近日，证监会发布了《证券、基金经营机构行政许可申请受理及审核情况公示》。该公示显 示，目前排队申请基金托管资格的机构仅有3家，其中券商仅剩东吴证券1家。 据21世纪经济报道记者不完全统计，截至2024年底，排队申请基金托管资格的券商曾多达7 家，包括西部证券、财信证券、东吴证券等。 这意味着，短短8个多月时间内，已有6家券商撤回基金托管资格申请。 业内人士指出，券商基金托管牌照申请出现"撤回潮"的主要原因，在于基金托管新规显著抬高 了准入门槛，监管层面的窗口指导也加速了部分机构的撤回进程。而基金托管新规的出台，旨 在推动行业从"数量扩张"转向"质量竞争"，通过"硬门槛+动态监管"重构行业生态。 年内6家中小券商撤回申请 近日，证监会官网公示了证券、基金经营机构行政许可申请受理及审核情况。目前排队申请证 券基金托管资格的机构仅剩3家，分别为东吴证券、蒙商银行和广州银行，3家机构的申请材料 接收日分别为2021年1月28日、2022年8月30日、2022年10月17日。 据21世纪经济报道记者不完全统计，截至2024年底，排队申请基金托管资格的券商曾多达7 家，具体包括西部证券、财信证券、东兴证券、湘财证券、东北 ...

Group 1 - The core point of the news is the significant reduction in the number of securities firms applying for fund custody qualifications, with only three remaining in the queue, primarily due to new regulatory requirements that have raised the entry barriers for such qualifications [1][2][4] - As of the end of 2024, there were originally seven securities firms applying for fund custody qualifications, but six have withdrawn their applications in just over eight months, leaving only Dongwu Securities remaining [1][4][8] - The new fund custody regulations aim to shift the industry focus from "quantity expansion" to "quality competition," implementing "hard thresholds and dynamic supervision" to reshape the industry ecosystem [1][7] Group 2 - The new regulations have increased the net asset requirement for securities firms to 300 billion RMB, which many smaller firms cannot meet, leading to a wave of withdrawals from the application process [6][7] - Among the seven firms that were previously in the application queue, only Dongwu Securities met the new net asset requirement, with a net asset of 429 billion RMB as of the first quarter of this year [8] - The current landscape shows that only 68 institutions in China have fund custody qualifications, with 36 being banks and 30 being securities firms, indicating a concentration of custody services among a few large players [4][9] Group 3 - The fund custody industry is experiencing a trend towards concentration, with banks and a few large securities firms managing approximately 80%-90% of public and private investment funds [9][10] - The top five securities firms in terms of the number of private fund custody services account for 65.71% of the total, highlighting the dominance of larger firms in the market [10] - The market dynamics suggest that smaller securities firms may need to explore differentiated survival strategies, such as collaborating with larger firms for operational support, as they face increasing marginalization [11]

钛媒体App 8月19日消息，年初以来，随着基金托管新规逐步落地，排队申请托管牌照的部分券商和银 行因无法满足准入门槛要求，收到了监管窗口指导后陆续撤回了牌照申请。"准入门槛已经提高，一些 券商满足不了监管的统一要求，因此7月就提交了材料，向证监会正式提出撤销基金托管资格申请。"某 券商相关人士表示。公开数据也印证了这一说法。证监会官网近日披露的信息显示，在排队申请基金托 管资格的机构名单中，券商仅剩东吴证券1家。回顾2024年底，彼时排队申请基金托管资格的券商曾多 达7家，包括西部证券、东吴证券、渤海证券等。这也意味着，在不到一年的时间里，已经有6家券商撤 回了基金托管资格申请。 (证券时报) ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article highlights that several brokerages and banks have withdrawn their applications for fund custody licenses due to increased regulatory entry requirements since the beginning of the year [1] - Only one brokerage, Dongwu Securities, remains in the queue for fund custody qualifications, down from seven brokerages at the end of 2024 [1] - The withdrawal of six brokerages from the fund custody qualification application process indicates a significant tightening of regulatory standards in less than a year [1]