来源：市场资讯 （来源：ETF小管家） 9月26日，港股市场表现震荡，汽车板块逆势前行，$港股通汽车ETF富国(159239)涨超2%，成分股小鹏 汽车-W、国富氢能涨超5%，零跑汽车涨超2%。 | 1.213 +0.024 +2.02% | | | | 港股通汽车ETF富国 1 6 0 0 0 > | | | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | | SZSE CNY 10:02:48 交易中 | | | | | T+0 / 0 + | | 净值走势 | 富国恒生港股通汽车主题ET | | マモ | 0.00% 120日 | 0.00% | | 委比 | 37.08% 交 | 28542 | 5日 | 2.54% 250日 | 0.00% | | 重五 | 1.218 | 675 | 20日 | 5.30% 52周高 | 1.20 | | 壶四 | 1.216 | 523 | 60日 | 25.18% 52周低 | 0.93 | | 卖三 | 1.215 | 2356 | 实时申购赎回信息 | 申购 | 陵回 | | 英二 | 1.214 | 12795 | 笔数 | 5 ...

Group 1 - The ETF market on September 1 showed mixed performance, with the New Energy Vehicle Battery ETF (159775) leading gains at 10% [2] - The Gold Stocks ETF Fund (159322) increased by 9.22%, while the Gold Stocks ETF (517400) rose by 8.41% [2] - The Nasdaq Technology ETF (159509) experienced the largest decline at 2.64%, followed by the Satellite Industry ETF (159218) down 1.81%, and the Hong Kong Stock Connect Automotive ETF (159239) down 1.74% [2]

港股通汽车ETF富国（159239）业绩比较基准为恒生港股通汽车主题指数收益率(使用估值汇率折算)， 管理人为富国基金管理有限公司，基金经理为田希蒙，成立（2025-05-19）以来回报为14.98%，近一个 月回报为8.44%。 风险提示：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文为AI大模型自动发布，任何在本文出现的信息（包括但不 限于个股、评论、预测、图表、指标、理论、任何形式的表述等）均只作为参考，不构成个人投资建 议。 来源：新浪基金∞工作室 8月22日，港股通汽车ETF富国（159239）涨2.50%，成交额6056.49万元。当日份额减少200.00万份，最 新份额为7178.08万份，近20个交易日份额减少3350.00万份。最新资产净值计算值为8253.35万元。 ...

港股通汽车ETF富国（159239）业绩比较基准为恒生港股通汽车主题指数收益率(使用估值汇率折算)， 管理人为富国基金管理有限公司，基金经理为田希蒙，成立（2025-05-19）以来回报为11.64%，近一个 月回报为6.37%。 来源：新浪基金∞工作室 8月19日，港股通汽车ETF富国（159239）涨0.27%，成交额4156.88万元。当日份额减少100.00万份，最 新份额为7828.08万份，近20个交易日份额减少2900.00万份。最新资产净值计算值为8739.26万元。 风险提示：市场有风险，投资需谨慎。本文为AI大模型自动发布，任何在本文出现的信息（包括但不 限于个股、评论、预测、图表、指标、理论、任何形式的表述等）均只作为参考，不构成个人投资建 议。 ...

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article is that the standardization of ETF naming conventions by various fund companies, including Jiashi Fund, aims to enhance product recognition and improve investor decision-making efficiency [1][3][5] - Jiashi Fund has announced changes to the names of 22 index products, adopting a naming rule that includes "benchmark index + ETF + manager name" or "benchmark index + ETF" [1][2] - Other fund companies, such as E Fund and Huatai-PB Fund, have also rebranded their products this year to reduce name similarities and improve clarity for investors [2][3] Group 2 - The standardization of ETF names is expected to lower the information screening costs for investors and enhance product differentiation [3][5] - Industry experts believe that the previous naming conventions led to a homogenization of product names, complicating the decision-making process for investors [3][4] - The new naming strategy will help investors quickly identify core information about ETFs and streamline the selection process based on their investment goals [3][5] Group 3 - The article emphasizes that while standardized naming is beneficial, it should not be a one-size-fits-all approach; different product categories may require tailored naming strategies [4][5] - Analysts suggest that embedding the manager's name in the product title links the product's performance to the fund company, potentially motivating managers to enhance their product management [5][6] - Additional information, such as classification tags and risk-return characteristics, should be provided to assist investors in making informed decisions beyond just the product name [6]