Core Points - The announcement from Suining Market Supervision Administration indicates that 10 out of 187 food samples tested were found to be non-compliant, primarily due to excessive use of food additives and pesticide residue exceeding limits [2][3]. Group 1: Food Safety Supervision - A total of 187 food samples were collected from various categories including grain products, edible agricultural products, condiments, and beverages [2]. - The main issues identified in the non-compliant samples were related to the overuse of food additives and pesticide residues exceeding permissible levels [2][3]. Group 2: Non-compliant Products - Specific non-compliant products included items such as bean curd skin with a lemon yellow additive exceeding the limit of 0.0444g/kg, and green onions with pesticide residues of 2.36mg/kg, which is above the allowed 0.3mg/kg [2][3]. - Other non-compliant products included various food items from local supermarkets and restaurants, indicating a widespread issue in food safety compliance within the region [2][3].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding the "Duoban" trademark used by White Elephant Food Co., with consumers questioning the marketing practices and potential misleading implications of the product labeling [1][3]. Group 1: Trademark and Product Information - The "Duoban" trademark is registered by White Elephant Food Co., and the product weight is confirmed to be as stated on the packaging, indicating no issues with the product itself [5]. - White Elephant has 14 trademarks related to "Duoban," of which 5 are registered, including "Duoban," "White Elephant Duoban," "White Elephant Duoban Bag," and "White Elephant Duoban Bucket," most of which were applied for in September 2018 [5]. Group 2: Consumer Perception and Market Response - A media investigation revealed that the "Duoban" products contain 25% to 20% more content compared to previous versions, with price increases of only about 25%, and some flavors even seeing price reductions [9]. - Legal experts emphasize that while trademark registration is a legal right, it should not mislead consumers, highlighting a growing intolerance for "trademark speculation" as consumer protection laws evolve [11].