外资态度来看，本期较上一季未再披露的外资机构即BARCLAYS BANK PLC。 2025年10月28日，乐心医疗(300562.SZ)发布2025年第三季报。截至2025年10月27日，共有5个机构投资 者披露持有乐心医疗A股股份，合计持股量达458.12万股，占乐心医疗总股本的2.10%。其中，机构投 资者包括中国工商银行股份有限公司-圆信永丰医药健康混合型证券投资基金、招商银行股份有限公司- 永赢中证全指医疗器械交易型开放式指数证券投资基金、中国建设银行股份有限公司-圆信永丰聚优股 票型证券投资基金、广东乐心医疗电子股份有限公司-2024年员工持股计划、广东乐心医疗电子股份有 限公司-2024年员工持股计划，机构投资者合计持股比例达2.10%。相较于上一季度，机构持股比例合计 下跌了2.06个百分点。 公募基金方面，本期较上一期持股增加的公募基金共计2个，包括医疗器械ETF、圆信永丰医药健康A， 持股增加占比达0.41%。本期较上一季度持股减少的公募基金共计1个，即圆信永丰聚优A，持股减少占 比小幅下跌。本期较上一季未再披露的公募基金共计85个，主要包括招商量化精选股票发起式A、融通 鑫新成长混合A、 ...

Core Viewpoint - Tianyi Medical (301097.SZ) reported a decline in institutional ownership in its Q3 2025 financial results, with a total of 4 institutional investors holding 1.4158 million shares, representing 2.40% of the total share capital, down by 1.10 percentage points from the previous quarter [1] Institutional Investors - A total of 4 institutional investors disclosed their holdings in Tianyi Medical, with a combined shareholding of 1.4158 million shares [1] - The institutional investors include: - China Merchants Bank Co., Ltd. - Penghua Hongjia Flexible Allocation Mixed Securities Investment Fund - Shanghai Xishirun Investment Management Co., Ltd. - Xishirun Beiyue No. 3 Private Securities Investment Fund - Jiangsu Zhaoxin Private Fund Management Co., Ltd. - Zhaoxin Collective No. 1 Private Securities Investment Fund - Industrial and Commercial Bank of China Co., Ltd. - CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy Flexible Allocation Mixed Securities Investment Fund (LOF) [1] - The total institutional ownership percentage decreased to 2.40% compared to the previous quarter [1] Public Funds - One new public fund disclosed its holdings this quarter, namely CITIC Prudential Multi-Strategy Mixed (LOF) A [1] - A total of 49 public funds were not disclosed in this quarter compared to the previous quarter, including: - Yuanxin Yongfeng Ju You A - Yuanxin Yongfeng Medical Health A - Nuoan Multi-Strategy Mixed A - Yuanxin Yongfeng Xingyuan A - Penghua Double Bonds Poly Bond B [1]

Core Viewpoint - Saintno Bio (688117.SH) reported a decline in institutional ownership in its half-year report for 2025, with a total of 70.23 million shares held by eight institutional investors, representing 44.62% of the total share capital, down 4.62 percentage points from the previous quarter [1] Institutional Ownership - As of August 14, 2025, eight institutional investors disclosed their holdings in Saintno Bio, totaling 70.23 million shares, which is 44.62% of the company's total equity [1] - The institutional investors include Sichuan Sino Investment Co., Ltd., Sichuan Development Securities Investment Fund Management Co., Ltd., Lepu Medical Technology (Beijing) Co., Ltd., and several mutual funds [1] - Compared to the previous quarter, the total institutional ownership percentage decreased by 4.62 percentage points [1] Public Fund Disclosures - Four new public funds disclosed their holdings this period, including Huashang Intelligent Life Flexible Allocation Mixed A, Huashang Emerging Vitality Mixed, Huashang Core Growth One-Year Holding Mixed A, and Huashang Excellent Growth One-Year Holding Mixed A [1] - Seven public funds that were previously disclosed did not report this quarter, including Yuanxin Yongfeng Ju You A, China Merchants Medical Health Industry Stock, and several others [1]

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the news is the introduction of a new policy by the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC) aimed at enhancing the long-term performance of public fund managers by linking their compensation to the performance of their funds relative to benchmarks [2][3] - The policy targets fund managers whose products have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 10 percentage points over three years, leading to a significant reduction in their performance-based compensation [2][3] - The initiative is expected to align the interests of fund managers with those of investors, encouraging a shift away from short-term speculation towards a focus on long-term investment capabilities [2][3] Group 2 - As of May 21, 2023, there are 5,898 public funds managed by fund managers with over three years of experience, with 1,341 funds underperforming their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points [3][4] - Among these, 31 funds have underperformed their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points, including notable funds managed by well-known managers such as Zheng Chengran from GF Fund and Yao Zhipeng from Harvest Fund [3][4][5] - The worst-performing fund, Morgan Small Cap A, managed by Guo Chen, has a cumulative return of -23.03% over three years, underperforming its benchmark by 127.69 percentage points [4][5] Group 3 - Conversely, there are 543 funds that have outperformed their benchmarks by over 10 percentage points, with 33 funds exceeding their benchmarks by more than 50 percentage points [7][9] - The top-performing fund, Huaxia North Exchange Innovation Small and Medium Enterprises Selected Fund, managed by Gu Xin Feng, achieved a cumulative return of 194.13%, surpassing its benchmark by 175.89 percentage points [9][10] - The North Exchange theme funds have emerged as a significant area for excess returns, with several funds exceeding their benchmarks by over 60 percentage points [10] Group 4 - In response to the new policy, many fund companies are adjusting their performance benchmarks to better reflect the risk-return characteristics of their funds [11][12] - Recent adjustments include changes to benchmarks for various funds, such as the adjustment of the performance benchmark for the浦银安盛稳健增利债券 from "CSI All Bond Index" to a more complex composite benchmark [11][12] - The trend of benchmark adjustments is expected to continue as fund companies seek to align their performance metrics with regulatory expectations and improve their competitive positioning [13][14]