Core Insights - The recent performance of active equity funds has been under scrutiny, with over 38% of these funds still in losses over the past five years despite a significant number achieving positive returns since 2025 [1][2][3] - Key factors contributing to the underperformance include high-level accumulation, frequent trading, and reliance on specific sectors, which have eroded fund values [1][5][7] Performance Overview - As of November 10, 2025, the Shanghai Composite Index has risen by 19.42%, while 97.45% of active equity funds reported positive returns [2][3] - However, 1019 active equity funds remain in losses, with 38% of the total, indicating a stark contrast in performance for investors who entered the market earlier [1][2] Fund Performance Analysis - Among the 2695 active equity funds with over five years of existence, 1676 have achieved positive returns, with six funds reporting over 200% returns [3] - Conversely, nearly 40% of active equity funds have not turned a profit in five years, with some funds experiencing maximum drawdowns starting in 2021 [3][4] Underperforming Funds - Notable underperformers include funds managed by well-known managers, with losses exceeding 30% over five years [4] - Specific funds like Tianzhi New Consumption and Fangzheng Fubang Innovation Power have reported losses of -65.25% and -62.32%, respectively [3][4] Trading Behavior - High average stock positions during market peaks have been linked to poor long-term performance, with funds showing an average stock position of 84.22% during critical periods [5][6] - Frequent trading has also negatively impacted fund performance, with an average turnover rate of 460.71% across all active equity funds, rising to 508.45% for those with over 30% losses [7][8] Sector Reliance - Many funds have shown over-reliance on traditional sectors, leading to underperformance despite being labeled as "new" or "growth" funds [8][9] - Funds like Tianzhi New Consumption and Invesco Great Wall New Growth have shifted their holdings but still struggle to achieve positive returns [8][9] Market Outlook - The active equity fund market is seeing a resurgence, with 1354 new funds launched in 2025, indicating renewed investor interest [11] - Fund managers are advised to focus on sectors with long-term growth potential, such as high-end manufacturing and new consumption, while being cautious of market volatility [12]

Core Insights - The article highlights the performance of active equity funds in the context of the Shanghai Composite Index surpassing 4000 points for the first time in a decade, revealing that over 97% of these funds achieved positive returns since 2025, yet 38% remain in losses over the past five years [1][2][3] - Key reasons for the underperformance of many active funds include high-level accumulation, frequent trading, and reliance on specific sectors, which have eroded fund values [1][5][6] Performance Overview - As of November 10, the Shanghai Composite Index closed at 4018 points, marking a significant recovery, with major indices like the Shenzhen Composite and ChiNext Index showing gains of 27.6% and 46.35% respectively since 2025 [2] - Despite a high percentage of active equity funds showing positive returns in 2023, the long-term performance reveals a stark contrast, with many investors experiencing losses since entering the market around the end of 2020 [2][3] Fund Performance Analysis - Among the 2695 active equity funds with over five years of existence, 1676 have achieved positive returns, while nearly 40% remain unprofitable, with some funds experiencing drawdowns exceeding 50% [3][4] - Notable underperformers include funds managed by well-known managers, indicating that even established names are not immune to market challenges [4] Causes of Underperformance - High-level accumulation during market peaks has been identified as a significant factor contributing to the long-term underperformance of active equity funds [5][6] - Frequent trading has also negatively impacted fund performance, with average turnover rates for underperforming funds significantly higher than the market average [7][8] Market Trends and Future Outlook - The article notes a shift in investor sentiment towards active management products, with a notable increase in the number of newly established funds and a doubling of issuance scale compared to the previous year [11] - Fund managers are advised to focus on sectors with long-term growth potential, such as high-end manufacturing and new consumption, while being cautious of over-reliance on specific themes or sectors [12]

来源：明见局 首发｜明见局 作者｜张典 当卡塔尔投资局以37.8%的外资持股比例成为华夏基金重要股东时，这家曾稳居行业头部的老牌机构正遭遇信任问题？ 明星产品从百亿标杆到垫底常客 华夏能源革新基金，这只曾因精准押注新能源赛道而规模破百亿的明星产品，如今似乎已沦为"亏损代名词"。 根据公开数据，截至2025年7月，该基金A类份额近三年亏损幅度达37.93%，是同类基金平均亏损水平的9倍，在752只可比基金中排名第709位， 处于绝对垫底区间。 二季报数据更显触目惊心：A类份额单季利润亏损超3.4亿元，C类份额亏损近2500万元，两类份额净值增长率均大幅跑输业绩比较基准。 值得注意的是，这种颓势并非偶发波动而是持续数年的系统性下滑。2024年半年报时该基金规模尚在百亿以上，到2025年二季度末已缩水至77.78 亿元，半年内蒸发近27.5亿元，降幅超26%。 这些曾被公司视为招牌的基金经理，离职前管理的产品普遍业绩惨淡。郑泽鸿卸任的华夏核心制造混合任职回报-19.40%，周克平管理的华夏创新 未来亏损超40%。 更值得警惕的是人才断层危机。张弘弢离职后，接任者杨斯琪缺乏超大规模产品管理经验；郑泽鸿留下的能源革新基 ...

Wind数据显示，截至7月17日，全市场共有197位基金经理离任，涉及104家公募机构，离任人数较去年 同期增加18位；同期新聘基金经理308位，较去年同期减少13位。尽管人员更替总量上升，基金经理总 数仍较年初增加111位至4056人，折射出行业在人才流动中持续扩容的态势。 而华夏基金与中欧基金以新聘11人并列行业首位，南方、招商各增10人，兴证全球基金新聘9人，富国 基金、工银瑞信基金、易方达基金、中金基金、银华基金均新聘8位，加速填补空缺。 值得注意的是，共有34家基金公司年内暂无基金经理离职或新聘变动，其中包括前海开源基金、银河基 金、海富通基金、国联安基金、东方基金等公司，凸显部分中小机构的团队韧性。 具体来看，嘉实基金以13位基金经理离任高居行业榜首，远超其去年全年的6位，创下历史峰值。 | 序号 | 基金公司 | 离任基金经理数 | 新聘基金经理数 | 基金经理数 | 基金经理变动率(%) | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | 1 | 眾求重等 | 13 | 5 | 104 | 11.61 | | 2 | 作夏ま金 | 5 | 11 | 131 | ...