9月29日，中国执行信息公开网已经没有万达集团董事长王健林的限高信息了。 就今年，万达甩卖的资产就超过了500亿。2025年4月，王健林以24.9亿元将万达酒店管理公司100%股权卖给了同程旅 行。5月，又将北京、广州、成都等一二线城市的48座万达广场打包出售给太盟投资、高和丰德、腾讯控股、京东潘 达、阳光人寿等机构组成的联合体，市场预估交易金额达500亿元。7月，再以2.4亿元的价格将快钱金融30%股权卖给 中国儒意。 据9月28日消息，天眼查APP显示，王健林被限制高消费，该消息一出迅速引发广泛关注，曾经那个定义"小目标"的男 人如今却沦落如此境地。 曾经意气风发的老王，现在是真的难了。 当天便有知情人士透露，此次"限高"系由万达下属项目公司的经济纠纷引发。双方此前已通过多种方式持续协商解决 纠纷，目前公司正在进一步了解具体情况，此次限制高消费"或因执行层面存在信息不对称导致"。 早在2017年，万达便被数千亿的负债逼到甩卖资产求生。富力、融创用低价拿走了万达的酒店和文旅项目。故事里， 这个部队出身的地产大亨摔了杯子，此后的万达持续甩卖资产…… 图源：天眼查截图 ...

Core Viewpoint - Dalian Wanda Group and its legal representative Wang Jianlin have been restricted from high consumption due to economic disputes involving subsidiary project companies, despite the company selling multiple assets to alleviate its debt burden [1][6]. Group 1: Company Financial Situation - Dalian Wanda Group has sold seven Wanda Plazas this year as part of its asset disposal strategy, but it has not successfully extricated itself from its debt issues [1][6]. - The total amount involved in the execution case against Dalian Wanda Group is approximately 186 million yuan (about 27 million USD) [2]. - The company has a total of 10 execution records with a cumulative amount exceeding 5.2 billion yuan (about 740 million USD) [4]. Group 2: Legal and Financial Actions - The court issuing the consumption restriction is the Intermediate People's Court of Lanzhou, Gansu Province [1][2]. - Recently, Dalian Wanda Group's shares worth 8 billion yuan (about 1.1 billion USD) have been frozen, with the freezing period set from September 1, 2025, to August 31, 2028 [4][5]. - The company has faced multiple instances of share freezes, which are directly linked to its debt issues, with each freeze corresponding to unpaid debts [6]. Group 3: Historical Context and Strategic Moves - The company's debt pressure primarily stems from previous investment missteps, particularly in large-scale cultural tourism projects initiated in 2016 [7]. - Wang Jianlin's attempts to list the company on the A-share market to raise funds have failed three times between 2016 and 2023, exacerbating the debt burden [7]. - In 2022, Wanda sold 26 Wanda Plazas and lost control of Zhuhai Wanda Commercial Management, reducing its stake from 78.83% to 40% [7]. Group 4: Recent Developments - In 2023, the pace of asset sales has accelerated, with significant transactions including the sale of Wanda Hotel Management Company for 2.49 billion yuan (about 360 million USD) and the sale of 48 Wanda Plazas [9]. - A consortium involving major firms like Tencent and JD.com has been formed to acquire Wanda's assets, with a total investment of 22.43 billion yuan (about 3.2 billion USD) [9].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the financial struggles of Wanda Group and its founder Wang Jianlin, highlighting the significant debt and asset sales that have characterized the company's recent history [1][3][30]. Financial Situation - Wang Jianlin faces a court execution order of 2.4 billion yuan (approximately 0.34 billion USD) and a total debt of 7.6 billion yuan (approximately 1.07 billion USD) [4][6]. - In response to financial pressures, Wanda has sold 48 Wanda Plazas and its headquarters, along with 1,300 cinemas and 77 hotels, in a bid to recover cash flow [6][10][11]. - The company previously had a staggering 600 billion yuan (approximately 85.7 billion USD) in external debt, indicating a severe financial crisis [6][30]. Strategic Retreat - The article describes a strategic retreat by Wanda, with Wang Jianlin adopting a "sell, sell, sell" approach to stabilize the company [8][28]. - Since 2024, Wanda has transferred ownership of 26 Wanda Plazas and other significant assets, marking a drastic shift from its previous expansion strategy [10][11]. Family Dynamics and Reputation - The article contrasts Wang Jianlin's efforts to stabilize the company with his son Wang Sicong's public persona, which has been marred by personal controversies and a lack of focus on the family business [15][19]. - Wang Sicong's loss of control over his business ventures, including the transfer of his stake in Huanju Commercial to a competitor, symbolizes a generational shift and potential instability within the family business [23][24]. Broader Implications - The dual crises of financial and reputational challenges suggest that Wanda Group is facing a complex situation where both tangible and intangible assets are under threat [30][32]. - The article raises concerns about the future leadership of the company, questioning whether Wang Jianlin can navigate these challenges effectively while his son appears to be detracting from the family's legacy [28][30].

Group 1 - The article discusses the rise and fall of prominent business figures, particularly focusing on Wang Jianlin and Liu Qiangdong, highlighting the contrasting paths they are currently taking [2][4][6] - Wang Jianlin, once a titan in the commercial real estate sector, is facing significant challenges, including asset sales and debt pressures, as he navigates a complex business environment [7][9][15] - Recent developments include China Ruyi's announcement of acquiring a 30% stake in Kuaiqian Financial for 240 million yuan, marking a strategic shift for Wang Jianlin's Wanda Group [11][13][15] Group 2 - Wang Jianlin's asset divestitures are part of a broader strategy to alleviate financial strain, with this being the third major asset sale in six months [15][27] - The article notes that Wanda has faced legal challenges from former partners like Suning and Rongchuang, further complicating its financial situation [29][30] - In contrast, Liu Qiangdong is expanding his business ventures, recently launching a new delivery service and a "product partner" program, showcasing a proactive approach to growth [31][32][37] Group 3 - Liu Qiangdong's recent participation in high-profile events, including a meeting with national leaders, underscores his rising prominence and the government's support for private enterprises [41][45][49] - The article emphasizes the stark differences in the trajectories of Wang Jianlin and Liu Qiangdong, illustrating how market dynamics and personal choices shape their respective fates [53][57][66] - The narrative concludes with a reflection on the inevitability of change in business, suggesting that no one remains at the top forever, as new leaders emerge [68][69][71]