据《科创板日报》报道，波音公司最新同意支付至少5万美元（约合35.7万元人民币），以了结知名"吹哨人"约翰·巴尼特（John Barnett）家属提起的非正 常死亡诉讼。 △约翰·巴尼特 图片来源：央视新闻 波音支付5万美元 达成"全面最终且保密"的和解协议 根据波音周五（9月26日）提交给查尔斯顿联邦法院、请求法官批准的文件，双方达成了"全面的、最终的（不再有后续诉讼）且保密的"和解协议。 并且此和解将撤销巴尼特本人及其遗产代表提起的所有索赔，包括他在去世时仍在进行的案件。 换句话说，就是波音和巴尼特家属"一揽子"私下和解，彻底了结现有和潜在的所有法律纠纷，之后双方都不能再就这些事情追责或提告。 需要指出的是，和解的具体条款（包括波音可能支付的额外金额）未予披露。在5万美元的非正常死亡和解金中，2万美元将用于支付律师费和相关费用， 剩余款项支付给原告。 根据文件，波音"否认并持续否认公司任何行为"导致了巴尼特的伤害或死亡。 波音还通过邮件告诉媒体："我们对巴尼特先生的去世感到难过，并在达成这一解决方案之际向其家属致以慰问。波音在数年前已采取行动审查并处理巴 尼特提出的问题。" 截至9月26日收盘，波音股价大 ...

Core Viewpoint - The aviation industry is facing challenges related to the aging fleet, with a significant number of aircraft approaching retirement, necessitating effective disposal strategies to maximize their value and sustainability [3][7][10]. Aircraft Delivery and Retirement - A Boeing 737MAX was delivered to China after a two-month hiatus due to tariffs, marking a resumption of aircraft deliveries from Boeing to China [1]. - The retirement of older aircraft, such as a Boeing 737-700, involves complex disassembly processes, resulting in the recovery of over 1000 reusable parts [2]. Aging Fleet and Market Dynamics - The average retirement age for commercial aircraft is 25 years, with Chinese airlines facing an aging fleet issue in the next decade, as over 100 aircraft are expected to enter mid-life each year [3][8]. - Various disposal methods for retired aircraft include training for aviation schools, temporary storage, conversion to cargo planes, complete disassembly, and auctioning [4][5][6]. Challenges in Aircraft Disposal - The auction market for large aircraft is struggling, with high initial prices and complex regulatory requirements deterring potential buyers [5][9]. - The disassembly of aircraft is a complex process requiring specialized skills and equipment, often taking weeks or months to complete [7][10]. Financial and Technical Considerations - The financial aspect plays a crucial role in aircraft disposal, with leasing companies providing support throughout the aircraft's lifecycle, from valuation to re-leasing [10][11]. - Recent collaborations among leasing companies and airlines aim to enhance the efficiency of aircraft disposal and maximize asset value [11][12]. Policy and Market Development - Regions like Tianjin and Xiamen are actively developing frameworks to support the second-hand aircraft market, including financial incentives and improved regulatory environments [12].

特朗普还称，他不清楚这架飞机的具体改装成本，"这取决于军方"，"你知道空军，他们会花费一大笔 钱"。在被问及花钱改装这架飞机是否值得时，特朗普说，"我们将拥有一架很棒的（波音）747。我们 需要它。如果你看看这架飞机（其正乘坐的现役'空军一号'），它有32、34、35年机龄了——我不知 道，它确实很旧了……零件很难弄到。" 报道称，特朗普在从苏格兰飞回华盛顿的"空军一号"上对记者说，相比于波音公司正在建造的其他总统 专机，他将"更早"乘坐这架飞机。"它不是普通的（波音）747。它有很多其他飞机没有的东西，但（相 比波音公司在建的其他总统专机）我们会提前一年半到两年拿到这架飞机。"特朗普说。 5月21日，美国国防部曾表示，特朗普政府已正式接受卡塔尔政府捐赠的一架波音747客机。此事在美国 国内引发广泛质疑，涉及道德、法律和政府资金使用等多个层面。据美国有线电视新闻网（CNN）等 媒体报道，美国空军部长特洛伊·迈因克6月5日曾表示，将这架飞机改装为"空军一号""可能"花费空军 近4亿美元。福克斯新闻台称，民主党议员则表示，该机改装成本可能超过10亿美元。 【环球网报道】据美联社、福克斯新闻台商业频道等美媒报道，美 ...

Core Points - President Trump announced that he could first fly on the modified "Air Force One" gifted by Qatar as early as February next year, stating that it will be available much earlier than other presidential aircraft being built by Boeing [1][3] - Trump expressed uncertainty about the specific modification costs of the aircraft, attributing it to military decisions and indicating that the Air Force tends to spend a significant amount of money [3] - The U.S. Department of Defense previously stated that the modification of the aircraft could potentially cost the Air Force nearly $400 million, while some Democratic lawmakers suggested that the costs could exceed $1 billion [3]

【文/观察者网 邓军 编辑/赵乾坤】 印度航空事故调查提及波音客机燃油开关后，多国航空公司已对旗下多个型号的波音客机启动燃油开关 强化检测。 据路透社、《印度时报》等外媒报道，在众多航空公司已开始自行检查燃油开关锁定机制后，印度民航 总局 (DGCA) 也下令所有印度国内航空公司对其运营的多个波音型号飞机燃油开关及其锁定系统进行紧 急检查。 印度航空事故调查局的初步报告显示，印度客机坠毁事故中，涉事飞机的燃油开关在坠毁前从"运行"切 换到"切断"位置，导致发动机燃油供应中断。报告同时披露，美国联邦航空局（FAA）曾于2018年发布 公告，建议波音787等机型的运营商检查燃油开关锁定功能，防止其意外移位。 据《印度时报》报道，此次DGCA要求的紧急检查对象涉及波音787、747和737机型，运营商包括印度 航空、靛蓝航空和香料航空等多家印度航空公司。 路透社报道称，FAA于7月11日发布适航通知称，该机构认为无需针对787等所有波音机型发布燃油开关 相关的适航指令。波音公司也不建议航司就燃油开关采取行动。 观察者网从多个中国航司相关人士处了解到，暂未接到中国民航局关于相关波音型号飞机燃油开关及其 锁定系统进行紧 ...

Core Viewpoint - The Indian aviation authority has mandated an urgent inspection of certain Boeing aircraft following a tragic accident involving an Air India flight, raising concerns about Boeing's safety and quality issues [1][2][4]. Group 1: Accident Details - On June 12, an Air India flight from Ahmedabad to London crashed shortly after takeoff, resulting in 241 fatalities out of 242 passengers, with 19 additional casualties on the ground [1]. - The crash is noted as one of the deadliest aviation disasters in the past decade and the first involving the Boeing 787 "Dreamliner" [1]. Group 2: Investigation Findings - The preliminary report from the Indian Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau (AAIB) indicated that the aircraft's landing gear did not retract properly after takeoff, which is against standard procedures [4][6]. - The report confirmed that the aircraft's flaps were set to the correct position for takeoff, contradicting initial assumptions about flap retraction issues [4][6]. - Critical data from the black box revealed that the fuel control switches for both engines were switched from "Run" to "Cutoff" shortly after takeoff, leading to a rapid decrease in engine thrust [7][8]. Group 3: Potential Causes - The investigation has not definitively concluded whether the fuel switches were turned off due to mechanical failure, human error, or other factors [8][12]. - The design of the fuel control switches includes multiple safety features to prevent accidental operation, raising questions about how they were turned off [9][12]. - Preliminary findings suggest that the switches may have been manually turned off, but the exact circumstances remain unclear [13][14]. Group 4: Public and Industry Reaction - The initial report has sparked controversy in India, with public opinion suggesting that it too quickly absolves Boeing of responsibility [14][15]. - Critics argue that the report lacks sufficient evidence and transparency, as it does not provide original black box data or cockpit recordings to support its conclusions [14][15].

Core Viewpoint - Kenya Airports Authority announced an auction for 92 old aircraft stored at four domestic airports, offering them at very low starting prices, with a Boeing 707 starting at $2,497 and the cheapest at $58, indicating a significant clearance of unused assets [1][6]. Group 1: Background and Context - Kenya is one of the more economically developed countries in Africa, with a stable political environment and rich tourism resources, leading to the establishment of many international flights and making Nairobi a major aviation hub [4]. - The growth of the aviation industry has also spurred local aircraft maintenance services, resulting in many old aircraft being stored in Kenya, particularly at Wilson Airport, which has become known as a "graveyard" for old planes [4][6]. Group 2: Reasons for Auction - The auction aims to clear out the large number of unclaimed old aircraft, creating more space and generating additional revenue for the airport authority [6]. - The decision to auction these aircraft reflects the accumulation of planes that have reached the end of their operational life, similar to how aging humans face retirement [6][8]. Group 3: Aircraft Retirement and Disposal - Aircraft retirement is determined by various factors, including flight hours, takeoff and landing counts, and service years, with most commercial aircraft in China retiring after 20 to 30 years of service [8]. - Common disposal methods for retired aircraft include refurbishment for continued service, conversion from passenger to cargo planes, and dismantling for parts [10][13][15]. Group 4: Alternative Uses for Old Aircraft - Old aircraft can be repurposed for various unconventional uses, such as transforming them into restaurants, homes, or filming locations, showcasing their versatility beyond aviation [18][21][24]. - Some retired aircraft are donated to parks and schools, serving as recreational facilities and nostalgic reminders for the public [26][28].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent challenges faced by Boeing, particularly focusing on safety issues, declining orders, and the impact of a recent plane crash, highlighting the company's struggle to maintain its reputation and market position in the aviation industry [1][3][18]. Group 1: Recent Incidents and Impact - On June 12, 2025, an Indian Airlines Boeing 787 crashed shortly after takeoff, resulting in 241 fatalities and only one survivor, marking it as one of the worst aviation disasters in a decade [1]. - Following the crash, India's aviation regulatory body ordered inspections of all Boeing 787 aircraft and is considering grounding the model [1]. - The crash has intensified scrutiny on Boeing, contributing to a significant trust crisis and damaging the company's brand image [3]. Group 2: Boeing's Historical Context - Boeing, established in 1916, was once a dominant force in the aviation industry, producing iconic aircraft like the Boeing 707 and 747, which significantly shaped commercial aviation [4][6]. - The Boeing 747, known for its four engines and dual-deck design, was a technological pinnacle for the company, capturing over 60% of the global commercial aviation market at its peak [6]. Group 3: Financial Performance and Order Decline - Boeing's new aircraft orders plummeted by approximately 60% last year, reflecting a severe downturn in demand [3]. - The company has faced continuous losses since 2019, accumulating a net loss of $36 billion (approximately 260 billion RMB) over six years, marking the longest period of losses in its history [9]. Group 4: Cultural and Operational Changes - The decline in Boeing's engineering culture began after its acquisition of McDonnell Douglas in 1997, shifting the focus from safety and quality to profit maximization [10]. - Boeing's decision to outsource critical components led to quality control issues, exemplified by the delayed production of the 787 Dreamliner, which was three years behind schedule due to unusable parts from suppliers [11]. Group 5: Safety Issues and Regulatory Scrutiny - The 737 MAX crisis, resulting from rushed upgrades to compete with Airbus, led to two fatal crashes and revealed significant flaws in Boeing's safety management systems [13][14]. - Investigations uncovered 27 issues within Boeing's safety management, including poor communication and lack of effective reporting channels [14]. Group 6: Future Outlook and Market Position - Despite its challenges, Boeing is unlikely to face bankruptcy due to its dominant position in the commercial aircraft market, which is primarily shared with Airbus [18]. - The company is working with the FAA to implement a new safety management system to address quality and safety concerns, aiming to restore public trust [20].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the significant quality issues faced by Boeing's 787 aircraft, which have led to production halts and financial losses for the company. The problems stem from manufacturing defects and inadequate quality control, particularly at the North Charleston factory, raising concerns about Boeing's overall production and quality management systems [3][18]. Summary by Sections Boeing 787 Quality Issues - On December 9, 2022, the delivery of the C919 to China Eastern Airlines coincided with revelations of numerous quality problems with the Boeing 787, which had previously been seen as a beacon of hope for Boeing [3]. - The 787 has faced ongoing quality issues since 2020, including improper installation of structural components and inadequate surface finishing of composite materials, leading to safety concerns [5][11]. Investigation and Findings - The FAA's investigation revealed that Boeing had identified 15 non-conformities and 57 compliance issues related to the 787's airworthiness, with the vertical tail fin being one of the first identified problems [5][6]. - The North Charleston factory, where many of the problematic 787s were produced, has been criticized for poor worker quality and management systems, resulting in widespread defects across the aircraft [14][16]. Production Halts and Financial Impact - The FAA ordered a halt to 787 deliveries on May 29, 2021, due to the severity of the quality issues, which persisted until July 29, 2022, causing significant financial repercussions for Boeing, estimated at $5.5 billion [17][18]. - In the third quarter following the resumption of deliveries, Boeing managed to deliver only 9 aircraft, with 115 more undergoing repairs, highlighting the extensive nature of the quality problems [17]. Lessons and Implications - The article emphasizes that the quality issues with the 787 serve as a cautionary tale for other aerospace projects, particularly regarding the importance of stringent quality control and skilled labor in manufacturing processes [18].

Core Viewpoint - Boeing, once a symbol of American manufacturing, now relies heavily on foreign orders for survival, as evidenced by recent transactions with Middle Eastern countries and the implications of U.S. trade policies [2][52]. Group 1: Recent Transactions and Orders - Qatar gifted a Boeing 747 valued at $400 million to the U.S. military, which will be modified to serve as Air Force One [2][4]. - The UAE's AviLease ordered 20 Boeing 737 MAX aircraft, with an option for 10 more, while Qatar Airways signed a contract worth $96 billion for up to 210 Boeing 787 and 777X aircraft [6][7]. - Boeing's revenue is projected to drop to $66.5 billion in 2024, marking a significant decline from $101.1 billion in 2018, with continuous losses expected [7][9]. Group 2: Financial Performance - Boeing's financials show a decline in revenue from $101.1 billion in 2018 to an expected $66.5 billion in 2024, with a net loss projected at $10.7 billion for 2024 [9]. - The company has faced operational losses for five consecutive years, with a projected operating loss of $10.7 billion in 2024 [9]. - Boeing's backlog of orders remains substantial, with $49.88 billion in contracts as of 2024, indicating ongoing demand despite recent challenges [9]. Group 3: Historical Context and Industry Position - Boeing has been a significant player in the aerospace and defense sectors, being the largest exporter in the U.S. and employing over 172,000 people, with 85% based in the U.S. [26][38]. - The company has transitioned from a manufacturing powerhouse to a more finance-driven model, outsourcing approximately 70% of its production [33][34]. - The decline in Boeing's reputation and market share is seen as a reflection of broader issues within American manufacturing, particularly following high-profile accidents and operational challenges [36][41]. Group 4: Geopolitical Implications - U.S. trade policies and tariffs have created uncertainty for Boeing, with potential price increases for its aircraft due to tariffs, which could benefit competitors like Airbus [41][42]. - The relationship between Boeing and China has deteriorated, with no significant orders from China since 2017, contrasting with previous decades of strong collaboration [49][50]. - Boeing's future heavily relies on U.S. government support and the revival of American manufacturing, particularly under the current administration's policies [38][52].