享充电宝上无3C标识也无CQC认证标识的问题,记者多次致电深圳市 悦享智联科技有限公司,均无人接听。 没有3C认证的充电宝还能用吗? 在一处共享充电宝投放点,记者碰到了前来借充电宝的林女士,问及有无3C认证是否对借充电宝产生 影响,林女士表示并不会刻意关注,"手机没电了紧急充电用,不可能扫码借出来之后看看有没有3C认 证,没有的话再换回去,临时充电,能充上就行。" 根据市场监管总局2023年发布的对于移动电源等产品实施强制性产品认证(CCC认证)管理的相关规定 中,要求自2023年8月1日起,指定认证机构开始受理新纳入产品CCC(编注:即3C)认证委托,按照 《强制性产品认证实施规则 信息技术设备》和附件中列明的适用标准开展认证工作;自2024 ...
完善质检体系,守好充电宝安全底线
21世纪经济报道· 2025-07-01 03:06
在消费端,价格则成为一个决定性因素。电商市场上有太多100元以下的充电宝产品,也占了 销量的重头,因此,企业在拼技术的同时还要拼价格。但是,相关研究数据显示,一枚优质 电芯的成本价约为40元至50元,而为了减少成本,企业就会要求电芯供应商降价,供应商则 可能因此在原材料上压降成本。这也是此次多个充电宝品牌大面积召回产品的原因。 在一般情况下,价格与质量往往成正比。2017年江苏省的充电宝监测报告显示,价格区间在 0-150元的产品问题发现率为81.4%,151-200元的为50%,200元以上的为25%,符合"价高质 优"的一般规律。有媒体通过对主流电商平台的历史数据追踪发现,相关品牌同一款快充充电 宝,2021年售价在人民币129元至149元区间,到了2024年底降低到了69元。 现在,许多消费者购买电子产品都在电商平台上完成,而平台可以提供海量的产品供消费者 选择,大多数人更关注价格因素。但在此过程中,一些不良的价格竞争导致相关企业不得不 降低成本,这会进一步影响到质量与安全。安全失守过程是"内卷"的结果,但根源在于安全 底线亟需有效的"守门人"。目前,汽车行业"内卷"与充电宝行业高度类似,都需要"守门人 ...
出海速递 | 接棒外卖和生鲜,美团共享充电宝也出海了/京东物流在沙特推出海外快递品牌JoyExpress
3 6 Ke· 2025-06-19 10:54
Group 1 - Meituan is expanding its shared power bank business overseas, indicating a new growth opportunity for the company [2] - The new tea beverage market is intensifying competition in the U.S., with brands like Heytea and Luckin Coffee making significant moves [3] - Shenzhen's energy storage companies are rapidly entering new markets, driven by a flexible supply chain and responsiveness to global demand [4] Group 2 - JD Logistics has launched a new overseas express delivery brand, JoyExpress, in Saudi Arabia, enhancing its service offerings in the region [7][8] - JD Technology is testing a compliant stablecoin in Hong Kong, aiming for a Q4 launch to facilitate cross-border trade [8] - Beijing Yuxin Technology Group has submitted a listing application to the Hong Kong Stock Exchange, indicating a potential IPO [8] Group 3 - UniUni has completed a D1 round financing of over $70 million, aimed at enhancing digital capabilities and logistics automation [9] - Mammotion has released its first pool cleaning robot, SPINO E1, targeting major global markets [9] - Yushu Technology has finalized its C round financing, with significant participation from major investors [10] Group 4 - Alibaba Cloud is set to launch its second data center in South Korea, expanding its infrastructure [10] - Alibaba International Station has seen a 42% year-on-year increase in platform orders, indicating strong growth in cross-border e-commerce [10] - Alipay+ has introduced a global payment solution for smart glasses, marking an innovation in mobile payment technology [10] Group 5 - OpenAI is offering discounts on its ChatGPT enterprise version, anticipating significant revenue growth from enterprise clients by 2030 [11] - Waymo plans to introduce its autonomous taxi service in New York City, expanding its operational footprint [11] - Zoox, an Amazon subsidiary, is ramping up production of autonomous taxis, with plans for a commercial launch in Las Vegas [11] Group 6 - London is actively seeking to attract more Chinese companies to list on its stock exchange amid a shrinking market [12] - The Chinese Ministry of Commerce is advancing its CPTPP membership process, aiming for deeper integration into international trade [13] - A Chinese business delegation recently visited Kazakhstan, resulting in contracts worth approximately $11 billion [13]
小心“共享充电宝刺客” 有人归还后仍然被扣149元
Yang Shi Xin Wen· 2025-06-15 10:53
共享充电宝是在公共场所提供给人们充电,缓解手机"电量焦虑"的应急好物。然而最近,"共享充电宝刺客"却成了网络热词。明明都已经归还充电宝,可手 机却显示还在计费,这究竟是怎么回事呢? 多地消费者反映 充电宝归还后仍在计费 北京的王女士不久前在北戴河游玩时,扫码租借了一个共享充电宝,用完归还后,过了两天发现还在计费。王女士尝试联系共享充电宝的品牌客服人员解 决,但并不顺利。 多地的消费者也遇到类似情况。郑州的萧女士在青岛游玩时,在高铁站扫了某品牌的充电宝使用了半小时后,因为赶车将充电宝在原处进行了归还,可回家 三天后,她突然收到了一条被扣费149元的消息。 经过进一步了解才知道,这家充电宝的归还方式不是像大多数充电宝那样直接插进柜机,而是要重新打开小程序先扫码再操作归还。 多次联系客服协调后,对方表示会安排人去充电宝柜机核实。最终,萧女士收到了扣除使用费之后的143元退款。 王女士、萧女士的经历不在少数,记者在某投诉平台上以"共享充电宝"为关键词进行搜索,发现有近3万条相关投诉。主要也都集中在归还了却还在持续计 费、不退押金等方面。 同品牌不能易柜归还 指定归还点位不存在 在北京丰台区一餐馆的窗口处,记者扫了某款 ...
广深千余共享充电宝离奇“消失”!业内人士称或存盗卖产业链
Nan Fang Du Shi Bao· 2025-06-10 05:04
近日,广州美团共享充电宝的代理商周小姐向南都记者反映,称自今年以来,其公司投放在广州、深圳等地多个点位的千余美团共享充电宝离奇"下线"失 踪,公司直接经济损失超过7万元。 周小姐告诉南都记者,近期公司盘点设备时系统频繁提示异常"丢宝",在多个辖区报警并查看监控后才发现,投放的共享充电宝批量被盗。 头戴帽子口罩,遮挡严实 嫌疑人深夜扫街"盗宝" "驾驶着电瓶车,作案时清一色都戴着帽子和口罩。"近期,周小姐在广州市天河区、海珠区等多处报警,她发现,这些嫌疑人遮挡严实,即使在摄像头下其 真实面容也难以辨别。 "光是5月,我们一家代理就丢了200多个。"周小姐说,据美团技术人员为其调取的异常数据显示,丢失的充电宝主要来自户外充电机柜,而丢失的时间几乎 都在深夜和凌晨。 | C | D | E | | G | H | | K | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | | 丢宝仓位,机柜类型,丢宝原区,丢宝时间 | | | · 丢宝天数· 去宝省作· | | 丢宝城市 - | 三号线 | | 6 | 8-51 | 直接丢失 | 2025-05-25 03: ...
街头石墩可以看剧+手机无线充电了!网友却表示“拒绝”
猿大侠· 2025-06-03 02:08
如今大多数人都是机不离手,因此出门在外必须要充满电才有安全感,解决手机电量问题除了随身携带充电宝外还可以租借共享充电宝,但目前共享充电宝的租 借费用并不便宜,尤其是景区和高消费场所,价格已经高达6/8元每小时,钱包难免会有些吃紧。 对于深圳市民来说,又多了一个户外充电的选择。近日,深圳街头具备无线充电功能的新型石墩引发网友热议。 这种新型石墩在普通石墩的基础上,加入了视频播放及无线充电功能,支持免费充电,辨识度极高。 根据网传视频,石墩带有电子屏幕,点击屏幕可观看视频,且屏幕下方位置标注了"免费无线充电"几个字。 市民只要将手机放置在石墩上的指定充电位置,手机很快就进入无线充电模式。 按照运营方的说法,带屏幕的石墩是用作广告投放的,效果很好,接下来,他们计划进驻万达广场,并将该项目逐步推广至全国。 石墩显示屏和线路好密封好,可防水防雨,使用的是低压12V电源,符合国家规定的安全电压标准,确保使用安全。 对于能充电的石墩,网友态度却大不同。 支持者认为,这是城市智能化与便民服务的创新结合,有助于缓解市民的"电量焦虑",对依赖电子支付的群体具有实际价值。 反对者则认为,这是伪需求,实际意义不大,一来可能吸引人群滞 ...
2025年县域经济扶持:鲲鹏共享科技如何实现三四线城市铺设计划?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-05-14 23:29
当一二线城市的共享充电宝市场早已变成红海,品牌混战、点位争夺战愈演愈烈时,三四线城市却像一片尚未开垦的沃土,静静等待破局者。2025年,随着 县域经济扶持政策密集出台,下沉市场的消费潜力被推上风口浪尖。而鲲鹏共享科技,这家以"代理模式"为核心的共享充电宝集团,正试图用一套独特的打 法,撕开三四线城市的流量缺口。 但问题来了:共享充电宝在县城真的能赚钱吗? 鲲鹏的"农村包围城市"战略,靠什么落地? 县域经济扶持政策,如何成为他们的杠杆? 今天,我们从商业逻辑、政策红利、实战案例三个维度,拆解鲲鹏共享科技的下沉突围战。 "县城青年"的消费力早已不是刻板印象中的"低价敏感"。根据《2025中国县域消费报告》,三四线城市居民在本地生活服务上的支出年增速达18%,远超一 二线城市。而共享充电宝作为"即时性刚需",在县城的渗透率却不足30%——这意味着,每10个需要充电的人中,有7个可能因找不到设备而流失。 案例: 在四川某县级市,一位曾经营网吧的老板成为鲲鹏合伙人。他利用对本地娱乐场所的熟悉,3个月内铺设80台设备,月流水突破6万元,远超当地平均水平。 鲲鹏的洞察: 2025年,中央财政划拨5000亿元专项资金,用于支 ...