近日，证监会发布了《证券、基金经营机构行政许可申请受理及审核情况公示》。该公示显 示，目前排队申请基金托管资格的机构仅有3家，其中券商仅剩东吴证券1家。 据21世纪经济报道记者不完全统计，截至2024年底，排队申请基金托管资格的券商曾多达7 家，包括西部证券、财信证券、东吴证券等。 这意味着，短短8个多月时间内，已有6家券商撤回基金托管资格申请。 业内人士指出，券商基金托管牌照申请出现"撤回潮"的主要原因，在于基金托管新规显著抬高 了准入门槛，监管层面的窗口指导也加速了部分机构的撤回进程。而基金托管新规的出台，旨 在推动行业从"数量扩张"转向"质量竞争"，通过"硬门槛+动态监管"重构行业生态。 年内6家中小券商撤回申请 近日，证监会官网公示了证券、基金经营机构行政许可申请受理及审核情况。目前排队申请证 券基金托管资格的机构仅剩3家，分别为东吴证券、蒙商银行和广州银行，3家机构的申请材料 接收日分别为2021年1月28日、2022年8月30日、2022年10月17日。 据21世纪经济报道记者不完全统计，截至2024年底，排队申请基金托管资格的券商曾多达7 家，具体包括西部证券、财信证券、东兴证券、湘财证券、东北 ...

券商排队申请基金托管牌照，盛况不再。 证券时报记者独家获悉，年初以来，随着基金托管新规逐步落地，排队申请托管牌照的部分券商和银行 因无法满足准入门槛要求，收到了监管窗口指导后陆续撤回了牌照申请。 "准入门槛已经提高，一些券商满足不了监管的统一要求，因此7月就提交了材料，向证监会正式提出撤 销基金托管资格申请。"某券商相关人士对证券时报记者表示。 公开数据也印证了这一说法。证监会官网近日披露的信息显示，在排队申请基金托管资格的机构名单 中，券商仅剩东吴证券1家。回顾2024年底，彼时排队申请基金托管资格的券商曾多达7家，包括西部证 券、东吴证券、渤海证券等。这也意味着，在不到一年的时间里，已经有6家券商撤回了基金托管资格 申请。 排队家数从7锐减至1 近日，证监会发布的《证券、基金经营机构行政许可申请受理及审核情况公示》显示，排队申请证券基 金托管资格的机构仅剩3家，分别是蒙商银行、广州银行和东吴证券，3家机构的申请材料接收日分别为 2021年1月28日、2022年8月30日、2022年10月17日。 证券时报记者根据公开信息梳理，截至2024年底，排队申请基金托管资格的券商一度多达7家，分别是 西部证券、财信 ...

Core Viewpoint - Chongqing Rural Commercial Bank has received approval from the China Securities Regulatory Commission for its securities investment fund custody qualification, marking it as the first financial institution to obtain this qualification in 2023 and the 37th commercial bank overall [1][2]. Group 1: Fund Custodian Expansion - The bank will strictly adhere to regulations and the approval document to conduct securities investment fund custody business, ensuring the integrity and independence of fund assets while protecting the legal rights of fund shareholders [3]. - As of May, there are 68 financial institutions listed as securities investment fund custodians, with commercial banks accounting for over 52% of this group [3]. - Among the qualified commercial banks, state-owned banks and national joint-stock banks dominate, with only a few rural commercial banks like Guangzhou Rural Commercial Bank and Shanghai Rural Commercial Bank having custody qualifications [3]. Group 2: Positive Impacts on Banking Operations - Obtaining the fund custody license can expand the bank's intermediary business income, enhancing revenue diversification and risk resilience through fees from custody and account services [4]. - The custody qualification can improve customer loyalty and comprehensive financial service capabilities, allowing the bank to serve various asset management institutions and connect with high-net-worth and institutional clients [4]. - The custody business can lead to increased fund settlement and retention, optimizing the bank's asset-liability structure and enhancing overall profitability [4]. Group 3: Quality Enhancement in Business Development - Commercial banks must enhance their operational quality in fund custody, addressing issues such as compliance and internal controls, as evidenced by recent regulatory warnings against certain banks [5]. - There is a need for banks to invest in IT systems to support custody operations, including valuation and clearing systems, to ensure compliance and operational stability [5]. - Banks should focus on professional talent development, IT infrastructure improvement, risk management, and building cooperative relationships with fund companies to enhance the quality of custody services [6].

Group 1 - Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Bureau issued a warning letter to Suzhou Bank due to issues found in its fund custody business, including personnel management, valuation accounting, and internal control [1][2] - Specific problems identified include lack of required experience for core personnel, inconsistent valuation reconciliation, and errors in basic information entry in the asset custody system [2] - Suzhou Bank is required to rectify these issues and submit a written report to the Jiangsu Securities Regulatory Bureau within 30 days of receiving the decision [2] Group 2 - For the fiscal year 2024, Suzhou Bank reported operating income of 12.223 billion yuan, a year-on-year increase of 3.01% [3] - The total profit reached 6.375 billion yuan, reflecting an 11.10% increase compared to the previous year, while net profit attributable to shareholders was 5.068 billion yuan, up 10.15% year-on-year [3] - As of the end of 2024, the non-performing loan ratio was 0.83%, a decrease of 0.01 percentage points from the previous year, while the provision coverage ratio was 483.46%, down 39.31 percentage points year-on-year [3]