人民财讯8月24日电，券商中国记者注意到，在行业指数持续拉升之际，多只业绩排名领先的医药基 金、军工基金、新消费基金，反而在净值解套之后迎来较大的赎回压力。 有业绩爆棚的创新药基金并不甘心直接清盘，为此召开持有人大会，寻求修改基金合同终止条款，以保 住基金产品的存续。这凸显出股票基金市场火爆趋势中，各类赛道投资的分歧也在逐步加大。 记者注意到，因赎回压力导致合同终止风险或清盘的基金，大多是今年内市场人气热度大、业绩表现好 的优质赛道基，这些基金产品大多取得较好收益率和排名，基金面值接近解套或刚刚完成解套。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The recent trend of high-performing funds implementing "purchase limits" reflects a shift from scale-oriented strategies to investor return-oriented strategies, aimed at protecting existing fund holders' interests amidst a hot market [1][3]. Group 1: Fund Purchase Limits - Several high-performing funds have recently announced limits on large purchases, including the Caizhong Securities Asset Management's Digital Economy Mixed Fund, which has a return rate of 56.37% year-to-date as of August 18 [1]. - The Great Wall Pharmaceutical Industry Selected Mixed Fund and the CCB Flexible Allocation Mixed Fund have also set purchase limits, with year-to-date return rates of 135.09% and 49.74%, respectively [2]. - The招商成长量化选股 fund has implemented its second purchase limit this year, with a return rate of 29.55% as of August 18 [2]. Group 2: Reasons for Purchase Limits - Fund managers indicate that limiting purchases is necessary to protect performance, as large inflows at high net asset values can dilute returns and lead to inefficient cash management [2][3]. - Controlling fund size is crucial to avoid operational constraints on portfolio adjustments, especially when the fund size exceeds the manager's capability, which could lead to significant net asset value fluctuations [3]. Group 3: Market Focus and Alternatives - The limited funds primarily focus on popular sectors such as innovative pharmaceuticals, technology, and military industries, which are currently crowded, suggesting that now may not be the optimal time to invest [3]. - Fund companies are exploring other niche sectors and offering products like "fixed income plus" and FOFs to provide investors with a balanced selection [3][4]. - There is a growing interest in "fixed income plus" products and FOFs, with over 90% of FOFs achieving positive returns this year, making them an attractive option for investors seeking stable returns [4].

故事来源：木木夕 文章整理：落尘 我出生在被群山环抱的小村庄，祖辈世代以农为生。 父母用布满老茧的双手，在贫瘠的土地上为我刨出一条求学之路，将我送进了改变命运的中专 技工学校。 1 初涉基金，尝到甜头 童年物质匮乏的记忆如影随形，这让我对财富产生了近乎偏执的渴求。初入社会时，微薄的工资让我与"万元户"的梦想始终隔着一道天堑。记得那些年， 买衣服要先翻价签，日用品总要挑促销款，这种刻进骨子里的节俭，与其说是传承美德，不如说是困窘生活教会的生存智慧。 命运的转折发生在 2008年 ，当同龄人热议奥运盛事时，我颤抖着双手将攒够的万元存入银行。这张泛黄的存折，不仅承载着十年积蓄，更寄托着农家子 弟对安稳生活的全部想象。 五年后，账户数字奇迹般攀升到六位数， 可定期存款单上3.5%的年利率，却像一记警钟——原来钱也会在通胀中悄然缩水。 真正叩开财富之门的，是位皮肤黝黑的90后同事。这个同样来自大山的年轻人，用助学贷款完成学业后，竟能拿着几百元在资本市场摸索前行。"钱要流 动才有生命"，他轻敲手机屏幕上的K线图，我仿佛看见困在银行保险柜里的积蓄在无声抗议。 那个下午，我在工位上反复摩挲手机，终于下载了天天基 金APP。 ...

Core Viewpoint - The article reflects on the lessons learned from four years of investment experience, emphasizing that investing requires rational planning and long-term commitment rather than following trends blindly [3]. Group 1: The Cost of Following Trends - The investment in popular funds, particularly in sectors like pharmaceuticals and military, led to significant losses when market conditions changed, revealing the risks of single-sector investments [4][6]. - A specific growth value fund experienced a maximum drawdown of over 50% due to heavy exposure to technology stocks during market downturns [4]. Group 2: Misconceptions About Dollar-Cost Averaging - Increasing investment amounts in a declining market did not yield the expected results, as the account faced multiple interruptions due to insufficient funds, missing opportunities to buy at lower prices [9]. - The failure to adjust investment strategies based on market valuations resulted in continued losses, highlighting the importance of timely decision-making [10][12]. Group 3: Emotional Decision-Making - During a market rally in September 2024, the account still showed a loss of over 40%, leading to a decision to cut losses by redeeming a quarter of the investment, which ultimately missed out on subsequent gains [14][15]. - The experience underscored the need for stop-loss decisions to be based on fundamentals rather than emotions, and the importance of investing with disposable income [16]. Group 4: Key Lessons and Insights - Diversification is crucial to survival, as over-concentration in high-volatility sectors can lead to significant setbacks during corrections; a balanced approach with value funds or fixed-income products is recommended [18]. - A long-term perspective and disciplined execution are essential, with stable investment amounts and dynamic valuation thresholds for profit-taking [20][21]. - Independent thinking is more valuable than following trends, as short-term performance may not reflect long-term stability; index funds are suggested for long-term investments over active funds [22]. Group 5: Rebuilding Investment Confidence - The company is now reallocating previously liquidated funds into diversified indices like CSI 300, CSI 500, and major U.S. indices, adhering to a "five-year hold + annual review" strategy to achieve recovery through low-cost averaging [24]. - The narrative concludes with a belief that respecting market dynamics and maintaining a disciplined approach are key to preserving capital and achieving long-term success [25][26].