Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the discrepancy between consumer expectations and hotel practices regarding the use of disposable slippers, revealing that many hotels recycle slippers instead of providing new ones, leading to concerns about hygiene and transparency [34][40][51]. Group 1: Consumer Expectations vs. Hotel Practices - Consumers generally believe that slippers provided in hotels are single-use items, while many hotels consider them reusable and recycle them after cleaning [34][36]. - High-end hotels are more likely to recycle slippers due to their higher procurement costs, which can range from 3 to 6 yuan per pair, allowing them to be used two to three times [36][47]. - The lack of clear communication from hotels regarding the status of slippers has led to consumer distrust, especially when hygiene issues arise, such as hair being found on slippers [40][51]. Group 2: Industry Standards and Regulations - Current regulations do not explicitly require hotels to provide single-use slippers, leading to a gray area in hotel practices [40]. - Local health authorities have begun investigating the practices of hotels like Marriott, which have been accused of not clearly labeling or informing guests about the reuse of slippers [40][51]. - The article highlights that while some hotels, like MUJI, clearly state their slippers are not single-use, others may not disclose this information, leading to consumer confusion [38][40]. Group 3: Economic Considerations - The cost-saving measures associated with recycling slippers can lead to significant savings for hotels, potentially amounting to tens of thousands of yuan annually [47]. - The economic pressures faced by hotels, such as declining revenue and increased competition, have prompted them to cut costs in areas like guest amenities [49]. - The article suggests that the trend of reducing single-use items is part of a broader movement towards sustainability, but it raises questions about the quality of service provided in luxury hotels [41][49].

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding the use of recycled hotel slippers in high-end hotels, highlighting the disconnect between consumer expectations of cleanliness and the industry's practices of reusing slippers, which has raised hygiene concerns [5][22][24]. Summary by Sections Hotel Slipper Controversy - A Marriott hotel in Changzhou, Jiangsu, was criticized for providing slippers that were worn and had hair on them, raising hygiene concerns among guests [5][22]. - The hotel claimed that the slippers were not labeled as "disposable" and that their practice of cleaning and reusing slippers was standard in the industry, especially among high-end hotels [5][22][28]. Consumer Expectations vs. Industry Practices - Consumers expect clean and comfortable slippers when paying high prices for hotel stays, but many are disappointed to find that slippers are often reused [6][22]. - The article notes that the perception of "disposable" slippers differs between consumers and hotels, with many hotels considering them reusable [26][28]. Hygiene Standards and Regulations - Current regulations do not explicitly require hotels to provide disposable slippers, leading to confusion and varying practices across different establishments [31][32]. - The article mentions that local health authorities are investigating the situation to ensure compliance with hygiene standards [32]. Economic Factors - The cost-saving measures of reusing slippers are highlighted, with high-end hotels potentially saving significant amounts by recycling slippers instead of providing new ones [36]. - The article points out that the economic pressures faced by hotels, including declining revenues and rising operational costs, may drive them to adopt such practices [36]. Consumer Reactions - Many consumers are now taking precautions by bringing their own slippers or using disposable options to avoid hygiene issues [21][37]. - The article concludes that the recent revelations have led to increased skepticism about the cleanliness of hotel amenities, not just slippers but also other items like towels and bedding [36][37].

Core Points - The article discusses the controversy surrounding the use of recycled hotel slippers in high-end hotels, particularly focusing on a recent incident at a Marriott hotel in Changzhou, Jiangsu, where guests found the slippers to be unsanitary and reused [2][23][24]. Group 1: Hotel Practices - The hotel management stated that the slippers are not labeled as "disposable" and that their recycling and cleaning is a standard practice in the industry, especially among high-end hotels [3][24]. - Many hotel staff confirmed that the reuse of slippers has become an internal "unwritten rule," with higher-end hotels opting for cleaning and reusing them [3][32]. - The slippers in question were reported to have pilling and hair from previous guests, raising concerns about hygiene [2][23]. Group 2: Consumer Reactions - Consumers expressed frustration over paying high prices for hotel stays only to receive unsatisfactory and potentially unhygienic slippers [4][36]. - There is a significant disconnect between consumer expectations of cleanliness and the hotel industry's practices regarding slipper reuse [28][34]. - The incident has led to increased skepticism about the hygiene standards of hotels, with consumers questioning the cleanliness of other items like towels and bedding [41][42]. Group 3: Industry Standards and Regulations - The article highlights that current national standards do not explicitly require slippers to be disposable, leading to ambiguity in hotel practices [34][35]. - Local health authorities have begun investigating the situation, emphasizing that if slippers are not marked as disposable, they must adhere to strict cleaning and disinfection protocols [35]. - The article notes that the cost-saving measures associated with reusing slippers can lead to significant savings for hotels, particularly in high-occupancy environments [40].

Core Viewpoint - The controversy surrounding the use of "second-hand" slippers in high-star hotels highlights a disconnect between consumer expectations and hotel practices, revealing challenges in supply chain management and the need for clearer communication regarding hygiene and sustainability [1][6][21]. Group 1: Consumer Concerns - A user reported finding worn slippers in a Marriott hotel, raising questions about their cleanliness and reuse [2][5]. - The hotel explained that slippers are not single-use and are cleaned and reused for environmental reasons, but this practice contradicts consumer expectations of hygiene [5][6]. - The high room rate of over 700 RMB per night exacerbates consumer dissatisfaction when faced with perceived cost-cutting measures [2][5]. Group 2: Industry Practices - The hotel industry is increasingly adopting ESG principles, focusing on sustainability, which includes the use of reusable slippers [5][14]. - The cost of disposable slippers ranges from 14,020 to 52,560 RMB annually, while reusable slippers can cost significantly less, leading hotels to favor the latter for cost savings [8][10]. - The supply chain in the hotel industry is under pressure, with operational costs for linens and consumables accounting for 23%-32% of total expenses [7][10]. Group 3: Communication and Transparency - Hotels must clearly communicate their practices regarding the reuse of items like slippers to avoid consumer backlash [5][13]. - The lack of transparency can lead to a loss of consumer trust, which is more costly to repair than the savings from reusing slippers [21][22]. - Innovative solutions, such as providing information about the cleaning and reuse history of items, can enhance transparency and consumer confidence [19][20]. Group 4: Regulatory and Environmental Considerations - The hotel industry faces regulatory pressures to reduce plastic waste, with significant amounts of plastic waste generated per guest [14][16]. - There is a call for government support for hotels that implement sustainable practices, to avoid penalizing those that strive for environmental responsibility [17][18]. - International examples show varying approaches to sustainability in the hotel sector, suggesting potential pathways for improvement in local practices [16][19].

此报道一出，网友们纷纷展开热议。有人认为酒店拖鞋使用一次就扔太过浪费，回收利用无可厚非，有 人认为花高价住酒店买服务，竟然连一次性拖鞋都被"减配"。这场争议的焦点在于大众普遍默认的"一 次性"拖鞋究竟能不能够二次利用？ 据报道，有业内人士表示，部分经济型酒店可能使用薄款一次性拖鞋，用后即弃。但不少高端酒店确有 回收清洗后多次使用的情况，一般为使用三次，不同品牌要求不同。可见，酒店的拖鞋并非都是一次性 的。 但是，循环利用的酒店拖鞋，使用后起毛的鞋面、开线的缝隙等地方极易藏匿污垢和细菌，必须保证彻 底消毒清理。 此次，万豪酒店所谓"环保成本政策"的合理性也值得怀疑。有记者通过调研发现，一次性拖鞋的成本最 低仅约0.3元，而酒店负责人所说的"可循环使用"拖鞋则需要承担清洗、消毒和质检等费用，这样看 来，拖鞋是否做到一客一换便十分值得怀疑了。 据上游新闻报道，9月21日，有住客在网上反映江苏常州万豪酒店循环使用一次性拖鞋，肉眼可见拖鞋 已经起球还粘着睫毛。 对此，涉事酒店承认，出于环保可循环考量该类拖鞋会回收消毒后复用，且强调拖鞋未标注"一次性用 品"。目前，常州市卫生监督所及新北区卫生监督所已介入调查。万豪总部回 ...

本文为转载内容，授权事宜请联系原著作权人 常州万豪酒店回应循环使用拖鞋：具体情况正在调查 中新经纬版权所有，未经书面授权，任何单位及个人不得转载、摘编或以其它方式使用。 关注中新经纬微信公众号(微信搜索"中新经纬"或"jwview")，看更多精彩财经资讯。 中新网9月22日电(左雨晴)9月20日，有网友发帖反映，江苏常州一家万豪酒店提供的白色拖鞋明显起 球，鞋内还有毛发，质疑这些拖鞋被重复使用。21日，涉事酒店相关负责人向媒体承认，出于环保考 量，该酒店拖鞋经消毒清洗后会循环使用2-3次。同日，常州市卫生监督所介入调查，并表示要先判定 酒店拖鞋是否为一次性用品。 22日，江苏常州万豪酒店向中新网记者表示，具体情况正在调查，如果有结果将进行官方发布。 此外，记者询问北京、上海等地多家万豪酒店，工作人员均表示酒店提供的是一次性拖鞋，不会重复使 用。一工作人员称，如果消费者介意，可帮忙备注需求，在入住前再仔细检查一遍。 公开信息显示，万豪国际酒店集团作为国际酒店管理公司，旗下拥有丽思卡尔顿、瑞吉等30多个酒店品 牌。万豪集团官网显示，常州万豪酒店设有263间全景客房，"每间客房均配备先进的设施设备"。(完) 来源： ...

本文字数：1098，阅读时长大约2分钟 来源 | 上游新闻、正在新闻、界面新闻等 据上游新闻，近日有网友发帖反映，江苏常州一家万豪酒店提供的白色拖鞋明显起球，鞋内还有毛发，质疑这些拖鞋被重复使用。住客向服务员提出异 议后，对方送过来一双崭新的拖鞋。 21日，记者采访的涉事酒店相关负责人承认，出于环保考量，该酒店拖鞋经消毒清洗后会循环使用2-3次。同日，常州市卫生监督所介入调查，表示要 先判定酒店拖鞋是否为一次性用品。"如果是一次性拖鞋，确实禁止重复使用。如非一次性拖鞋，也须严格遵循清洗、消毒再使用的规范。" 针对万豪酒店未标注、未告知的情况，卫生监督所表示将进行现场查验，并通过酒店内部记录、拖鞋标签及相关单据，核实该酒店的拖鞋是否是一次性 拖鞋。 2025.09. 22 爱企查App显示，万豪酒店关联公司上海姜根酒店管理有限公司成立于2005年8月，法定代表人为马雷，注册资本30万美元，经营范围包括餐饮服务、 住宿服务、食品销售、酒类经营等。股东信息显示，该公司由LUXURY HOTELS INTERNATIONAL OF HONG KONG LIMITED全资持股。分支机构 信息显示，该公司已设立3家分支机 ...