Workflow
功率二极管
icon
Search documents
这家公司卖壳失败,现要剥离核心业务,股价涨停……
IPO日报· 2025-06-19 12:15
Core Viewpoint - The company, Beijing Airport Technology Park Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Airport Co."), plans to sell 80% of its subsidiary, Beijing Tianyuan Construction Engineering Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Tianyuan Construction"), to its controlling shareholder, Beijing Airport Economic Development Co., Ltd. (referred to as "Airport Development"), in a cash transaction, which is expected to constitute a major asset restructuring [1][2]. Group 1: Business Operations - Prior to the transaction, Airport Co.'s main business segments included construction engineering, property operation and management, and a heating service that will be integrated in 2025. Post-transaction, the company will no longer have construction engineering as part of its core business [2]. - In 2024, Airport Co. reported total revenue of 482 million yuan, with the construction segment contributing approximately 351 million yuan, accounting for over 70% of total revenue. This segment is considered the company's core business [2]. - The company incurred a net loss of 96 million yuan in 2024, primarily due to losses from Tianyuan Construction, which reported a loss of 91.24 million yuan and negative cash flow from operating activities of 17.43 million yuan. The losses were attributed to increased procurement costs and labor costs due to market and local government policy changes [2]. Group 2: Financial Performance - From 2020 to 2024, Airport Co.'s revenue showed a declining trend: 1.118 billion yuan in 2020, 1.013 billion yuan in 2021, 653 million yuan in 2022, 517 million yuan in 2023, and 482 million yuan in 2024. The net profits during the same period were 5 million yuan, -51 million yuan, -53 million yuan, -127 million yuan, and -119 million yuan, indicating continuous losses over four years [5]. - The company had previously considered a shell sale, which ultimately failed. In late 2021, a plan to acquire Ruineng Semiconductor Technology Co., Ltd. was announced but was later terminated due to disagreements on key terms among the parties involved [5][7].