华为FreeClip耳机
Search documents
当种草不再“靠感觉”,消费品牌如何养成“概率思维”?
Sou Hu Cai Jing· 2025-12-29 03:16
瑞幸咖啡高管有一句名言:"我们不相信碰巧,更相信数据。" 这家曾经走过低谷的咖啡品牌,如今平均每三天就推出一款新品,生椰拿铁更是在4年内卖出13亿杯。 爆款频出的秘诀,并不仰赖团队的灵光乍现,而是一套将口味、原料、甜度、香气全部数字化的研发体系,基于全国门店的订单数据,从无数要素的排列 组合算出爆款概率最高的答案。 在12月22日的小红书WILL商业大会上,经济学者香帅把这种变化总结为,数据能力已然改变商业形态,未来商业将从"经验时代"走向"概率时代"。 也就是说,品牌越来越不能仰赖"经验"来做决策。 随之而来的问题是,"算概率"的数据从何而来?过往的经验、销售报表和市场调研,只能解答"过去发生了什么",但用户当前在乎什么、烦恼什么、渴望 什么,这些鲜活的反馈,才是企业提升成功概率的关键。 在今年的WILL大会上,小红书提出"种草,进入效果化时代",其背后的底层逻辑,正是通过数据驱动,让品牌在产品、内容、渠道的每个环节,都能读 懂人心,从而提升整体经营的成功概率。 可以说,"种草"已经完全跳出营销层面的定义,成为整个品牌经营链路都绕不开的议题。 同样是靠数据提高爆品命中率,瑞幸在用户订单数据中算爆款概率,华为 ...
司法护“新”更护“心”,华为耳机知识产权案胜诉
Yang Zi Wan Bao Wang· 2025-12-01 23:41
Core Viewpoint - Huawei expresses gratitude to the Suqian court for its fair and efficient judicial protection of its brand following a trademark infringement and unfair competition case involving its FreeClip earphones [1][5]. Summary by Sections Case Background - Huawei launched its first open FreeClip earphones in December 2023, which quickly gained market recognition due to their unique design [2]. - Huawei discovered that two Shenzhen companies were selling earphones with packaging and branding that closely resembled its FreeClip product, using misleading terms that suggested a connection to Huawei [2]. Court Ruling - The Suqian court found that the packaging of the infringing earphones was highly similar to Huawei's FreeClip, likely causing consumer confusion [3]. - The court ruled that the use of Huawei's trademarks in product listings constituted trademark infringement, leveraging Huawei's brand recognition to attract customers [3]. False Advertising - The court identified that the infringing company used misleading statements in its marketing, suggesting performance equivalence or superiority to Huawei's products, which constituted unfair competition [4]. - The court ordered the infringing companies to cease production and sales of the similar earphones and mandated compensation payments totaling 900,000 yuan (approximately 90,000 USD) [4]. Judicial Support for Innovation - This case exemplifies judicial protection for innovative products in the context of a "first launch economy," maintaining market order during the critical initial phase of product release [5]. - The court's actions reflect a commitment to fostering a fair business environment and protecting intellectual property rights, which is crucial for high-tech companies like Huawei [6].
年度实测|我们在2024-2025都踩过什么坑,又真香了哪些好物?
虎嗅APP· 2025-09-29 13:19
Core Insights - The article discusses the dichotomy of consumer behavior, highlighting the tension between rationality and emotion in spending decisions [3] - It features user feedback from the "早点生活" community, showcasing both valuable purchases and regrettable ones [4][29] Group 1: Valuable Purchases - Users reported high satisfaction with products like the Joyoung blender, which is used frequently for making warm drinks [6] - The portable heated water cup was praised for its convenience in winter [8] - The Proya skincare product received positive feedback for improving skin condition [9] - Other recommended items include the Shokz bone conduction headphones and Xiaomi water dispenser, noted for their practicality and efficiency [16][18] Group 2: Regrettable Purchases - Several users expressed disappointment with items like the PS5 and a treadmill, which ended up being underutilized [26][27] - The SKG neck massager was specifically mentioned as uncomfortable and not recommended [27] - Other products that received negative feedback include the DJI Action 5 camera and various skincare items that did not meet expectations [23][22] Group 3: Consumer Insights - The feedback emphasizes that true value in products is derived from everyday use, suggesting a need for more practical and reliable consumer goods [29] - The article introduces the "向上向新榜单" initiative, aiming to curate a list of top products based on user experiences and professional evaluations [29]
华为耳机卖1000多是疯了吗?
半佛仙人· 2025-04-16 11:20
这是半佛仙人的第1782篇原创 1 最近有个特别6的事情,华为在果子的应用商店里上了一个用来连华为耳机的App,还不需要登账号。 果子用户为什么会这么喜欢? 其实,就这个问题已经说出了答案。 我自己也是果子用户,但我也爱华为这个耳机。 越是果子用户,越认可果子那套科技美学,越认可华为这个耳机。 价格根本不构成阻碍,因为果子自己的耳机也这个价啊。 你是果子用户,你不买这个,你买果子的,你省下什么钱了嘛? 没有啊。 这时候华为这个耳机都这么好看这么有设计感这么舒服了,而且同样适配果子手机,然后价格还差不多。 这不是更香了? 一个数码产品香不香,卖的好不好,很简单,就看产品上市一年后降价不降价就好了,这才是,市场真实的选择。 而且谁说好看不是核心竞争力了? 好看这个东西,对果子用户,就是巨大的杀伤力。 如果讲其他品牌的用户有多看重时尚性可能很虚,但对果子用户来说一点都不虚,好看的竞争力在果粉眼中真的太实在了。 很多果子用户那真就是奔着时尚性去的,丑对他们来说是难以接受的。 果子用户爱果子爱的是什么? 是艺术和科技的结合,是承载生活态度的工业设计。 果子历史上不止一款产品为了设计和调性造成产品本身从实用性上出现问题, ...